Look, I am pleased that Harvey is in jail and has been toppled from his perch. About a hundred women have accused him of sexual misconduct. I am pleased that women are speaking out and revealing sexual predators out there. After all, I have a wife and many daughters, daughter-in-law, granddaughters, and great granddaughters so I want them all safe from rapists. As a legislator, I even tried to get rapists imprisoned for life without possibility of parole or pardon. I tried to require life in prison because the death penalty was not available at the time.

So, I don’t have to prove my bona fides as to my respect and concern for women.

Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance said, “Weinstein is a vicious, serial, sexual predator who used his power to threaten, rape, assault, trick, humiliate and silence his victims.” No doubt that is a correct characterization but that does not prove rape in specific cases. Weinstein was a quid looking for a quo and the “ladies” were a quo looking for a quid.

It’s the oldest profession in the world.

Vance really proved himself a loyal devotee to the screaming feminists by saying, “This is a new day. Rape is rape whether the survivor reports within an hour, within a year or perhaps never. It’s rape despite the complicated dynamics of power and consent after an assault. It’s rape even if there is no physical evidence.”

If that insane, illogical, and illegal concept takes hold nationwide, dating is dead and any man is a fool if he is ever alone with a woman.

What disturbs me is that sane people assume that a woman’s rape accusation demands belief without any proof. Wow, we’re not on a slippery slope; we’ve already landed in a garbage dump.

Isn’t it possible, maybe not probable, but possible that some women make false accusations? Isn’t it possible that some women climb into bed with an influential person to further their career or to get a “sugar daddy”? Isn’t it possible that some women can fornicate with a powerful man, then 20 years later accuse him of rape to fund their 401-ks?

To properly come to a correct conclusion of a rape charge, the word must be defined. Webster says rape is “Sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent (by force, deception, while she is asleep, etc.” Another says rape is “forcible violation of a woman.”

The ancient Jews required rape (that demanded the death penalty) victims to yell and resist; however, the female was always presumed to be innocent unless the circumstances proved otherwise. While her resistance might not be successful, it would call attention to any witnesses and make it very clear to the rapist that the act was unwanted, unwilling, and unlawful.

The Bible wanted to be sure that a malicious woman could not charge an innocent man with a crime that required the death penalty. She must protest; however, it appears that many women can have sex for whatever reason then make a rape charge for financial benefit. I suggest that many modern feminists are not concerned with a man’s innocence or guilt.

One accuser, actress Annabella Sciorra testified that Weinstein forced himself into her apartment and assaulted her. “I was trying to get him off me. I was punching him, kicking him.” But did she scream? After all, it was an apartment. Did she report it to police? It sure sounds like rape to me but biblically it is not rape unless she resisted, screamed, and reported it to authorities.

Miriam Haleyi testified that Harvey attacked her in his own apartment, “Every time I tried to get off the bed he would push me back and hold me down.” But did she scream for help? Surely, she would have received help from high class people in the high end apartment. The report does not reveal that she reported him to police. Why did she not do that? Moreover, she emailed him in 2008, signing off with “Lots of love.” That was to her rapist!

Jessica Mann was in a relationship with Weinstein (read: she was willingly fornicating with him) when he raped her in New York City in March of 2013. They had many sexual experiences including a threesome. He showed up at the lobby of her hotel (where he had a room) then, after taking her to his room, commanded her to undress which she did. She was intimidated and fearful. He allegedly raped her but she did not yell for help nor did she report it to authorities. Why not?

Maybe she kept quiet because as reported by the Daily Mail, she said “they had consensual sex after a ‘long negotiation’ and she did it so he couldn’t kill her acting career.” However, she was shocked when he did a Golder Shower on her. After all, she wasn’t totally without character. After the alleged rape she sent him her new phone numbers five times to stay in contact!

Mann testified that Weinstein raped her again later that year in a Los Angeles hotel room yet according to reporting by USA Today, “She continued to have a friendly email relationship with the fallen mogul for years after, which the defense attempted to use against Mann: showing the court dozens of messages from Mann to Weinstein saying ‘I love you’ and calling him ‘a blessing in my life.’” She told him their sex was best she ever had despite him “urinating on her.”

