If a Hispanic judge is a better judge because of her cultural heritage then why not have a born again judge to empathize with Christians who come before the court? As of today, all current Supreme Court justices are Roman Catholic or Jewish. I feel left out and unrepresented!

President Obama, wishing to shore up his bona fides with the radical Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has nominated attorney Abid Riaz Qureshi to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Abid is reported to be a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood, a major terrorist organization with tentacles reaching worldwide.

Major news outlets such as the Washington Post and The New York Times gushed about Abid being the “first Muslim nominated” to the federal bench but that is not true. In 2009, Obama nominated Abdul Karim Kallon to the federal bench and he serves in the northern district of Alabama. Kallon works closely with the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a far left hate group that specializes in harassing conservatives and Christians who lean to the right. The SPLC calls itself an “advocacy” group but they seem to advocate for left wingers and are not too concerned with the truth if it hinders their advocacy for leftists.

Various Muslim groups and other radical leftists stood in line to be among the first to gush over the “brave” and “courageous” nomination of Abid. Such praise makes me suspicious even if Abid is a faithful, loyal American dedicated only to the U.S. Constitution.

The major Islamic group that praised Obama’s courage was CAIR that pretends to be a civil rights group dedicated to improving relations between Muslims and Americans; however, it is a front for implementing Sharia. It has connections to every Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group in North America and has refused to call Hamas or Hezbollah “terrorist organizations.”

The nominee’s connection with the Muslim Brotherhood should be enough to queer his nomination; however, in a nation that has lost its moral compass and worships at the shrine of diversity and toleration, his nomination may be continued into Hillary’s administration!

As to the Muslim Brotherhood, I reported in Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! that Mohamed Akram, a top Muslim Brotherhood operative, wrote a memorandum in 1991 that revealed their purpose. It was an internal correspondence that was meant for the eyes only of the organization’s leadership in Egypt. It unambiguously states that the mission of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America is to destroy “Western civilization from within … by [the infidels’] hands and the hands of the believers so that Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” Yet, their spokesmen have been White House guests! And now a person that is reportedly one of their own is recommended to be a federal judge!

The Muslim Brotherhood’s main objective is to introduce the Islamic Sharia as “the basis for controlling the affairs of state and society.” The Brotherhood says, “Allah is our objective; the Qur’an is the Constitution; the Prophet is our leader; jihad is our way; death for the sake of Allah is our wish.” U.S. Marines and Navy Seals would be happy to fulfill that wish.

Keep in mind that Muslims are permitted to lie if it furthers the Islamic push toward a world caliphate and make no mistake, that’s where they are headed. I want to know if Abid is also headed in that direction. Surely, he will be asked to comment on that important subject.

You can expect the apostles of tolerance (of everyone except conservative Christians) to object to those of us who want to know where the Muslim attorney stands on issues that affects everyone. However, even asking questions will incur the wrath of the haters. But we have a right to know how he will rule if he becomes a judge:

How would he rule on Sharia law that is demanded by 51% of Muslims in America? Will he permit Muslims to be judged by one law and other Americans to be judged by local American laws? Only a fool, fraud, or fanatic would suggest that such a question is insulting.

How would he rule on honor killings? After all, they are part of the Muslim culture and are common in Pakistan, the attorney’s birth place?

How would he rule in a case involving female sexual mutilation? After all, Jews are permitted to circumcise males on their eighth day of life so what’s the difference? But then, circumcision does not do irreparable harm as does female sexual mutilation.

How would he rule if I were accused of hate and causing psychological harm because I have told the truth about Mohammed being a thief, killer, and child molester? Would he come to my defense or defend the founder of his religion?

Where does Abid stand on multiply wives? Would he rule in favor of the leader of his religion and the teaching of the Koran and the Hadith? Inquiring minds want to know.

Where does he stand on the nation of Israel? Does he believe the Koran teaching that Allah turned Jews into pigs? Will he ridicule, reject, and repudiate that silly but stinging insult to Jews?

Where does he stand on freedom of speech? Would he put me in jail for saying that all true Muslims are terrorists as maintained by the Muslim scholar the “Blind Sheik” and others?

Will Abid repudiate all terrorist activities worldwide? Will he repudiate all fundraising for terrorist groups? Would he be willing to freeze or confiscate all Muslim funds tied to terrorist groups? Will he repudiate Sharia law whether in the US or in the Islamic world? Will he support the right of anyone to convert to any religion at any time under all conditions?

Muslim groups across the nation are gushing like a plain teenage school girl over the handsome football star. It is said that Obama is very “heroic” in making the appointment; however, it is unlikely that it will go anywhere. After all, the Senate has refused to act on his Supreme Court appointment and lower nominees. We can hope, even pray!

