Amnesty is a program pushed by pathetic progressives, even Evangelical progressives, to decriminalize millions of illegal aliens giving them citizenship. Many of the migrants are diseased, deranged, and dangerous as thousands of Americans have discovered. With this vast number of people from other cultures, languages, and religions, we are seeing a massive shift in American culture not experienced in our history.

My critics declare that I am unkind, unreasonable, and even unchristian for opposing amnesty and sanctuary cities; however, their charge is not based on solid reasoning or the Scripture. They distort the Scripture to make it fit their unreasonable, unconstitutional, and unbiblical demands.

We are told that the illegal immigrants are trying to escape Islamic tyranny, gangs, and poverty so America should make room for them since we are a Christian nation. Well, first of all, only people can become Christians; however, a nation can become Christianized or influenced by the Bible. Secondly, almost all my critics and supporters of amnesty and unlimited immigration confuse what a person should do with what a nation should do. All people who interpret ancient literature know one of the first questions that must be answered is, “To whom was this written and why.”

Pro-amnesty Evangelicals are not asking that question. Exodus 23:9 is usually used by the Bible-twisters to support their cause; however they use a flawed hermeneutic to build their case. “Also thou shalt not oppress a stranger: for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.” That passage is dealing with a person’s obligation, not national obligations. Of course, those religious leaders who use that verse know that but are being deceitful to establish a very shaky principle.

It is easy to prove my contention about this being a personal obligation. Verse 3 of that chapter warns the ancient Jews (and us today), “Neither shalt thou countenance (give approval) a poor man in his cause.” Moses was warning us about showing favor to a person because of his condition, whether rich or poor. We are not to be swayed by our emotions but by justice. The ancient maxim is, “Let justice be done, though the heavens should be dissolved.”

I heard one of the great evangelists of the last generation say, “Do right though the stars fall from Heaven.” The illegal aliens have not done right. They resolutely broke our laws and crashed our gates and forced themselves in front of others who have followed our laws and procedures. There are four million people who are waiting in line legally. The illegal aliens refused to wait. Their arrogance and audaciousness is astounding.

Furthermore, no one will tell me just how many immigrants are we expected to admit? Is there a limit? Do we wait until the ship is sinking before we realize that there are limits? If an overcrowded ship goes down then everyone is lost. Do gooders (as opposed to those who do good) are not the most logical thinkers.

Jim Wallis (another do gooder who doesn’t think logically) is the president of the leftwing religious outfit Sojourners who declared, “Evangelicals finally realize that how we treat the stranger, these 11 million undocumented people, [No, it is now 22 million] is how we treat Christ himself.” Jim must have been sleeping during his hermeneutics class in seminary because he did not get that from the Bible. Of course, Christians are to be kind, gracious, helpful, but that does not translate into being suckers, softies, and sycophants. We could really show how kind, gentle, gracious, and generous—as well as unwise, unreliable, and unhinged—we are by emptying all our prisons!

Radical Andrew Gillum, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and others want to empty prisons while Joe Biden pledged to cut the U.S. incarceration rate by more than 50%.

And the most hard core felons could move into their neighborhoods.

Wallis went on to say the leadership of the Evangelical Immigration Table (EIT which includes the National Association of Evangelicals and the Ethics and Religious Liberty Convention of the Southern Baptist Convention) and the evangelical community have “never been more united on an issue.” Jim has one of two problems: he is either disingenuous or uninformed because the vast majority of evangelicals want illegal immigrants to go home. A Pulse Opinion poll revealed that 78% of Evangelicals surveyed believed that the biblical command to “love the stranger” means “to treat the stranger humanely while applying the rule of law.” Additionally, a recent Pew Research Center poll showed only 25% of white Evangelicals believed the U.S. had a “responsibility” to accept refugees into the country.

Wallis is wrong again but then, he is used to that.

Christians are commanded by Christ to treat others the way we want to be treated. Let’s return to Exodus 23:9: “Also thou shalt not oppress a stranger: for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.” But that has nothing to do with illegal aliens. Fuzzy preachers neglect to tell their congregations that the Jews were in Egypt by invitation and were not trespassers as our modern invaders. In fact, the Jews were special guests as long as Joseph was alive and a friendly Pharaoh reigned.

They were strangers in Egypt (but not illegal aliens) even though they ended up as slaves. These verses do not apply to the immigration issue even slightly. Illegal aliens purposefully chose to break our laws, even arrogantly demanding entrance into our nation expecting to be cared for upon their arrival. They are not sojourners or strangers but scoundrels and are encouraged to break our laws by many leftwing religious groups, even some Evangelicals.

Of course, some of these leftwing Evangelical groups get paid $1 850.00 for each immigrant they settle in an American city. Follow the money.

Other desperate defenders of open borders tell us Joseph, Mary, and baby Jesus were migrants fleeing into another land for safety so American immigration laws should reflect that fact. However, it is not a fact. The family were not aliens since they were part of the Roman Empire as was Egypt at that time. Moreover, it was perfectly legal to travel from one Roman province to another. Loose Evangelicals should be ashamed of their distortion of Scripture to support a very tenuous position.

While the Evangelicals are correct in that the Kingdom of God has no borders and welcomes all who qualify through faith in Christ, the city of Jerusalem, the nation of Israel, and all other nations, states, cities, and villages and their gated estates do have distinct borders.

This is another example of how far left many Evangelicals are. Evangelical churches are wallowing in diversity and choking on heresy.

Many soft Evangelical leaders are hypocrites but it pays well.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

The meddlers are Evangelical leaders (not their followers) who presume to speak for those Christians foolish enough to follow them. Such leaders, as mentioned above, are guilty of shallow thinking, theology that is faulty, and are threatened with loss of income for those participating in resettling the “refugees.” I don’t doubt that many are sincere but they misuse Scripture to justify wrong, and it is always wrong to twist Scripture to accomplish even a noble result.

They twist the Scripture like a pretzel to make it fit their unreasonable, unconstitutional, and unbiblical demands about amnesty for dreamers. Such scriptural malfeasance is dumb, dangerous, and deadly! Religious leaders should not be talking about amnesty but accountability.

Dreamer-defender Evangelicals are misinterpreting, mishandling, and misusing the Bible to prove their case–unsuccessfully. All people who interpret ancient literature know that the first questions to ask are, “To whom was this written?”; “Who wrote it?”; “Under what circumstances was it written?”; and “When was it written?” Evangelicals are not asking those questions because to do so would defeat their dubious purpose–amnesty and open borders.

