Look, I am pleased that Harvey is in jail and has been toppled from his perch. About a hundred women have accused him of sexual misconduct. I am pleased that women are speaking out and revealing sexual predators out there. After all, I have a wife and many daughters, daughter-in-law, granddaughters, and great granddaughters so I want them all safe from rapists. As a legislator, I even tried to get rapists imprisoned for life without possibility of parole or pardon. I tried to require life in prison because the death penalty was not available at the time.

So, I don’t have to prove my bona fides as to my respect and concern for women.

Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance said, “Weinstein is a vicious, serial, sexual predator who used his power to threaten, rape, assault, trick, humiliate and silence his victims.” No doubt that is a correct characterization but that does not prove rape in specific cases. Weinstein was a quid looking for a quo and the “ladies” were a quo looking for a quid.

It’s the oldest profession in the world.

Vance really proved himself a loyal devotee to the screaming feminists by saying, “This is a new day. Rape is rape whether the survivor reports within an hour, within a year or perhaps never. It’s rape despite the complicated dynamics of power and consent after an assault. It’s rape even if there is no physical evidence.”

If that insane, illogical, and illegal concept takes hold nationwide, dating is dead and any man is a fool if he is ever alone with a woman.

What disturbs me is that sane people assume that a woman’s rape accusation demands belief without any proof. Wow, we’re not on a slippery slope; we’ve already landed in a garbage dump.

Isn’t it possible, maybe not probable, but possible that some women make false accusations? Isn’t it possible that some women climb into bed with an influential person to further their career or to get a “sugar daddy”? Isn’t it possible that some women can fornicate with a powerful man, then 20 years later accuse him of rape to fund their 401-ks?

To properly come to a correct conclusion of a rape charge, the word must be defined. Webster says rape is “Sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent (by force, deception, while she is asleep, etc.” Another says rape is “forcible violation of a woman.”

The ancient Jews required rape (that demanded the death penalty) victims to yell and resist; however, the female was always presumed to be innocent unless the circumstances proved otherwise. While her resistance might not be successful, it would call attention to any witnesses and make it very clear to the rapist that the act was unwanted, unwilling, and unlawful.

The Bible wanted to be sure that a malicious woman could not charge an innocent man with a crime that required the death penalty. She must protest; however, it appears that many women can have sex for whatever reason then make a rape charge for financial benefit. I suggest that many modern feminists are not concerned with a man’s innocence or guilt.

One accuser, actress Annabella Sciorra testified that Weinstein forced himself into her apartment and assaulted her. “I was trying to get him off me. I was punching him, kicking him.” But did she scream? After all, it was an apartment. Did she report it to police? It sure sounds like rape to me but biblically it is not rape unless she resisted, screamed, and reported it to authorities.

Miriam Haleyi testified that Harvey attacked her in his own apartment, “Every time I tried to get off the bed he would push me back and hold me down.” But did she scream for help? Surely, she would have received help from high class people in the high end apartment. The report does not reveal that she reported him to police. Why did she not do that? Moreover, she emailed him in 2008, signing off with “Lots of love.” That was to her rapist!

Jessica Mann was in a relationship with Weinstein (read: she was willingly fornicating with him) when he raped her in New York City in March of 2013. They had many sexual experiences including a threesome. He showed up at the lobby of her hotel (where he had a room) then, after taking her to his room, commanded her to undress which she did. She was intimidated and fearful. He allegedly raped her but she did not yell for help nor did she report it to authorities. Why not?

Maybe she kept quiet because as reported by the Daily Mail, she said “they had consensual sex after a ‘long negotiation’ and she did it so he couldn’t kill her acting career.” However, she was shocked when he did a Golder Shower on her. After all, she wasn’t totally without character. After the alleged rape she sent him her new phone numbers five times to stay in contact!

Mann testified that Weinstein raped her again later that year in a Los Angeles hotel room yet according to reporting by USA Today, “She continued to have a friendly email relationship with the fallen mogul for years after, which the defense attempted to use against Mann: showing the court dozens of messages from Mann to Weinstein saying ‘I love you’ and calling him ‘a blessing in my life.’” She told him their sex was best she ever had despite him “urinating on her.”

Wait a minute! A rape victim is in her rapist’s hotel room a few months later! And she tells him he, the rapist, has been a “blessing” in her life. And she loves him! Come, come, only a fool or an unhinged feminist would believe that was rape. Sex, but not rape.

