My earlier article, “Pete, Since You Brought it Up, How “Gay” Are You?” loosed a plethora of vile comments and repeated vicious phone calls. Almost every critic identified me as a hater. I expected that but the articles from the LGBTQ websites were shocking in their detestation, distortion, and dishonesty. Not one of my critics identified any errors in my assertions dealing with perversion.

It is not hate to tell the truth about anything. It is love, not hate, to help break the chains of a dangerous, deranged, diseased, and deadly lifestyle. It is not hate to help one find a life of forgiveness, joy, satisfaction, normalcy, and purpose.

It seems my critics and proponents of perversion can’t read, or comprehend, or they have mental problems. Maybe all three. They all sing the same lyrics and same melody—off key. All, without exception, were dissonant, divisive, dark, and dirty.

I had scores of attacks and they were all vicious, vulgar, even vile. No one gave me credit for being honest and sincere. No one sought to correct me. No one was kind or thoughtful. Almost all their mothers failed to wash out their mouths with Ivory Soap for dirty talk. Of course, dirty talk comes from a dirty mind.

One site attempted to reply but was so incompetent, even I was embarrassed for the writer: “In news both stupid and stupefying, a former Indiana politician has called on Pete Buttigieg to denounce fisting and rimming as part of his political platform….calling on the presidential candidate to disclose more about his sexual practices.” No, I don’t know if Pete and his “husband” practice the disgusting practice of rimming and fisting. I only mentioned that 22% of homosexuals do so and it would help voters decide if they knew his opinion about such disgusting practices.

My critic wrote that I insisted that Buttigieg should make clear that “he is not into golden showers. Apparently, Boys doesn’t mind that Donald Trump actually is into the practice according to an MI6 dossier.” However, every honest, sane person in the free world knows the referenced Steel “dossier” was a fabrication commissioned and funded by the Democrat Party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign committee.

The Jerry Springer Show had more credibility than Steel.

Nor did I say Buttigieg should admit to golden showers, only that 23% of homosexuals practice such dangerous behavior.

Since he was on a roll (of course, one always rolls downhill) he added to his gaffs by saying of me, “In lectures, he has also claimed that if a woman doesn’t scream during rape, a man has done nothing wrong.” He was misquoting another article where I cautioned people to prove all things, not to take anyone’s word that another person has committed a crime; however, non-thinking Progressives maintain that any male or Conservative is guilty until proven innocent. All women are innocent, fair, and honest.

I mentioned that the Bible requires a woman to scream if she is being raped. No scream, no rape charges against a man. I did not say or suggest that the man was guiltless, but he could not be prosecuted if she did not resist and scream. My critic got “a man has done nothing wrong” out of thin air.

Of course, a man is guilty if he kisses and hugs making sexual advances to a woman; but in this dangerous day, it must be understood that just because a man may be guilty does not mean that a complaining woman may be innocent. That seems to be too nuanced for homosexuals to comprehend.

The only thing that was almost right in his article was the headline: “Totally straight Indiana politician Don Boys is obsessed with Pete Buttigieg’s kinks.” For sure, I am “totally straight”; however, I am no longer a politician, am no longer living in Indiana, but I’m not “obsessed” with Pete’s alleged kinky lifestyle. I simply responded to a politician who wants normal people to vote for him, and since he boasted about his “gayness,” voters should know just how “gay” he is. That is not being obsessed but maybe the writer doesn’t know the meaning of “obsessed.”

One thing for sure: his writing would never drive a reader to a dictionary.

An article in the LGBTQ Nation yelled “Indiana Republican asks Buttigieg ‘how gay are you?’” in shockingly vulgar diatribe about sex.” It went on: “He also managed to accuse Buttigieg of supporting pedophilia, eating feces, and putting animals in his rectum.” Again, another example of delusion, dishonesty, or simply dumbness.

I wrote nothing about Pete supporting pedophilia, eating feces, and putting animals in his rectum. What I did was document that half of homosexuals were seduced by perverts before age 14, 17% of homosexuals admit to rubbing or ingesting feces, and 41% put flashlights, carrots, and at times gerbils in the rectum of a “lover.”

Maybe PETA should get involved since this is animal cruelty unless—unless the gerbils gave consent.

The writer also charged me with writing, “Buttigieg will therefore die while in office. Obviously, the claim is untrue.” I did not suggest Buttigieg will die in office; I only said that stats prove that homosexuals live 20 fewer years than normal people because of drug use, violent behavior with partners, carrying numerous infectious diseases, alcoholism, and other deadly practices.