Recently, more than fifty Evangelicals signed the “Evangelical Leader Statement of Principles on Dreamers” which was the brainchild of Russell Moore, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commissions of the Southern Baptist Conventions (SBC). Moore is an SBC leader that many in the membership wish would just go away; however, wishing doesn’t work.

Those religious domestic dreamers, commenting on the illegal dreamers asserted that to send illegal aliens (who were brought here by parents) back home is a “moral issue.” They are right since it is immoral to be in a nation illegally. They tell us that a Christian nation would gladly accept the dreamers; however, those people know that only persons can be Christian, not a nation. A nation can show some Christian principles in their laws but only a person can repent and receive Christ.

A few months ago, other Evangelical leaders waltzed down the same primrose path demanding citizenship for dreamers. However, they were trying to drive a square peg into a round hole with a sledge hammer, but it simply won’t fit. The President of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference Samuel Rodriquez opined, “It’s about our Christian faith. It’s about Matthew 25 and Leviticus 19. It’s about finding a way where we can reconcile Romans 13, ‘respecting the rule of law.’” No, like many Evangelicals, he has to misuse, mangle, and misinterpret the Scripture to make it mean what it was never meant to mean.

The Bible twisters almost always use Exodus 23:9 to support their cause of immigration, amnesty, and sanctuary cities; however they use a flawed hermeneutic to build their tenuous case. That verse commands, “Also thou shalt not oppress a stranger: for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.” However, that chapter is dealing with an individual’s obligation to be gracious–not national guidelines for treatment of immigrants. Even novice theologians know that. Of course, those religious leaders who use that verse know what they are doing, but they are desperately trying to give credibility to a very shaky principle.

Verse 3 proves my contention about this being a personal obligation not a national policy. That verse warns the ancient Jews (and us today) that “Neither shalt thou countenance (give approval) a poor man in his cause.” Moses was warning us about showing favor to a person because of his condition, whether rich or poor. We are not to be influenced by our emotions but by justice. The ancient maxim is, “Let justice be done, though the heavens should be dissolved.” I heard one of the great evangelists of the last generation say, “Do right though the stars fall from Heaven.”

Leviticus 19:33 is also used incorrectly: “And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him.” Again, the preceding verses prove that God was giving instructions for personal conduct by warning them not to consume blood; not to get tattoos or pierce their flesh; not to prostitute their daughters; not to break the Sabbath days; not to be involved with sorcery and fortune telling, etc. Then He warned them not to vex a stranger living among them. In fact, Moses went on to say, “thou shalt love him as thyself.”

These verses do not apply to the immigration issue even slightly. Illegal aliens purposefully chose to break our laws, even arrogantly demanding entrance into our nation expecting to be cared for upon their arrival. They are not sojourners or strangers but scoundrels (with a few innocent women and children) and are being encouraged to break our laws by many left wing religious groups, even some Evangelicals.

The senior pastor of Mosaic Church in Memphis said, “We were once the same kind of refugees. Our families come from similar situations.” No, many of these modern “refugees” chose to break the law and many come unvetted, uninvited, and unwanted to America.

Left wing Christians tell us that Jesus was a refugee; however, they don’t seek to prove it since it can’t be done. As a baby, Christ was taken to Egypt for a few weeks until the death of Herod but He was a visitor not a refugee. It seems many religious leaders have no shame when they try to be politically correct even as they are theologically corrupt.

Jews were to be kind to strangers because it was the right thing to do and it would be good for the strangers and good for the nation. Many foreigners visiting Israel were impressed by their faith, freedom, and fairness, and converted to Judaism. New Testament Christians are commanded by Christ to treat others the way they want to be treated.

Left wingers, including many Evangelicals, are belching out anger, angst, and animus as they twist Scripture to support citizenship for dreamers.

My critics declare that I am unkind, unreasonable, and even unchristian for opposing amnesty for dreamers, open borders, and sanctuary cities; however, their charge is not based on solid reasoning or the Scripture. They skew the Scripture to make it fit their unreasonable, unconstitutional, and unbiblical demands.

The dreamer issue is proof that many religious leaders wear pantyhose, silk shorts, shirts with lace around the edge and sniff perfume from frilly handkerchiefs–and are wrongly called men of God! They need to develop strength, stamina, spine, and a scriptural orientation if they are to advise others about the immigration mess.

Boys’ book  Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published by Barbwire Books; to get your copy,  click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Birthed by Obama, DACA stands for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. We are told that it is only right to give citizenship status to the innocent children since it wasn’t their decision to break our immigration laws. But what if a family breaks into Dollywood, Disney World, or Clyde’s Gator Farm without paying. When discovered can they plead that it is only right for them to spend all day without paying or being expelled? Maybe even a free lunch in the name of compassion. After all, they were already there.

I note that DACA zealots all use the same language in their pitch for amnesty and for sure, that’s what it is. Everyone speaks of “kids” and not simply “kids” but “incredible kids” and the strong implication is that they are all brilliant students, normal Americans, dedicated workers, future Ph.Ds; and budding Nobel Prize laureates. Others (less brilliant) are “proud members of the military.” It would almost be un-American to send them home. However, to give them citizenship is saying to the world: sneak into the U.S. as a minor and you will have citizenship. Under chain migration rules, a citizen can bring in his relatives so dreamers’ relatives also become citizens!

I see a major train wreck ahead. Or, to change metaphors, every ship ever constructed has a limit as to the number it can handle–so with a nation. The boat is full. Pull up the ladder.

We are told, “this is the only home they have known,” and they would find it impossible to adjust to the nation of their origin. However, that is not true. Mickey Kaus’ excellent Sept. 12, 2017 column in the Washington Post–yes, that Washington Post–reveals that most came here at 8-12 years of age (and older). Therefore, they were not brought here cradled in a parent’s arms; consequently, they would have little problem with their national language.

Moreover, dreamers would not be totally ignorant of the culture since most of them lived a few years in their homeland. Additionally, unknown to many Americans, a huge number of them came alone. A dreamer is not a dreamer because he or she was brought here by parents. Anyone who came here illegally under age 16 qualifies as a dreamer. Remember all those kids who rode the tops of trains and others who slogged alone across the border? Under Obama’s DACA’s rules to qualify, they were required to enroll in high school but they were not required to continue!