Mann swore that she lied to numerous people when she declared that Weinstein “validated” her, “understands” her, was “nothing but good” to her, and made her “feel so fabulous and beautiful.” That praise of a “rapist” doesn’t sound like a rape victim. Additionally, she spent the next night with a friend so she could celebrate her “rapist’s” birthday the following day!

That sure doesn’t pass the smell test. In fact, the offensive odor would gag a maggot.

Moreover, none of these “ladies” got tested for an STD following their sexual encounter with Harvey the Pig. That is incredibly stupid.

This case is considered a big victory for the #MeToo movement but I think it is a threat to every man in America and to every woman if it is assumed that she never lies.

This case proves to me that all slime-balls don’t always have a beard; some come in skirts and high heels.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

Everyone will agree that male and female aggressions are ever with us disconnecting families, disrupting the workplace, disturbing society–and dumping rapists, killers, and thieves into the prisons.

All Conservative theologians teach that sin was inflicted upon us by the first family’s disobedience to God’s clear command. The result of that disobedience is the cause of all pugnacious activities. However, most people don’t believe this in our day and some liberals declare that all violent behavior is an abnormal activity in flawed persons (of course, everyone is flawed) or it is a response to provocation or stimulation. Then, if those provocations can be identified or eliminated, all violence could be expelled from the earth.

They are wrong.

When God created the world and man, He placed Adam in the Garden of Eden to dress and keep it. All the other creatures had sexual counterparts but not Adam so He created Eve to be Adam’s “help meet.” When Satan initiated the Fall, he used a serpent to convince Eve to disobey God. Satan approached Eve, not Adam and when they sinned by disobeying God, Adam, not Eve was reproached by God. The man had to accept most of the responsibility.

Satan saw Eve as vulnerable and God saw Adam as responsible as head of the nascent human race. As a consequence of their sin, Eve would deliver children in sorrow and pain and Adam would have to work hard fighting the birds, bugs and beetles, thistles and thorns, drought and downpours to produce enough food to sustain them. All Bible-oriented denominations used to believe that.

I still do.

It is interesting that the couple, newly sinners, showed the very human quality of placing blame rather than accepting responsibility. When confronted by God for their sin, Adam blamed Eve. She then blamed the serpent, who of course, didn’t have a leg to stand on.

Note the deterioration: It is generally agreed by conservative theologians that Creation took place about 4000 B.C.; A few hundred years later Cain killed Abel; Over the next five hundred years violence and wickedness accelerated to the point of provoking God to destroy the world with a global flood about 2400 B.C.

Adam’s son, Cain was an Alpha Male or as Chad Howse wrote, “the real man, a man’s man, a warrior, a stand-up guy. It doesn’t matter what you call him, he’s a leader, the guy others look to for motivation, inspiration, and often with a hint of jealousy.” Such a dude was Cain who with his drive, desire, and determination to escape his family and belligerent background, left family and friends to build Enoch, the world’s first city. Cain tried to escape his reputation without success. As Matthew Henry commented, “those who depart from God cannot find rest anywhere else.”

Note the progression and rapid growth in violence and especially the development of female aggression following the Flood. Even with a new start, there was failure.

In the very earliest days of civilization Nimrod was an aggressive male being “a mighty hunter” who built the Tower of Babel in present day Iraq. Flavius Josephus wrote that it was likely under his direction that the building of Babel and its tower began.

The first indication of warfare is seen about 2084 B.C. in Genesis 14 when a coalition of kings kidnapped Lot along with others and fled the countryside. Abraham, being responsible for his nephew, armed his 318 trained servants and pursued the bad guys almost to Damascus. He fought the enemy and brought back Lot, his family, and servants and all the bounty. All modern warfare started at that time.

Of course, there was fighting in various parts of the occupied world from the beginning but in 1457 B.C., the first detailed account of an actual battle comes to us from the ancient Egyptians. It seems a series of fiefdoms in present day Syria and Israel rose up against their Egyptian masters in the Battle of Megiddo. In modern day Israel, the site will be the place of the Battle of Armageddon in the last days.

