Don Boys Common Sense for Today Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:55:11 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Trump Nominated for Nobel Prize but Is the Nobel a Farce? Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:55:11 +0000 President Donald Trump has been nominated to receive the Nobel Prize for his work with Israelis and Muslims in the Middle East. This possibility has left knees jerking all over America and Europe. Note, they were left knees. Of course, Obama was given the same prize for doing—well, for breathing. Even some honest liberals (a vanishing breed) are still embarrassed with that fiasco.

The Nobel Peace Prize has lost its luster.

Palestinian terrorist leader Yasser Arafat was given the peace prize prompting a member of the committee Kåre Gudbrand Kristiansen to resign. In an article for the Times of Israel in 2012, American columnist Jay Nordlinger called Arafat “the worst man ever to win the Nobel Peace Prize.”

Most uninformed people think the Nobel Prize is the epitome of accomplishment but let me remind you that it has been given to the Larry, Curly, and Moes of this world. It is now a joke to informed people since, in recent years, it has become a farce, fraud, fake, and fatuity (unintelligence, silliness)! However, the problem is that most people don’t know much about the Nobel Prize other than it is supposed to be the highest honor a person can receive.

The Nobel Peace Prize stands for, well, nothing. The past prize holders are a gaggle of terrorists, two-faced politicians, empty suits, and malefactors. And a handful of worthies.

Alfred Nobel died in 1872, leaving most of his fortune to establish prizes as determined by various committees in Sweden and Norway. The Peace Prize is determined by members of the Norway Parliament. The professions to be honored for exceptional accomplishments were physics, medicine, chemistry, literature, for work in peace, and now economics. So far, so good.

Al made his fortune by inventing dynamite, an invention that changed the face of the world for good and evil. It is interesting that he almost called his invention “Nobel’s Safety Powder”! What a misnomer! He also developed “Gelignite,” a blasting gelatin that made drilling much more efficient and less expensive. Money started piling up in his bank account.

However, a French newspaper erroneously printed his obituary, confusing him with his deceased brother, and characterized Al as a “merchant of death” because of the deadly use of dynamite in warfare. The paper wrote, “The merchant of death is dead” and went on to say, “Dr. Alfred Nobel, who became rich by finding ways to kill more people faster than ever before, died yesterday.” He was horrified that he would be remembered in such a manner and instituted the Nobel Prizes to provide him a positive legacy. It worked.

Since 1900, many more or less deserving people have received the awards such as Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Rabin, William Faulkner, T. S. Eliot, Ernest Hemingway, Samuel Beckett, Pierre, and Marie Curie, Max Planck, and Albert Einstein.

Pierre and Marie Curie, along with their daughter and her husband, won five prizes, although Marie, when a widow, had an affair with a former pupil of her dead husband. Love letters were discovered and printed in a newspaper, and she was pressured to refuse the prize; however, she accepted it, saying her private life had nothing to do with her profession.

Le Duc Tho, a bloody communist of Vietnam, was awarded the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize, although he refused the prize because peace had not been established in Vietnam. President Obama accepted the prize even though he is an “empty suit” and may be the least qualified person to be nominated. Yet, he accepted the award. It seems some people can’t blush anymore.

Was Le Duc Tho more principled than Obama?

Others who received the Peace Prize include Martin Luther King, Jr., Mikhail Gorbachev, Nelson Mandela, Yasser Arafat, Jimmy Carter, and Al Gore. An observation: It seems that to qualify for the peace prize in modern times, one must be incompetent, a communist, a terrorist, or a socialist. All right, maybe one doesn’t have to fit into one of those categories, but it sure seems to help.

Martin Luther King, an admitted serial fornicator and major plagiarist accepted the prize in 1964. It is further enlightening of his character (or lack thereof) to note that when he went to Norway to accept the Nobel Prize, he was caught drunk, running naked down a hotel hallway trying to catch a woman and was stopped by the police as reported by Alan Stang in his January 21, 2008 column.

Nelson Mandela was a former president of South Africa, member of the Communist African National Congress, and hero to most people, but as a young man, he was arrested and spent 27 years in a South African prison not as a civil rights fighter but for sabotage (and other crimes). When arrested, he had on his person an article in his own handwriting, “Why I am a Good Communist.” The white South African government offered him his freedom many times if he would renounce terror and violence, but he refused and continued his prison sentence and enhanced his reputation as a weird kind of martyr.

Some Nobel winners have been a major embarrassment to the memory of Alfred Nobel, such as Daniel Carleton Gajdusek, who won in 1976 for his research in human slow-virus infections. Daniel spent 19 months in jail after pleading guilty in 1997 to charges of child molestation. Then there was Johannes Fibiger, who won in 1926 for discovering that parasitic worms cause cancer; however, that turned out to be totally false!

The Nobel Peace Prize is to recognize “the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Evidence is abundant that it has failed to live up to those standards.

A list of those who have not received a Nobel Prize is also noteworthy: Leo Tolstoy, James Joyce, Mark Twain, Gertrude Stein, Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla, Mahatma Gandhi, George Orwell, Arthur Miller, Ronald Reagan, and Raymond Damadian.

Dr. Damadian is the inventor of the MRI scanner (that has saved hundreds of thousands of lives), yet the Nobel committee gave the prize to two other scientists who helped him! The award can be bestowed to as many as three people for the same work, yet they purposefully refused to honor Damadian! Question: Could the Prize committee’s refusal to honor him be because Damadian belongs to an Independent Baptist Church and is a young-earth creationist? No, surely not. That would be, well, bigotry and unprofessional and prejudicial, and the black-tail, white-tie Nobel committee could never be guilty of such sins. Could such people be undisguised, unashamed, unfeeling, unaccountable hypocrites?

Famous agnostic anti-creationist Canadian philosophy professor Michael Ruse wrote of his deep concern suggesting the “likely hypothesis” that Damadian was rejected by the Nobel Committee for his open creationism, completely disregarding his amazing contribution to medicine. “Damadian is a Christian,” said Ruse, “whose beliefs include the Genesis account of creation, Adam and Eve the first humans, universal flood, and all the rest.”

Well, we can’t have that, can we? One of the world’s most important medical discoveries has been snubbed for years, but you can bet the farm that the snarling 17-year-old climate “expert” Greta Thunberg will win this year.

If they give a standing ovation for mediocrity, what will they do when they meet superior talent?

Yes, Virginia, the Nobel Prize Committees are made up of many sanctimonious hypocrites, and the prize has become a frivolous farce for famous fakers.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0
Mr. Trump, Forcing COVID-19 Vaccinations on Everyone Will Be Divisive, Dangerous, and Deadly! Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:32:13 +0000 World scientists are working feverishly to develop a vaccine for the Chinese coronavirus, and they are suggesting that it might be available before the end of this year. I don’t mean to be critical, but they haven’t found a vaccine for AIDS after throwing billions of dollars at it for more than 30 years.

And there is no vaccine even for the common cold that’s been around for millennia.

If and when a vaccine is available, there are definite indications that everyone will be required to get it. Virginia has already made that decision. And that is the problem before us. After we live through the pandemic and the arguments about masks and lockdowns, now we face the most dangerous part of the battle—telling the do-gooders what they can do with the vaccine.

Mr. Trump will make the biggest mistake of his presidency if he tries to force every American to accept the jab. Trump declared, “Our military is now being mobilized so at the end of the year we’re going to be able to give it to a lot of people very, very rapidly.” Well, Mr. Trump, to quote Samuel Goldwyn, “include me out.” Forced vaccination for the Chinese coronavirus will be divisive, dangerous, and deadly!

And dumb.

I heard Trump say that the vaccination would not be required, but I don’t trust his health advisors at the federal health agencies. Those agencies are snake pits of corruption run by political hacks with medical degrees. None have ever looked a COVID-19 patient in the eye, and few have ever looked a patient in the eyes.

I wonder if Mr. Trump will assure Americans that we will not experience the following for not getting vaccinated: will we be safe from losing a job; losing our insurance or Medicare; have our children taken from us; or be required to have some identification to permit us to buy or sell?

The World Health Organization (WHO) has an Immunization Agenda 2030, in which they’re planning to vaccinate everyone for everything across the globe: “IA 2030 envisions a world where everyone, everywhere, at every age, fully benefits from vaccines to improve health and well-being.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest funder of the WHO, and Gates intends to vaccinate the global population against COVID-19.