Wait a minute! A rape victim is in her rapist’s hotel room a few months later! And she tells him he, the rapist, has been a “blessing” in her life. And she loves him! Come, come, only a fool or an unhinged feminist would believe that was rape. Sex, but not rape.

Mann swore that she lied to numerous people when she declared that Weinstein “validated” her, “understands” her, was “nothing but good” to her, and made her “feel so fabulous and beautiful.” That praise of a “rapist” doesn’t sound like a rape victim. Additionally, she spent the next night with a friend so she could celebrate her “rapist’s” birthday the following day!

That sure doesn’t pass the smell test. In fact, the offensive odor would gag a maggot.

Moreover, none of these “ladies” got tested for an STD following their sexual encounter with Harvey the Pig. That is incredibly stupid.

This case is considered a big victory for the #MeToo movement but I think it is a threat to every man in America and to every woman if it is assumed that she never lies.

This case proves to me that all slime-balls don’t always have a beard; some come in skirts and high heels.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

In my column, I took the position that a false accusation can destroy a man’s family, friends, finances, and future. All sexual assaults should be seriously looked at and any rapist should be executed as they were in bygone years in America and most nations of the world.

As a member of the Indiana House of Representatives, I introduced a bill that would put rapists in prison for life with no possibility of parole. I antagonized my friend the governor when I removed his authority to pardon future rapists. A reporter asked me why I introduced a bill that required life in prison for rape and I replied, “Because I know I can’t get the death penalty.” I did not win her vote as “favorite legislator of the year.”

With that background, I can hardly be accused of hating women or being soft on rape.

Most of the screamers took umbrage with my statement that rape “is having sex with a woman while she screams for help. No scream, no rape according to Deuteronomy 22:23-24. Did she bite his hand? Poke him in the eye? Women know instinctively how to protect their honor: screaming, shouting, slapping, spitting, slugging, and stabbing with a finger, pencil, or hat pin. Since she did not cry out or stab him, I will not believe her without a film of the event.”

A man called me and started screaming, “I’m a Ph.D. and have read the same books as you. The Bible passage you quoted requires death for both persons. What if she was too scared to scream? Have you ever been raped? Maybe she was unable to fight? Maybe she was a mute.” He went on and on but he refused to consider that no one should be found guilty without corroborating evidence. No one, not even a conservative.

“Cathy” called and sounded like an old friend. “Hi, Don. This is Cathy and I want to know what you meant by your Kavanaugh column.” I asked if we were friends or knew each other and she admitted we did not. I told her that her question was silly since I made it very clear what the column was all about: you can’t find a man guilty without corroborating evidence to prove guilt. And I was horrified that anyone would even consider such a thing. She used some very vulgar words to characterize me and hung up when I challenged her to tell me seriously if all women can always be believed. She called back in a few minutes and said, “Don, don’t try to make decisions based on a 3,000-year-old book.”

Well, everyone has to have a foundation for what he or she believes and I choose to believe the Bible as being the inspired, inerrant, infallible, and indispensable standard for my life. Now, because I believe in a perfect Book does not make me or all my decisions perfect since I am a flawed individual. But I do have a standard that helps me make minor and major decisions in my life.

So, the Bible and thousands of years of history support the fact that a rape victim must resist or there is no rape. My critics have presented all kinds of scenarios to prove the Bible wrong: what if she is incapacitated, she is deaf and dumb, she is too scared, etc. However, that’s covered in God’s command for the Jews to do justice for all under all conditions.

The Jews did not have police or prison system until the time of the Kings. Egypt did have prisons as per Joseph in prison after being falsely accused of rape. However, the Jews did have a justice system that included Cities of Refuge. Furthermore, Deut. 16:18 commanded Israel to appoint highly qualified judges to administer justice to the aggrieved and to enforce weights and measurements in each town. When they found anything wrong, they brought the offender before the magistrate at the city gate (where business was transacted and cases decided in the East), and the offender was punished by the officer on the spot.

The following verse warns judges, “Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift.” The judges were to do right to all and wrong to none. The judge’s personal opinion didn’t matter. The poverty or prosperity or position of of the accused and accuser were to be totally irrelevant.