Aggressive women are seen in 2067 B.C. when Sodom was destroyed and Lot’s daughters had sex with their drunk father “that we may preserve seed of our father.” This was the first time the written record shows females being sexually aggressive. Then, in 1898 B.C., Tamar deceived Judah, her father-in-law into thinking she was a prostitute and slept with him. Nine years later, Joseph, master of Potiphar’s house, refused to be seduced by Potiphar’s wife as he fled with his coat left in her hands. Obviously, females can be aggressive and make false accusations against a totally innocent man! That’s been true from almost the beginning of time.

That fact must be constantly reiterated, even shouted from the house tops.

God created male and female each with a personality, potential, and propensities to perpetuate the human race. He made man to be strong to protect the family and to provide daily sustenance. He would have to work hard to meet the needs of the family. Men are to protect, provide, and preserve the family unit.

The woman was given persistence, patience, and placable qualities to round out the family’s needs. Men are made different from women–but you knew that. Women don’t need upper body strength as men do. Some argue that the differences in the genders is a result of millions of years of evolutionary progress while others tell us it is simply the original creation plan. Each gender is made to accomplish the reason for their creation–the continuation of the human race.

In recent months, men realized the rules between men and women have changed after some male pigs took advantage of their position, power, and prestige to grope, fondle, kiss, and rape women. Only God knows how many accusations were false and prompted by revenge, hatred, or publicity. Only a fool or a screaming feminist refuses to admit some of the charges were untrue. False accusations have damaged and destroyed some innocent men and nothing on earth can help them.

Many in authority have taken the position that a false rape charge never happens but those people will believe anything. They think Pepsi will sell for a nickel again, mainline China will retake Taiwan, the Democrats will come to their senses and cooperate for the good of the nation, and Elvis Presley, Jimmy Hoffa, Judge Crater, and Amelia Earhart will be found eating an escoviche dinner with adult beverages at a beachside bistro in Jamaica.

If men get to where they have no interest in women then the future of the race is in jeopardy. Men, by their nature, are aggressive in all areas of life; however, that aggression must be harnessed and directed by caution, kindness, gallantry, honesty, and grace. A man must never force his attention upon any woman and if he does, the full force of the law should hit him like a pile of bricks. However, courtship and romance must never be taboo or out of date. For France to make it illegal for a man to ask a woman for her phone number ($435.00 fine) is insane.

But then, that happens in France.

The left fears, hates, and tries to castrate strong, white men and while that could solve an immediate problem it sure does not bode well for the future.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Everyone knows the media crowd are generally a bunch of unstable, unprincipled, and untrustworthy lowlifes and increasingly that immorality is infecting the general population because of their music, movie, and television influence. If the plunge continues, we will have to change our national symbol from the noble eagle to the nasty buzzard.

But the sexual accusations against men have an ominous portent for America; and men, in general, are in danger. In fact, leftists and other opportunists are using a legitimate issue, i.e. sexual assault on women, as an excuse to attack our basic foundational principles. It seems their goal is to always believe the women, no matter the circumstances, and castigate the men–whether guilty or not!

I just read an ominous piece titled, “Effective Report Writing: Using the Language of Non-Consensual Sex” and funded in part by you, the taxpayer! It is a course that teaches police authorities how to prepare a report that reflects negatively on the trustworthiness of the accused men! It was sponsored by End Violence Against Women International (EVAWI) and their website says they are dedicated to “changing the way we respond to sexual assault in our communities. Our goal is to pave the way for survivors to achieve justice and healing, so the decision to come forward and seek help is a safe one. Our vision is to end the cycle of repeat offenses and assure that rapists are held accountable.”

Well, no sane person could disagree with that goal except sex abusers; however, the good ladies are willing to stomp on the Constitution with stiletto heels to achieve their lofty goals. They make that clear with their motto Start by Believing; however, police are supposed to assume any accuser may have ulterior motives. The accuser may want payback; she may want a payday; she may be a scorned woman; or she just may be a dingbat. But no, now police officials are told to consider all accusers as sincere and become an advocate for them!

Any police chief who implements this unlawful, unconstitutional, and unfair plan should be forced to stand before his entire force and be drummed out of the department.

You know, I am surprised that I am constantly surprised. I know that the leftist mind is corrupt so it constantly spews corruption. But, I keep thinking that even they would be queasy about promoting such nonsense. But, no, they keep surprising and shocking me.

Police investigators are told to “record witness statements, especially those that corroborate the victim’s account or provide an implausible or even absurd version of reality.” They are told to “recreate the entire reality of the sexual assault from the perspective of the victim.”