Many federal health officials’ eyes glaze over when they think and speak of financial benefits for COVID-19 research and treatment. Hospitals have been making huge profits from Medicare patients, as revealed by Senator Scott Jensen, Republican from Minnesota, on Fox News. He reported that hospitals are paid more if Medicare patients are listed as having the Chinese coronavirus and three times the normal price if they are put on a ventilator. This is what prompted the minor scandal recently when so many hospitals were listing suicide, heart deaths, etc., as COVID-19 deaths. One man died in an auto accident, another died of a heart attack, another died of gunshot wounds, yet all three were listed as having COVID-19.

Follow the money; after all, it’s yours.

However, it is not only local hospitals reaping the profits of death but federal health officials who are embedded with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the National Institutes for Health (NIH), and the World Health Organization (WHO). The CDC is the federal agency responsible for directing, developing, and deciding on safety and efficacy. In simple terms: does it work, is it safe, and is it really necessary?

And, in a jaded moment, I will suggest that another prerequisite is that it must be expensive. The history of vaccines and drugs has revealed that safety and effectiveness are sometime disregarded, but they are always expensive.

It is a fact known by all informed people that all drugs and vaccines are not safe for everyone. Many people have died or been harmed for life because of a bad reaction to drugs or vaccines. No health expert on earth will guarantee you that you will be safe by getting a vaccination. Drug and vaccine manufacturing companies are protected by law from being held legally accountable for any harmful reactions. Wonder why that is true if they are safe. A firm that needs such protection does not overwhelm me with confidence.

Moderna has been developing a COVID-19 vaccine with hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of help from the federal government. Moderna received a $483 million award from U.S. taxpayers in April, and the award could eventually be “worth about a billion.”

There is already a safe and effective treatment for the Chinese coronavirus, specifically, Hydroxychloroquine known as HCQ combined with azithromycin and zinc. To be effective, the patients must be in the early stage of the disease. Many physicians have treated hundreds of patients, many of them with additional health problems, with outstanding success. One Texas doctor has treated almost 400 patients with HCQ and has not lost a patient! Another physician has treated more than 700 patients and only lost one patient. The drug is sold over the counter in some nations and has been used safely for more than 65 years.

So, why isn’t every physician prescribing HCQ to COVID-19 patients? Dr. Fauci says that it has not had supervised clinical trials. Wait a minute. Many doctors who deal with dying patients are using it successfully. Well, yes, but the CDC doesn’t have a patent on the drug. Could that be the motive for Dr. Fauci to ridicule it at every opportunity? Moreover, Dr. Fauci and other critics have never treated a Chinese coronavirus patient.

Fauci has recommended the very expensive remdesivir drug owned by Gilead Sciences. It is declared that Fauci and the CDC have no financial interests in that company, and that may be true. However, could Fauci and the CDC downplay other drugs because they have put everything on the expected vaccine? And will any federal health agency or person have any financial benefit from its sale? Wow, that could be billions of dollars; and maybe as important, a Nobel Prize for Dr. Fauci.

The global vaccine market is showing some escalating growth, and it is expected that it will reach total revenues of nearly 60 billion U.S. dollars this year. Some of that will reach the hands of federal health officials who sit in judgment as to whether it is safe and effective! In 2016, the CDC made 137.8 million from royalty income. In total, 56 individual patents were found to be owned or shared by one or more members of the committees within the CDC. I believe that is called a conflict of interest.

If force is used to vaccinate everyone, it will make criminals out of Trump’s best supporters and may put some of us in jail. One of my readers said if Trump’s federal troops try to force him to be injected with mercury, he will inject the injecter with lead. Both mercury and lead are lethal. Forced vaccinations mean many will be shot, really shot!

Since I believe the vaccine may be worse than the disease, I will refuse to be vaccinated, although I’m convinced Trump’s advisors will recommend draconian measures to force me (in a free society) to capitulate. I would not even consider getting vaccinated if I were given the right answers to these questions: does the vaccine contain mercury, formaldehyde, or any human cells? What evidence is available that it will work? What proof is there to know it is safe? What are the full results of the tests? If you have a negative reaction such as being paralyzed, who pays, and how much? Why can’t we have religious objections since they are available in other matters?

I hope Mr. Trump will promise not to force free citizens to have a chip implanted or number tattooed on the hand or forehead.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0
Racism, Rebellion, and Revolution Promoted by Prissy Prostitutes of the Press! Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:58:54 +0000 It seems the only standard now used by the media is a double standard. I remember when reporters (in all media) took pride in their independent, balanced, and accurate reporting. You know, the hard-hitting reporter who could not be bought, and was often underpaid, but one you could trust. His agenda was truth. He or she would never report an untruth and would never refuse to reveal the truth.

Recently, I saw a network reporter interview the attorney for Jacob Blake and neither one mentioned anything negative about Blake who is recuperating in the hospital after being shot seven times. The video shows him resisting arrest; there was a knife in his vehicle; he had been charged of entering the home of a teenager and sexually molesting her but none of that was mentioned. Don’t you think a real reporter would have thought the public should hear that part of the story? But no, the motive was to accuse police with shooting a young black man who, according to friends and family, was destined to receive the Nobel Prize. Such reporting does not reveal the truth; it simply tells the story that leftists want the public to hear—then have them retaliate and join the mob for “justice.”

The days are long gone when journalists could be counted on to tell the whole truth. Some younger people can’t remember those days. And this downward slide toward mediocrity is getting swifter each year. It seems an honest reporter appears on the national scene as often as a chaste prostitute.

Many courageous reporters lost their lives revealing the truth about crime, political corruption, etc. Maybe today the absence of courage, not lack of character and convictions, is the reason for not telling the whole truth.

Americans believe “that 62% of the news they consume on TV, in newspapers, and on the radio…is biased,” according to a survey from the Knight Foundation and Gallup. Americans don’t hate the media for what they write; they hate them for what they don’t write. And for twisting the facts to meet their leftist narrative promoting racism, rebellion, and revolution.

General William T. Sherman, who had many problems, also hated the press more than a 150 years ago. The reports of his march from Atlanta to Savannah burning everything he could not carry were true. He wrote, “I hate newspapermen. They come into camp and pick up their camp rumors and print them as facts. I regard them as spies, which, in truth, they are. If I had my choice I would kill every reporter in the world, but I am sure we would be getting reports from Hell before breakfast.”

Senator Barry Goldwater, not as violent as Sherman, during his presidential bid in 1964 said, “I won’t say that the papers misquote me, but I sometimes wonder where Christianity would be today if some of these reporters were Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.” Of course, politicians have complained about the media for more than 2,000 years. Most with good cause.

Thomas Jefferson wrote, “Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle.”

A good example of this twisting of the facts is seen in the shooting of Blacks by police officers. Every celebrated shooting of a black man has been the ostensible cause of protests and rioting; without exception, the black “victim” has been a thug or was resisting arrest. Yet, the media and liberals play the same old record over and over because they think it moves non-thinkers to the left.

That is dishonest, despicable, and dangerous. It is dangerous because they are playing with peoples’ minds. Often, they are weak minds or minds that seldom think and it continues the violence with more people killed and injured and more property being destroyed.

Only one example is sufficient to support the above—the Michael Brown shooting. The media continues to dishonestly portray Michael as a victim who was surrendering to police with his hands upheld and saying, “Hands up, don’t shoot.” That did not happen and those who continue the falsehood are dishonest racists who are fomenting additional violence for which they will not be held accountable.

Some actually suggest that police officers leave home each day looking for a young Black they can kill! That is a good example of minds not being used. Yet, Conservatives are blamed for the racial tensions! Gutless public officials must take some of the blame but the lack of truth from the media is the main reason for the racists’ and conspirators’ incredible success.

The irresponsible media dwell on spurious numbers to convince the moron voters that there is a war on Blacks; however, the most recent available FBI crime numbers reveal that “black male teenagers were nine times more likely to commit murder than were their white counterparts. That’s right, nine times, and the gap in these urban areas is undoubtedly even larger.”

Now, if Black teens are nine times more likely to commit murder then it is reasonable that there would be nine times more Blacks teens in prison. Therefore, the reason for black teen incarceration, immorality, abortion, drugs, rebellion, and deaths, etc., is not with the police but with parents.

Let me be clear as possible for the slowest person: if young Blacks (as with all groups) were taught to obey police officers, they would live longer. Sure, there are some bully cops but they must be obeyed then torn down in a court of law. But usually, the Black in question is himself, a felon.