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reveals that much of the propaganda from the promoters of amnesty is totally false. USCIS lists 149 nations from which DACA applicants came and 26 of those have English as the national language! Still others are from nations where English is often used by a large English speaking part of the nation. Furthermore, according to Matt O’Brien in his Issue Brief “at least 36 of the nations of origin listed by USCIS are European.” Most of those nations have very generous welfare programs far superior to the U.S. so a dreamer sent back would not be in financial difficulty.

Nor are they all innocent, academically superior, proud Americans since over 2,000 individuals were convicted of alien smuggling, sexual assault, and other crimes. Their status as dreamers was rightly terminated. Many others are about to be terminated. However, there should be a few exceptions for those who obviously would be a major contribution to America. In other words, select those and put them on the track to eventual citizenship.

The plea about them serving faithfully in the military is also bogus because fewer than 900 DACA recipients joined the military! That means a little more than one tenth of one percent of the total DACA population served in the military. That’s not the message my heart and head were getting.

Moreover, amnesty will only perpetuate more illegal crossings to gain citizenship. They won’t have to “stand in line” to come to America as our daughter-in-law did. She spent years getting her final papers. Now, she would be a fool to spend so much time and money when she could fly into a Mexican border town from Manila and wade one of the shallow spots at the Rio Grande. Voilà, she would become an American under Trump’s plan without waiting or spending money.

Trump is strangely demanding that illegal aliens receive amnesty and eventual citizenship whereas if they were returned to their country of origin, many of them would get much higher benefits than in America. Furthermore, Trump will have to tell true U.S. citizen youth how he can justify illegal aliens taking jobs and educational positions from true citizens.

Matt O’Brian suggested that many of the DACA applicants came from nations that are hostile to the U.S. Moreover, their nations of origin are not known for thorough vetting such as Pakistan, Iran, Venezuela, Libya, Syria, and Yemen. Only a naïve fool suggests that we can be sure no terrorists are embedded in the DACA crowd.

Many politicians and media personalities are saying, “Is it fair to send the DACA kids back to their homeland” but they are asking the wrong question. They should ask, “What is the best decision for America?”

Finally, the number of DACA kids was 800,000 yet President Trump recommended 1.8 million would be covered and on the road to citizenship! Wait a minute! What happened? What did he get for more than doubling the number? Surely, a novice horse trader would expect something in return. In trading, you never give without getting.

President Trump, it is not in America’s best interest to add 1.8 million to a path for citizenship. That will not “make America great again.” The dreamers will turn America into a nightmare.

I was wrong and you were right about DACA Mr. Trump, but now I am right and you are wrong. I was willing to admit my mistake, are you?

Boys’ book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

The message sent to every person: sincere refugee, thief, terrorist, or thug is “If you get here, you can stay,” so they come by the trainloads. And when they come, they are handed a bag of freebies: education, medical care, welfare payments, legal advice, etc. In that bag of goodies the illegals hope to find amnesty.

Hispanic extremists continue to raise the ante to get as much as they can; after all, we “owe” it to them. One sign demanded, “Give us FREE Health care, Jobs–no taxes, House, Food – You OWE us America! We will shoot more police in Arizona until we get FREE!” Has anyone but me asked why that person did not go to jail? Another sign demanded, “Citizenship for 11 million.” And citizenship means more Democrats to vote to guarantee all the freebies. And some Republicans are too stupid or cowardly to resist it. The pro-amnesty zealots have written what they call a “Bill of Rights for Undocumented Americans” in which they make their demands to U.S. officials.

They assume or presume that if people are present in the U.S. (even illegally) they have certain rights that must be recognized. They contend that since they are human, they have rights and, of course, that is true; but one of those rights is not U.S. citizenship. U. S. citizenship is a privilege not a right. Illegal aliens have the right to be treated fairly but firmly, even forcefully if they resist. They have a right to food and water but not the right to choose from a menu. They have a right to be photographed and placed in a data file; and upon their illegal return, they have a right to a cell. They have a right to be treated with dignity as they are escorted back to the border and not to be shoved too forcefully southward. But they don’t have the right to U. S. residence or citizenship.

Here’s an appropriate analogy: You have worked hard, saved, and finally built a nice home, not a palace, but a nice home. One evening a man walks in your unlocked door and asks for food and water. You are surprised and offended but kindly provide his request. As he eats at your table, he starts to watch television and moves to your favorite chair. You think he is being pushy but you want to be a thoughtful host. He stays all evening and when you suggest that it is time for you to go to bed, he asks where he can sleep. You don’t have a spare bedroom but he decides that he will take yours. After all, it’s a matter of humanity.

The next day he informs you that he likes the area and has decided to stay; however, you tell him that is impossible. You have your own life to live; but he demands that you accommodate him, even build an additional room for him. You are incensed but you do as he demands. Later that day he informs you that his religion requires special foods and he would like to have it prepared for the evening meal. He specifies no pork or shrimp and any beef or lamb must be prepared to exacting standards. He prefers to eat at 6:00, sharp.

He settles down in the new room you built at your expense but he tells you that he has some health problems and needs for you to get him a doctor–at your expense. Next, he is concerned about his future so he wants you to provide him a retirement program. He observes your frustration, anger, and resentment; and with a sinister smile, he suggests, “You should have stopped me at your front door.”

Only a fool would acquiesce to such free-loading tyrants. But that’s where the U.S. is with illegal aliens. They are here and they are demanding their “rights.” It is called their “Bill of Rights,” but it is only a start! They want any talk of building a wall stopped as well as talk about airline security since it is “chest-thumping rhetoric.” They arrogantly demand that everything is “on the table.” That means legal residency–citizenship.

The first demand is “Acknowledgment that we are already here, that we are human beings with a right to be, that our mere presence cannot be deemed illegal or our existence alien.” Well, just because they are humans does not justify legal existence in the U.S. Another demand is “Affirmation that we are to be treated with dignity and respect, not just because of who we are, but who you are.” Who I am determines how I react to freeloaders who don’t display much dignity, humility, gratefulness or respect for our laws.

Another demand is the “right to be presented with a path to citizenship… combined with interim deferment of all law-abiding Undocumented Americans against detention and deportation.” But there are problems in that criminals cannot become U.S. citizens. Plus, there are procedures that must be followed and requirements met. It is rather asinine for them to use the term law-abiding.

Still another demand is a “Guarantee of wage equality with a legal right to petition for wage theft or workplace mistreatment without jeopardizing our immigration status.” Maybe when pigs learn to fly in formation over the White House!

And another demand is “Assurance of humanitarian treatment, including medical care.” That just broke the bank.