Screaming feminists obviously do not believe in that high view of justice for all. Well, that’s not exactly true because if they were the accused, they would be quoting the Bible, the Koran, the Book of Mormon, and the Talmud. They would parrot even the U.S. Constitution in their own defense! Maybe even the babblings of ancient Druids to gain any support.

When rape occurred, the two principals were brought before the city fathers who compiled the facts, listened to the charges, heard the witnesses, and made a decision. If a maid were deaf, then of course, she could not cry out and she would not be complicit in any illegal sex activity. The rapist was then judged to be executed and was then stoned, the normal and the most ancient form of execution. The victim and any witnesses cast the first stones followed by other citizens. It was not vigilantism but an organized, methodical, and judicial procedure.

During the hearings, I believed Ford was honest but mistaken about her attacker. I felt sorry and pity for her; however, it is now my opinion that she is a liar and tool of evil, unprincipled Democrats. She lied about her fear of flying; she lied about being claustrophobic; she lied about the polygraph test; she lied about her ex-boyfriend’s credit card and charged $600 on it; and she lied about when her second front door was installed. My daddy the philosopher with a sixth grade education said, “Anyone who will lie will do anything.” Daddy was right.

Ford should be fired from her university position and get a job as a greeter at Target.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Everyone must keep in mind that there is a miniscule possibility that her accusations are true just as there is a small chance that there are little green men on Mars.

I have strong feelings about such issues and want justice to prevail. I’m not interested in some leftwing or rightwing agenda. I wish to go on record as saying that I have a wife, three daughters, and too many granddaughters and great-granddaughters to count, so I am very pro-female.

I’ve been called a purist, a prude, and even a Puritan. None are true but since age 15, I have kept my hands to myself and strictly followed the “Billy Graham and Jerry Falwell rule” never to be alone with an unrelated woman.

A false accusation can destroy a man’s family, finances, and future. All sexual assaults should be seriously looked at and any rapist should be executed as in bygone years and any false accuser should be branded with an L on her forehead and horse-whipped out of town (figuratively).

Only fools or fanatics or feminists (but then I repeat myself) say that all female sexual accusations against men should be believed. Period. Under those circumstances then Bill Clinton is a rapist after all. Will feminists demand accountability from him and Hillary for their shameful treatment of Bill’s accusers?

Concerning automatically believing all female accusers, comedian and writer Kurt Metzger factiously said, “ALL women are as reliable as my bible! A book that, much like a women, is incapable of lying!”

But then anyone is capable of lying.

Must I drag up the Duke Lacrosse incident (three athletes were falsely accused of raping a black stripper), the University of Virginia case (seven fraternity brothers were falsely accused of gang-raping a female student), and the Tawana Brawley case (four white men were falsely accused of raping a teenage black girl). I could go on and on but will not. Just realize that there are numerous horrific false charges that have destroyed innocent people. It is shocking that Liberals out there don’t care about justice, truth, honesty, and fairness.

According to female fascist progressives, all the above men, found innocent, are really guilty because three females said so.

The young men falsely charged will have to live with the stigma all their lives. The attorneys’ fees, the lost jobs, the lost tuition, the loss of credit hours, the stress—how are those losses to be compensated?

Some have said that false rape charges are rare; however, studies prove they are rather frequent. The Rumney study (2006) suggests that between 10-50% of rape allegations are false. The Kanin study (1994) arrived at an estimate of 40%. Other studies such as Stewart (1981) have arrived at figures as high as 90% that were false.

The FBI reports that between 4,400 and 5,100 allegations of rape every year are deemed false.

Please understand that a false rape accusation is a major attack upon a man for which few women are sentenced after the discovery of the false charge. The man usually loses his reputation, his job, friends, and often his family—yet was totally innocent. Plus, if found guilty when he is in fact innocent, he spends many years in prison where he is often raped!

If an innocent man is accused but does not go to prison, he must live with the stigma for a lifetime; it becomes a sentence without a conviction. Whether Kavanaugh is confirmed or not, where does he go to get his reputation back?

Most false accusations cause the woman no problem unless she does it a few times then usually gets a slap on the wrist. Maybe a large brand on their forehead might be a good warning for others who are loose and free with their lips. Maybe the L should be real!