The media are cheerleaders for the Democrat Party so they usually twist any news to make it unfavorable to Trump, knowing it will be pleasing to all liberals.

Trump did not praise white supremacists at the Charlottesville rally; however, that is believed (or is reported) by the dishonest media.

The New York Times reported that Bret Kavanaugh had a new sexual misconduct accusation while a student at Yale University. No, there was no new allegation.

Time magazine reported that the bust of MLK was removed from the oval office; but it was a lie.

I know of no exception that all major media declared as a fact that the Trump campaign “colluded” with Russia. Now we know it didn’t happen.
Honest reporters will change their minds when they discover the evidence demands it. Allen Weinstein began researching the Alger Hiss case to prove his innocence, but the evidence did not support that result so he wrote Perjury to prove Hiss’ guilt making every liberal in America grit their teeth, stomp their foot, and hold their breath until they turned blue.

Well, they were already blue.

Honest people will tell the truth even if it affects their salary, status, or security.

The degeneration in the quality of the media has been developing for more than a hundred years as John Swinton’s experience shows. John was a former chief editorial writer for the New York Times, and he made some true but shocking statements on the condition of America’s media at the New York Press Club.

“There is no such thing, …in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it….If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone….The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread….We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”

John said that at the New York Press Club.

In 1880.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0
Freedom of Speech Means Discussing Any Issue—Even Jews! Tue, 08 Sep 2020 17:48:45 +0000 In 1649, when Maryland, founded by Roman Catholics, was still a colony, they passed a law titled, “A Law of Maryland Concerning Religion.” It was the first hate speech law passed in the New World. Anyone who “insulted” the Virgin Mary, the apostles, or the evangelists could be whipped, jailed, or fined. And if you denied the Trinity or the divinity of Christ, you could be punished by execution or the seizure of your lands. No Jews or Unitarians were permitted, and they were not very excited about seeing Baptists.

The pro-Catholic law was repealed in 1654 when Protestants took control of the colony and made it illegal for Roman Catholics to practice their religion openly. What goes around comes around.

All tyrants of all ages have tried to restrict freedom of speech.

Modern politicians in the U.S. and Europe are desirous of again becoming the gatekeepers of free speech.

Chancellor Angela Merkel told the German Parliament that the government must decide what can be considered free speech to keep society free! However, her government will decide what hate speech is! Merkel has been ridiculed and called “stupid” for her silly and dangerous declaration; however, her problem (one of many) is not a thinking problem but one of tyranny. She, like many leftist leaders, does not trust people to make up their own minds because they will often oppose the leaders—the totalitarians.

Shockingly, everyone must think alike in this Orwellian day. Moreover, if there is disagreement, it means someone may be offended. Thinking people realize that not everyone will agree or must agree. In fact, people have a right, especially in America, to believe outrageous things but don’t have a right to do outrageous things that can hurt others.

You have a right to be offended, but I have a right not to care. You have a right to deride, disagree, and defy me as long as you don’t harm me. Wimps and those who can’t defend their obnoxious positions use hate speech as a club to retaliate against the truth.

Progressives tell us that freedom of expression can only exist if it’s limited by a government that gets to define what extreme speech is! I don’t agree, but there seems to be an unspoken agreement among the media not even to discuss specific issues; however, I believe there is nothing to fear from asking questions and openly discussing any subject.

In this surreal world, we are told we must believe certain things since, after all, everyone says they are true. Strange that we must believe something that is banned from discussing, debating, and maybe disbelieving—or even debunking!

In our tame, twisted, and tortured culture, it is not acceptable to question the presence, prominence, and power of Jews. It has been said many times that Jews control the media; however, that does not mean they are in control, nor does it mean they are nefarious.

Let’s discuss it.

For decades the charge is made that Jews dominate Hollywood as if that alone is devious, dangerous, or deleterious. There is no question about the accusation, as proved by two famous Jews: Ben Stein and J. J. Goldberg. It is a given: Jews do dominate the entertainment industry. It is obvious the Jews control Hollywood since Universal, Columbia, Warner Brothers, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Fox, and Paramount were all founded by Jews.

Is this dominance because they are more talented or work harder or are more determined, or is it more sinister?

Let’s discuss it.

The Jerusalem Post reported that 20% of the respondents to a survey among Europeans from 16 nations believe “a secret network of Jews influences global political and economic affairs.” They also believe that “Jews exploit Holocaust victimhood for their own needs.”

The discussion intensifies when orthodox Jews and their involvement with pedophilia is mentioned, but that may be a “third rail” that must be avoided.

It must be emphasized that Jews have made an incredible contribution to discoveries that impact everyone every day.

Let’s have a public discussion on why Jews are so accomplished. Is it their education, their religion, or is it in their DNA? It is right, reasonable, and responsible to discuss this matter civilly.

The New York Times reported that Jews “make up 0.2 percent of the world population, but 54 percent of the world chess champions, 27 percent of the Nobel physics laureates and 31 percent of the medicine laureates.” Moreover, Nobel Prizes have been awarded to over 900 people, and 20% of them were to Jews. Sounds impressive to me.

It is very interesting that twelve Muslims have received the Nobel Prize, but Jews have received almost 200. Furthermore, there are only 6.5 million Jews in the world and over 1.8 billion Muslims!

I would like to moderate such a discussion.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0
Blacks Should Choose Their Heroes More Carefully! Fri, 04 Sep 2020 15:20:30 +0000 In recent years, many Blacks have made heroes out of thugs, thieves, and thespians simply because black leaders wanted to use the notoriety of famous Blacks in the drive for improvement of black civil rights. It is a fact that such folly is dishonest, disgraceful, and dishonorable to legitimate civil rights. In recent years, non-thinking Blacks have made heroes out of thugs like George Floyd, Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, and others who were killed while resisting arrest.

It is normal for each entity—Indians, Whites, Blacks, preachers, teachers, philosophers, etc., to idolize people they look upon as their own kind. Of course, heroes are often chosen who are not heroes at all—more like zeros. I thought of this recently during the protests across America. I realized that we usually jump too quickly to identify with people who echo our own beliefs, and those people are often too flawed to hold up to children without qualifying our recommendation.

Many well-known Blacks and Whites are held up as people to be emulated even though they lived very wicked lives and destroyed themselves by making the wrong decisions as to drugs, education, religion, and associates. Frankly, there is no excuse for that since there are so many Blacks who made an impressive contribution that would be ideal heroes.

Many Blacks have set records and had major accomplishments in athletics yet were tarnished persons whose lives no one should emulate. I can understand why Muhammad Ali is considered a hero. Ali may have been the greatest boxer of all time; however, it is not much of a sport to try to knock out the brains of a man.

Ali was a draft dodger, Black Muslim, serial fornicator, and outspoken, rabid segregationist.

He told the media, “We don’t want to live with the white man; that’s all.” And concerning interracial marriage: “No intelligent black man or black woman in his or her right black mind want white boys or white girls comin’ to their homes, schools, and churches to marry their black sons and daughter to produce little, pale half-white, green-eyed, blond-headed Negroes.”

Are the hypocrites in and out of BLM demanding the cities change the streets named for Ali?

On a British television show, I heard Ali say that bluebirds fly together; red birds fly together, buzzards fly together. And “Blacks are more comfortable with other blacks.” The British interviewer was almost speechless. Indeed, Ali’s religious beliefs at the time included the notion that the white man was “the devil.”

The London Daily Mail quoted Ali’s son, who opined of his famous father, “when it came to his private life, his morals were those of an alley cat. The way he treated his first three wives and neglected some of his nine (known) children was frankly disgraceful.”

Ali had nine children by four different wives and two other relationships, and his large family has split the loot that was left—more than $80 million.

Muhammad was an incredible athlete; however, he was a very flawed individual with occasional indications of courage and commitment, but not much character. Why is he honored by Whites and Blacks, yet Strom Thurman, George Wallace, and David Duke are hated for their segregationist views?

Liberals are the biggest hypocrites in the world.

Louis Farrakhan is a black racist who has clearly stated his hatred for Jews and all Whites, yet the race-baiters pretend he is a gentleman with whom one can have dinner and a polite conversation. And hypocrites in the media refuse to hold white and black liberals to account for their close association with Screwy Louie. He’s called Screwy Louie because of his insistence that he is constantly protected by a vast flying object and scores of smaller flying saucers.

Why would any thinking black or white person consider that nut case a hero?