It is my humble opinion that anyone who agrees with the above is incompetent, inconsiderate, or insane. It is similar to a lifeboat overloaded with survivors floating in the frigid Atlantic. The boat is just above water and a 300 pound man swims along and demands to be pulled aboard. Of course, everyone is compassionate, concerned, and contrite about his plight but they also know that if he is pulled on board, everyone drowns. He is left to drown because there was no other option.

Life requires very difficult decisions at times. This is one of those times: no more immigration for five years and no amnesty to law-breakers.

After all, the “boat” will only hold so many and if others climb on board, we will all go down with the ship.

No amnesty! It is divisive, destructive, dangerous, and deadly! And dumb!

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Well, I couldn’t have said it better!

In my book, I look at the big picture going back to the early days of Islam and tracing the inculcation of terror as a way of life. Muslims don’t love death; they hate life. They are reared in a culture of terror. They are pathetic individuals without hope in this world or the world to come, and need to hear and accept the message of the grace of God through Christ.

Immigration is the most pressing issue facing most nations on earth. But why not have open borders and unlimited immigration? What about amnesty, after all, shouldn’t everyone be interested in forgiveness and redemption? How can sanctuary cities be bad if God provided six Cities of Refugee in ancient Israel? What are the costs of unlimited immigration to average Americans? How will it change every-day life in America?

What is the truth about Mohammed? I provide information from Middle East experts not from alleged haters of all things Muslim. I also analyze the Koran and many hadiths to reveal the prophet of Allah as he was–a thief, a killer, and a child molester. Why are there so many mistakes in the Koran if it is a perfect book sent from Allah and why is it filled with mistakes, mishmash, and madness?

The US is in a Hundred Years’ War with Islam and your life will never be the same. I predict numerous terror attacks across America to where everyone will be fearful of leaving their homes for work, school, church, or shopping.

Sharia law is examined in detail and a study has revealed that 51% of Muslim Americans want to live under sharia, not local laws! I think those people should live under sharia if they desire, only that means they must move to Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc. Well, I suppose they could try London, Paris, or Brussels if they like cosmopolitan living with a Middle East ambiance.

Jihad is clearly and forcefully taught in the Koran as an obligation for every Muslim and it is defined in koranic footnotes as “holy fighting in the cause of Islam.” A footnote on page 39 of my official Koran warns Muslims that “he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.” So, it is not enough to literally fight and die for Islam, each Muslim must do so with gusto!

Every Muslim must participate in producing a world caliphate where sharia is universally observed. They envision a greater empire than the Ottoman Empire (made up of Turkish tribes) that began in 1299 and gasped its last breath following WW I after more than a 600-year rule. The modern terrorist attacks are designed to destroy the non-Muslim world to make way for a new Muslim order.

Muslim Invasion not only reveals the tangled, troubled, and terrorist world of Islam and the horror it produces but the book also provides some answers how to disentangle ourselves from this plague. We might use the neutral, placid Swiss as an example since they have taken steps to disengage from the acceleration of Islam by banning the full-body covering burqa; the refusal by the capital city of Bern to permit the building of a large Islamic center; and they further banned minarets from which the call to prayer is sounded.

Recently, two Muslim boys refused to shake the hand of their Swiss female teacher thereby causing a national uproar. Shaking hands with the teacher at the beginning and end of each school day is part of their culture and the Swiss were not willing to change it. One politician asked, “Today it’s the handshake, and what will it be tomorrow?” Great question. After a royal battle it was decided that all Muslim boys must shake hands with their teachers just as Swiss boys must do. After all, the Swiss have a right to maintain their culture and if Muslims (or Baptists) don’t like it, they can move back to Cairo or Nashville!

Everyone living in America, including Muslims, should proclaim, “America–first, last, and always!” Radical leftists will scream, “bigotry” but will not discuss the issue. Most sane, sensitive, and sincere Americans believe that we don’t have to apologize for putting our national interests first and wanting to keep America, America! It does not mean that we are, by nature, superior to everyone else, nor does it mean that we wish ill of anyone. We just believe we have a superior Constitution and Bill of Rights and want to keep it that way. We like what we have here although we would like to remove the crime, hatred, perversion, abortion, etc.; but it would be abnormal if we did not want America to continue to be America. No one suggests that we are perfect or close to it, but I prefer America to any place I have been. What is wrong with that? Let me prompt your answer: nothing is wrong with it.

We identify with America as we identify with our family. I don’t identify with your family but with mine. I don’t wish you ill will or failure. I just identify with my family. Because, well, because it is my family. As with a family, so with a nation. If that were not true, then there would be no nations. But then, maybe that’s exactly what the globalists want: one massive “family” in one big world with no boundaries where all cultures would be equal.

That is a horror story for the world and Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! seeks to discuss, debate, and defeat that possibility.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy of Muslim Invasion, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

There are about 7 million Muslims in the U.S. and 300,000 of them prefer Sharia law and 25% declare that it is acceptable to use violence to punish those who offend Islam if they try to portray the prophet Mohammed! And Evangelical leaders want to bring even more to the U.S. and are hand you the bill.

Among other requests, the Evangelical Immigration Table (EIT) wants Congress to not exclude any specific religious group or nationality from the massive resettlement program. In recent years the group has brought in about 2,000 Syrians to the U.S. and 97% are Muslim. Obama has already brought over 100,000 “refugees” since 2012. Note that few insist that maybe Christians should be at the top of the list.

Let me see if I understand this situation: Some American Evangelical leaders are pressuring Congress to give amnesty to illegal aliens already here and to bring in even more! These are people who know nothing about democracy, have no concept of freedom, speak a foreign language, worship a pagan god, are so backward they have bathed in a river and peed into a hole in the floor all their lives, and will immediately become a financial leach on the face of America! Now, I think it is wonderful that they want to upgrade their living standards and culture (as well as their sanitary practices); however, it doesn’t seem wise to change the face of America to accomplish that. Future Americans will rise up and call these Evangelical leaders cowards and traitors.

Moreover, why are Evangelicals receiving barrels of money from the federal government anyway? If evangelical leaders are so concerned about “refugees” then let them pass the collection plate the way our church does when people have a need. Of course we should help people but don’t expect taxpayers to pay the bill. May I suggest that there is no constitutional provision for such program? But then, there is no constitutional provision for abortion, same-sex “marriage,” farm subsidies, student loans, etc., but that doesn’t bother our esteemed officials, even some “conservatives.”

