Wokeism is the new Nazism.

Comparing Nazis’ treatment of people in an effort to reach their desired results with modern woke zealots’ behavior will be resented—by modern Nazis. However, my analysis will be accepted by informed people.  The historic Nazis made their vile mark upon the world but were stopped and almost eliminated, while modern wokers are dismantling a thriving society with little opposition. America and the world will never be the same because of the virulent, venal, even vicious virus of wokeism.

Think with me along these lines—the Nazis’ dangerous, disastrous, and deadly system as compared with what the wokers are doing.

Would you permit your disabled child to be killed by the state to keep him or her out of pain and make life easier and better for you and your family?

Or to save the government health care system from going belly up!

Where did you or the state get the authority to do the above? Does any state or jurisdiction have the right to mistreat a helpless citizen?

USSANews.com reported a Canadian man was euthanized by health officials after being hospitalized for “hearing loss,” according to reports. He had texted his brother, asking him to “bust him out” of the hospital, but it was too late. He was killed by those allegedly called and trained to save lives and “to do no harm.” In reasonable, humane societies, his euthanasia would be considered murder. However, “authorities” in medicine and politics seem to be all-powerful.

Both medicine and politics need to have their wings clipped. That will keep them closer to earth and common sense.

In 1920, a world-shaking book was published by Germans Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche with the English title, Permission to Destroy Life Devoid of Value or Permitting the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Life. It addressed the legal relationship between suicide and euthanasia and extended it to killing the mentally ill. The book suggested that killing a patient was justifiable when it led to saving other lives, particularly when the patients in question were of no value to themselves or society. The book advocates killing the mentally ill or the intellectually dead, especially since such people were a drain on society—useless eaters.

When Hitler came to power legally, he wanted a pure nation of strong, blond, blue-eyed Germans. Those who could not contribute to that view of National Socialism had to go. Many thousands left the country. Others stayed and were sent to work camps. The Nazis used the legal and medical research of Binding and Hoche to support their culling of the weak, incompetent, demented, etc. And this was supported by the German people. A 1925 poll of German parents of disabled children indicated that 74% favored euthanizing their children! The book helped to make suicide and euthanasia legal.

If you think it couldn’t happen here, you had better think about the above poll—in the land of Martin Luther and thousands of Catholic and Lutheran churches.

Before Hitler’s rise to dictator in 1934, grotesque laws were framed as public health measures with the goal of strengthening society. The German euthanasia program was officially adopted in 1939 and accelerated quickly to bizarre lengths. Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide author Robert Jay Liftin revealed that Nazi policy underwent several modifications.

“Of the five identifiable steps by which the Nazis carried out the principle of ‘life unworthy of life,’ coercive sterilization was the first. There followed the killing of ‘impaired’ children in hospitals. Then the killing of ‘impaired’ adults, mostly collected from mental hospitals, in centers especially equipped with carbon monoxide gas.” This bizarre project was extended to “impaired” inmates in concentration camps.

The Nazis did the above and more based on the best medical science at the time. The diseased and disabled individuals were unproductive members of society and drained out of society much more than they contributed. Plus, they were a lot of trouble to care for!

More than half of all German physicians became early members of the Nazi Party, exceeding the party enrollments of all other professions. That suggests to me that M.D. might refer to morally deficient. National Socialist officials could say, “Hey, we are only doing what the medical experts tell us the science requires.”

Well, we have sure heard that many times recently.

The world had embraced the “science” of eugenics. The Germans, yes, even the Nazis, thought they were good people acting on sound evidence and a solid ethical basis. These defendants engaged in genocide, but they did so under the protective cover of medical authority and official legitimacy. Almost anything can be justified if based on “following the science.”

We sure know about that, don’t we?

Our government has permitted electric shock; lobotomies (Rosemary Kennedy, sister to the late president John F. Kennedy the most famous victim); cocaine sold like candy in drug stores and used in the first Coca-Cola in the late 1880s; Bayer began advertising a heroin-laced aspirin in 1898 until 1913; forced sterilization; forced inoculations; etc., that compare with Nazi policies.

However, no government has the authority to slaughter innocent unborn babies; permit, even encourage, assisted suicide; sterilize people against their will; authorize immorality (heterosexual or homosexual) of any kind; legalize unwanted medical treatment; permit children to have their sexual organs chopped off or be mutilated; encourage and sponsor changing genders—which can’t be done; and on and on.