Abolitionist John Brown, in the mid-1800s, was a white wacko, killer, and thief, made into a hero by Unitarians in New England. After he and his five sons dragged five slavery sympathizers out of their cabins in “Bleeding Kansas,” they hacked them to death. John then moved back east to form a “provisional government” of the United States, and he was chosen commander-in-chief. He also planned to create an area in the Maryland and Virginia mountains to be a stronghold for escaped slaves. His plan was to convince well-to-do, self-hating Whites to finance a war between Whites and Blacks.

Surely, no sane white people would come near such a nut case, but they already had. Some famous New England white leaders had supported his “work” in Kansas. The group, in addition to Brown and his boys, was called the “Secret Six.” They were some of New England’s brightest! Men like physician Samuel Gridley Howe, industrialist George Stearns, journalist Franklin B. Sanborn, ministers Thomas Wentworth Higginson and Theodore Parker—all highly placed and respected men—known as “useful idiots.”

These men financed Brown’s plan to attack the Federal Armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now, West Virginia). With 16 white men and 5 Blacks, they took the armory and held 60 leading citizens hostage. The first person killed in this attempt at freeing the Negro was a free black railroad worker who was shot in the back at the railroad station.

The armory was stocked with weapons and ammunition that Brown planned to give to escaped slaves as they joined his rebellion. They didn’t rebel. Brown’s group held out all the next day and night against the local militia but surrendered the following day when Colonel Robert E. Lee and a few marines attacked. Brown was wounded, and two of his sons were killed along with eight others in the “army of liberation.”

Brown was tried for murder and treason and died on the gallows in what is now Charles Town, West Virginia. One of the town militiamen who observed the execution was John Wilkes Booth, who later had his time on the world stage.

It is shocking and scandalous that anyone, white or black, would consider Brown anything but a nut case, yet he was financed by New England’s elite. He does not qualify as a hero simply because he supported the anti-slavery movement. This speaks to how people are supporting racist, radical, revolutionary Black Lives Matter, Antifa, Nation of Islam, etc.

People who support unsavory, unlawful, and unhinged extremists are facilitators of their evil deeds. Every responsible leader should clearly denounce BLM, Antifa, and the Nation of Islam.

Nat Turner was a black slave in Virginia who claimed to be a Baptist preacher and felt destined for greatness. His parents considered him a prophet and encouraged him in his “ministry.” They were convinced of that because of unusual marks on his head and breast! Turner reported seeing spirits fighting in the sky, and he allegedly heard voices. Being a “prophet,” he communicated “revelations” to fellow slaves. I don’t need to emphasize that these are signs of a nut case, not a prophet.

Then, when Mount St. Helens erupted on August 21, 1831, nearly 3,000 miles away, the atmospheric conditions convinced Turner that God wanted him to kill his white enemies! About seven months earlier on February 12, a solar eclipse convinced him it was time to do what he was ordained to do. The eruption in August was his sign so he and other slaves attacked and killed 55 white people, including men, women, and children–some as they slept. One victim was a baby in its cradle. Some of the victims were beheaded, including children. The killers used axes, clubs, swords, and guns.

It is believed that none of the deadly weapons were registered.

Armed citizens confronted the attackers, and Turner was captured, tried, and executed by hanging after hiding for two months. He was flayed, beheaded, and quartered. It seems the slaveholders wanted to send a message to other slaves.

It is understandable that witless, guilt-ridden Whites and gullible Blacks seek to make every Black a hero, but surely, no sane people think Turner was anything but a monster.

It seems many Blacks are careless in choosing their heroes. However, black leaders, especially those who insist on telling the whole truth about Confederate heroes and founding fathers, should be cautious about holding up killers and Communists to be emulated by young Blacks! Any Black who supports BLM, Antifa, Nation of Islam, and similar hate groups should repent in sackcloth and ashes.

Why don’t some Blacks choose more principled heroes, rather than bottom feeders? But then, many Whites do the same going right to the bottom.

No, it’s not in our genes; it’s in our choices.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0
The French Revolution, Like the BLM Revolution, Was as Accidental as the Rose Bowl Parade! Tue, 01 Sep 2020 16:56:21 +0000 All principled people want everyone to have an equal opportunity for a good life, a safe life, and a productive life, whatever his or her race, religion, or region. That reasonable, humane, and kind attitude is the reason for a quick acceptance of the proclamation, “black lives matter.” That was the right attitude, even a Christian perspective to have. All good and decent people would agree.

Of course, we all thought black lives mattered, and most of us added, but then all lives matter. What we didn’t know when we first heard those words is that not all those people were concerned about black lives; they wanted to produce rage, resistance, revolution, and reparations.

Those realities are obvious as I write this column. Sane, thoughtful people have said, “Whoa, just minute, I’m for equality and fairness, but I want no connection with BLM since it really means, Burn, Loot, Murder.”

This lethal crusade is not new. It has been in the works for years. Like termites, it has wormed its way into our churches, schools, military, entertainment, and industry. At the core is hatred of authority.

Many people involved with BLM, Antifa, Nation of Islam, and other groups are innocent dupes, guilty of being too lazy or careless or stupid to think for themselves and take a stand for principle, not swallowing grandiose slogans. Maybe too late, they will realize they were regarded as useful idiots to be used by unprincipled tyrants. No doubt, many have realized the truth as they watched New York City, Portland, Minneapolis, Seattle, Kenosha, and other cities burn.

This revolution is not spontaneous. The nefarious leaders had only been looking for the opportune time. They found it: authorities apparently mistreated a man, even a bad man (although we all know now that he was resisting arrest and had overdosed on fentanyl); the weather was right; it was a chance to attack the man every leftist hates, Donald Trump; and the money was available to fund the whole thing. It didn’t matter that the money was dirty and from a corrupt individual. Everything fell into place like it was planned.

It was.

The on-going Revolution of 2020 is not accidental unless the Rose Bowl Parade could be so identified.

This has happened before.

The dictum of “liberty, equality, and brotherhood” struck a chord in the hearts of the eighteenth-century French, especially the common people who paid most of the taxes, did most of the backbreaking labor, and did most of the fighting and dying during their intermittent wars.

Scott says in Inside the terror of the French Revolution that the French did not understand that there can be equality of opportunity and of the law, but that does not guarantee equality of outcome. After all, true liberty will provide room for differences in abilities and choices. Two equally free people may have a vast difference in personal character, discipline, ability, ambition, and numerous other attributes that will impact results. Forced equality of outcome never works.

What most readers of the infamous French Revolution have missed is that it was not an automatic response by an oppressed, overtaxed, underfed people to an oppressive king. Rather, it was a revolution that had been planned for decades. Humanists such as Voltaire, Diderot, Rousseau, plus thousands of masons, illuminists, atheists, agnostics, and other God-haters, planned to eradicate all religions, King Louis XVI, and the father-led families in France. Some, like Voltaire, were critical of the Roman Catholic Church but did not want it destroyed since it was the glue that held the nation together. Their goal was to destroy its grip on the nation.

Note that the Revolution was an attack on all authority—the church, the crown, the cottage.

Pierre Bayle (died 1706), was a French Calvinist philosopher who had a major influence on the Enlightenment. He was forced into exile by the repressive policies of King Louis XVI. Bayle’s writings demanded freedom of thought, religion, and no despotic rule. Legitimate critics of monarchy and the absolute rule of King Louis XVI had been fueling reproof, resistance, and revolution for decades. However, the radical critics went all the way to the guillotine.

Emmanuel Joseph Sieyes, Jacques Pierre Brissot, Goerges Danton, and Maximilien Robespierre played an essential part in propelling France toward the Revolution. However, the nation had been infected by skeptical, even atheistic termites for decades that destroyed the nation’s foundations.

The framers of the Revolution were all influential journalists or aristocrats in powdered wigs and silk knee-breeches, carrying expensive snuff boxes. The common people who did the work, paid most of the taxes, and fought the wars wore long pants called pantaloons. They were work clothes.

The march to the guillotine started in 1717 with Voltaire when he was imprisoned in the Bastille for almost a year for mocking authorities. He was a courageous crusader against tyranny, bigotry, and cruelty; but he was also a skeptic, believing in a god and the afterlife, but not much else.

His wit influenced future writers and philosophers to attack authority, and some went much further than Voltaire wanted to go, but that usually happens when men are separated from the authoritative Bible. He and other philosophers were interested in public morality and virtue even though most of them lived like barnyard animals. That was true of Voltaire, who was sexually involved and lived with his “fat and rosy-cheeked niece” until his death.