And when I pray, it is to the God of the Bible in the name of Jesus Christ. That is still my right–for now.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy of Muslim Invasion, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

It seems modern Muslims are giving past decapitators a bad name!

Alexander Blackwell (died 1747) was a British adventurer who was involved in a mysterious plot in Sweden and was tried, tortured, and beheaded. At his execution, Blackwell came to the block and put his head on the wrong side. The executioner pointed out his mistake and Blackwell moved around to the correct side, saying that he was sorry for the mistake, but this was the first time that he had been beheaded. Ahh yes, beheadings were always permanent, sometimes polite, but always to the point!

Decapitation has been reintroduced into our lives by Muslim terrorists even though it is a reckless, repulsive and reprehensible way to express one’s hatred of an enemy, declare a warning to others, or to exact justice. Of course, what the Muslims know about true justice would fit into the navel of a flea. More about that later–Muslims, not the flea.

Barbarism is as old as mankind and no nation has been an exception. Astyages, the last king of Media carried barbarism to its height when he ordered his general Harpagus to eat the head of his (Harpagus’) own son, and Harpagus said that whatever a king did or said was all right with him! Cyrus the Great was Astyages’ grandson and dethroned his grandpa in 550 B.C. Good for Cyrus.

An attempted assassin in China in 1570 A.D. was buried alive in the ground with only his head exposed, and the head was slowly sawn off with a bamboo saw by passers-by for several days. This official and sluggish execution was an example to all would-be assassins that they could be next.

The Celts of Western Europe followed the “cult of the severed head” which was responsible for their reputation as head hunters. An ancient historian reports:

“They cut off the heads of enemies slain in battle and attach them to the necks of their horses. The blood-stained spoils they hand over to their attendants and striking up a paean and singing a song of victory; and they nail up these first fruits upon their houses,…They embalm in cedar oil the heads of the most distinguished enemies, and preserve them carefully in a chest, and display them with pride to strangers, saying that for this head one of their ancestors, or his father, or the man himself, refused the offer of a large sum of money. They say that some of them boast that they refused the weight of the head in gold.” Ghastly, gory, and grotesque!

Rome was known for beheading its citizens, while non-citizens were crucified. Since the Apostle Paul was a Roman citizen, he was “honored” with beheading. Christ, not being a Roman citizen, was crucified, but unlike Paul, He refused to remain dead!

Often the head of the beheaded victim was displayed in the Roman Forum as was the case of Cicero, maybe the most noble of Romans, whose hands and head were nailed on the Rostra (the podium from which he spoke!) in the Forum in 43 B.C. Cicero had antagonized Mark Antony in some of his speeches in the Forum and was identified as “an enemy of the state.”

Beheading was a popular form of capital punishment since it was quick and a cheap way to get the job done. Capital punishment derives from the Latin word “capitalis” meaning “head,” since in ancient times a death sentence typically meant the offender lost his head. However, it seems most officials went to a little extreme in carrying out their idea of justice. Death was not enough.

Beheading was often considered the honorable way to die for an aristocrat; in England it was considered the privilege of the upper class to be beheaded. Death on the gallows or burning at the stake was considered dishonorable. Women were usually burned at the stake. Severed heads often were displayed on the London Bridge, as many as 40 at a time, sending a message to citizens about rebellion against the king.

In recent days the Mexican drug cartel has been sending horror throughout the continent by dropping heads along the highways, in front of churches, etc. They are even using chain saws to make the beheadings more gruesome, ghastly, and grotesque.

All beheadings are grotesque but Muslim beheadings are the most reckless, repulsive, and reprehensible because they are religiously inspired. Islamic hypocrisy is astounding.

http://bit.ly/1iMLVfY  Watch these 8 minute videos of my lecture at the University of North Dakota: “A Christian Challenges New Atheists to Put Up or Shut Up!”

Few people know that the first example of a just war was Abraham who led his army of 318 men to pursue a four-king confederacy from, at that time, the small lands of Chaldea and Persia. Those kings had invaded the land and taken Abraham’s nephew and servants captive along with some property. Abraham was outnumbered but he chased the invaders almost to Damascus and rescued the people and property. He was not concerned with attaining land, riches, or power, but to right a wrong. That is the reason all wars should be fought.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with those who declare that America has a mandate to right all the wrongs of the world and to establish freedom around the world–at taxpayer expense!

I’m all for freedom; however, it is insane to try to impose a democracy on people who have no history of freedom and no desire for it. Totalitarians of all stripes find true freedom anathema. All true Muslims are totalitarians. Read their books and listen to their leaders. They don’t want democracy or representative government but desire, demand, demonstrate for sharia law.

Moreover, since I demand consistency of myself, I believe that all nations are sovereign; therefore, we have no right to infringe on a nation’s sovereignty unless there is just cause for doing so. We now have two examples that justify our incursion into two sovereign nations–Mexico and Sudan.

