This on-rushing bandwagon (full of explosives) may cause more racial strife than forced busing for school integration! Radical black leaders are demanding that U.S. taxpayers pay the descendants of slaves a suggested $1,000,000 each! And yes, I am serious, but it gets worse because those black leaders are serious.

The National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America (N’COBRA) was established in 1987 and is a gaggle of organizations and individuals organized for the sole purpose of hustling reparations for black descendants in the United States. In February of 2001, hundreds of people attended the Reparations Convention in Chicago, where “Brother Howshua” proposed that blacks receive free education, free medical care, free legal advice, and free financial aid. Additionally, there would be no taxes, and if they wish to emigrate to Africa, they would each receive a million dollars!

Of reparations, The Washington Post admitted, “The subject is scalding hot, untouchable as public policy. Even the brave run from it.” Yes, it is “scalding hot,” but no, I am not running from this illegal, immoral, and incredible shakedown. And, make no mistake, it is just that: a shakedown, a scam of significant proportions.

The reparations scam has been simmering for decades, and it is scalding hot now that Democrats are running things. Many Democrats are for reparations, but then most politicians, to get votes, would promise young, tender missionaries for Sunday dinner to any cannibals in their district. And with the chaos at the southern border, we may have a few cannibals—and they will vote Democrat.

Of course, informed people are dazed and dazzled by their pandering to the lowest common denominator, but few are deceived.

At the National Reparations Convention in Detroit, it was a Muslim love fest with traditional Muslims and Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam. Their website says, “You can never be totally free, until Mother Africa is recognized and respected. Free the land!” I have no idea what that means. One Black said when he gets his reparation check, he is going back home to Africa. Well, that would be one positive use of confiscated funds.

At the Detroit meeting, I did not see one white face in the forum of maybe 300 people who want access to your checkbook. Every time N’COBRA was mentioned, the Nation of Islam was mentioned. When the offering was taken, the Muslim leader said, the money would go to the “N’COBRA national movement and the local Nation of Islam.”

Farrakhan agreed, declaring, “Our reparations must be complete and total.” In other words, open your wallets, Whitey. Or, more correctly, give me your checkbook after you sign all the checks. Farrakhan also ranted in one of the most racist diatribes I have ever heard, but no one in the media discussed it. Was it too hot?

Farrakhan was introduced as “one of the greatest leaders in history.” He calmly ranted about Blacks being the original humans until they were corrupted by Whitey. He then said Blacks were “the original man, the cream of the planet, and the absolute God of the Universe.” He declared, “Blacks are liars, thieves, homosexuals, lesbians, etc., because the white man made them that way…And reparations were not only about money.” He asked, “What will a white man’s nigger do with money and no love for himself and his own people?”

Louis used nigger three times, but I’ll be scolded for using it rightly. He said when Blacks reach a certain point of success, “there will be Whites and the system will block any further growth…We want equal justice under the law applied equally to all regardless of creed, class or color…We want a full and complete freedom….”

He did not blame Jewish people for sending the United States to “hell” as he did in another speech. Instead, he warned Jewish people, “when it’s God who puts you in the ovens, it’s forever.” He has also repeatedly described Jewish people as “satanic.”

Farrakhan has a history of making bigoted statements against white people, once declaring that “white people deserve to die, and they know, so they think it’s us coming to do it” at a Milwaukee event. He also described white people as “potential humans” who “haven’t evolved yet.” In addition, he has said that Hitler was a “great man” overlooking his whiteness.

Farrakhan lives very well off the backs of Blacks. So what’s new? Haven’t most black “leaders” (and some white leaders) done that for generations? Louis has a 77-acre country estate in addition to two posh Chicago homes. For sure, race-baiting pays big time.

The black hustler did not tell the Detroit audience if he is still followed by a monstrous spaceship wherever he goes to protect him from harm. Farrakhan did not tell them that he also saw Elvis, Amelia Earhart, and Jimmy Hoffa on the ship, but had he done so, the crowd would have believed him. After all, “God” cannot lie. Louis told the crowd that the “wheel” ship would one day destroy the white man and bring Blacks into power. He also assured the adoring crowd that 1500 smaller planes from the giant “wheel” follow him at all times.

Now you know why he is called “Screwy Louie.”

How can anyone take such a nut job seriously? Why does the media give him any credibility? It is a major scandal that any politician or any civilized person would consider him anything but a low-life exploiter of naïve, careless, and gullible Blacks. (And of naïve, irresponsible, and gullible media personalities.)

Dr. Maualana Karenga, the founder of Kwanzaa, was a leading promoter of the shakedown conference in Detroit. He said in a N’COBRA convention announcement, “400 years of terror…fear when awake and when asleep… fear being brutalized, fear of being raped.. .nonstop terror committed by this nation…the terror has not stopped…after 400 years of terror, there’s a debt to be paid.”

Karenga’s dishonest demagoguery was deplorable and dangerous, but his rap sheet is more damning.

His legal record is a good introduction to those who don’t know him. On September 17, 1971, Karenga, then known as Ron Karenga, was sentenced to one to ten years in the slammer on counts of felonious assault and false imprisonment. The charges stemmed from a May 9, 1970 incident in which Karenga and two others tortured two women. According to the Los Angeles Times, “Deborah Jones, who once was given the title of an African queen, said she and Gail Davis were whipped with an electrical cord and beaten with a karate baton after being ordered to remove their clothes. She testified that a hot soldering iron was placed in Miss Davis’ mouth.”

Please remember that this is the dude who developed the “African-American holiday” known as Kwanzaa that some Blacks have decided to celebrate instead of Christmas. However, it is not African and for sure not American.

At his trial, Ron Karenga’s sanity was in question, and a psychiatrist declared, “This man now represents a picture which can be considered both paranoid and schizophrenic with hallucinations and delusions, inappropriate affect, disorganization, and impaired contact with the environment.” The psychiatrist observed that Karenga talked to his blanket and imaginary persons and believed that he had been attacked by dive-bombers!

My three-year-old grandson also talked to his blanket, had imaginary friends, and believed he had been attacked by peg-legged, one-eyed Caribbean pirates. Still, he has not been offered a position at a major university, as was Karenga! An irresponsible judge sentenced Karenga to one to ten years in prison; he served four years. Then he went from being a prisoner to a professor at California State University at Long Beach when he became head of its Black Studies Department! I think he should still be in prison making license plates.

Black Lives Matter supports N’COBRA along with Screwy Louie Farrakhan and wacko Karenga, so that should tell you something about the group that wants your money as retribution for slavery they never experienced.