Maximillian de Robespierre was one of the most influential figures of the French Revolution, which brought about the fall of King Louis XVI in 1792, and was the main cheerleader for the on-rushing and bloody revolution. He did not give the French people a Republic of Virtue where everyone was equal, free, and exercised brotherly love but a reign of terror where thousands of innocent people were killed.

A reviewer of Inside the terror of the French Revolution described the revolution as “a bloody reign of terror with mob rule, despotism, and the descent into barbarism with the mass killings of men, women, and children by their own government, not because of their deeds or misdeeds or real crimes, but because of their birth, opinions, and associations – or simply, for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

The Bolshevik’s Revolution in 1917 had the same killing philosophy. Orders were given that the soldiers were not to look for evidence of crimes against people or ask what they believe. They were simply to kill every person who was a leader: educators, pastors, physicians, and others. Guilt was not necessary. That was true in the French Revolution of the late 1700s, and it is true of the American Second Revolution of 2020.

The revolutionists led in part by Marat, Danton, Saint-Just, Hébert, Robespierre unleashed a horrible monster, a monster that, in the end, they could not control, for as Pierre Vergniaud said, “The revolution, like Saturn, is devouring its’ own children.”

We have already seen that take place with BLM and other tyrants.

The much voiced and beloved “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity” that sounded so desirable turned into “you accept us, or we will beat you into a bloody mess—or worse.” Later, the words or death were added to their three-word motto.

Religious monuments were destroyed in the large cities; Public and private worship and education were outlawed; Priests and ministers, along with those who harbored them, were executed on sight.

The French Revolution began with a Reign of Terror as over 40,000 people were beheaded in Paris. It was an intentional campaign to de-Christianize French society and replace it with a civic religion of state worship.

Robespierre, on February 5, 1794, in a speech titled “The Terror Justified,” declared, “Lead … the enemies of the people by terror. …Terror is nothing else than swift, severe, indomitable justice.” Then he began denouncing, detaining, and decapitating first the royalty then the wealthy then the farmers and businessmen then those hoarding food then the clergy. Then the former revolutionaries. Then, Robespierre himself was walked up the steps to be guillotined.

Robespierre put a prostitute in Notre Dame Cathedral and called her the goddess of reason to be worshiped. The new secular government proceeded to forbid crosses as being offensive and took control of the Roman Catholic Church and took control of the bleeding nation.

I don’t believe in reincarnation, but some leaders of BLM and Antifa appear to be wearing silk stockings and carrying French snuff boxes. And for sure, they all seek to justify their violence, and no one is wearing work clothes.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0
Jerry Falwell’s Retirement Package Causing Outrage at Liberty University! Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:41:05 +0000 If angels weep, they are weeping today over the earth-shaking events taking place at Liberty University, followed by reverberating aftershocks worldwide. That’s only slight hyperbole, especially in the religious world.

Jerry Falwell, Jr. was Liberty University president and did a very commendable job as an educator even though he was not trained in education. He generated a $1.60 billion endowment fund, erected many impressive buildings to where Liberty has the sixth-best campus in America, hugely increased student enrollment, established a School of Medicine and School of Law, and developed a world-class athletic program. Additionally, Liberty is the number one online college in America.

Evidently, Jerry did some impressive things as president.

Sadly, as the world knows, Jerry admitted his wife Becki had a sexual affair that reportedly lasted over six years. The additional allegation from the male adulterer is that Jerry also watched the affair between him and his wife. Jerry has not confirmed that perversion known as voyeurism.

After much media confusion, Liberty’s Board of Trustees accepted his resignation that included a $10.5 million retirement package. His contract signed in July of 2019, “entitles him to $10.5 million over two years, including $8 million in retirement and $2.5 million for the equivalent of two years’ salary.”

My sources at Liberty and Thomas Road Baptist Church tell me there is “outrage” over the contract. One email revealed, “The [Trustee] Board has taken a beating over the $10 million.” I have some longtime friends on Liberty’s board and a few casual acquaintances, and I don’t mean to embarrass them, but did they confront Jerry about the sordid lifestyle of their president and his wife?

If not, why not?

This is not new. Jerry has been acting like an-out-of-control high school freshman for a long time. Liberty University has been receiving bad press in recent months with outrageous charges against Jerry. If some of the more egregious accusations of the past 18 months are true, then the compromises of the son will tarnish the impressive contributions of his father.

With the news of recent days, we know that the charges of the past are minimized by the factual charges of the present.

Being a longtime friend of Jerry Sr. and Liberty Dean Dr. Harold Wilmington plus knowing many Liberty graduates, I decided to get the facts of Jerry’s past activities from the source, so I emailed Scott Lamb, Liberty’s Senior Vice President of Communications and Public Engagement on October 19 and again on November 12. Scott wrote back on November 12, saying, “we’re just not under a mandate to answer any, and every question posed to us.”

Of course not, however, friends and supporters of Liberty have a right to hear some answers regarding charges as reported in the major media.

I am a longtime friend of Jerry Sr. and Liberty, and I bought a Liberty annuity, so I think I have a right to some answers. I emailed Jerry on November 14 but did not hear from him. But then he probably doesn’t know me. At least, I don’t remember meeting him.

Jerry’s pastor, University Trustees, family, and friends failed him in not confronting him with the many accusations that would get any Liberty student expelled.

Jerry tweeted about a fellow Baptist, “Sorry to be crude, but pastors like @plattdavid need to grow a pair. Just saying,” That is not acceptable speech that honors Christ. Christians are commanded in Col. 3:17 “And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus…”

That includes Jerry, Donald Trump, me, and all other professing Christians.

A high-ranking Liberty official said, “At Liberty, Falwell is very, very vocal about his sex life.” A great sex life is commendable, even Christian (!), between a naturally born man and a naturally born woman married to each other. However, it does not follow that one talks about it with anyone except in a counseling setting. Jerry’s sex talk seems to be common knowledge around Liberty Mountain.

If so, Jerry is dumb as a post and needs to repent.

It was charged that there are “racy” or embarrassing photos of Jerry, his wife, or both of them. Jerry said. “There are no compromising or embarrassing photos of me.” Good, but what about photos of Becki in a French maid costume? He said, “I never had any picture of Becki Falwell dressed in a French maid uniform,” but are there any compromising photos of her?

It is common for those who attend a couples’ conference to hear the teacher/preacher/ family counselor suggest a way to spice up a marriage is for the wife to do some strange things such as her greeting hubby in the evening wrapped in Saran wrap, or dressed as a French maid! While that may be quirky, such photos should never be taken or shown to friends. The Liberty Trustees should have asked if he (or anyone) took questionable pictures and permitted them to be seen accidentally or purposefully.

If so, Jerry is dumber than a post, and the Trustees may be culpable for inaction.

The Trustees should have asked if Jerry supported his son Trey’s purchase of a “gay-friendly” hostel in Miami Beach in 2013. Evidently, he did if he lent him the money or guaranteed the loan. With Jerry’s lack of wisdom and a pathetic sense of right and wrong, how could the Trustees approve such a generous retirement contract without a morality clause? Or was there a clause that does not legally apply to the situation?

Even the Hollywood crowd demands a protective clause in their contracts.

Jerry’s support of a “gay-friendly” business cannot be justified with Scripture since, I Timothy 5:22 commands, “neither be partaker of other men’s sins: keep thyself pure.” If he helped purchase the place, then he is a participant in every drunken party, adulterous affair, and homosexual hook-up.

And he needs to repent.

A well-placed Liberty source told me that Jerry Sr. would never have anything to do with homosexuality or abortion. Since I knew Jerry Sr. almost 60 years, I agree. Jerry Sr. would have run from the pro-homosexual hostel deal as if his hair were on fire.

His son did not run away; he financed it.

Jerry is said by Liberty people to boast about the size of his genitals! Is he so insecure that such boasting inflates his ego, providing a false sense of power and influence? There is little doubt that the boasting was coarse, crude, and crass if reports are accurate.

Jerry was quoted in an unrelated article in the Washington Post saying, “I have been accused of having balls the size of cannonballs.” That may be acceptable talk with athletes in a locker room or even the boardroom with a bunch of lawyers, but it is always juvenile, wrong, and never in good taste. He would not have said that in the presence of his mother or father.

Did the Trustees look at this quote and try to help him?