Right Wing Watch (a far left project of People For the American Way) chastised me suggesting I am on an anti-Buttigieg campaign but provided a link to my blog and article, “Why Will No Reporter Ask Mayor Pete these Questions?” and that triggered “Christian Bigot: Why Aren’t Reporters Probing Pete Buttigieg’s Sex Life?” by Hemant Mehta.

But then, I never called for Pete to answer questions about his sex life but I did ask him to repudiate perverted practices. The writer sarcastically asked, “Where the hell does this guy get his information?” Of course, he is aware of scores of academic and medical studies that support what I have written about homosexuality. Some of them done by homosexuals! I’m smart enough not to make untrue, unproven, or even unfair statements in print or on talk shows knowing my opponents would treat me like fresh meat in a shark tank.

He made a statement that is laughable, but isn’t funny, when he said “Christian fundamentalists think about gay sex far more than gay men.” Normal people don’t ever think about such perversion unless one of them gets in their face with his perverted demands. Why is it that homosexuals think anyone wants to know about their sex life?

Since Pete has publically talked of how “gay” he is, I simply asked him how “gay” is that. Seems reasonable to me since he mentioned it. I was quoted saying, “Since homosexuals are seven times more likely to use illegal drugs, will Pete repudiate their illegal drug use (to heighten sexual pleasure), and will he demand prosecution for those who use illegal drugs?” Good question but no answer.

My critic quoted me again, “Since many homosexuals have a urine and feces fetish bringing them into contact with numerous lethal bugs, will Pete repudiate that unhealthy practice to save lives? And possibly save the health care system from bankruptcy?” Another good question but no answer. Note that I did not ask Pete if he did some of the dangerous, dirty, and dumb things homosexuals do but I asked him to repudiate those deadly practices.

The LGBTQ crowd’s defense of perversion is almost as respectable, reasonable, and right as a witch doctor with his bag of chicken bones and hippopotami dung.

I have cast enough pearls today.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

It is so tiresome to constantly hear the caterwauling from the secular and the religious left about immigration policies. On Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough, a lackluster and lapsed Southern Baptist, whined about the “shameful” white Evangelicals (Yes, Virginia, everything has to do with race.) “who don’t follow Jesus’ commands on Immigration.”

What Joe meant was we don’t follow his comments, concessions, and conclusions on immigration.

Poor old Joe, I feel sorry for him as he tries to keep his show on the air and keep his thousands of viewers. So, he dips into demagogy and goes after white Christians who don’t accept his twisted interpretation of Scripture to prove an unbiblical position—open borders! The Bible teaches that borders are a necessary fact of life and are reasonable, reachable, and required.

Progressives speak endlessly about “children in cages” yet have advocated, approved, and even applauded the butchering of helpless unborn babies and even voted to have them killed after birth if parents so desire.

Joe quoted an Atlantic article by Peter Wehner, a professing Conservative Christian who served in three administrations in the White House. Wehner spoke of the “core” of Christ’s message as being whether or not the poor were helped. Well, all Christians are told to help the poor, visit those in prison, give a cup of water, etc., but that is not the “core” of His message. The core is that He came to save that which was lost. Following personal salvation, a new Christian is then expected to live the new life that is within him.

Joe went on and on about how Evangelical Christians don’t think they have a responsibility to give a cup of water in Jesus name; however, no Christian is saying that. Joe and open border fanatics are saying that. While each Christian must help those in need, that has nothing to do with a government’s immigration policies that permit open borders and their land to be overwhelmed with people of known and unknown conspiracies, hatreds, creeds, and illnesses.

The Atlantic article was full of feel-good activities that are normal for Christians but not the “core” as professed. Wehner refers to Matthew 25 “where Jesus says if you want to know whether you’re going to go to heaven or not, it’s whether you help the poor.” I’m very pleased that a media person was discussing people going to Heaven; however, Wehner was singing the right melody but the wrong lyrics. He was spouting heresy with which no informed person would agree.

Helping the poor has nothing to do with going to Heaven. Helping the poor is a normal result of knowing Christ in a personal way.

Wehner told of his viewing the results of Hurricane Katrina and noticed the “evangelical organizations” that were doing a good job but he added, “This is a pretty radical departure.” No, it is what real Christians have done for 2000 years! Wehner is obviously uninformed about how history shines a bright light on Christians in time of disaster, disease, and death—when Christians fed the injured, gave water to fevered victims, even carried out the bedpans while unbelievers fled for safety.