When shrimp learn to whistle Dixie in four-part harmony.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

However, they did not do so, and the great Roman Empire crumbled. Rome was no longer Roman because of lack of assimilation, and America and many of the free nations are doing what Durant warned of Rome’s fall. Struck giddy with feel-goodism, we have opened our gates for tribes of uneducated, uncultured, and often uncouth peoples that are quickly transforming America into another nation. America is no longer American. We are seeing the decline and fall of the American Republic!

Many free nations are making the same mistake as massive hordes of emigrants with alien cultures, languages, religions, etc., are swamping and overwhelming European populations. England is no longer English, France is no longer French, and Germany is no longer German.

Muslim leaders generally have not tried to educate their people in civilized behavior. If they want to live among decent, civilized people, they should discard the Arabian Desert mentality. They should dress normally, lighten up, and realize that most of us are not going to agree with their theology or seek to emulate the sayings and actions of “the prophet.”

We have a culture and theology of our own, thank you.

It is nonsense to promote policies that are dangerous, detrimental, and destructive to one’s homeland. There is no validity in the arguments used by liberals/progressives in this debate. Our primary interest must not be to promote a social policy. Helping relieve the social and economic problems of another nation is not relevant. Nor is it desirable or in our best interest to appease and serve an elite group of U.S. businesspeople. Nor do we make policy decisions to make whiners feel good. What is best for our nation must be the criterion.

U.S. Congresswoman Barbara Jordan was a black liberal Democrat who headed the Jordan Commission in 1995. Although a liberal, she said, “Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave.” Can any honest, sane person disagree with that?

Evidently, Biden and what’s-her-name Harris and most Democrats disagree since they have installed metaphorical signs at the southern border declaring, “Welcome to America, the land of endless freebies thanks to Democrats and RINOs. Join the line to the left.”

And the line is endless.

America has more immigrants than any other country in the world. Today, “More than 40 million people living in the U.S. were born in another country, accounting for about one-fifth of the world’s migrants.” We are the most concerned, compassionate, and careless nation on earth. All other nations are more careful about who comes and goes and who stays than America is.

Pew Research Center reported, “more than 1 million immigrants arrive in the U.S. each year.” What is shocking in that report is more people came from China (149,000) than any other nation in 2018! Mexico sent us her best 120,000 people. No one knows how many illegal aliens are coming via the Biden Expressway at the southern border.

We accept a million legal immigrates each year—a number that should be reduced to zero for five years. If migrant workers are needed, then temporary worker cards can be awarded using strict supervision. When the time has expired, each case can be evaluated, and if workers are still needed, then the cards can be renewed. Everyone wins since the necessary laborers are found; poor foreign workers have temporary jobs; money is sent home; etc.

We must admit that if large numbers of immigrants, legal or illegal, enter the U.S., it will relieve some of the other nations’ social and economic problems, but what will it do to America’s problems? By what twisted logic are U.S. citizens expected to forfeit their hard-earned money to provide for foreigners, especially those foreigners who are criminals?

Should U.S. taxpayers be expected to finance millions of uneducated, unskilled, and often un-American illegal immigrants? I can defend the position that we should not finance legal immigrants. The Biden administration’s legalization of at least eleven million illegal aliens (some say it is more than 20 million) will destroy a once-great nation. By stopping all immigration for five years and plugging the hole in our borders, we would permit “assimilation [to] catch up with infiltration.”

While many of the aliens are decent, hardworking people, many are not. I think this tragic immigration policy will create political, financial, and cultural anarchy. For sure, it is changing America.

The school system, fire protection, police protection, etc., generate vast expenses that the taxpayers pay; but poorly educated immigrants, legal or illegal, do not pay their share. They are tax consumers receiving in services far more than they pay in taxes. That means other taxpayers must “carry” on their backs the non-payers.

In times past, most immigrants melted into the pot, but not today. They have no desire to assimilate and become Americans. Harvard immigration expert George J. Borjas declared, “In fact, the evidence suggests that there has not been any economic assimilation for the cohorts that entered the country in the 1990s.” Illegal aliens get lost in a massive group of their own kind and don’t need to melt into the pot. They sit, soak, and sour in the salad bowl.

We are told that the U.S. economy depends upon foreign workers; however, Borjas reveals that legal and illegal immigrants in the labor market produce $1.6 trillion per year; however, 97.8% of that money goes to the illegal workers, and only “2.2% accrues to native-born Americans.” Borjas suggests that there is more cost to America than financial benefit.

The pro-immigration people tell us that immigrants don’t take jobs; they make jobs and pay taxes. However, while that is true in some individual cases, it is not true in the aggregate. Borjas estimates that the immigrants’ cash welfare benefits alone cost about $1 billion more than is paid by them in taxes each year.

Illegal immigrants take jobs at lower wages, thereby subsidizing the American businesses that hire them illegally. If laws were enforced against hiring illegals, Americans and legal workers would be the source from which businesses hire their workers, paying them the going wage and benefits. High-paid workers “willing to work hard” are often laid off because illegal immigrants are willing to work just as hard for much less money. Whom do you think a business owner is going to hire under those conditions?

We are told that immigrants are needed as agricultural workers—work that Americans will not do. Still, a more accurate statement is that they take jobs that Americans refuse to accept at greatly reduced wages! Furthermore, when an American gets a job, he must be paid the minimum wage with all required benefits. No wonder businessmen prefer to hire illegal aliens. When times get tough, Americans will work at any job to put food on the table. Don’t you feel good knowing that foreigners are working at very low wages to make more profit for those agribusinesses.

There are many negative results from illegal immigration: bankrupt hospitals, burgeoning schools, astronomical welfare funds, soaring crimes, lower wages, fewer jobs for legal Americans, and invasion of violent gangs even into northern cities.

American businessman gets cheap illegal labor; the illegal immigrant gets low wages but far more than possible in Mexico; and he or she often sits, soaks, and sours in America’s salad bowl–while we finance it all!

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D. ; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

Each of the three Popes excommunicated the others.

The Church managed to survive that fiasco, the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the Reformation, but will it survive the global sex scandal and the machinations of Pope Francis?

In recent days, it was revealed that Francis has been up to some hanky-panky when it was discovered that he “liked” a seminude model’s picture on Instagram. The Vatican announced today that it has launched a probe into the nudie caper.

It seems the Pope keeps stepping in it almost weekly. Maybe he believes any publicity is good publicity.

Many Roman Catholics think Pope Francis is a loose cannon that has broken away from its mounting and constitutes a danger to the whole Church as it shoots in all directions. Headlines in the Daily Mail blared, “Vatican at War!” Even cardinals are running away from his latest folly. His latest shot was an endorsement of civil marriages for the LGBTQ crowd, thinking that such action would help him win a global popularity contest.

And stop the bleeding of money and members or, more crudely, nickels, and noses.