While we question the morality and the competence of Hitler’s experts, we must also question modern health officials as well as politicians who think they can make a pretend boy become a real boy.

No, government officials in Germany and the U.S. don’t have the authority, but they have the power since they carry the guns.

The expression “life unworthy of life,” which appeared first in Binding and Hoche’s book, was essential to Nazi ideology. The two authors, a lawyer and a physician, were not political and for sure were not National Socialists. They were academics dealing with a very delicate subject: Does the state have the right to kill some people for the good of many? Does the state have a right to decide when a life is unproductive?

Between 1934 and 1939, the number of people sterilized ranged from 200,000 to 400,000 Germans to keep a clean or pure race.  Between 1933 and 1945, roughly 15,000 deaf people were forcibly sterilized. In Canada, they kill them as the news revealed.

According to Hoche, “some living people who were brain damaged, intellectually disabled, autistic (though not recognized as such at the time), and mentally ill were ‘mentally dead,’ ‘human ballast’ and ‘empty shells of human beings.’” Hoche believed that killing such people was helpful since they made no contribution to society and were considered disposable.

They were useless eaters.

New Nazis are walking among us today and are considered intellectuals teaching at major American universities, receiving generous salaries and perks. The wokest among them tell us a child can decide what gender he/she/it wants to be. Moreover, such confused children have a right to receive hormone blockers and even have their tell-tell organs chopped off to give credibility to their insane fantasies.

To hide a male’s sexual organ before surgery (mutilation), the Boston Children’s Hospital  advises transgender teenagers as young as 13 to implement “safer tucking” to make their penis look like a vagina. Taping with medical tape is recommended using tape for that purpose; however, if boys use duct tape, the hospital (that used to have a sterling reputation) added, “if you do use duct tape, remember to shave (although not right before, as that can cause irritation) so that the tape does not pull hair. Soak in a warm bath before removal to make the tape less sticky.”

Those hospital officials are not only woke but weird, even wacky. But double board certified.

Furthermore, childbirth, monthly periods, and menopause are no longer strictly the bailiwick of females, and such events can now be experienced by any male who desires them according to the wokest of the woke. But then, why would any sane man want those experiences?

American philosopher Peter Singer Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University, and others have made similar arguments for any time abortion to weeks following birth and any time euthanasia. Singer declares, “It would be morally wrong to choose to have a child with disability.” He and other fuzzy, foolish, and fatal ethicists believe permitting a disabled child to live is wrong. Therefore, if killing a hemophiliac infant has no adverse effect on others, it would, in their view, be right to kill him.

Singer—not only woke but wicked—has no problem with sex with the dead (necrophilia) as long as consent was given to the person while alive. Of course, sex with animals is acceptable. Not sure about needing consent. Maybe the wag of a dog’s tale is sufficient. But it gets worse—it always does. Singer told ABC, “A woman has oral sex performed by her dog. I know women who have said this is something that pleases them. The dog is free to do it or walk away. There is no dominance over the dog. That seems to me harmless.”

Notice that having personal supremacy over the dog would be wrong but perverted sex is acceptable.

To be clear, I have more respect for the dog than I do for the woman or Singer, and under normal circumstances, such disgusting subjects should not be discussed by normal people; however, we are living in very unusual times.

Humans are responsible for living as humans and will give a personal account to a just and holy God one day.

University of California professor Kenneth Watt opined, “Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.”

Watt, Singer, and Company are far from harmless. As in Germany, freakish, foolish, and fraudulent scientists declared war on the culture to replace it. Tenured professors’ positions are secure no matter how unbiblical, un-American, unqualified, or stupid they are. Moreover, they are generally safe from being fired unless caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy.

Woke fanaticism is obvious, as supported by watching almost any television show. Radicals have put the cult in culture and removed the civil from civilization. It almost makes me want to resign from the human race.

And it has lost its humanity.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former Indiana House of Representatives member who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 20 books, the most recent, Reflections of a Lifetime Fundamentalist: No Reserves, No Retreats, No Regrets! The eBook is available at Amazon.com for $4.99. Other titles at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don  Boys, Ph.D., and visit his blog. Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles and click here to support  his work with a donation.)