Europe is lost, gone, hopeless, destroyed, wrecked, smashed and America is following the exact path. Only a fool, fanatic, or faker says otherwise.

Note that these Evangelical leaders are not responding to their constituency because their rank and file has already spoken. A Pew Research Poll revealed that white Evangelical Christians were opposed to the Syrian refugee resettlement program by a two to one margin but the leaders plow on since they know what’s best! After all, what do the hoi polloi know about such matters?

Mike Philips senior pastor of Immanuel Fellowship Church in Frisco, Colorado declared that he and his liberal friends are “bothered by the rhetoric” from critics. I suppose he means those of us who suggest that we can’t afford to lose more jobs, lowering of wages, lack of vetting, and the confusing, compromising, and corrupting of our culture. Mike declared, “I realize that some are genuinely concerned about the vetting process. Personally, I’ve looked at it; I think it’s a very tight, very good process.” No, he is wrong as the Director of the FBI reported that they could not clear every immigrant.

Galen Carey works for the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) and declared how safe the resettlement program is. Well, then I suppose he would be the first to invite the “refugees” to move into his neighborhood since we have an “obligation” to accept these people into the very crowded “life raft.” The senior pastor of Mosaic Church in Memphis said, “We were once the same kind of refugees. Our families come from similar situations.” No, many of these modern “refugees” chose to break the law and come unvetted, uninvited, and unwanted to America.

I remind these “do gooders” (as opposed to those who do good) that the Bible often speaks of borders, borders that should be respected. All the major cities in the Ancient Middle East had massive walls, not to keep people in but to keep gatecrashers from coming in uninvited.

These compromising Evangelical leaders are trying to drive a square peg into a round hole with a sledge hammer, but it simply won’t fit. The President of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, Samuel Rodriquez (an incredible preacher) opined, “It’s about our Christian faith. It’s about Matthew 25 and Leviticus 19. It’s about finding a way where we can reconcile Romans 13, ‘respecting the rule of law.’” No, Sam, like many Evangelicals, has to twist the Scripture like a pretzel to make it mean what it was never meant to mean.

Matthew 25 deals with the judgment of the Nations and in verse 35 Christ said, “For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in.” No, that has no relevancy to the immigration issue. In that text, Christ is judging the nations as to their treatment of the Jews during the Great Tribulation. I ask Evangelical leaders who use this verse out of context: “Have you no shame?”

Open border and amnesty people should read and understand Act. 27:26: “And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.” That verse teaches that while all mankind are of the same blood, i.e., the human race, there are some bounds of their habitation.

Since all men have the same source, there is no valid reason to think one is better than another although each should be loyal to and proud of his roots. The Apostle Paul knew that the Athenians had a foolish notion that they were self-produced, and were the aboriginals of mankind. They believed that the first men sprung up in Attica, like radishes! Well, that’s about what evolutionists believe when they say life rose from a warm, little pond. Science has come a long way baby.

All the pro-amnesty preachers use the same verses to support their unsupportable position. Some perspective follows that soft Evangelicals do not provide.

God respects borders–after all, He set them! Border is used 129 times in the Bible and borders used 49 times. Only a few times does the word refer to the border of a piece of clothing, the rest have to do with tribal or national boundaries. Border is first used in Gen. 10:19 when He set the borders of the Canaanites. From scriptural evidence, God does not believe in open borders. He set firm borders as recorded in Deut. 32:8: “When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.” This refers to Noah’s sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth and the areas of the world their posterity would populate and control.

I remind you that God scattered and separated the people into nations and languages at the Tower of Babel where they were trying to build a tower to reach Heaven. Some say they were building a tower so that they would have a refuge if another global flood happened. It was probably a plan to thwart God’s will since He had told them to scatter across the face of the earth and multiply. They wanted to make a name for themselves and stay where they were. This is the first attempt to produce a global society. Progressives are still at it today telling us that nationalism is narrow and bigoted.

Amnesty and open borders are anti-biblical, totally contrary to God’s plan for man’s survival. Europe has had open borders for many years. The citizens of the 28-country European Union may travel freely among any of the member states except Bulgaria, Cyprus, Ireland, Romania, and the United Kingdom that require travelers from other EU states to present a passport or ID card at the border.

You can see the folly of open borders in the daily newspapers as hundreds of thousands of migrants have been trampling through Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungry, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and into Germany. Now that it is too late, some European nations are reinstating border controls; however, the horse is galloping down the road.

It’s past time for Congress to stop the invasion of aliens who are transforming our nation as you read this. Stop funding religious leftwing groups and let them fund their own give-away programs.

And a word of unsolicited advice to ordinary church members: flee those churches that are pro- amnesty, pro-open borders, and pro-sanctuary cities as if your hair is on fire.

Because it will be some day.

Moreover, the DHS admitted on Jan. 20 of 2016 that about 500,000 aliens overstayed their visas last year and are living illegally in the U.S.! Michele Bond, assistant secretary for the Bureau of Consular Affairs admitted that U.S. authorities did not know the location of 9,500 of 122,000 who were revoked! That is dumb, dangerous and deadly! We should not be talking about amnesty but accountability.

Amnesty is a program pushed by pathetic progressives and loosey-goosey Evangelicals to legalize millions of illegal aliens giving them citizenship. Many of the migrants are diseased, deranged, and dangerous proved by 10,000 Americans being killed each year by immigrants. With the arrival of this vast number of people from other cultures, languages, and religions we are seeing a massive shift in American culture not seen in our history. Not only is amnesty dumb, dangerous, and deadly; it is divisive. Just watch the rest of this year.

My critics declare that I am unkind, unreasonable, even unchristian for opposing amnesty, open borders, and sanctuary cities; however, their charge is not based on solid reasoning or the Scripture. They twist the Scripture like a pretzel to make it fit their unreasonable, unconstitutional, and unbiblical demands.

We are told that the illegal immigrants are trying to escape tyranny and poverty so America should make room for them since we are a Christian nation. Well, first of all, only people can become Christians although a nation can become Christianized or influenced by the Bible. Secondly, almost all my critics and supporters of amnesty and unlimited immigration confuse what a person should do with what a nation should do.

All people who interpret ancient literature know that the first questions asked is, “To whom was this written?”; “Who wrote it?”; “Under what circumstances was it written?”; and “When was it written?” Evangelicals are not asking those questions because to do so would defeat their purpose.