Some common sense definitions are necessary regarding this accusation. Rape is having sex with a woman while she screams for help. No scream, no rape according to Deuteronomy 22:23-24. Ford says Kavanaugh held his hand over her mouth so did she scream for help when his hand was elsewhere?

After all, it was in a bedroom of a house; surely, one of the other 4 teens could have heard him scream when she bit his hand. Did she bite his hand? Poke him in the eye? Women know instinctively how to protect their honor: screaming, shouting, slapping, spitting, slugging, and stabbing with a finger, pencil, or hat pin. Since she did not cry out or stab him, I will not believe her without a film of the event.

Moreover, Matthew 18:16 clearly commands that there must be at least two witnesses to validate a charge against a person. This is a repeat of Old Testament law. Ford has no witnesses. The other man who was allegedly there, Mark Judge said, “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way.” This week, another teen that was supposed to be there Patrick J. Smyth said the incident did not happen. That should settle it; now let’s all go home, pull down the shades, and get some sleep.

Well, we all know about Potiphar’s wife who falsely reported to her husband that Joseph tried to rape her. She had tried in vain to get Joseph into her bed, then she sought to characterize him as rapist to her husband. In that, she succeeded. No doubt she felt resentful because she felt repelled and reproved by Joseph’s virtue. She accused him to his peers who no doubt resented Joseph’s high esteem from his master.

Not everyone who has a spotless conscience can keep a spotless name if a conniving woman is determined to smear him. It is no new thing for the best of men to be falsely accused of the worst of crimes by those who themselves are the worst of criminals.

Joseph, although totally innocent, was sent to prison for many years; but after a difficult time he became the number two man in Egypt, second only to Pharaoh!

Lessons to be learned are many. Brett Kavanaugh should not have been drinking let alone been drunk if he was there. And why was a 15-year-old girl at such a party? Why did she go to a bedroom with two drunk or sober boys? Was she drinking? Had she been sexually promiscuous?

Has she or her Washington-based attorney received any substantial sums of money from any person or group? Why did she wait so long to make the charges? Why make the charges anonymously? And why wait until this time to make her charges? Has she supported radical leftwing causes other than the Democrat Party, ActBlue (partly funded by George Soros) and the presidential bid of Bernie Sanders?

Why should she be more credible than the judge who has a lifetime of impeccable service?

Ford said the other boy jumped on top of Brett putting considerable weight on her and the two boys “scrapped with each other.” Wait, in middle of an attempted rape, with hormones raging, Brett allegedly interrupted his rape to tussle with a friend! Doesn’t pass the smell test.

USA Today reported that “more than 200 former students of the school signed a letter in support of Ford,” but the paper did not reveal that many of those people were at the school long after she was there. The article did not mention that of 65 female high school contemporaries of Kavanaugh’s signed a letter vouching for his integrity. Plus all the female law clerks that worked for the judge have vouched for his integrity and character.

A horrific thought: if Dr. Ford is telling the truth and can convince the committee of that then a sexual groper will return to the Circuit Court!

Come on, let’s have some transparency and accountability. Being a woman is not, absolutely not, enough reason to accept her word over Kavanaugh’s.

Senator Orrin Hatch suggested that maybe it is simply that Christine Blasey Ford, in her recollections, must be “mixed up.” It is reported that she passed a polygraph test given by “a former FBI agent” but I want to know more about that.

Even if she passed the polygraph test, that does not prove her accusations valid. She may honestly believe what she is saying is reality when it is not.

I’ve had some experience with being deceived. My daughter and I were alone one afternoon when I heard something break. I yelled, “Tammy, what happened?” What had happened was my small daughter broke an expensive vase I had purchased in Athens, Greece. She pretended she did not know what happened. “It just fell off the table,” she said. I can still see her standing in the door of my office with guilt all over her face. Like most people, she wanted to blame others instead of taking the responsibility. I have told that story all over the world, but it didn’t happen that way. It wasn’t Tammy; it was Suzan. Suzan is adamant that it was her not her younger sister who was the culprit.