Obviously, Jerry has no convictions about visiting nightclubs since he admitted visiting the Wall nightclub in Miami “to listen to music for about 30 minutes.” A photo was published, but Jerry denied that the photo of him and Trey was genuine. However, there is no question about the picture of Trey and his wife holding drinks at the club.

Did the Trustees confront him about his night at the nightclub?

Brandon Ambrosino accused Jerry of trying to scrub the nightclub pictures from the internet; then Jerry strangely emailed him asking, “Why would I want a picture like that taken down if I had seen it?” That suggests very clearly that being in a nightclub is permissible, and nothing a Christian leader needs to defend. Are Liberty students permitted to frequent such clubs?

The issue is not if Jerry tried to get photos scrubbed, but did they exist?

Politico reported there are “photos from that evening in which Jerry Falwell Jr. and other members of the Falwell family can be seen—including Jerry’s wife, Becki, sons Trey and Wesley, and Trey’s wife, Sarah. In the images, the Falwells can be seen in the middle of the club’s dance floor, while lasers and other light effects reflect around them. In at least two photos, Falwell’s family members can be seen holding alcohol.”

The photos are rather damaging. Does Jerry now or did he in the past drink alcoholic beverages as has been reported?

If so, he needs to repent. If the Trustees refused to deal with that, then they need to repent. Moreover, it is shocking that a golden parachute would be given to him without an escape clause.

It would appear from what we know that Jerry Falwell, Jr. has major problems—lack of wisdom and commitment—and for sure did not get any of his father’s character, convictions, or common sense.

The world now knows about the Falwell failures, but to be honest, fair, and balanced, there were other failures if the Board of Trustees refused to deal with very public and damaging accusations. An explanation is due to the school why a generous retirement contract was signed, with the board members knowing of Jerry’s failures.

It will not surprise me if Donald Trump, in a seizure of compassion and obligation (for Falwell’s past support), puts Jerry in a top spot in his new or even present administration. I hope not.

But even more destructive, why did Jerry’s local church (wherever it is) not put him under church discipline. But few churches do that anymore. You know, “it will hurt the ministry.”

Oh, yes, tell me about it.

It appears that to Jerry, Christianity is a flag to fight under but not a faith to follow.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0
Jerry Falwell: Can it Get Any Worse? Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:47:24 +0000 Last year I wrote a column about Liberty University President Jerry Falwell titled “Jerry Falwell, Guilty Until Proven Innocent?” I noted that the media are quick to jump at any failure of a Christian leader, especially with the name of Falwell, whether true or false. I was convinced that many accusations were untrue.

Jerry was the President of Liberty University, founded by a longtime friend of mine, Jerry Falwell, Sr. Jerry Senior did an astounding job in establishing the school, and Junior did an astounding job expanding the school. After many failures, he then did additional harm when an Instagram went public of him with his arm around a woman at a yacht party. Both Jerry and his female friend were pictured with pants unzipped, and his underwear was exposed.

Jerry was wrong in many ways in that incident, but he posted it on Instagram; that was not dumb; it was super dumb. While there is no vaccine for the Chinese coronavirus or racism, there is also no vaccine for stupidity.

He took a leave of absence from Liberty. Today, many major media outlets reported he had resigned as President. Later today, it was reported he had not resigned.

Whatever, Jerry Falwell should never have anything to do with the university. Forgiveness, yes; return to power, no.

Most of the media and all on the left hated Senior with passionate heat. It always shows in any article or interview. However, friends of Liberty will not be true to principle or the memory of Jerry Sr. if this additional escapade is not handled biblically.

On Sunday, Jerry confirmed a major sexual failure in his family to the Washington Examiner. He called it an “inappropriate personal relationship,” but a more honest and appropriate term is adultery.

Everyone has a tendency to soften, lessen, and make more pleasant anything that is unpleasant. He added that “Becki had an inappropriate personal relationship with this person, something in which I was not involved.” I’m suspicious of that statement. It appears to be as old as man. “The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.”

The media is ablaze with new charges that Jerry’s wife Becki had a year-long (now we are told it lasted six years) sexual affair with the “pool boy,” Giancarlo Granda! Jerry admitted the shocking affair to the Washington Examiner. However, Granda, a business partner of the Falwells, also charged that Jerry looked on while he and Becki had sex as reported by Reuters. That’s revolting, repulsive, and reprehensible if true.

Jerry has not admitted that additional salacious voyeur accusation.

Moreover, many false charges can be expected after such an affair is made public, and no honest person, even Falwell-haters, should believe them without corroboration. Jerry has done many stupid things recently, but he just can’t be that stupid unless he has been taking stupid pills. Falwell’s attorney has categorically denied the Reuters story about Jerry being an observer.

But then, sin does that. It makes us think we are special when no one is special. And any person on Earth has the potential of doing anything if the circumstances are just right. Of course, the public has a right to expect more from Christians than such barnyard behavior.

Giancarlo said his “sexual relationship with the Falwells began when he was 20,” and Becki was in her late 40s. She is now 54. Jerry charged that when he tried to get out of a business arrangement he had with Giancarlo, Giancarlo began blackmailing him until he was “just tired of it” and admitted the affair to the media.

Falwell said he and Becki reconciled quickly, but the extortion continued, and he got fed up and released the information to the Examiner. Jerry admitted, “I shouldn’t have been afraid to admit my vulnerabilities and to reach out for assistance from the mental health professionals who could have alleviated this pain and stress.”

It is good that Jerry took some responsibility for the affair. He said he should have sought help from “mental health professionals,” but his first stop should have been at an old-fashioned altar to confess his sins of boasting about his sexual prowess; the size of his testicles; he and his son relaxing in a Miami nightclub; and helping his son purchase a “gay-friendly” Miami Beach hostel characterized by Politico as a “cesspool of vice.”

Granda revealed other incriminating material to Reuters that is even worse than his affair with Becki; however, some of it cannot be verified. There were audio recordings between him and the Falwells that are disturbing. He also released a text, allegedly from Becki to him, that has her saying, “Right now I am just missing you like crazy …. Have you had this effect on all of your lady friends?”

Other messages between the Falwells and Granda reveal anger and frustration. In the same message string, Falwell reportedly replied, “You should by now understand that I will not be extorted. I have always treated you fairly and been restrained in response to your threats because I did not wish to ruin your life. Going forward, stop contacting me and my family.”

This is a sad example of the failure of church discipline. Whatever the final outcome of this story, many of the details will remain unknown. Someone long ago should have dealt with Jerry, not because of these new accusations, but his admitted failures in the past. That would include Jerry Jr. and his son dancing and drinking at a Florida nightclub; providing more than a million-dollar down payment for the “gay-friendly” hostel; the “racy” photos of Becki; and Jerry’s Instagram of him with his arm around a woman in hot pants (both their pants unzipped) on a yacht with bikini-clad dancers on deck.

Heavens! What do you have to do to receive church discipline in Virginia? Baptists, like Roman Catholics, are required to live according to basic biblical principles. If you don’t follow them, then you must give an account. Even the Moose Lodge expects that.

Some of the above charges are so outrageous they can only be identified as sad, sinful, and stupid. One can get forgiveness for sin but not for being stupid. He sure does not qualify as President of a Christian university. Or any university.

I have many longtime friends associated with Liberty, including some board members, and I have been told that Jerry is not a member of Thomas Road Baptist Church. If so, then Pastor Jonathan Falwell and that church cannot be held responsible. My sources have confirmed that Jerry and his whole family have seldom been seen at the church in years.

Whatever church the Falwells are members of, the church leadership failed to treat them as other members: in love holding them accountable for transgressing biblical and church standards of behavior.

Christians are not perfect people but saved people. Moreover, we need to be forgiven day-to-day for our sins. The failed members of the Falwell family have discredited Christianity, disgraced their church, dismayed their family, demoralized Liberty students, destroyed their reputations, damaged Liberty University, and dirtied Jerry, Sr.’s memory.

President Trump will have to quickly reevaluate his association with Falwell, one of his most important and ardent supporters who has stepped in it too many times.

Sins can be forgiven but cannot be undone.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0
Joe and Kamala—There is No Vaccine for Hypocrisy! Sat, 22 Aug 2020 16:23:57 +0000 The Democratic National Convention (DNC) last week was unusual in that they twice removed “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance to placate their Muslim and LGBTQ constitutes who claimed the mention of God is “offensive” and “nonsense.”