Exodus 23:9 is usually used by the Bible-twisters to support their cause of amnesty; however they use a flawed hermeneutic to build their tenuous case. “Also thou shalt not oppress a stranger: for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.” That chapter is dealing with a person’s obligation to be gracious–not national guidelines for treatment of immigrants. Of course, those religious leaders who use that verse know what they are doing but are being dishonest to give credibility to a very shaky principle.

Verse 3 proves my contention about this being a personal obligation not a national policy. That verse warns the ancient Jews (and us today) that “Neither shalt thou countenance (give approval) a poor man in his cause.” Moses was warning us about showing favor to a person because of his condition, whether rich or poor. We are not to be swayed by our emotions but by justice. The ancient maxim is, “Let justice be done, though the heavens should be dissolved.” I heard one of the great evangelists of the last generation say, “Do right though the stars fall from Heaven.”

Illegal immigrants have not done right. They resolutely broke our laws and crashed our gates and are forcing themselves in front of others who have followed our laws and procedures. There are four million people who are waiting in line legally. The illegal aliens refuse to wait.

Jim Wallis is president of Sojourners, (a leftwing religious/social outfit) and said that “Evangelicals finally realize that how we treat the stranger, these 11 million undocumented people, is how we treat Christ himself.” Jim must have been sleeping during his hermeneutics class in seminary because he did not get that from the Bible. Of course, Christians are to be kind, gracious, generous, and helpful, but that does not translate into being suckers, softies, and sentimentalists. We could really show how kind, gracious, generous, and helpful we are as well as stupid by emptying all our prisons! And the most hard core prisoners could move into Jim’s neighborhood.

Wallis went on to say that the leadership of the Evangelical Immigration Table (EIT), which includes the National Association of Evangelicals and the Ethics and Religious Liberty Convention of the Southern Baptist Convention, has “never been more united on an issue.” However, that is a little misleading. Of course, the feeble evangelical leaders are singing from the same page but the evangelical congregation is singing another song. The vast majority of evangelical church members want illegal immigrants to go home. A 2014 Pulse Opinion poll revealed that 78 percent of Evangelicals surveyed believed that the biblical command to “love the stranger” means “to treat the stranger humanely while applying the rule of law.”

The pro-amnesty preachers tell us that all people should be treated with dignity but you can deport someone and still show him or her some dignity. New plan: Deport with Dignity! Amnesty has nothing to do with personal dignity. Evangelical leaders would be wiser to listen to their members rather than rushing to the cameras trying to speak for them.

As for helping the poor and evangelizing them why can’t that be done in their home nations? After amnesty happens the wall will not be built and controls will be even looser. Then it will be too late. We are told that amnesty and even more immigration would be an incredible opportunity to win people to Christ without sending missionaries. However, Christ said to go into all the world and win them, not have some government send them to you thereby destroying your own nation in doing so.

Leviticus 19:33 is also used wrongly: “And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him.” Again, the preceding verses prove that God was giving instructions for personal conduct by warning them not to consume blood; not to get tattoos or pierce their flesh; not to prostitute their daughters; keep the Sabbath days; not to be involved with sorcery and fortune telling, etc. Then He warned them not to vex a stranger living among them. In fact Moses went on to say that “thou shalt love him as thyself.”

Jews were to be kind to strangers because it is the right thing to do and it would be good for the strangers and good for the nation. Many visiting strangers came to visit Israel, were impressed by the faith, freedom, and fairness and converted to Judaism. New Testament Christians are commanded by Christ to treat others the way they want to be treated.

Exodus 23:9 tells us, “Also thou shalt not oppress a stranger: for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.” But that has nothing to do with illegal aliens. Fuzzy-thinking preachers neglect to tell their congregations that the Jews were in Egypt by invitation and were not trespassers. In fact, they were special guests as long as Joseph was alive and a friendly Pharaoh reigned. They had not entered the land illegally as do modern invaders. The Jews were strangers in Egypt but not illegal aliens.

These verses do not apply to the immigration issue even slightly. Illegal aliens purposefully chose to break our laws, even arrogantly demanding entrance into our nation expecting to be cared for upon their arrival. They are not sojourners or strangers but scoundrels (with a few innocent women and children) and are being encouraged to break our laws by many leftwing religious groups, even some Evangelicals.

The international money speculator George Soros is sugar daddy to the EIT, a leftist group of Christian leaders that never saw a socialist scheme they didn’t like. Soros’ agenda, in addition to making money, is to promote every leftwing program especially transplanting Muslims into Europe and America. He is funding various religious non-profits to accomplish that task. According to National Review, EIT gets a substantial portion of its funding from groups backed by George Soros.

In early December, the EIT asked Congress to authorize more Syrians to be brought into the U.S. and evangelical leaders stood up and yelled, “Bring them on, even more to our shores.” On Dec. 16, 2015, Fox News reported that since 2012, Obama has brought 102,000 Syrians into the U.S. and given them permanent residency! And you thought it was only 10,000!

Amnesty, open borders, and sanctuary cities are destructive, dangerous, even deadly. It is time for Congress to put on their big-boy pants and stop Obama’s “Get Out of Jail Card” and his “Pass Go, Collect Welfare” schemes.

(Boys’ new book, The God Haters was published by Barbwire Books; to get your copy of The God Haters click here. An eBook edition is also available.)

He is bold, blunt, brash, boastful, and bombastic none of which would eliminate him but I don’t like his gambling empire which is associated with booze and prostitution. He, of course, is not a conservative since he has been all over the map. He appears to be an opportunist. He doesn’t seem to know what he believes about abortion, but he knows that it is permissible to take private property for his own use! No Conservative, no Constitutionalist, no Christian can agree with that.

He told “60 Minutes” on Sept. 27, 2015 that he is for universal health care: “I am going to take care of everybody.” He added, “the government’s gonna pay for it.” That’s you and me. As to abortion he would continue government support of Planned Parenthood but not their abortion efforts. Of course, that is insane. Last year he told “Meet the Press” that he would not rescind the Iran Nuclear Deal. He is mushy on the Israeli question and refused to agree to Jerusalem as Israel’s capitol. As to immigration, he told Newsweek last year that he wants amnesty: “I want to move ’em out, and we’re going to move ’em back in and let them be legal.” That is amnesty after a quick visit back home. Whatever Trump is, he is not a Conservative.

My big concern is that he seems to be without character. He obviously has an inferiority complex and has to always tell everyone that he has the most, the biggest, the richest, the nicest, the shiniest of whatever. To inflate himself, Donald boasted that his Las Vegas hotel is the “tallest, most beautiful building in town” when there are three taller buildings. He boasted that his jet is “bigger than Air Force One” when his plane is about 75 feet shorter. It seems he hasn’t had much of a relationship with truth.