“You have not lived today until you have done something for someone who can never repay you.” – John Bunyan

Muslims are very touchy people, as evidenced by the killing of ten journalists at the Paris-based satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015 after the magazine published cartoons of Mohammed. Two policemen were also killed, and a teacher in Paris was beheaded eight months later because he had shown some of the cartoons to his class.

Paris officials are almost sure it was a hate crime.

Earlier in 2005, Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten published irreverent, anti-Muslim material, and it caused riots around the world.

Muslims feel strongly what people say about Mohammed and Jews, especially what is said about the Holocaust. No traditional Muslim believes Hitler killed 6 million Jews during WW II. Most Muslims totally reject the Holocaust.

Everyone knows millions of people died during WW II, but it would be stunning for a panel of experts to discuss the circumstances: Who came up with 6 million dead Jews? Has that number been drastically reduced by experts? Has Auschwitz lowered the number of Jews killed from 4 million to 960,000? If so, why do intelligent people still use the 6 million number?

Has a written order been found to document such a vast program of Jewish extermination by the Nazis? Were the 6 million gassed and cremated? Can we discuss the physical problems of gassing and cremating 24,000 each day at Auschwitz alone?

Why not?

Since Hitler was fighting a world war, Holocaust deniers say it would not be wise to kill millions of Jews when Nazis advertised for workers to produce rubber, supplies, bombs, planes, etc., in the prosecution of the war.

Were the stacks of emaciated bodies found at the liberated camps victims of typhus, dysentery, and pneumonia? Did anyone care enough about the truth to check it out?

Many people, other than Muslims, question various parts of the Holocaust story, but the issue must not be discussed, debated, and for sure, not denied. However, it is acceptable to deny that Jesus Christ is God of very God to whom everyone on Earth will give an account. It is also permitted to believe the silly story that the Earth and Universe created themselves. But we must not even discuss the Holocaust and any possible difficulties.

Why not?

The Holocaust would make a stimulating discussion and permit experts to produce their evidence, thereby allowing non-experts to make intelligent decisions. Some may decide the Holocaust happened as per the common belief, while some could deny any Holocaust and decide that Hitler was a misunderstood, lapsed Roman Catholic altar boy. Still, others might decide Jews were murdered, but it was a haphazard program perpetrated by rogue camp superintendents. Some could decide that it is too complex and too much time has passed, so let’s move on with determination to never mistreat anyone, even our enemy.

Whatever the Holocaust facts, surely no true devotee to truth and freedom will defend the incredible sentence of Alison Chablozin in England of 18 weeks in prison for “disseminating grossly offensive material and messages on social media denying the Holocaust.” Prison for not believing the “correct truth”! Where are all the traditional Liberals demanding justice for Alison?

Hey, where are all the Conservative defenders of free speech?

Many will be angry with me for mentioning the banned subject, and some of the news sites that usually publish my columns will refuse this one. Why the fear of discussing this issue?

Or any issue? Can’t truth stand alone? Must it be propped up to protect it from falsehood? I thought truth always dispelled error as light dispels darkness. I demand to know why those who speak the loudest about truth and tolerance refuse to discuss forbidden issues.

It is un-American to have forbidden subjects.

Moreover, almost no one will discuss how German citizens were treated by the Allies following the war’s end. After the war, millions of Germans were put in huge fenced meadows without food, clothing, or protection. It is charged, “7 Million German Civilians were deliberately starved to death on extreme food rationing after the war – Any additional help with food from local sources or the Red Cross was denied.”

Very few Americans know there is anything to discuss about the above. What part did General Eisenhower play in that crime?

Maybe the chest-thumping declarations about devotion to truth are so much showboating by closet totalitarians who are very fearful of the truth.

Less volatile is the issue of forced vaccinations, especially for children. Most medical people adamantly insist on vaccinations when children attend school, although other physicians disagree. Everyone admits that anyone, at any time, can have an adverse reaction to a shot with a disability, disease, or even death resulting. Similar to Russian roulette! We are seeing that at this time with the China coronavirus vaccinations.

Most people believe that vaccinations have contributed to eliminating most childhood diseases in the past 50 years. But dare I ask about the widespread afflictions we have seen in the past 30 years? Is there a correlation between government-mandated shots and allergies, autism, mental retardation, and many other afflictions that were almost unheard of until recent years?