The Pope’s goal is to bring us all together in an attempt to undo the sixteenth-century Reformation and have a world church supporting a world government and world economy.

Was the Reformation a mistake, or was it one of the most significant events in world history?

Most educated people don’t have a firm grasp on the world’s religious, political, economic, and social conditions in the Middle Ages. Nor do they know what has been the dream, some say nightmare, of globalists—a united worldwide church. After all, who will disagree with everyone getting along? Of course, no one will, but there is much difference in getting along with people and uniting with those with whom you have vast differences.

The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) has always considered Protestants as “separated brethren” even though the Roman Church declared for hundreds of years that there was no salvation outside the RCC. They always invite non-Catholics back into the fold with the understanding that the Vatican will still run things, and their peculiar doctrines and practices will prevail. Catholic officials are willing to overlook minor theological disputes and ignore them as a condition of bringing the breakaway denominations “back home.”

As long as they bring their checkbooks and don’t try to run things.

While Rome is willing to concede on minor differences, they will not concede on the veneration of Mary or the mass. During the 18th century in France, ordinary Frenchmen ridiculed the Roman Catholic Church (their national church) for their teaching of turning a piece of bread into God. However, Rome will not concede on the mass.

Get ready, folks, the world church is being formed with headquarters in Rome, but here is one Bible-believer who will never “return to Rome” since my crowd was never in her! Independent churches were publicly baptizing converts in huge tubs throughout Germany, Switzerland, and other European nations long before the Reformation. I will stay independent (as were all original churches) as a hog on ice and free as an eagle until shrimp learn to whistle and pigs learn to fly.

An all-inclusive, world church is not going back to the Bible but back to bondage!

According to LifeSiteNews of August 22, 2019, a multi-faith committee was announced “to implement the ‘Human Fraternity’ document signed by Pope Francis and a Grand Imam in February that stated, among other things, that a ‘pluralism and diversity, of religions, is willed by God.’”

But then, the only way we can know the will of God is what is revealed in His Word. The Bible does not endorse a world church but a definite coming out from among them. Not unity but separation. The Bible never teaches denominationalism or world church, but each local church is to be a group of simple, sincere, and scholarly Christians who meet to sing, pray, and preach without any interference from any government or denominational authority.

The Pope has no more biblical authority than an ordinary pastor or priest in an obscure village.

Francis is aware that his biggest problem in constructing the world church will be Muslims who are accustomed to running everything, including the guillotine. Also, the Jews have been around longer than anyone has, so they will not be quick to respond to this theological courtship or, more correctly, seduction. Some Jews even believe all non-Jews are of a different and inferior species! How will that play in Rome? Or Tehran?

So, headlines yell, “Vatican issues a happy Ramadan to all ‘Muslim brothers and sisters’”; however, traditional Muslims do not consider any non-Muslims as spiritually related. The Koran often identifies all non-Muslims as “polytheists,” “unbelievers,” “infidels,” etc., with which Muslims are not to be friendly. And for sure not to cooperate with them.

The Pope asserted, “We Muslims and Christians are called to open ourselves to others, knowing and recognizing them as brothers and sisters…. this way, we can tear down walls raised out of fear and ignorance and seek together to build bridges of friendship that are fundamental for the good of all humanity.”

When Reformers broke with Rome in the 16th century, they did not do so out of fear or ignorance but because of overwhelming convictions and intelligence. The Bible had been translated and was now available to everyone, and it was obvious that what Catholic leaders were teaching was not found in its pages. The Bible reader had been intimidated and harassed and had his pockets picked for centuries to construct massive cathedrals all over Europe.

With the translated Bible, they discovered that the Bible said nothing about Popes, archbishops, cardinals, holy water, rosary beads, hail Mary, the immaculate conception, lent, the sign of the cross, vestments, relics, statues, purgatory, limbo, penance, confession to a priest, elevation of Mary, indulgences, pilgrimages, etc.

When one gets rid of all that, he almost ends up with an independent Bible or Baptist Church!

The average Christian finally read in the newly translated Bibles that independent churches were to be filled with simple and sincere people, where someone read the Bible, another prayed. Then the preacher (not a priest) delivered a sermon followed by the singing of hymns. No liturgy, no ceremony, no mass, no richly dressed preachers. The Europeans could find very little in the Bible that reflected what they had experienced for a lifetime in their vast cathedrals.

While Pope Francis spoke of “brothers and sisters” and friendship, ordinary Christians were chaffing under sharia in Muslim nations. Many were being persecuted as Francis gushed platitudes to appease and impress Muslim fanatics. He did not demand religious freedom or even tolerance on the part of Muslims in the Middle East nations.

Francis demands that Protestants forget about the doctrines and practices that precipitated the Reformation but does not require or even suggest that Muslim leaders must make major concessions with Koranic commands that deal with hating and killing Jews and Christians or even making friends with them. No demands that female sexual mutilation is barbarity and must be stopped; no demand that honor killings are beastly; no requirements that killing any Muslim if he or she converts to Christ is criminal; and no demand for Islamic nations such as Saudi Arabia to permit Christian churches (not one in the whole nation). It seems Francis is quiet about the absurd and vile teachings of Islam.

But then, Francis is a bridge-builder; however, here is one dude who will never cross that bridge.

Pope Francis is a hypocrite who is more interested in public relations than helping the hurting and Gospel-deprived people under Islamic rule. But how can he give something he probably doesn’t have?

The Pope shamelessly speaks of building bridges rather than a hated wall to keep out unwanted immigrants while he lives behind a massive wall. Did I mention that Francis is a hypocrite?

But the Pope keeps trying. He is the only person in Europe who can give an order and see it carried out by non-thinking zealots. Only the Pope can break the barriers and usher in the World Church.

For sure, I’m not going to be a part of his world church, not even if I am promised the Pope’s tiara, the keys to his Popemobile, and the combination of the Vatican vault.

I had to struggle with the combination to the vault.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

President Trump, no doubt because of intense pressure, honored Islam at the White House with a Ramadan dinner to break their daily fast! The guests were “safe” Muslims all being diplomats and ambassadors from Muslim-majority nations. Of course, it was still giving credibility to a dangerous cult that is at war with America and all non-Muslim nations. It would be as reasonable to honor snake handlers from Appalachia! At least they are a domestic cult while Islam is a foreign cult. And snake handlers are only dangerous to themselves and don’t have plans for world dominance.

The Muslim front groups for terrorism were not invited to the White House so they decided not to attend the dinner to which they were not invited! Trump is to be commended for not honoring the most extreme Muslims as he is to be condemned for honoring their hostile religion. Such is politics and most Americans have no ability to discern the subtleties.

The ignorance of Americans toward Islam is shocking. We should at least have basic knowledge about those who plan to conquer or destroy us!