For sure I am not a supporter of Hillary Clinton but it was totally crass for Trump to make an issue of her potty trip during the televised debate. Concerning her trip to the potty he said, “It was disgusting…. Where did she go?” It had nothing to do with political issues or the debate. Trump simply slugged Hillary below the belt. Some say it was only politics; however it only proved Trump is a thug and a rude dude.

Donald said Ted Cruz was a “total hypocrite.” And, “He’s a nasty guy. Nobody in Congress likes him.” Well, that could be a recommendation after all, Christ said in Luke 6:26 “Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you!” Cruz should wear that like a merit badge given to him by Donald the Rude.

Moreover, he refuses to deal with issues but majors on insulting people. I am not a fan of Rosie O’Donnell but a wise person does not say everything he thinks even if they are true. He was out of line to say Rosie was a “nice fat little Rosie,” or to say she is “crude, rude, obnoxious and dumb.” He has characterized women as “fat pigs,” “dogs,” “slobs” and “disgusting animals.” Rosie called him a “snake-oil salesman” but that is unfair–to snake-oil salesmen. Trump has a problem with women resulting in the moniker of Donald the Crude.

His problem with women is obvious since he has been married thrice. Trump has had big problems with his personal choices. He fathered a child out of wedlock with the woman who became his second wife with the birth taking place two months after the wedding. He was married the third time to a Slovenian model in 2005. While that history does not seem as bad as Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Clinton’s many foolish, filthy, feral flings, it is part of his résumé and must be part of the equation. It would be pathetic but not precedent-setting to have such a man in the Oval Office.

Trump uses foul language proving he is an uncouth, unthinking, uncaring, and uneducated person. A few years ago, even the most rude, crude, and lewd men did not use vulgarity in decent company especially in the presence of women. Even non-Christians should not use vulgarity.

My critics will accuse me of living in a religious bubble and that has been generally true for most of my adult life. However, that does not mean that I have had no exposure to the real world with all its corruption. After all, I have traveled worldwide, shopped, dealt with businessmen, was a life insurance salesman, served in the Indiana House of Representatives (where I reprimanded the cursing wife of a judge in front of him and their legislative friends), and appeared on hundreds of television and radio talk shows where I was called many vulgar words that I had no idea of their meaning! So my “bubble” has not meant total seclusion.

All my close friends and associates are very kind, honorable, honest, educated, cultured, urbane, sensitive people who eschew “gosh,” “heck,” “darn,” although we do lose control at times and utter “cool” or “neat.” Gasp! Maybe we say “cool” to appear cool in the eyes of others!

I am not suggesting that people who use dirty four letter words are living in the depths of depravity, although I am saying that such words are unnecessary, uncouth, uncivil and a poor example to others, especially the young.

Whatever we say should be unambiguous and not be embarrassing or an insult to others. The Bible teaches that our yea should be yea and our nay should be nay. Vulgar (even non-vulgar) curse words are proscribed and never acceptable by civil, cultured, or Christian people.

The Apostle Paul commanded us in Colossians 3:8 “Put off all these: anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communications out of your mouth.” He also said, “Evil communications corrupt good manners.” Swearing results in a coarsening of society.
Evidently Trump’s momma never washed out his mouth with soap as was commonly done years ago! That worked for thousands of us. Donald the Crude needs his mouth washed out with soap.

But it gets worse.

He referred to oral sex on “Celebrity Apprentice All-Stars” twisting a female star’s comment to appear she referred to oral sex when she did not. Recently, he used a Yiddish vulgarity to slam Hillary. And he insulted Megyn Kelly referring to her monthly period. He’s a lewd dude. So that makes him Donald the Lewd.

Speaking of Arianna Huffington he said, she is “unattractive both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man–he made a good decision.” Say what? Homosexuality is never justified. Was that an endorsement of same-sex “marriage”? Alas, the irrational, irrepressible, and irresponsible Trump is Donald a rude, crude, lewd dude.

When asked if he ever asked God for forgiveness for his actions he said, “I am not sure I have. I just go on and try to do a better job from there. I don’t think so,” he said. “I think if I do something wrong, I think, I just try and make it right. I don’t bring God into that picture. I don’t.” That is an asinine, arrogant, and atrocious reply. Even a shallow Christian would not make such a statement. Christ said we should pray, “Forgive us our trespasses.” Why? Because everyone sins and needs forgiveness. Even Donald Trump, probably more than anyone knows. Moreover, it could be dangerous to put a narcissist like Trump in control of U.S. military machine. A man who thinks he is always right is a very dangerous person.

When Trump is challenged for his lack of decency, decorum, or discretion, he always seems to justify it by pointing out his high polling numbers among Evangelicals. Americans can support whomever they please; however, for a Christian to vote for Trump is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.

Trump the rude, crude, lewd dude has proved the old adage that money and power can’t buy class or real friends but they may buy votes; however he won’t get my vote unless the alternative is a Socialist or a future resident of a federal prison.

Boys’ new book, The God Haters was published by Barbwire Books; to get your copy of The God Haters click here. An eBook edition is also available.)

Obama has generous support for amnesty from the wealthiest liberal non-profits in the nation such as the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Open Society Foundations of the financier George Soros, and the Atlantic Philanthropies. For more than ten years those groups have given more than $300 million to immigrant organizations, “including many fighting for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.” Those groups and others are using money from U.S. sources to destroy America as we know it!

Even in normal times, it is insane for a nation to have open borders where anyone for any reason can enter without restrictions. Then when you consider a time of war, national pestilence, or terror, it is doubly insane to permit unrestricted entry into a nation. That’s about where the U.S. is today. With an astronomical increase in crime; with burgeoning welfare roles; with cities and states whining about empty coffers; with hundreds of thousands of Americans out of work and more to follow; we still have almost open borders! We might as well put up a huge sign on our southern border: “Terrorists and other illegal aliens Welcome! Follow the arrows to Tucson!” Maybe an additional sign promising “free medical care and education”!

Open border fanatics tell us that “The U.S. had open borders from its inception until 1882. It makes one wonder what the Founding Fathers would think of us today!” However, that is not the whole story because in 1882 there was much of America unexplored, uninhabited, and unavailable. We needed the people–farmers, smiths, merchants, salesmen, trappers, cobblers who came and fell in love with their new nation, learned English, and melted into the pot. But the pot is not melting today. It is now a salad bowl where many different peoples do their own thing and have no interest in the general welfare.