All men are in the crosshairs of these looney ladies but it is really dangerous to be in the crosshairs of police authorities.

Hey, if there is no doubt about a woman being raped, then of course tell the account to best prosecute the pig; however, the police investigator does not know that at the time. Police should give no more credibility to the accuser than to the accused. Remember, he is an accused person at this time not a guilty person. She could be lying in her teeth and he could be totally innocent.

But it gets worse. Police are told to “Recreate the Reality of the Sexual Assault from the Victim’s Perspective.” Not if I’ve been accused! After that statement, emphasized in main word caps, the report has to gall to assert, “While the role of law enforcement is as an unbiased fact finder, a key component of this process is to document and seek to corroborate every aspect possible from the victim’s account of events.” However, she is an alleged victim until evidence proves otherwise.

Officers are told to ask the alleged victim what she felt and thought during the alleged rape. However, if it was consensual and it happened years ago, she may editorialize and say that she was frightened that she would be killed if she did not obey. Or, she may not admit that it was consensual. Men are at the mercy of any dishonest, designing, and disgusting woman.

In this 34-page report, investigators are urged to go beyond being neutral but are asked to “overcome” defense attorneys in sexual assault cases! It is to be assumed that all accusations are gospel truth and this is obvious since victim is used hundreds of times and alleged and accuser don’t even appear once! Is anyone willing to use the words bogus, bias, and bigotry?

Investigators are told that their focus should be on getting statements that “corroborate the victim’s account or provide an implausible or even absurd version of reality.” Wow, there goes all neutrality and presumption of innocent. No matter how absurd!

Investigators are told that when inconsistencies are uncovered during an investigation, they should not prejudice the claims of the female! After all, false accusations seldom happen. Yea, tell that to the boys at Duke University.

Investigators are to “make sure” that the finished report does not resemble a “consensual sexual experience.” What these ladies demand is to start any sexual accusation investigation with presumptive guilt of the man and the angel-like innocence of the woman. Forget ethics, impartiality, honesty, fairness, and justice. Yet, this horrible, irresponsible report has been disseminated across our nation’s law enforcement agencies!

When an accused man presents a robust defense, it is alleged to be victim-bashing. Going into a trial, the woman is told, “You will be believed”; however, if that is acceptable then we can do away with the investigators, judges, and the whole judicial system. Some cities are even piloting pretrial cross-examinations to shield the accusers from a thorough interview so as to not traumatize the victim a second time. Wait a minute. Thus far, no evidence has been developed to prove there was a first time trauma. They even suggest that victim be replaced with survivor. Wow, that’s fair!

It should be remembered, and a reminder should not be necessary, that the judicial system is not to promote any social, moral, economic, or religious agenda. Its main object is justice, not to make a bunch of women giddy with their cause, however noble it may be. Justice for all, female and male should be the end result. The guilty must never escape and the innocent must prevail; but in the real world made up of flawed humans, we know that the ideal does not always prevail. However, going into a case with the presumption of guilt always on the male makes no more sense than going into a case with the presumption of guilt always on the female and both are only a step this side of insanity and a step from legal anarchy.

Most of the media seem to take the position that if a woman said it then that’s all the evidence needed! It doesn’t matter about the circumstances, about her credibility, nothing else matters. She is a woman! As comedian and writer Kurt Metzger factiously said, “ALL women are as reliable as my bible! A book that, much like a women, is incapable of lying!”

Well, the Bible can always be trusted but not all women (or men) can be. The above report is a disgusting, disturbing, and dangerous piece of rubbish that had to be prepared by devious and irresponsible zealots.

Eugene J. Kanin did a study published in Archives of Sexual Behavior titled, “False Rape Allegations” in a “small metropolitan community, 45 consecutive, disposed, false rape allegations covering a 9 year period….” According to the study, the false rape charges constitute 41% of the total forcible rape cases reported during this period. “These false allegations appear to serve three major functions for the complainants: providing an alibi, seeking revenge, and obtaining sympathy and attention.” The false charges “reflect impulsive and desperate efforts to cope with personal and social stress situations.” Now that report makes reflects reality.

All women are flawed creatures like the rest of us so they can lie. False accusations can destroy a man, his family, and his future. All sexual assaults should be seriously looked at and any rapist should be hanged (literally) and any false accuser should be branded with an L on her forehead and horse whipped out of town (figuratively).

After second thought, I believe, no; all right, I’ll settle for figuratively.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.