Let’s discuss it.

The charge is that vaccinations of very young children have been the catalyst of many health problems in the past 20 to 30 years with the mumps, measles, and rubella (MMR) and diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus (DPT) vaccinations especially dangerous. And when multiple shots are given at the same time, the evidence of harmful results is compelling. Of course, no one, child or adult, should ever permit a shot that contains mercury or aluminum or human remains.

When parents refuse the required shots, often the physician, with his/her messiah-complex in full bloom, treats the parents as unloving, uneducated, and uninformed Neanderthals. Usually, the physician is the one who drags his or her knuckles on the floor. (And Neanderthals did not drag knuckles either, but many evolutionists do.)

But there can be no public discussion or debate, or disagreement because everyone knows vaccinations have saved millions of lives.

But, let’s discuss it anyway just to prove we can.

It is shocking the number of people who believe the 9/11 attacks were an “inside job” or that the American government knew in advance of the attacks. A Rasmussen poll revealed, “Overall, 22% of all voters believe the President knew about the attacks in advance. A slightly larger number, 29%, believe the CIA knew about the attacks in advance.” A majority of Americans believe that “the government is concealing information about the 9/11 attacks.”

I have seen the video of architects and engineers promoting the theory that the buildings were destroyed by well-placed bombs. The information cannot be dismissed out of hand. Too many professionals (who know far more about it than you and I) have raised too many questions, but we must not talk about it even though it may not change minds.

Why not discuss the facts that possibly make falsifiers look like fools?

Race has become a more volatile subject than any other issue, and there are nuts and non-thinkers on all sides of this issue. Of course, people with weak minds and big mouths use the race club to beat their way into a conversation. I’m a Bible-practicing Christian with a desire to love everyone since God loves everyone; however, that does not mean I must disregard facts and common sense when discussing an issue.

I am white and have been since birth and will probably stay white. Furthermore, I’m somewhat proud to be white, although I’ve been ashamed of what many Whites have done.

I’m also an American; therefore, I believe it is natural, biblical, and only logical to put America first. We should never do anything detrimental to our national interests. In foreign aid, trade, and international affairs, America’s interests should always be first. Frankly, I question the honesty, thinking ability, or patriotism of anyone who disagrees with that proposition.

However, I will fight for their right to be stupid.

Some would declare that such a position makes me a white nationalist. Gasp! Well, I am white by birth and a patriot by choice; therefore, I believe America’s interest must be preferred by Americans in all matters. Consequently, the expectation from the nutty left is that I should immediately fall on my knees and beg for mercy.

When pigs learn to fly in formation and do somersaults over the White House.

No, not even then.

There’s a lot of dishonesty and demagogy or simply dumbness floating around about this issue. One dictionary said a white nationalist is “one of a group of militant whites who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation.” To think they killed a live tree to print such tripe! That might be a good definition of a white supremacist but not of a white nationalist.

But the tripe goes on when you look at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) website (a radical left-wing group spewing hate while raising money from deceived, deluded, and dumb people). Honest people wonder why anyone supports such a leftist group since they have been discredited in recent months.

The fanatics at the SPLC are too lazy or too prejudiced to do their homework and delineate various controversial groups. They declare, “White nationalist groups espouse white supremacist or white separatist ideologies, often focusing on the alleged inferiority of nonwhites. Groups listed in a variety of other categories – Ku Klux Klan, neo-Confederate, neo-Nazi, racist skinhead, and Christian Identity – could also be fairly described as white nationalist.” That is a tub full of poppycock and more than a dash of hogwash.

With a generous portion of balderdash.

Kristen Clarke of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law said: “There is no defensible distinction that can be drawn between white supremacy, white nationalism or white separatism in society today.” Obviously, Kristen is dumb as a box of rocks, but then, she is a social justice attorney.

One does not have to be a hater to believe that white people have as much right to revere their own kind and seek to preserve their influence—as all groups should do.

But let’s talk about it.

It’s time to open the window and yell, “I’m not going to take it anymore.” Then use what pronouns you choose; tell an innocent joke even about racial minorities—or majorities, “gays,” women, men who pretend to be women or even Fundamentalists. And stop using “the n-word” and use nigger if it’s not used in contempt.