The Biden-Harris team declared, “there is no vaccine for racism.” Neither is there a vaccine for hypocrisy or lying!

Moreover, no one at the convention thought someone should at least refer to the fact our major cities (run by Democrats) are burning at the hands of BLM and Antifa revolutionaries.

But we were permitted to hear from Donna Hylton, a 55-year-old woman who is one of “America’s most impactful community leaders.” However, Donna was “convicted for the kidnapping, rape, torture, and murder of a 62-year-old Long Island real estate broker in 1986.” The torture involved using plyers on the victim’s testicles. Most honest people would think the DNC should have at least suggested that Donna had been a little violent in her past.

However, the purpose of the convention was to choose and present to the voters the Democrat’s choice of President and Vice-President of the United States. While Joe and Kamala did an acceptable presentation of themselves with their usual careless and vitriolic attacks upon President Trump, their hypocrisy would gag every buzzard east of the Black Hills of South Dakota.

I had to fight my body’s retching reaction whenever Joe and what’s her name used such hallowed terms as moral, decent, values, and principled. Joe’s “decency is on the ballot” and to “tell the truth” would gag a maggot.

Those above qualities are all highly admirable attributes to be acquired; however, they are only notable in people who have character. Unprincipled people never exemplify them. Joe and Kamala have spent a lifetime denigrating and desecrating and dodging those same desirable principles.

However, they tout them during political campaigns since they work with dummies, demagogues, and Democrats. But I repeat myself.

While in law school at Syracuse University in 1965, Joe was caught plagiarizing and admitted taking five pages from a law review article for his 15-page report. He said his “mistake” was neither intentional nor “malevolent.” He didn’t steal a thought or phrase but five pages, word for word. He asked the university for permission to leave the school so he would not be labeled “a cheat.” Of course, he got an F but was permitted to take the class again and passed. Moral, decent, truth? Whatever the university did, Joe was still a cheat.

His lying continued after college when he told a reporter that he was in the top half of his class when he was at the bottom of his class. He said he was involved in civil rights marches then admitted that he did not march. But he admitted that he worked as a lifeguard at an all-black swimming pool. He declared he had been “shot at” during a visit to Iraq then had to admit it was not true. He told of being arrested in South Africa when trying to visit Nelson Mandela but admitted it was not true. Sorry, but it’s a fact that our next possible President is a fabricator. That sounds better than using liar.

He was forced to drop out of the 1988 presidential race after it was revealed that he stole some of JFK’s and Bobby’s speeches. Following Joe’s acceptance speech, even liberals like HuffPost accused him of stealing a Canadian politician’s words! Joe is a slow learner. Maybe a vaccine for lying could help him.

Joe is on the record as saying migrants who cross the border illegally “should have to get in line” unless they are seeking asylum, but he does not believe that today. What does he really believe? Do we believe flip or flop?

Joe teamed with Senator Strom Thurmond in a joint effort to oppose integrating schools in the 1970s. That action horrifies Joe today, but more importantly, it horrifies all on the left. If Joe wants us to know the truth, let us have the truth.

Jill Biden’s ex-husband has accused the potential first lady of having an affair with Joe Biden and says, “They lied about how they met in the 1970s, according to a bombshell new report.” Joe, what was that you said about decency? And, what about “telling the truth?” What about breaking up a man’s home by sleeping with his wife since that is not normally associated with decency, morality, or principled? But then, the way words have lost their meaning and the way unprincipled politicians use anything to make themselves look good, maybe such deception is acceptable in our Brave New World.

A female Democrat in Nevada revealed Biden’s “demeaning and disrespectful” smelling her hair and kissing her head with hands on her shoulders.

The media have been very quiet about the numerous incidents of Biden handsy, handling, and hugging numerous children even in the presence of their parents and recorded on television! One YouTube video presents numerous incidents of him being “Creepy Joe.” One headline screamed: “Dad Confronts ‘Creepy’ Joe Biden Over Child Molestation,” but Joe did not answer his question: “What about the girls you molested on C-SPAN at the Senate swearing-in?” Moreover, the man was removed from the public meeting.

March of 2020 was a bad day for Biden when Tara Reade, one of his former Senate aides, publicly charged Biden with sexually assaulting her in 1993. According to the Business Insider, Biden pressed her against a wall in a Capitol Hill hallway, reached under her skirt, and digitally penetrated her. The report quotes her saying, “she filed a complaint with the Senate personnel office concerning Biden’s alleged ‘sexual harassment and retaliation,’ but didn’t mention the alleged assault.” Biden has unequivocally denied assaulting or harassing Reade.

Seven other women accused Biden of “touching them inappropriately or invading their personal space in ways that made them feel uncomfortable. [They] said Biden’s behavior did not amount to sexual harassment or assault.”

He later said he’s “not sorry for anything that I’ve ever done.” He doesn’t know the difference between right and wrong.

Whatever happened to the Me Too Movement?

Joe’s vice-presidential choice said she believed the women who accused Biden of inappropriate contact, including touching and kissing. “I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it.” Does she still believe that?

Joe Biden’s son Hunter assured us of his father’s “honesty” and integrity at the convention while introducing his father. But that’s like Italian Benito Mussolini vouching for his German buddy with the bad haircut and funny mustache: “Yea, Adolph is a misunderstood former choir boy who always keeps his word.”

The same Hunter made $1.5 billion on a questionable foreign deal. Joe can settle this fiasco once and for all: tell the whole truth about it, open all appropriate records, and ask for all involved to be candid.

I could go on and on about flip flops and other charges; however, the question demands an answer: Is this man qualified, apart from his famous gaffs, to be the leader of the free world? If not, and it is discovered after he is elected, the office will go to Senator Kamala Harris, a woman of color—as if that matters. Evidently, it does matter to many Democrats, thereby proving they are racists.

Harris was Attorney General of California and had the reputation of sleeping her way to the top of the heap. She was openly the mistress of Willie Brown, former mayor of San Francisco, so our possible Vice-President is a fornicator. More than that, she is an ingrate. After getting to the top with the help of Brown, she now says, “His career is over; I will be alive and kicking for the next 40 years. I do not owe him a thing.” Well, no, I suppose she has already paid him; they both got what they wanted.

That’s why prostitution is still the oldest profession. The quid pro quo works.

Some of the leftist press, seeking to mitigate her fornication, say the charges “are technically true but given Brown had been separated for about a decade, the claims are misleading.” No, the fact Willie was separated from his wife makes no difference at all. They were both fornicators.

Kamala lied about smoking weed in college while listening to the “music” of Snoop Dogg and Tupac. It was untrue because Harris graduated college many years before their albums were released. Senator Gabbard (who was nowhere near the DNC) said, “She put 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.” Harris has admitted to its use. There is another need for a vaccine for hypocrisy.

Kamala is not a descendant of slaves but of a slave owner! The Jamaica Globe quoted her father, professor Donald Harris saying, “My roots go back, within my lifetime, to my paternal grandmother Miss Chrishy (née Christiana Brown, descendant of Hamilton Brown who is on record as plantation and slave owner and founder of Brown’s Town).” Brown’s Town is an inland town a few miles from the Jamaica coast.

It would seem there will be no reparations for Kamala.

So our possible next Vice-President is not only a fornicator but also a hypocrite. Maybe Dr. Fauci can develop a vaccine for hypocrisy.

Kamala Harris and Joe Biden make a perfect choice for the pot smokers, fornicators, baby killers, open border fanatics, reparation zealots, and Democrats with terminal brain rot.

If the normal, moral, decent, liberty-lovers stay home on November 3, Joe and Kamala will be moving to Washington.

Where can I move?

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0
Mail-in Voting is an Engraved Invitation for Corruption and Democrats Will Vote From the Grave! Tue, 18 Aug 2020 21:41:31 +0000 Politicians and babies both need to be changed often and for the same reason, and Americans will be attempting to make changes in November. America’s future depends on what change if any, we make at the voting booth. And the results will depend on whether we go to the polls or mail in a ballot. The long-honored absentee ballot is generally safe, but a massive mail-in vote is an engraved invitation for vote corruption.

Often, a politician may indicate a need for a change, but in reality, it’s only a bad odor. Not yet. While it might be premature to change a baby’s diaper impulsively, it might be perilous to do the same for a politician. Hence, the need to not be hasty in the November election.

While there are thousands of hopeful politicians on the ballots, the most vital is the presidential race, but does that position need to be changed?