There is an American Marine in a dirty, dangerous, even deadly Mexican prison because he made a wrong turn! Sgt. Andrew Tahmooresi, being treated for PTSD in San Diego, served faithfully two tours in Afghanistan and while driving south in California on March 23 he inadvertently drove into Mexico. In his car were three legal guns. Mexican thugs physically abused him, stripped him naked, and chained him to a bed. While he languishes in a Tijuana jail, American politicians don’t even talk about his intolerable, illegal, and immoral incarceration.

Tomorrow, Obama should announce that within 24 hours a detachment of Marines will land in helicopters outside the prison and achieve his release. He should say that no one wants bloodshed but the Marine will not be “left behind.” However, a massive pile of rubble may be left behind.

Corrupt Mexican officials, like most tyrants, like to push innocent people around but they are not known to be courageous warriors. They have the same reputation the French have in warfare: French WW II military rifles can be purchased cheaply since they have never been fired and only thrown down once! The Mexican thugs in uniform will cave like a house of cards when real warriors arrive. The fact is they will cave following the President’s warning which is the reason for the warning.

A more egregious case is Meriam Ibrahim who was arrested by the Sudan government in August of 2013. Meriam’s father was a Muslim who abandoned the family when she was very young. She was reared by her Christian mother and was married in a Christian church to Daniel Wadi, an American citizen. Her father’s family complained about the marriage resulting in her conviction for adultery since her marriage was not recognized by the religious tyrants and apostasy although she had never been a Muslim.

In an Islamic paradise a man is permitted to marry a non-Muslim; however, a woman is forbidden to marry outside the Muslim religion. Her original sentence was to be lashed 100 times for adultery followed by death by hanging for apostasy. Furthermore, the law requires that children must follow their father’s religion. (But then, that would make Obama a Muslim!) Just another example of barbarians trying to control every aspect of one’s life.

The 27-year-old mother recently gave birth to her second child, Maya, while in prison along with her older child. It was reported that she was chained by her ankle while giving birth!

A few days ago she was freed from prison after an appeals court overturned the original conviction; however, she and her children, along with her husband were detained at an airport in Sudan a few hours after her release. Then on Thursday she and her family were released although she is in imminent danger and has received death threats from “peaceful” Muslims. At present, she and her family are in the American Embassy waiting permission to leave the country.

We need to enforce the old truth that Americans should feel safe anyplace in the world and our government should guarantee that fact. There is ample precedent for doing so especially based on the Teddy Roosevelt adventure.

In 1904 American businessman Ion Perdicaris and his stepson were kidnapped by Muslim terrorists. They were taken from their home in Tangier by Raisuli, the “Last of the Barbary Pirates,” and held for $70,000 ransom along with other demands. President Roosevelt (a progressive!) sent seven battleships to Morocco and a message: “This government wants Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead.” Perdicaris was released in a few days!

That international incident was an example of Teddy’s “Speak softly and carry a big stick” philosophy. Obama speaks softly (when he has a teleprompter) and carries a wet noodle.

Obama doesn’t need to send seven battleships to Sudan; one frigate should do the job since Muslims seem to have the same lack of courage Mexicans have. Although Muslims do seem to have their way with women and children! Obama should use his phone to warn the cowards in Sudan to release the family or a frigate loaded with Marines will sail into the Red Sea within twenty-four hours.

This administration is the most incompetent, impotent, and inept in the past century and is reaping what has been sowed for about six years. We have a weak, wimpy, worthless president, and everyone who voted for him has bloody hands. He laid a foundation for appeasement by kowtowing and bowing toward his Muslim buddies, refusing to identify terrorists as terrorists and his unskillful, unprofessional, and unforgivable bungling of Benghazi.

We should officially recognize that all Muslim nations are terrorist nations and should close all our embassies in those nations and send all Muslim ambassadors packing for their desert homes.

I suggest that it is past time for America to identify our friends and our foes, and to stop kissing our foes and kicking our friends. Friendly nations should be assured that it pays to be friends with America and our foes should be thoroughly convinced that it will cost them to be our enemies. The cost should start today: No more money to any Muslim nation. Frankly, there should be no money to any nation! The International Welfare Window should be closed!

Obama’s weakness, waffling, and wobbling on principle is a major problem for us. I would not permit him to lead a Boy Scout troop on a nature hike in a city park, and I would not trust Secretary of State John Kerry to procure a bottle of Ketchup from the corner Seven Eleven.

Meanwhile, Obama, should call out the Marines and rescue our people. He would be using his phone for some good for a change.

http://bit.ly/1iMLVfY Watch these 8 minute videos of my lecture at the University of North Dakota: “A Christian Challenges New Atheists to Put Up or Shut Up!”