Treason is “any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance.” That means anyone, including leading politicians, who seeks to weaken our nation, worsen our economy, or wreck our system is a traitor. We must leave room for honest disagreement as to how to solve a problem but to disassemble a defense that has been utilized for a hundred years qualifies as treason.

Thousands of illegal aliens cross into the U.S. from Mexico carrying drugs, disease, and destructive plans to our nation. Others want to pick tomatoes and other vegetables; however if tomato pickers can slip in, so can terrorists. Yet, we have major politicians (including President Obama) who are so unconcerned, they are determined to give amnesty to those gatecrashers already here! That would be an invitation for even more illegals to rush north.

The current very negative consequences of immigration are largely because more recent groups aren’t learning English at the same rates as their predecessors. Harvard economist George Borjas suggests that “it’s not very costly anymore” for new immigrants if they don’t learn English because so many of them have formed communities that insulate them from other Americans. Therefore, they don’t need to learn English since they can function with each other. Illegal aliens get lost in a huge group of their own kind and don’t need to melt into the pot. They sit, soak, and sour in the salad bowl.

We should send a loud message to all politicians that it is time to take charge of our borders to clean up the mess: Build the wall; no amnesty; no more guest workers until the economy stabilizes; no more immigration for five years; fine businesses who hire illegal aliens; send the gate crashers home; arrest the “coyotes” who get rich smuggling illegals across the border; demand that our “friends” in Mexico stop playing the hypocrite and close their northern border as they have their southern border. It’s past time to get started.

First, we impeach the President!

http://bit.ly/1iMLVfY  Watch these 8 minute videos of my lecture at the University of North Dakota: “A Christian Challenges New Atheists to Put Up or Shut Up!”

Hispanic extremists continue to raise the ante to get as much as they can, after all we “owe” it to them. One sign demanded, “Give us FREE Health care, Jobs–no taxes, House, Food – You OWE us America! We will shoot more police in Arizona until we get FREE!” Has anyone but me asked why that person did not go to jail? Another sign demanded, “Citizenship for 11 million.” And “citizenship” means “Democrat” voters. And Republicans are too stupid to resist it.

This is incredible, indefensible, and insane yet our politicians and fuzzy Christian leaders seem to think it is acceptable and admirable instead of abhorrent and abominable. Furthermore, illegal aliens kill about 10,000 Americans each year–when they are not “picking tomatoes.”

Even in normal times, it is insane for a nation to have unrestricted immigration, and during wars, national pestilences, or terror it is doubly insane to have porous borders! That’s about where the U.S. is today. With an astronomical increase in crime; with burgeoning welfare rolls; with cities and states whining about being out of money; with millions of Americans out of work and more to follow; we still have almost open borders! We might as well put up a huge sign on our southern border: “Terrorists and other illegals Welcome! Follow the arrows to Tucson!” Maybe an additional sign promising “free education and medical care” with additional information for those with leprosy, dengue fever, tuberculosis, polio, and malaria!

Each year about 500,000 illegal aliens cross into the U.S. with many carrying drugs, disease, and destructive plans for our nation. In recent days Border Patrol agents have contracted various diseases, lice and scabies. Many illegals want to pick tomatoes; however if tomato pickers can slip in, so can terrorists. Yet, we have major politicians who are so unconcerned they want to give amnesty to the illegal gatecrashers already here! The President seems to be unaware that he is sitting on a seething volcano that is about to explode!

There are now more than 80,000 illegal aliens from terror-friendly or terror-supporting nations hiding in the U.S.! American citizens will hold elected officials responsible for terrorism resulting from their inaction, ineptitude, or incompetence relating to border security. America’s volcano is going to explode!

Since most immigrants from Mexico and South America have lower skills, they are more likely to request public assistance, gorge the public school system, overwhelm the health care industry, and spike the crime reports. Bigotry? Not at all. Just the facts. Did you know that 15% of California students are illegal aliens and 25% of inmates in federal prisons are illegals? They are not in prison for being gatecrashers but for committing crimes in the U.S.! You are funding them! Moreover, 75% of those on the most wanted list in L.A. are illegals.

A recent survey shows that about 40 million immigrants live in the United States. About 12 million are illegal aliens. In Texas, 58% of illegal households collect some form of welfare while nationally, 47% of illegals receive welfare. Illegal aliens will cost taxpayers about $113,000,000 this year!

Should U.S. taxpayers be expected to finance illegal immigrants? I can defend the position that we should not finance legal immigrants? “Thanks” to Republicans and Democrats, with amnesty just around the corner, immigrants will get on the welfare rolls and most will stay there. Have the loonies taken over the asylum?

I was told by a post office official in San Luis, Arizona their office has 11,200 post office boxes in a town of about 3,000 people because people living across the border in Mexico use them as a permanent American address to collect public benefits. Courtesy of YOU. Don’t you feel warm and fuzzy knowing that you go to work each day to support parasites across the border?

We must admit that if large numbers of Hispanics, legal or illegal, enter the U.S. it will relieve some of Central America’s social and economic problems, but what will it do to America’s? By what twisted logic are U.S. citizens expected to take their hard-earned money to provide for foreigners, especially foreigners who are criminals? Maybe it can be justified if you worship at the shrine of global government, but no thinking person does that, do they?

The pro-immigration people tell us that immigrants don’t take jobs; they make jobs and pay taxes. However, while that may be true in individual cases, it is not true in the aggregate. Illegals cost Americans ten billion dollars more than they pay in taxes!

We are told that Hispanics are needed to do work that Americans will not do, but a more correct statement is that they take jobs that Americans don’t want at the going wage! According to the Los Angeles Times, 2% of illegals are picking crops (while 29% are picking our pockets). When times get tough, Americans will work at any job to put food on the table. Don’t you feel good knowing that Mexican immigrants are working at very low wages to make more profit for agri-businesses? Fact is, for every 100 illegal aliens who get a job, 60 Americans will lose their job.

It is time for the U.S. to take charge of our borders, keep out illegal aliens, apprehend those now living in the U.S. illegally and demand that our “friends” south of the border stop playing the hypocrite and close make their northern border as tight as their southern border. It’s past time to get started.

The volcano is about to explode!
http://bit.ly/1iMLVfY Watch these 8 minute videos of my lecture at the University of North Dakota: “A Christian Challenges New Atheists to Put Up or Shut Up!”