Then, run through the streets, yelling, “Free at last, free at last, thank God almighty, I’m free at last.”

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

I don’t want to put these words in print, but I must. I believe the far left has been softening up America to eliminate the President of the United States and accomplish a coup d ‘état by Socialists and Communists. (A Communist has a gun; the Socialist doesn’t, but he will get one.) Others, less radical, will be satisfied to destroy his administration.

As a student of History and a keen observer as well as an active political person, I have never seen such hatred expressed for a politician and his policies. I don’t believe every viciously vocal person against Trump wishes him dead, but historians will identify each of them with the irresponsible haters who have connected the dots and got the message: kill Trump.

It was only one month after President Trump was inaugurated that a group of young children in Chicago were filmed beating and tearing apart a President Trump piñata, as leftist bullies cheered them on.

Even mentally dull people have understood the definite, desired, and deranged message: if you have a noble cause, you don’t have to respect laws or fear accountability. Furthermore, when a racist hater is caught breaking the law, he or she understands to immediately yell “racism” and whine about an obscure but favorite unnamed uncle who was mistreated as a slave.

Conspirators and the weak of mind (often the same people) have noticed that looters are not arrested and put in jail, arsonists are treated as heroes, thieves are not arrested if they steal loot worth less than $700, and thousands of felons have been released from prison to continue their felonious actions. Moreover, they are aware of celebrities (often actresses whose basic talent is letting their breasts hang out or racist and sexist males who have had a hit rap song spouting vile, vulgar, and violent messages) who have suggested the President should be removed, even killed.

No dog whistle is needed.

Everyone knows that minorities can live a life of crime, and when caught, they can resist arrest; and if police shoot them, they will be defended by protesters as heroes. We have been told that looting is not looting since the looters deserve it because (maybe) their ancestors were slaves. The protesters (many of them white) have discovered the art of eating without working by making a profession out of protesting.

Shockingly, police officers are harassed and fired and, at times, jailed for doing their job resulting in whole departments resigning. Who can blame them?

Racist films such as Why Don’t We Murder More White People? are aired at taxpayers’ expense at the San Francisco museum for a month, and people wonder why so many Blacks attack Whites for no reason.

When cities pay millions of dollars to criminals and their families for alleged illegal police action, it is no surprise that others are encouraged to try the same tactic.

Local and national leaders have blown the dog whistle giving permission for violent and illegal actions against our government and the President.

University of New Mexico Professor of History Richard Berthold said, “Anybody who can blow up the Pentagon gets my vote.”

Only a few months later, failed comedian and Trump hater, Kathy Griffin was attempting to perform comedy and held up a bloodied, decapitated Donald Trump head for cameras. Why isn’t she in a federal prison?

Peter Fonda targeted Trump’s 11-year-old son, Barron, saying, “We should rip Barron Trump from his mother’s arms and put him in a cage with pedophiles and see if mother will stand up against the giant a**hole she is married to…” You remember Peter whose only claim to fame is riding a motorcycle and being the brother of Jane. The two Fondas were apples that fell far from the tree. Their father, Henry was an early Republican because of his respect for Lincoln and later changed his party affiliation; however, he was a classic liberal who was balanced and honest.

Representative Maxine Waters declared, “I will go and take Trump out tonight,” and while she qualifies as liberal, she does not qualify as balanced.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “I don’t know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country. Maybe there will be.” Well, we know how that turned out, but Nancy has not repented in sackcloth and ashes on national television. Nor has she been removed by a gutless House.

New York Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo said, “Show me where it says protesters are supposed to be polite and peaceful.” So, I pulled out my pocket Constitution and read in the First Amendment “or the right of the people peaceably to assemble….” I will be glad to lend Andy my copy of the Constitution if he doesn’t have one.

Former Attorney General Eric Holder, who was held in contempt of Congress, said, “When they go low, we kick.”

Joe Biden once said that if he and President Trump were in high school together, he’d “take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him.”

Actor Johnny Depp asked, “When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?”

Broadway star Carole Cook invoked Abraham Lincoln’s assassination while discussing President Trump with a photographer by saying, “Where is John Wilkes Booth when you need him?” As an aside, who is Carole Cook?