However, I can clearly see Tammy in my doorway. I could pass a polygraph test; but it would still not make Tammy guilty or Suzan innocent. I have been wrong about that vase for 35 years until I was proved wrong. Doesn’t matter what a test might show. Whatever the test results, “It Ain’t Necessarily So!”

Same with Judge Kavanaugh.

The Senators should listen to Dr. Ford politely then vote to recommend to the full Senate that he be the ninth justice on the U. S. Supreme Court.

Even with the miniscule possibility that Kavanaugh is guilty which I admit could be true since everyone involved is human, he should still be on the highest court. After all, isn’t redemption possible anymore? Can’t a man see the error of his evil ways and change? Yes, but we are told that would mean we would have a liar on the U.S. Supreme Court! Big deal. You think the other eight are innocent?

Let’s stop the charade. Tammy didn’t do it; neither did Brett.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Everyone will agree that male and female aggressions are ever with us disconnecting families, disrupting the workplace, disturbing society–and dumping rapists, killers, and thieves into the prisons.

All Conservative theologians teach that sin was inflicted upon us by the first family’s disobedience to God’s clear command. The result of that disobedience is the cause of all pugnacious activities. However, most people don’t believe this in our day and some liberals declare that all violent behavior is an abnormal activity in flawed persons (of course, everyone is flawed) or it is a response to provocation or stimulation. Then, if those provocations can be identified or eliminated, all violence could be expelled from the earth.

They are wrong.

When God created the world and man, He placed Adam in the Garden of Eden to dress and keep it. All the other creatures had sexual counterparts but not Adam so He created Eve to be Adam’s “help meet.” When Satan initiated the Fall, he used a serpent to convince Eve to disobey God. Satan approached Eve, not Adam and when they sinned by disobeying God, Adam, not Eve was reproached by God. The man had to accept most of the responsibility.

Satan saw Eve as vulnerable and God saw Adam as responsible as head of the nascent human race. As a consequence of their sin, Eve would deliver children in sorrow and pain and Adam would have to work hard fighting the birds, bugs and beetles, thistles and thorns, drought and downpours to produce enough food to sustain them. All Bible-oriented denominations used to believe that.

I still do.

It is interesting that the couple, newly sinners, showed the very human quality of placing blame rather than accepting responsibility. When confronted by God for their sin, Adam blamed Eve. She then blamed the serpent, who of course, didn’t have a leg to stand on.

Note the deterioration: It is generally agreed by conservative theologians that Creation took place about 4000 B.C.; A few hundred years later Cain killed Abel; Over the next five hundred years violence and wickedness accelerated to the point of provoking God to destroy the world with a global flood about 2400 B.C.

Adam’s son, Cain was an Alpha Male or as Chad Howse wrote, “the real man, a man’s man, a warrior, a stand-up guy. It doesn’t matter what you call him, he’s a leader, the guy others look to for motivation, inspiration, and often with a hint of jealousy.” Such a dude was Cain who with his drive, desire, and determination to escape his family and belligerent background, left family and friends to build Enoch, the world’s first city. Cain tried to escape his reputation without success. As Matthew Henry commented, “those who depart from God cannot find rest anywhere else.”

Note the progression and rapid growth in violence and especially the development of female aggression following the Flood. Even with a new start, there was failure.

In the very earliest days of civilization Nimrod was an aggressive male being “a mighty hunter” who built the Tower of Babel in present day Iraq. Flavius Josephus wrote that it was likely under his direction that the building of Babel and its tower began.

The first indication of warfare is seen about 2084 B.C. in Genesis 14 when a coalition of kings kidnapped Lot along with others and fled the countryside. Abraham, being responsible for his nephew, armed his 318 trained servants and pursued the bad guys almost to Damascus. He fought the enemy and brought back Lot, his family, and servants and all the bounty. All modern warfare started at that time.

Of course, there was fighting in various parts of the occupied world from the beginning but in 1457 B.C., the first detailed account of an actual battle comes to us from the ancient Egyptians. It seems a series of fiefdoms in present day Syria and Israel rose up against their Egyptian masters in the Battle of Megiddo. In modern day Israel, the site will be the place of the Battle of Armageddon in the last days.