Muslims throughout the world are obligated to obey the Koran and the Hadith, the two primary sources of Islamic theology and laws for daily living. Muslims are obligated to follow the same path of Mohammed. So, the “perfect” Koran is required reading for all Muslims and absolute adherence to its teaching is demanded.

The Hadith is the collected sayings and actions of Mohammed; some Muslims reject the hadiths because they are so absurd and they cannot live with the ridicule that follows. But without the hadiths, much of Islam is lost. For example, the details on how to pray, how to perform the Hajj, and the five pillars of Islam all come from the Hadith, not the Koran.

Some of the outrageous beliefs of Muslims listed below are taken from my first book dealing with Islam: ISLAM: America’s Trojan Horse! (now available as an eBook). I assure you that the PBS Special and other media pieces dealing with Mohammed were mere propaganda pieces that revealed none of the following.

According to most Muslims, Judas died on the cross instead of Christ! “Yet they slew him not, and they crucified him not, but they had only his likeness.” (Koran, 4:157-158.) Obviously, from the beginning, the Koran cannot be trusted and is far from a “perfect” book.

I heard a Muslim cleric say that death does not sever the marital relations between a husband and wife so sex with the dead is permissible! Moroccan Muslim cleric Zamzami Abdelbair declared that necrophilia is religiously acceptable!

Mohammed slept with his dead aunt! Narrated by Ibn Abbas: “I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and I slept with her in her coffin (grave) that I may lessen the pressure of the grave. She was the best of Allah’s creatures to me after Abu Talib.” Mohammed was referring to Fatima, the mother of Ali. Mohammed was trying to give his aunt a ticket to Heaven or make it easier for her after death.

You never heard that from the spokesmen at CAIR or other Islamic public relations groups who have a love affair with terrorists.

Mohammed had sexual relations with every wife every day! “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number. I asked Anas, ‘Had the Prophet the strength for it?’ Anas replied, ‘We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty men.’” (Sahih Bukhari (5:268.) Mohammed was not only dishonest; he was delusional! He seems to have had delusions of adequacy!

Islam permits cannibalism according to Al-Shafie, who is considered to be the founder of Islamic jurisprudence. He declared, “We allowed the eating of the flesh of dead humans… under necessary conditions. It [dead human flesh] must not be cooked or grilled to avoid Haram (wrongdoing) …and he can kill a murtadd (apostate) and eat him.” Again, “One may eat the flesh of a human body. It is not allowed to kill a Muslim nor a free non-Muslim under Muslim rule (because he is useful for the society), nor a prisoner because he belongs to other Muslims. But you may kill an enemy fighter or an adulterer and eat his body (716 in volume 1, Al-Kortoby).”

That’s something else CAIR officials never discuss.

Since the Koran in 6:37, 17:59, 28:48 and 29:50-51 states that Mohammed did no miracles, Muslims looked for proof of his prophethood. They point to a huge growth on his back as proof! (That might make the hunchback of Notre Dame a Muslim prophet!) The growth was big as a “pigeon’s egg.” (Sahih Muslim, Book 030, Number 5790 Shaikh ‘Abdu ‘l-Haqq.) Sure, a growth on the back is proof of prophethood; that makes sense–to an uneducated, uncivilized, and unsophisticated seventh-century Bedouin.

Mohammed hated the cross and according to al-Waqidi, “Muhammad had such a repugnance to the form of the cross that he broke everything brought into his house with that figure upon it.” (Dictionary of Islam, p. 63.)

Mohammed didn’t think a woman had much of a mind. In Vol. 3, Book 48, Number 826, “The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes,’ He said, ‘This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind.” Mohammed said, “I have not seen any one more deficient in intelligence and religion than you women.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, Book 6, No. 301; Vol. 2, Book 24, No. 541.) I’m still waiting to hear from the screaming feminists about their reactions.

Mohammed said that wives “are as a tilth (property) unto you, so approach your tilth when or how ye will.” (Koran 2:223.) Since women are property, men are free to have sex with them at any time or beat their wives as per the Koran in 4:34. Husbands are told to first admonish the wife, then refuse to sleep with her, then to beat her. Occasionally, Muslim men will take time from beating their wives to lecture others on how sensible, sensitive and sophisticated they are!

Mohammed clearly taught that it was acceptable to beat wives so he had no problem with beating drunks! Narrated Abu Huraira: “A drunk was brought to the Prophet and he ordered him to be beaten (lashed).” (Bukhari Vol. 8, Book 81, Number 772.) Don’t think that practice will put AA out of business even though few people like such meetings.

Mohammed knocked on the door of Hell in trying to speak with the dead. Muslims who overheard him asked, “Are you calling the dead?” and the Prophet answered, “They hear me no less than you do, except that they are unable to answer me.” (Haykal, The Life of Muhammad, Translated by Isma’il Razi A. al-Faruqi, p. 74.) The Bible condemns all witchcraft including speaking with the dead.

It seems Satan urinates in the ears of those who sleep during prayer time! (Hey, don’t look at me like that. I don’t explain them; I only report them. Ask a Muslim to explain it to you.) Narrated Abdullah: “A person was mentioned before the prophet and he was told that he had kept on sleeping till morning and has not gotten up for the (fajr–early morning) prayer. The prophet said, ‘Satan urinated in his ears.’” (Vol. 2, Book 21, No. 245.) Be careful about missing mosque services or slumbering in church!

Mohammed believed that yawning comes from Satan: Narrated Abu Huraira: “The prophet said, ‘Yawning is from Satan and if anyone of you yawns, he should check his yawning as much as possible, for if anyone of you (during the act of yawning) should say: ‘Ha,’ Satan will laugh at him.’” (Vol. 4, Book 54, No. 509 – see also Vol. 8, Book 73, No. 242.)

Muhammad even claimed that Satan actually lives in the upper part of a person’s nose during the night and therefore it needs to be flushed out every morning by snorting water in and out of one’s nose! Narrated Abu Huraira: “The prophet said, ‘if anyone of you rouses from sleep and performs the ablution, he should wash his nose by putting water in it and then blowing it out thrice, because Satan has stayed in the upper part of his nose all the night.’” (Vol. 4, Book 54, No. 516.)

Read again the previous paragraph then call your ear, nose, and eye specialist and inform him.

Fevers come from Hell. Narrated Aisha: “The prophet said, ‘fever is from the heat of the Hell-fire so abate it with water.’” (Vol. 4, Book 54, No. 485 also Vol. 1, Book 10, No. 514.)

Mohammed practiced medicine without a license when he ordered people to drink camel’s milk and urine! Narrated Abu Qilaba: “Anas said, ‘some people of ‘Ukal or ‘Uraina tribe came to Al-Medina and its climate did not suit them. So the prophet ordered them to go to the herd of (milch) camels and to drink their milk and urine (as a medicine) …” (Vol. 1, Book 4, No. 234.)