We have a choice of Donald Trump who has a checkered past bedding various women but who has kept many of his promises he made to us. In that, he is a very unusual politician. For me, this is a replay of 2016—choosing the one who will do less damage, stabilize our economy, keep the baby butchers at bay, return peace to our cities, keep China behind her famous wall—without bankrupting our nation.

His vice-president Mike Pence is a good man. After caving to the LGBTQ tyrants in Indiana pre-election, he has done better than any other politician in standing for family and morality. While he could be more forceful, we all know the LGBTQ crowd specializes in bullying, badgering, and blackmailing decent opponents. He has done a respectable job with the other chores Trump assigned him.

As an Independent, that is the team I will vote for again, understanding that no candidate is perfect. I decided not to run this time.

The other ticket is abysmal, and it is difficult to understand how any honest American could put them in office. Joe Biden has a history of plagiarism, lying, very loose hands around girls and women, fanatically desirous of grabbing every gun in America and putting us in debt quadrillions of dollars. Biden is the description of a Throttlebottom—an innocuously inept and futile person in public office.

Biden is pathetic and surely will only get the sympathy vote and maybe his wife’s.

Kamala Harris is his choice for Vice-President, and she has a record that is far, far left. She is the most radical U.S. Senator. She climbed to power in California with the help of her lover Willie Brown, thirty years her senior and Speaker of the House in California. Brown has been separated from his wife since 1976 (but not divorced), and Kamala is only one of many women with whom he fornicated. Her appointed job required no credentials, no work, and she was “paid the equivalent of a full-time [state] senator for arriving at a one- to two-hour meeting each month.”

A Republican member of the state assembly at the time said, “Screwing the speaker has its rewards. Stevie Wonder could have seen through that play.” However, whatever hours she has logged in bed, she is far more dangerous to America than Hillary.

Senator Harris went after Judge Kavanaugh relentlessly like a pit bull going after a porterhouse steak. She believed the unsupported, unreal, and unchaste charges because “a woman would never lie about such a thing.” Now that it is to her benefit, she refuses to believe the senate aide’s accusation of Biden—because it is in her interest not to believe.

There is little benefit of listing all the decadent, dangerous, and deadly positions Kamala has taken; however, her willingness to be on the ticket with Biden, who has refused to answer a charge of sexual abuse, shows her lack of character. She has always played to the gallery and reverses positions to meet her immediate needs. During the primary race, she believed Joe was guilty of sexual abuse of his senate aide Tara Reade. Now, she is partnered with a predator! That used to be known as being two-faced and would require her spending extra time each day putting makeup on her two faces.

Before the Never-Trumpers and Hate-Trumpers remind us again of Trump’s aggressive, appalling, and adulterous affairs, he never slept around to his political or monetary advantage. However, moral issues do not seem to concern most people.

On the political issues alone, the Biden-Harris ticket would literally destroy America! So, the choice is simple.

America deserves and must have more decent, qualified, honest officials. Still, mail-in-voting will only make a bad problem even worse, allowing into office many incompetent, indecent, and ignominious scalawags and lowlifes. It is no surprise our cities, states, and nation are a mess.

Headlines on July 24, 2020, in USSA News screamed, “Democratic Ex-Congressman Charged With Rigging Votes, Bribery, Falsifying Records And Obstruction.” The article revealed that a former congressman had been charged by the federal government with ballot stuffing, bribery, and obstruction. Michael Myers, 77, was charged with conspiring with and bribing a former elections judge in Philadelphia to add votes to favored candidates over several elections.

Yet, we are told over and over that voting fraud is no problem, but public facts disprove that.

According to Judicial Watch’s analysis of data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) this year, “there are 378 counties nationwide that have more voter registrations than citizens living there and old enough to vote.” I’m math deficient, but I don’t think that is possible.

“According to one study, by News21, there have been 2,068 cases of alleged election fraud since 2000.” Yet, Democrats declare there is very little election fraud!

Electronic voting was supposed to improve the election process in making voting more efficient, quicker, and less fraud, but Rhode Island voters uncovered fraud. Rock Island County Republican voters gathered outside of the Rock Island County Clerk’s office on Friday, October 24, alleging a voting machine switched their vote. “Voters said when they selected a candidate on the electronic voting machine, the machine would switch their vote to the opposing candidate.” Is that fraud, or is it failure since Democrats had the same problem?

Voting machines are not as reliable as touted to be according to the Salina Journal on November 26, 2014 issue. “A malfunction of electronic voting equipment left 5,207 votes out of the original Nov. 4 Saline County, Kansas vote total.”

Brad Friedman of the very liberal Huffington Post admitted, “What we have here is an extraordinarily compelling case that our electoral system has gone terribly wrong…We’ve got one election after another that makes no sense whatsoever. They may have been rigged, they may have failed due to error – (but because they can’t be audited) it’s 100 percent faith-based voting.” This is the reason we now print out our machine ballot in Georgia, sign, and deposit it.

Recently, a local television station experimented with vote-by-mail, and it exposed the deficiencies of the system. WRDW in Philadelphia sent 100 “mock ballots” from across the city to a post office box set up specifically for the test. The results showed 21 percent of the votes hadn’t been delivered within the same city after four days. Some mailed a week prior were also missing.

The Times report goes on to reveal voter corruption in Texas, Indiana, Oklahoma, Kentucky, and Wisconsin. Yet, dishonest, desperate, and distressed Democrats keep telling us that there is no problem with voter fraud.

On August 8, the media reported, “more than 223,000 mail-in ballots sent to registered voters in Clark County, Nevada, were bounced as “undeliverable” in the state’s June primary election, newly released data reveals.”

Also, on August 8, the New York City Board of Elections disqualified 84,208 vote-by-mail ballots in the June 23 Democratic presidential primary, “according to a report cited Wednesday evening by the New York Post.

It is obvious to anyone deaf, dumb, and blind that mail-in-voting is not reliable. So, even the most rabid Democrat can understand that fact.

The Washington Times reported on voter fraud in Virginia. “A study by the watchdog Public Interest Legal Foundation found in just eight Virginia counties, 1,046 alien non-citizens successfully registered to vote.” But it gets worse. “Nearly 43,000 voters in Pennsylvania had potentially duplicate registrations in either Pennsylvania or other states.”

Another longtime problem, especially among Democrats, is the strange determination of dead people to vote. The Times reported on this phenomenon: “A report in Denver exposed multiple incidents in recent years where dead Coloradans were still voting.” But then, dead Democrats have been voting in Chicago for decades.

This November election, because of the hatred of Donald Trump, there will be massive problems: lost ballots, stolen ballots, late ballots, machine failures, machine malfunction, intimidation, multiple votes from the same people, alien voters, and of course, many dead people will rise and vote—all Democrats.

This week the Detroit News reported that Michigan clerks rejected 846 mailed ballots during the August 4 primary “because the voter was dead.” But the Democrats keep saying there is little voter fraud.

I just heard the shocking, surprising, and even startling news that my lifetime Republican cousin in Cook County, Illinois, is voting Democrat this November. But it would never happen if he were still alive.

A quote from one of my ebooks dealing with voter fraud is very appropriate here:

We stumble along to democracy’s demise, following along behind those “boys” from the Democratic clubhouse in Chicago. Two of their finest were in a graveyard in the middle of the night, copying names from tombstones to bring them back to life, at least politically. One of them fell two rows behind the other in getting the names.

“What’s the matter?” shouted the name-taker in the lead. “Hurry it up, will you?”

His teammate, who was lagging behind, complained, “The name on this tombstone is one of those long, complicated ones, probably Polish.”
“Well,” shouted the other, “Forget about that one. Go on to the next one.”
In a burst of righteous democratic zeal, the laggard yelled, “What do you mean, ‘Go on to the next one’? This guy has as much right to vote as anybody else in this graveyard!”

Alas, there is more truth than humor in that apocryphal incident. With vote-by-mail making it even easier for the dead to vote, we could be on a downward slide into the darkest days of our republic.

CNN opined, there is very, very little evidence of any sort of widespread voter fraud in the country.” They chastised Trump for declaring vote-by-mail would result in cheating, pointing out that he had voted absentee ballot. Absentee voting is no problem, but there is a huge difference in that and everyone voting by mail. It has even been stated that ballots be provided for every person in the country, with no mention of citizenship or age. Or voter registration. It is an engraved invitation for illegal voting.

Any Republican voting for vote-by-mail is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

]]> 0