Aggressive women are seen in 2067 B.C. when Sodom was destroyed and Lot’s daughters had sex with their drunk father “that we may preserve seed of our father.” This was the first time the written record shows females being sexually aggressive. Then, in 1898 B.C., Tamar deceived Judah, her father-in-law into thinking she was a prostitute and slept with him. Nine years later, Joseph, master of Potiphar’s house, refused to be seduced by Potiphar’s wife as he fled with his coat left in her hands. Obviously, females can be aggressive and make false accusations against a totally innocent man! That’s been true from almost the beginning of time.

That fact must be constantly reiterated, even shouted from the house tops.

God created male and female each with a personality, potential, and propensities to perpetuate the human race. He made man to be strong to protect the family and to provide daily sustenance. He would have to work hard to meet the needs of the family. Men are to protect, provide, and preserve the family unit.

The woman was given persistence, patience, and placable qualities to round out the family’s needs. Men are made different from women–but you knew that. Women don’t need upper body strength as men do. Some argue that the differences in the genders is a result of millions of years of evolutionary progress while others tell us it is simply the original creation plan. Each gender is made to accomplish the reason for their creation–the continuation of the human race.

In recent months, men realized the rules between men and women have changed after some male pigs took advantage of their position, power, and prestige to grope, fondle, kiss, and rape women. Only God knows how many accusations were false and prompted by revenge, hatred, or publicity. Only a fool or a screaming feminist refuses to admit some of the charges were untrue. False accusations have damaged and destroyed some innocent men and nothing on earth can help them.

Many in authority have taken the position that a false rape charge never happens but those people will believe anything. They think Pepsi will sell for a nickel again, mainline China will retake Taiwan, the Democrats will come to their senses and cooperate for the good of the nation, and Elvis Presley, Jimmy Hoffa, Judge Crater, and Amelia Earhart will be found eating an escoviche dinner with adult beverages at a beachside bistro in Jamaica.

If men get to where they have no interest in women then the future of the race is in jeopardy. Men, by their nature, are aggressive in all areas of life; however, that aggression must be harnessed and directed by caution, kindness, gallantry, honesty, and grace. A man must never force his attention upon any woman and if he does, the full force of the law should hit him like a pile of bricks. However, courtship and romance must never be taboo or out of date. For France to make it illegal for a man to ask a woman for her phone number ($435.00 fine) is insane.

But then, that happens in France.

The left fears, hates, and tries to castrate strong, white men and while that could solve an immediate problem it sure does not bode well for the future.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

But I do have an explanation.

When I was in the third grade, I, well, I was somewhat indiscrete with Carol sitting in front of me. As she sat down after sharpening her pencil, I rubbed her bare shoulder and I got a quick response. I carry her imprint on my left knee to this day! She turned and jabbed me in the leg with a very sharp pencil driving the lead deep into my flesh. It is still there next to my scar from surgery for a football injury I received a few years later. I learned to keep my hands to myself! For a while!

When I was in the seventh grade, I was dancing with Nancy in her living room while her parents were upstairs. The music was playing and forgetting the experience with Carol, I got too free with my hands and Nancy pushed me through her storm door—her glass storm door. That was my last dance.

That did it! I was convinced, and committed if not yet converted. I would never impose myself on a female again. Then, when I was converted to Christ and called to preach, I made the decision to not touch and hug the ladies and never to be alone with any unrelated female. I even expect a lady to extent her hand for a common handshake before I extend my hand.

Any man who assumes he has permission to be anything other than courteous, even chivalrous to a lady is a pig who deserves any punishment permitted by law. In fact, I have always believed that a rapist should be executed after a fair, fast trial! I introduced a bill in the Indiana House of Representatives that would require life in prison for rape with the stipulation that the governor could not pardon the felon or give him clemency. Everyone came after my scalp even my “friend” the Governor! He was angry because I was trying to limit his authority while almost everyone else thought I was mistreating rapists by the stiff sentence!

A reporter for the Indianapolis Star asked me why I chose the “extreme life sentence” for rapists and I replied, “Because I can’t get the death penalty!” That penalty would sure eliminate repeat crimes.