Mohammed gave explicit instructions on when and how to urinate. He said, “One of the major sins is not to protect oneself [one’s clothes and body] from one’s urine [i.e., from being soiled with it].” (Vol. 1, Book 4, No. 215.)

Mohammed believed that people would be tormented in their graves for soiling their clothes with their urine: Narrated Ibn Abbas: “Once the prophet while passing through one of the Heytan (gardens or graveyards) of Al-Medina or Makka, heard the voices of two persons who were being tortured in their graves. The prophet said, ‘These two persons are being tortured not for a major sin (to avoid).’ He then added, ‘Yes! (There they are being tortured for a major sin). Indeed, one of them never saved himself from being soiled with his urine while the other used to go about with calumnies (to make enmity between friends).’” (Vol. 1, Book 4, No. 215.)

Mohammed took a green branch from a date tree, broke it, and placed a piece on each grave to relieve the pain of those being tortured for careless peeing!

Muslims are taught that soiling their clothes with urine is a major sin yet they don’t blink at killing Muslims who leave Islam–even their own children!

So, how can sane people believe the “holy” books of Islam that are filled with such mistakes, mishmash, and madness? They can’t, yet they are trusting their eternal souls to its teaching!

If it weren’t for terror being the major impetus of this cult, much of its teaching would be slightly gigglesome yet Islam was honored by President Trump in the White House! At least the President did not say, “Muslim Americans have been part of our American family since its founding” as Obama did.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Islam is on a world crusade to subvert every nation and bring everyone under sharia. Anyone who challenges that fact is disingenuous, delusional, or dumb as a box of rocks. It is folly to challenge truth since it always prevails–sooner or later. Progressives and even Evangelical Christians haven’t learned that truth.

I have interviewed numerous Muslims all over the world and have written two books on the subject to document Islam’s world crusade.

Committed Muslims cannot be trusted. They are permitted to lie to further the cause of Islam. Being doubted and questioned makes it very difficult for non-fanatical Muslims to function in a free society since they are lumped along with the fanatics.

My emails and phone calls from hate-filled Muslims supports my contention and proves their mindset. From the beginning of one of my critic’s missives, I assumed we were not going to be friends. He wrote, “You are a hater and a bigot not because you ‘revealed the facts about Islam’ but because you are a complete dishonest, lying corrupt scum!” He was responding to my article dealing with Muslims having permission to lie if it furthers the cause of Islam. Being very perceptive, I assumed I was not one of his favorite persons.

A number of Koran and Hadith passages establish the religious authority of breaking oaths, lying, unilaterally violating treaties, and generally scheming against non-Muslims. It is not unfair or untruthful or unchristian to say that no Muslim can be trusted because of this doctrine of permissive lying known as Taqiyya!

A good example of Islamic lying is seen in the life of Mohammed who gave permission to one of his disciples to lie to facilitate the murder of a poet who had angered him: a follower asked Mohammed, “Would you like that I kill him?” Mohammed told him he would.

The follower said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing i.e. to deceive Kab.”

Mohammed replied, “You may say it.” There, Mohammed approved lying and murder. (Sahih al-Bukhari 5.369.)

Mohammed authorized lying according to Bukhari, vol. 4, book 52, numbers 268–271 because “war is deceit” as a justification for him murdering unarmed prisoners after promising them safe passage. True Islam is evil with skin.

Bukhari (3:49:857) reveals, “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.” Muslims can “invent” information to advance Islam.

Bukhari also reveals that Muhammad said if he took an oath and later found something else better, he would do “what is better” and expiate his oath. Now you know how Muslim leaders say one thing in America or Europe and go back to their Muslim nations and say the opposite while speaking in Arabic.

There are three circumstances where lying is permitted by Muslims: “in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them)” (Book 32, Number 6303).

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) insists that it “has not now or ever been involved with the Muslim Brotherhood, or supported any covert, illegal, or terrorist activity or organization.” The truth is that ISNA was, in fact, created by the Muslim Brotherhood. Moreover, they have financially supported Hamas terrorists. At least nine of their leaders have been accused by prosecutors of supporting terrorism.

I am accused of not providing verses from the Koran that support Muslims’ lying, but the following prove my contention of Islam’s deception, duplicity, and dishonesty.

Allah tells his followers that they are released from liability to unbelievers. Sura 9:3 reveals, “And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people on the day of the greater pilgrimage that Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters.” In other words, unbelievers don’t deserve fair and honest responses that Muslims deserve.

“Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing” (surah 2:225). Therefore, Muslims don’t have to be faithful to their oaths and Mohammed was an excellent example who broke his word and treaties whenever it benefited him.

Verse 226 deals with a man who takes an oath about not having sex with his wife (Al-‘lia) for a certain time but if he changes his mind, the oath is forgiven and he is released from his word.

“Allah hath made lawful for you (Muslims) absolution from your oaths (of such a kind), and Allah is your Protector. He is the Knower, the Wise” (surah 66:2).

Mohammed’s lying is the best example Muslims have to validate lying under certain circumstances. A quote from my book, ISLAM: America’s Trojan Horse! proves that Mohammed was a liar (who was also a thief, killer, slaver, and child molester): “With every month, Mohammed grew stronger as more converts showed up at his tent. (Ladies, loot, and land will do that.) Now was the time to take Mecca for good. A treaty was made between the leaders of Mecca and Mohammed whereby he and his followers could make the pilgrimage to the Kaaba; Mohammed could ‘preach some revivals’ but could not engage in any forced conversions. However, true to his lack of character, Mohammed broke the treaty within a year since he believed it was legitimate to fake a peace when you are weak so that you can smash your enemy when you are eventually strong.”

Mohammed was a liar and gave permission for his followers to lie to advance Islam. That lying is going on today to advance sharia in America.

Furthermore, surah 3:54, 8:30, and 10:21, reveal that Allah is “the best deceiver”!

If your god cannot be trusted, then you are in big trouble! Can you be sure you will have 72 virgins after all!

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

They also refused to do a review of my book, Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! Can’t imagine why.

The same paper permitted a local Muslim to accuse Cal Thomas of bigotry comparing him to Jew-haters in Nazi Germany! What chutzpa! A Muslim “spokesperson” accusing a highly respected and talented Christian journalist of bigotry! That’s like a skunk accusing a rabbit of having bad breath! I wrote in defense of Cal but the editors refused to publish it.