A commentator on MSNBC, GOP establishment consultant Rick Wilson said, “They’re still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump.” Wilson is known as one of the vilest “Never Trumpers.”

Madonna told thousands of Women’s March attendees in Washington that she has “thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House” since President Trump was elected. The crowd cheered heartily. The lady dropped some f-bombs on the crowd and closed by saying, “I choose love.”

Did the leftist media demand she be arrested or at least be investigated? Or be required to apologize? No, she continues to sing or whatever she does. She, at least, should have a big H branded on her forehead for encouraging blowing up the White House and closing her “speech” with choosing love.

Many prominent people have compared President Trump to Adolf Hitler for his comments targeting some Mexicans and Muslims and for his populist politicking style. Others have called Trump a dictator, while others accuse him of killing vast numbers of people because of his handling of the Chinese coronavirus.

When Hitler came to power as Chancellor of Germany in 1933, it must be remembered that he was voted into office. The people had high hopes he would solve their problems—the poverty, the unemployment, the hyperinflation in 1923, and the worldwide depression in 1929. One big change he made was the privatization of state industries with almost 20% increase in weekly income. But then, most of that impressive increase was because of an unprecedented increase in war production.

All Germans knew the preparation for war was contrary to the Versailles Treaty that ended World War I. That treaty was a humiliation for Germany, and many honest historians would declare it was unjust and unnecessary and much overkill. Germans were delighted that the economy was on the road to recovery, and their nation was getting stronger daily and was deserving of respect, even pride. Hitler told them what they wanted to hear: they were building an empire that will survive a thousand years. It lasted almost 13 years.

After dragging Germany and other European nations into the greatest conflagration in man’s history, all honest Germans knew he was a madman. There were many plots to kill Hitler as the number of German deaths multiplied enormously, as their major cities were bombed every night, as food and necessary products were almost impossible to find, and as they realized they were the pariah of the world.

Hitler needed to die; after to all, he was evil. Innocent people were being killed, the nation was repeating World War I, and his death would save Europe as well as Germany. Almost all reasonable people agreed. Hitler had to go for many legitimate reasons. A few religious leaders opposed any assassination attempts, while other religious leaders were actively involved in trying to kill their chosen leader.

So, the logic is simple to the simpletons: if Trump is dangerous and is destroying America, then it would not be wrong, yea, it would be right to save everyone by getting rid of Trump. We are seeing and will continue to see those on the left building their case for the disgrace, the defeat, the dismissal, and the death of Donald Trump.

If that happens, America will end up on the garbage heap of history. The public educational system, the major media, and the unbiblical churches have been laying a foundation for a race, religious, or regional war for almost 50 years.

We are at an unprecedented time in our history, and in November, we will know whether we are the land of Washington, Jefferson, and Madison or Bevis and Butthead.

And Biden.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

Edward Simon, a Jewish biology professor at Purdue University, wrote, “I don’t claim that Darwin and his theory of evolution brought on the holocaust; but I cannot deny that the theory of evolution, and the atheism it engendered, led to the moral climate that made a holocaust possible.”

Because I want to be balanced, honest, and factual, I am forced to include here that the ravings against the Jews of one of the world’s greatest, most principled men, Martin Luther also added fuel to the fire. All great men do a few stupid things in their lives because they are flawed creatures.

I wonder what the current “moral climate” is doing to students in public schools as they are taught they came from animals and are without any purpose in life? Could the incredible number and depth of our social problems be the result of Darwinism? I am convinced this is so, for if one believes that life has no purpose, and man came from beasts, then dignity, fairness, kindness, honesty, faithfulness, honor, and justice have no relevance and importance.

A well-known evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith assessed Darwin’s impact on Hitler and Germany: “We see Hitler devoutly convinced that evolution produces the only real basis for a national policy….The means he adopted to secure the destiny of his race and people were (sic) organized slaughter which has drenched Europe in blood.” Keith asserted, “Hitler (was) an uncompromising evolutionist, and we must seek for an evolutionary explanation if we are to understand his action.”

In Hitler: A Study in Tyranny, Alan Bullock wrote: “The basis of Hitler’s political beliefs was a crude Darwinism.” Adolph was aghast at Christianity’s rejection of Darwin’s theory. Hitler declared that “Its [Christianity] teaching was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle and the survival of the fittest.”