I am suspicious of any woman who admits to sleeping with a creep twenty years ago because she was young or was intimidated or was fearful of losing a job or was fearful of not getting a job or would hurt someone’s feelings! That is pure balderdash and won’t pass the smell test. Face it: if a male is an aggressor or rapist, then an unresisting, uncomplaining female is a whore.

The whole #metoo movement needs some parameters. There is a massive difference in introductory conversation with a female, flirting, harassment, hugging/kissing, and rape. The problem is too many people consider them equal infractions. Conversation, even casual flirting with a female is normal and a fact of life for thousands of years.

While it is true that many women have been harmed, almost destroyed by male aggressors, there may be an equal number of men who have been destroyed by angry, vengeful women helped by a bevy of avaricious attorneys.

Actor Morgan Freeman has been accused by CNN that he “sexually harassed or was inappropriate towards women.” CNN reporter Chloe Melas claims Freeman “was sexually inappropriate to her at a press junket” in 2017. One woman said she was the target of demeaning comments by Freeman while another said he looked her up and down and wished that he was in the television studio with her.” I don’t think looking a woman “up and down” or being “sexually inappropriate” are felonies. They are unmanly, ungentlemanly, and unpleasant but not unlawful. In my day, looking at a female, not necessarily with lustful intentions, was known as ogling or eyeing an interesting female. It was also known as gawking, gaping, gazing, or basically looking ridiculous while trying to make an impression.

Another woman charged, Morgan would “come over to my desk to say ‘hi’ and he’d just stand there and stare at me. (More ogling!) He would stare at my breasts.” Most people would agree that it is not illegal or immoral or illicit to say “hi” or even stare at a woman’s breasts. Maybe crass or crude.

CNN spoke to two male witnesses who each reported a separate occasion in which Freeman asked women to twirl! Wow, to twirl! And in public! Maybe I don’t know what it means to twirl.

At a party Freeman went up to women in a circle and would “stand maybe within an inch of their face and just look them up and down and not say anything, and then would move on to the next woman and he’d stand like within an inch of their face and look them up and down and not say anything, and it was really, really strange.” Strange, silly, and stupid but not illegal.

Freeman described what an accuser was wearing during their first meeting, saying, “She had on a dress cut to here.” He added, “She wants to be thought of as serious but you can’t get away from the short dresses.” She was devastated! Maybe I’ve missed something and someone will explain what was illegal or oppressive about that statement. Fact is, I agree with it! I don’t think any decent woman would wear a short skirt with a split up to “here.”

It was charged, “He’d say things like ‘I’d like to have an hour with her’ or make vulgar and sexual comments about women,” the former employee said. Furthermore, “He would be verbally inappropriate and it was just shocking.” I don’t think it is illegal to want to be with a woman for an hour and even the vulgar and sexual comments are not illegal although they would be disgusting, demeaning, and debasing.

Another charge is that he made women feel “uncomfortable.” Last time I checked, though undesirable, it was not illegal.

My wife worked for a major national bank when her boss kissed her on the cheek much to the delight of the office staff. She simply slapped him in the chops as his face flushed with embarrassment. That took care of that! It didn’t happen again. No cops, lawyers, investigators, prosecutors, or judges were involved. No money changed hands.

A woman should “put a man in his place” (and for the rapists, it hasn’t been dug yet) by not dressing like a street walker, being modest, never suggestive, and letting all know she does not come with a price tag. She is not for sale to any person, for any price, or for any promise and if a male pig crosses the line from simple flirting and general male/female banter to sexual aggression, she will give him a black eye or split lip.

That will solve all the harassment except for the most aggressive pigs. Jail should take care of the others.

Look, I am not an advocate for vulgar and aggressive men or rude and crude men; but the distinction must be made between what is illegal, indecent, immoral, and insulting. Morgan is not the kind of person I would want to have as a dinner guest but I will have to hear much more “evidence” than that above to get him fired or jailed.

But then, I too was a sexual aggressor. I was just younger than Freeman. Much younger. We must remember that there are truths and half-truths and while I was a sexual aggressor, that was not the whole truth. When reading of all the sexual accusations, remember you must know the whole story.

Beware of a half-truth; you may have gotten the wrong half.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.