Julian the Apostate, Roman Emperor during the fourth century, was the first to note, “Christians cared not only for their own poor but for the pagans as well.” Christian kindness, often during times of persecution, was shown to everyone, not simply their own.

Christians have always believed they had a responsibility to help others as a Christian duty, so during times of famine they shared their food; in times of sorrow they wept with the bereaved; and in times of pestilence, they nursed the sick and dying. The non-Christians and the pagans took notice of such kindness–and at a time when other institutions were damaged, discredited, and often dissolved, the Christian churches were deployed and developed. William McNeill wrote, “Pagans fled from the sick and heartlessly abandoned them.” Christians stayed and served–and died.

That’s what real Christians have always done.

Wehner wrote about Evangelicals who criticized Clinton yet “turn a blind eye to the ethical and moral transgressions of Donald Trump, but also constantly defend him?” I think his arrow missed its target because the Christians I know haven’t turned a blind eye toward Trump and don’t “constantly defend him.” We admit Trump has a sordid, sorry, and sinful past and has present problems yet he must have support to do the job he was elected to do. We did the same with Clinton and Obama—supporting them when possible while also holding their feet to the fire. Trump is running a nation, not leading a prayer meeting.

Wehner mentions that people who are strong on family values are so eager to give a man “with a sordid personal and sexual history” a mulligan as in golf, “not counting that one.” I don’t give Trump a mulligan but do give him space to protect Americans and fulfil his difficult job.

In an earlier Atlantic article Wehner dealt with how Pete Buttigieg’s “faith” will impact his presidential aspirations. Again, he charged Evangelicals with not “holding Trump accountable.” While there may be such a crowd, I don’t know of any influential leaders who would be so negligent. Reasonable appreciation for America-first leadership does not mean Trump is not recognized as a very flawed person.

Wehner goes off the rails when he opines, “None of Trump’s high-profile evangelical supporters speak out against his cruelty and dehumanizing style, his pathological lying and bullying manner, or his Nietzschean ethic—and in some instances they celebrate it.” No, most of us hold our noses and are embarrassed with some of Trump’s antics; however, no matter how offensive, he is far better for our nation than Hillary. And at least, Trump is keeping his promises to nominate conservative judges, reduce taxes, cut regulations, defund abortion, salvage religious freedom, drain the swamp, etc. But then, maybe some of these Evangelical writers and religious leaders don’t want such reform.

Buttigieg’s insistence that the “Christian faith is going to point you in a progressive direction” was a “bright-red flag, and ought to worry Christians regardless of their politics” rightly confessed Wehner, the Evangelical. Progressive—as in free college tuition, free health care, free health care for illegal immigrants, voting by prisoners and immigrants, acceptance of the LGBTQ agenda, abortion up to and after birth, reparations for Blacks, etc.

Progressivism is retrogression into a dark, dismal, and dangerous past and no sane person wants to go there. Progressivism is certainly not biblical but desperate leftists think pleading a bogus biblical position will give them much needed credibility.

It doesn’t.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

Homosexuals also have a “coming out” but not as elaborate as the southern ladies. Most southerners pay little or no attention to the social elites’ fancy affairs since they are busy making a living. However, arrogant homosexuals seem to think that all of us want to know about when they “became aware of their sexuality” and feel a need to announce it to the world. As if we care.

Pete Buttigieg is mayor of South Bend, Indiana and is “married” to Chasten Glezman, a teacher at Montessori Academy near South Bend. Pete calls Chasten his “husband” but since that is asinine, aberrant, and not accurate, I will refer to him as his “lover.” I do that knowing I will be reminded that Time magazine gave him some credibility with a cover photo of Pete and his lover. However, Time’s rush to gush is typical of the leftist media who are willing to promote anything that is anti-biblical, anti-common sense, and anti-decency.

Glezman admitted that he and Pete met online, had their first date in South Bend in September of 2015, then he “moved to Indiana and started living with Buttigieg in 2016.” Obviously, they lived together before “marriage.”

In December of 2017, the “couple” announced their engagement and were “married” in June 2018 in the Cathedral of St. James (Episcopal) in South Bend. (That says much about everyone involved.) Following their ceremony, the couple stopped by for a short visit at a LGBTQ Pride Week block party; and then went to their wedding reception where they danced the night away with 200 guests.

Their ceremony was livestreamed on YouTube and featured a reading from Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion in the landmark 2015 same-sex “marriage” decision that made perversion legal if not moral.