Hannah Arendt wrote in her 1951 classic, The Origins of Totalitarianism, “Underlying the Nazis’ belief in race laws as the expression of the law of nature in man, is Darwin’s idea of man as the product of a natural development which does not necessarily stop with the present species of human being.”

John Toland’s Adolf Hitler: The Definitive Biography says this of Hitler’s Second Book written in 1928 but not published until after his suicide in his underground bunker within hours after his marriage to Eva Braun: “An essential of Hitler’s conclusions in this book was the conviction drawn from Darwin that might makes right.”

The unreasonable, unbiblical, unscientific philosophy of Darwin and his disciples laid a foundation for hundreds of years of hatred, barbarity, and unbelief reaching into the future and impacting millions of innocent lives.

If Darwin were alive today, he would be hooted out of the scientific community because he was not a trained scientist and because of his outrageous views about black people. Darwin thought that Blacks were closer to man’s ape “ancestors” than the white race! Wonder what the race baiters think of that?

Darwin’s disciple T. H. Huxley wrote, “It may be quite true that some negroes [sic] are better than some white men, but no rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average negro [sic] is the equal, still less the superior, of the average white man….The highest places in the hierarchy of civilization will assuredly not be within the reach of our dusky cousins….” (I inserted sic in the above places not because he used the term Negro but because he did not capitalize it.)

“Dusky cousins!” How would that be received down at the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People? But it gets worse. Henry Osborne, who was professor of biology and zoology at Columbia University, said that Blacks were further back on the evolutionary ladder (nearer the apes) than Whites, and “The standard of intelligence of the average adult Negro is similar to that of the eleven-year-old youth of the species Homo sapiens.” Blacks aren’t human! Wow! The most KKK nut doesn’t believe that!

Edwin Conklin (died 1975), Professor of Biology at Princeton University and president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said that Blacks had not evolved as far as Whites and “Every consideration should lead those who believe in the superiority of the white race to strive to preserve its purity and to establish and maintain the segregation of the races, for the longer this is maintained, the greater the preponderance of the white race will be.” Well, maybe that was the reason Ed never received a lifetime Achievement Award from the NAACP. Too bad.

The major haters of the last 100 years have been evolutionists. Men like Nietzsche (who often said God was dead, called for the breeding of a master race and for the annihilation of millions of misfits), Hitler, Mussolini, Marx, Engels, and Stalin were all outspoken evolutionists. Darwin’s dangerous book is credited for making mass killer Joseph Stalin an atheist and evolutionist.

Few people know Stalin was first an evolutionist then a revolutionist drenching Eastern Europe in blood. He was baptized after his birth in 1878 into the Russian Orthodox Church and at age ten enrolled in the Gori Church School where he found Darwin’s book on a shelf. He read it and began to doubt all religious truth, but at 16 he enrolled in the Spiritual Seminary in Tiflis. There he joined 600 trainee priests who lived at the seminary. His twisted evolutionary teaching helped turn him into a master monster of murder–killing 20 to 60 millions of people and spreading Communist hatred around the world.

E. Yaroslavsky, a close friend of Stalin, wrote about this in his Landmarks in the Life of Stalin, “At a very early age, while still a pupil in the ecclesiastical school, Comrade Stalin developed a critical mind and revolutionary sentiments. He began to read Darwin and became an atheist.” So, Joe Stalin attended two church schools and became an unbelieving Communist because of Darwin’s book.

Found in a church school!

Shortly after The Origin of Species was published, Friedrich Engels wrote to Karl Marx, “Darwin, whom I am just now reading, is splendid.” About a year later Karl Marx, responded, “During my time of trial, these last few weeks, I have read all sorts of things. Among others, Darwin’s book of Natural Selection,…this is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view.”

These people and their theories have been responsible for the slaughter of multi-millions of people, and the destruction of freedom all over the earth. It is amazing that so many liberals, radicals, fascists, communists, and the easily impressed worship at Darwin’s shrine.

Obviously, the foundation of racism, hatred, and violence in the last hundred years is based in evolutionary teaching of the last one hundred and fifty years. This, coupled with not understanding that all people are created in God’s image and are to be respected until they prove by their actions that they are rebels against God and society made racism inevitable.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.