Later, they ran a cartoon showing an “Evangelical Zealot” standing on the chest of a hapless and helpless Muslim as the “zealot” crams “Fundamentalist Christian Dogma” down his throat? For those who did not understand the cartoon, the heading informed readers the gist of it was “Converting the Muslims.” Again, I came to the defense of Truth but the editors refused to make a correction.

I called the editors and publishers and challenged them pointing out historical truth but they refused to budge. One editor did admit that the cartoon was a mistake but evidently, they didn’t have enough paper and ink to permit me to write a correction! It was a matter of courage or lack thereof.

ABC News commissioned me to write an article for their website dealing with creation and evolution since there had been much coverage dealing with the subject in various journals. Evolutionists had been hammered and major university professors had begun to ask embarrassing questions making evolutionists uneasy. Consequently, major journals cranked out hysterical propaganda pieces to do damage control for the Americans United for Separation for Church and State (who recently had their annual meeting in a New Jersey telephone booth), PAW, National Center for Science Education, ACLU, and assorted atheists, agnostics, and associates who bow before the idol of evolutionary science.

Galloping to the rescue of beleaguered evolutionists came Time, Newsweek, USA Today, New York Times, and others spouting untrue, unfair, unscientific drivel to con the gullible public into believing the humbuggery of evolution and that those who advocate creationism are Bible thumping fanatics. (I almost never thump my Bible and when I do, it is not really hard.)

Evolutionists trotted out weary accusations against creationists, implying all are “Fundamentalists” (gasp!), always denigrating them, often suggesting a belief in a flat earth! Really desperate evolutionists even suggested that we carry a bag of rattlesnakes to church each Sunday! I am shocked, shocked that educated scientists would stoop so low. This is further proof, if it is needed, that many scientists are asinine, arrogant, and audacious bigots in defending their religious philosophy called evolution. Of course, bigots are as easy to find in a secular university as a bowling ball in a bathtub.

With the above vicious libel of creationists, ABC News, after commissioning me to write an anti-evolution piece for their website, refused to use it because I was “too militant!” No, I was too accurate and had too much sting. They wanted a mild piece so they could point to it and say, “See, we are balanced. We provided a forum for the other side.” But they did not want a challenge to the evolutionary myth.

Evolutionists must never be presented as fools, fanatics, fakers, and frauds but creationists can be presented as inept, incompetent, and insane! That is dishonest and the major media moguls wonder why they have been abandoned by thinking people! Even an Oxford professor can understand the reason.

But the censorship continued.

I wrote the editor of Pulpit Helps, a major Christian publication with which most preachers are familiar. My concern was with a review done by the editor about a book of sermons by Martin Luther King, Jr. I enclosed a column that dealt with King that they could publish providing some fairness and balance. They refused to publish my column. The correspondence was very revealing and by no means unusual:

To the Editor:

I just read your message to me regarding Martin Luther King, Jr., and of course, we can disagree about King. I have fought for that privilege (to disagree) in Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism for 35 years.

However, I am surprised and amazed and somewhat disappointed that Pulpit Helps would be fearful of facing the truth of any matter. It is one thing for secular journals to worship at the shine of political correctness and another for Christian magazines to do so.

You mentioned that you were in high school when King was killed so you have grown up in an atmosphere where King has been idolized and almost beyond scrutiny especially in the public schools and the media.

You wrote, “I wanted to view King’s life in a balanced perspective and have an accurate view of him as a man, civil rights leader, and preacher.” You surely must be kidding! You did not do that in your review. Did you have “balance” in your review when every word was positive? You wanted accuracy when you praised his preaching and never mentioned his heresy! I assume that your reading of King was very limited; maybe only to the book you were reviewing!

You also wrote, “Neither do I agree with those who demonize him.” Is telling the truth demonizing him? You know, I believe between the two of us, I have a much more balanced, fair, and accurate view of King. I think some good came from some of his work while enormous harm also resulted. Unlike many conservatives and many haters, I think King was right in the bus boycott and I believe that because Blacks should have equal rights to public facilities (since they pay taxes) as do Whites. Blacks should not have been subjected to back of the bus status and colored water fountains. However, private businesses are something else altogether! The government has no authority (power yes, authority no) to tell a private businessman how he must run his business. But of course, that is another issue.

You said, “Since the piece in Pulpit Helps was a book review and not an article we will not print your submitted article.” Of course, that is a classic cop-out! Surely, Pulpit Helps is interested in balance, truth, and accuracy.

You did not deal with the various criticisms of King in my article. Please note that your book review dealt with King’s preaching. While you might like the particular book you reviewed, surely you were obligated to reveal to your readers that the book did not reflect King’s preaching and his beliefs. King was a life-long Liberal who rejected the virgin birth, deity, and resurrection of Christ. Do you take the position that one can reject those doctrines and be a Christian? If so, you have removed yourself from mainline, orthodox Christianity!

Remember that the Apostle of Love in his second epistle told us not to even bid one God speed if he did not hold to the doctrine of Christ. Do you disagree with John or do you disregard John? And to disregard means to disobey! It seems you are more impressed with the writings of King than you are of John! At this point, you are defending King and disobeying John! King often spoke publicly to radio and television audiences of Christ and “faith” but never did he challenge men to place faith in the propitiatory work of Christ to experience personal salvation! He did not because he did not believe that was essential for one to have eternal life. I assume you and the folks at Pulpit Helps do believe it.

You did not deal with King’s many adulterous affairs as he admitted to Parade magazine. How can you do a book review of such a man without one word of caution, without one word of suggestion to readers that further research might be helpful? And to emulate his life would be disastrous.

Do you think the fact that King was murdered wipes out the many sins in his life? Do you think that because Blacks were mistreated during that period, that fact somehow excuses his sins? Are you suggesting that because he made some positive contributions, his doctrinal errors and his wicked life should be overlooked?

Does King get special treatment because he was black or because he was murdered or because he was a preacher? What drives you and others to give him the “kid glove” treatment? Why not treat him fairly, honestly, and accurately? Why do you and others seem to have a mission to protect King’s image? Why not tell the truth as you do, I assume, in other matters? Question: If David Duke wrote a book that was true, fantastic, a classic and an incredible contribution to American literature, would you review it without mentioning that he was a former KKK member? I think not.

Another question: Bill Clinton writes a classic bestseller. Not one paragraph in it that any honest, fair, and informed person disagrees with. Would your review be totally positive without mentioning that he had been a moral leper, had been impeached by the House, had lied under oath, and had sold or given valuable information to the Chinese Communists, etc.?

Brother, why not treat people like people, not as white, black, rich, or poor? Just people. Why make decisions based on how you and the magazine will be perceived rather than on the merits of the case? Does truth matter anymore?

You refused to deal with King’s thievery of his Ph.D. dissertation at Boston University and many of his other writings that were plagiarized from others without even a suggestion of giving credit. If you did not know about that, it is inexcusable. If you did know about it and refused to mention it in your review, that too was inexcusable.