I don’t hate Pete or his lover or any other homosexual, but I will not give them a pass when they or others suggest that “gayness” is not perversion, that it is normal, maybe even admirable. Nor is it bigotry to explain to uninformed readers what “gayness” is. However, with my demand to know the extent of Pete’s “gayness,” I will become the object of ridicule and rebuke, and rejection. Maybe, even more death threats. But if you love homosexuals more than you fear retaliation, you tell them the truth.

And this article will be rejected by some of the sites that normally publish my articles—for telling the truth! No doubt, I will be held in more disdain for revealing the disgusting things that homosexuals do than the homosexuals who do those disgusting things! You can expect the homosexual crowd to have a hissy fit because of this article. That is as predictable as tomorrow’s sunrise.

To emphasize my point: Pete and his lover chose to make their perversion a very public matter. They really worked at it. Pete said, “I’m gay as a—I don’t know, think of something really gay—that’s how gay I am.” Remember, Pete brought this up so I, as a voter, have a right to know just how “gay” Pete is. After all, he wants to be President of the United States and I want to know where he stands on important issues.

Since studies show that about half of homosexuals were seduced into perversion by age 14, I wonder if Pete would totally renounce and repudiate such a revolting practice. Just a simple disavowal with appropriate disgust thrown in will suffice.

All homosexuals are aware that their lifespan is about 20 years less than for normal people so voters should know that a homosexual president may not live to finish his term. Moreover, 70% of homosexuals admit to having at least one STD plus they are infected with other contagious diseases such as tuberculosis, pneumonia, etc. About 20% of homosexual men are infected with HIV and about half of them do not know it. Don’t voters have a right, even an obligation, to know a candidate’s health status since the candidate’s health is always an issue? Is a homosexual candidate an exception? If so, why?

Will he release his complete medical records?

Since homosexuals do many dangerous things it seems wise, considerate, thoughtful, and loving to suggest they cease such dangerous activities. After all, we strongly suggest that one should not smoke, eat much red meat, not drink, and not gain weight since those are deadly activities. Why is it unreasonable, unkind, or untoward to demand the same of homosexual candidates?

Pete admits to using marijuana while at Harvard and wants to make smoking weed legal, but does he still use marijuana, use tobacco, drink hard liquor, overeat, lose sleep, and refuse to exercise?

Homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous as reported in a six-month study of daily sexual diaries by Corey and Holmes in the New England Journal of Medicine. In that study, homosexuals “averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year.” It is known that even the most devoted and long-lasting homosexual relationships are usually not monogamous. Each partner normally reserves a night out each week to “play the field.” Will Pete admit that that is too “gay”?

Studies show that almost all homosexuals practice oral sex and about half ingest semen which is as dangerous as ingesting raw blood exposing them to hepatitis A and B, gonorrhea, and HIV. Moreover, about 90% of homosexuals practice rectal sex and two-thirds do so on a regular basis. Furthermore, 17% of homosexuals admit to rubbing or ingesting the feces of homosexual partners. Will Pete admit that too is too “gay”?

About 23% of “gays” (according to the largest study ever conducted) participate in golden showers where they urinate on each other, splash each other with urine or drink urine. Now, it is a person’s own business if he has a taste for urine, but we have a right to know what Pete thinks about that. Is he “that gay”?

Will Pete repudiate the 41% of “gays” who practice fisting where one rams his fist into the rectum of his partner? Or, at times, they use carrots, bottles, flashlights, (even gerbils!) or other objects often requiring a trip to the hospital for removal. Surely, Pete will repudiate that.

Will Pete repudiate the 90% of “gays” who practice rimming which is so disgusting that I won’t continue to explain it? In doing research for my book, AIDS: Silent Killer!, the owner of a chain of homosexual bathhouses told me that often the same man is “rimmed” 20 times in a single night. Will Pete repudiate such a disgusting practice?

Surely, Pete will repudiate the 37% of homosexuals who practice sadomasochism, the 90% of homosexuals who use illegal drugs, and the 66% who admit to restroom sex.

Franklin Graham was right when he said about Pete, being gay is “something to be repentant of, not something to be flaunted, praised or politicized.” In declaring that fact, Graham was showing love and concern for the mayor because God judges sin—all sin even the sin that shouldn’t even be named. Perversion results in judgment with horrible, eternal results.

If you haven’t noticed, they are no longer “gay” in Sodom.

Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives, who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for eight years. Boys’ book, Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! is available here. Follow Dr. Boys on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D. and TheGodHaters, Twitter, and visit his blog.