You did not even try to deal with King’s love affair with Communist Party functionaries during his very public life. Note that he was not simply involved with Communists but with Party activists! He hired many Communists to run various field offices and even refused to fire them when he was told by his politically sensitive friends that such action would be wise. Your selective quote of his regarding Communism does not cancel his ardor for the Communist Party members with whom he climbed into bed.

King was a Black opportunist who used people: Blacks, Whites, union leaders, the media, etc., to further his own cause. You have helped perpetuate his false image by burning incense to him with your book review. I am disappointed in Pulpit Helps not being willing to stand for Scriptural truth regarding separation from doctrinal error as well as separation from personal immorality.

Sincerely,

Don Boys, Ph.D.

Christ said that He was the Truth so how can anyone, claiming to know Him, be careless with the truth?

Censorship is alive and well in America.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

I wrote this column many years ago and have refused to release it until now. Various circumstances compel me to do so. Of course, I will be called hysterical among other things but I only want to awaken, alarm, and activate innocent uninformed Americans before further disasters strike that will permanently change this nation.

To those who declare, “It will never get that bad,” I remind you that no one thought we would be living in an America that is 20 trillion dollars in debt; where about half of us don’t know what family is; where we argue about the gender of a person; where many think perversion is normal; where millions of innocent babies are butchered; and where university professors have forgotten the concept of truth and their students have lost the ability to think.

I hope this column is way off mark, totally false, but don’t count on it. It contains a message I don’t want to convey–but must! I am torn between two thoughts. I feel a need to warn people of future possibilities, no, make that probabilities, yet I am fearful of being not only a prophet of disaster but also a promoter of the same.

Dark days are upon us, the worst that have ever happened! Far worse than any of our wars. We will forever be in a time of perpetual war with intervening periods of peace. We will look back at the early 2000s as the “good old days.”

Muslim terrorists are highly motivated people. They look at the long haul, not the short run. They think of the Crusades as being recent. Their hatred still burns (with some justification) for the popes, priests, and potentates who planned, promoted, and preached the Crusades of the Middle Ages. The Muslims are still looking for vengeance against “the Crusaders,” meaning all non-Muslims. Vengeance is being taken as I write!

It will not surprise me to discover that for weeks many germ-carrying Muslims have been circulating throughout U.S. airports, trains and bus stations, and other crowded thoroughfares spreading deadly, highly contagious germs to an unsuspecting people. In fact, I will be very surprised if that does not happen. This month, research papers were found hidden at Mosul University after the fall of ISIS detailing experimentation using chemical weapons on human beings!

The infected terrorists would walk through the crowds, breathing, coughing, and sneezing, passing their infection to innocent people. Not very high tech but very effective. Also, those infected terrorists could still be used as homicidal bombers! Muslim leaders would get double their bang for their buck! Muslims believe in the Big Bang!

Those infected terrorists (or uninfected terrorists) could explode body bombs in crowded restaurants, theaters, malls, schools, and ballparks spreading death and destruction. It would also spread terror in the smallest towns and hamlets. No one would feel safe, and that is what terror is all about. The safe days are gone forever. A climate of terror is falling upon free nations like a noxious fog.

Those terrorists would go to church with more than a Bible or Koran. They would go with explosives strapped to their bodies. If I were a pastor, especially of a high profile church, I would guard against such possibilities. Muslims are not informed and sophisticated enough to delineate between various Christian groups, so any denomination could be vulnerable. Churches such as Notre Dame, St. Johns, First Baptist in Dallas, Thomas Road Baptist Church, First Baptist in Jacksonville, and any church with a cross out front and other churches whose pastors have been critical (albeit truthful) of Islam will be targets. Thousands of church members could be killed on one Sunday morning by such people. If ten or fifteen churches were blown up next Sunday, what would that do to other churches across America? I believe that soon no church will even consider meeting without posting armed guards at every church door.

About this same time, a few terrorists with only fifteen minutes training could shoot a
commercial airplane out of the sky with a shoulder-fired missile. This would probably take place at a major airport during a takeoff or landing. A team of two or three terrorists could be out of a van, set up for firing, fire a missile, and be back in the van speeding down the interstate all within fifteen minutes! And be free to fire again. Again, very low tech. When that happens, the travel industry, including all airlines, car rentals, hotels, resorts, and related industries would be devastated for decades, if not forever. The many industries that depend on travel would be shut down.

At this time, the terrorists could coordinate a simultaneous attack from the sea with their ships or with vessels they have seized. Ships loaded with dirty nuclear bombs could set a course for major ports: Los Angeles, Houston, San Francisco, New Orleans, Tampa, Miami, New York, etc. Even if some ships were blown out of the water by our military, the onboard bombs could wreak havoc in those metropolitan areas.

Or, terrorists might concentrate on the Mediterranean area, especially Rome. Rome is in their crosshairs and has been since the Crusades. It would not be unusual for them to consider the use of ships since they have used airplanes, cars, trucks, and other vehicles for their evil purposes. No doubt, they will also attack cruise ships in the Mediterranean or Caribbean.

In recent years, there has been talk of an “American Hiroshima” whereby an American city would experience a nuclear explosion from a suitcase bomb! U.S. officials know that there are nuclear suitcase bombs in the U.S. that were purchased from break-a-way rebels in the old Soviet Union. If major American cities were destroyed with millions dead, it would be the end of the greatest civilization of all time! Could that be the reason that the Bible does not refer to America whereas even very minor nations are mentioned in Scripture? I would think that a nation as impressive as America would be hinted at in Scripture, but not so.

You turn on your television set some morning to discover that a major city is in flames with hundreds of thousands dead and millions dying a slow death from radiation. Will you have a job after that? Will you even care about a job? Your first and major thought will be survival–food, water, and shelter.

It is possible that Muslim terrorists will detonate nuclear bombs in some of our major cities or they might set off a bomb in one city then blackmail us with the other bombs. “Surrender to Muslim sharia and live under an American caliphate or tomorrow a bomb will go off in another city.” What do you think national politicians would do? Ladies, how do you think you would like wearing a burka? I hope your favorite color is black. While a burka will not permit your belly button or breasts to be revealed, it will reveal your eyes—only your eyes!

The nuclear bombing of only one U.S. city would impact the world economy and make the Great Depression look like a blip on the screen. Insurance companies will go into bankruptcy or into the courts to refuse claim payments and banks will be closed. You will try to call the toll-free number to sell your mutual funds only to hear a constant busy signal. You will talk to your broker only to find that both of you are broke.

The U.S. Government will be broke and will renege on its financial obligations. Tax payments to the IRS will plummet as the cost of rescue and recovery soar into the stratosphere. The Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation, an agency (already billions of dollars in the hole) that guarantees your pension, will go belly up. So will Social Security. Everyone will be on his own.

Some are fearful that the followers of that “peaceful” religion of Islam will go high tech and set off an Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) device resulting in wiping out all U.S. electronic devices but keeping our superstructure intact. Former CIA chief James Woolsey testified before a Congressional committee as reported at WorldNetDaily that the EMP could have “devastating consequences.”

If all electronic devices and electronically powered equipment were terminated because of the effects of an EMP device, then the U.S. would quickly grind to a halt. It might be more devastating than a major nuclear bomb! Think what it would mean: no elevators to take people to the upper floors of apartment and office buildings; no air conditioning; no heat; no lights; no subways; no stop and go lights in any city; no telephones, no radio or television; no computers, no cell phones, no air travel, and many other problems. America would be back in the 1800s again!

Furthermore, no EMP would have a return address! So against whom would we retaliate? In addition, if all our electronic systems were down, how would we mount an effective response without planes, guidance systems for missiles, etc.?

Islam is not only a very present danger; it is also a perpetual danger!

If only a few of the above take place, it is not melodramatic to say that American streets could become dark, deserted, and dangerous places as anarchy reigns.

Dark days indeed but not for those who know the Light of the World.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

He adroitly managed to tell the truth without telling all the truth; however, he was not correct when he said, “This is not a battle between different faiths, different sects, or different civilizations.” That was not only wrong but super wrong and knowledgeable people know that we are in a battle between Islam and Christianity; a battle between Sunnis and Shiites; and a battle between a culture based on the Bible and a culture based on the Koran. It is not very smart to make a public declaration that sane, honest, informed people know to be false.

But, what did Trump refuse to say? What are the issues he did not discuss?

*The president did not say that the Kingdom of Saudi Aribia is home to the Wahabi sect of Islam that is probably the most vicious, violent, and visible in the world. A 2006 report by the U.S. Department of State revealed, “Saudi donors and unregulated charities have been a major source of financing to extremist and terrorist groups over the past 25 years.”

A European Parliament report estimates that Saudi Arabia has spent over $10 billion to promote Wahabism through Saudi charitable foundations. Trump did not demand that such financial support cease.

About Saudi Arabia, Trump wrote in 2011: “It’s the world’s biggest funder of terrorism.” But Trump did not bring that up in his speech.

*He did not say that the Wahabi sect funds most of the mosques in America nor did he announce that no additional mosques would be built in America until an equal number of churches are permitted in Saudi Arabia!

*He did not say that there is not a church or synagogue in all of Saudi Arabia nor did he support my position of eight years ago that the Kingdom should permit the Trinity Baptist Church to be established in Mecca, Medina, and Riyadh.

*He did not say that females should receive equal treatment as men. They should be permitted to drive, work, and marry whom they choose, divorce on the same basis as men, and not be forced into childhood “marriages” with old dudes–or young dudes.

*He did not demand that female genital mutilation (FGM) cease in the Kingdom and the Muslim world. He did not condemn popular Saudi Sheikh Mohamad Alarefe’s statement to 8 million followers that “Circumcision [FGM] is a noble act to do to women.”

*He did not say that since we are all good friends, the Saudis should permit Christian workers in the American Embassy and oil workers to have the right to celebrate Christmas in their own homes without harassment from Muslim police.

*He did not turn to President el-Sisi of Egypt and ask for the right of churches in Egypt to get permits to repair their buildings or even build new ones.

*He did not say that any person should have the right to choose his or her religion without any coercion and change it if they don’t like it.

*He did not say that honor killings are never justified and perpetrators should pay the severest penalties.

*He did not say that since we are all buddies, it would be nice if the Saudi government recognized what everyone in the world knows: the nation of Israel is a reality.

It was significant that Melania did not wear a head scarf that is required by all women in Saudi Arabia. Nor did Trump bow to the king, as did Obama who bowed from the waist. I liked that part of the ceremony.

Some Trump critics say Trump did bow but that is desperation, deception, even dishonesty speaking. Trump was receiving a medal and had to squat, not bow, to permit the king to place the medal over his head.

But even if it were so, it was not an Obama bow (and kiss on the hand of the Saudi king) or like President George W. Bush who diplomatically kissed and held hands with Saudi royalty during the royal visit to Bush’s Texas ranch! That silly, disgraceful act gagged every buzzard on the Chihuahuan (Texan) Desert.

Americans don’t bow to any human. And they don’t bow much to God either.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Leading Evangelicals are at it again–taking a legitimate issue and twisting the facts for an unreasonable, unacceptable, and unbiblical result. They are beating the drums for more refugees (a tragedy if only one terrorist is included) being admitted into the U.S. and shamelessly attacking the conscience of Christians to win their spurious argument. They conjure up helpless, hopeless, and hapless citizens from Muslim nations who must be settled in the U.S. But they are dishonest, very confused, or fanatical.

The drum beaters have a major job ahead of them because Christians have clearly spoken on this issue. A Pew survey conducted before the election reported that about two-thirds of white Evangelicals (67%) and mainline Protestants (65%) declare that they have no moral responsibility to accept Syrian refugees.

The World Relief people, Christianity Today, Sojourners, etc., are trying to lay heavy layers of guilt upon Christians who resist and criticize accepting refugees into America. An article in Christianity Today yelled, “Evangelical Experts Oppose Trump’s Plan to Ban Refugees.” Note that it was not lay members but experts who oppose a temporary ban on refugees. If the experts have any smarts, they will listen to their constituents. And what qualifies them as experts?

Ed Stetzer, Wheaton College professor and blogger, wrote, “First, we must continue to reject false facts.” Ed, there is no such thing as “false facts.” Building up steam like an old-time Pentecostal tent evangelist he said, “I’m pro-life because the unborn are made in the image of God, as are refugees. So, I’m pro-refugee because I am pro-life.” It is commendable that Ed is pro-life but that position does not require a principled person to be pro-refugee especially when some of the refuges will turn out to be terrorists.

But Ed disagrees. He wrote, “This is a safe program and one that evangelicals like me say, even if Trump will not, ‘Give [us] your … huddled masses, yearning to be free.’” His declaration that more refugees placed in America is a “safe program” cannot be verified.

The promoters of more refugees seem to assume that the U.S. is the only available nation for refugees; however, that dog won’t hunt. The Muslim nations should have first call on accepting refuges from Syria, Libya, Somalia, etc. Why move refugees away from their own geographical area to a nation that is totally alien to them in language, religion, customs, law, industry, etc.?

While it is dangerous to question motives of people, I would be slothful if I did not point out that many of these Evangelical pro-refugee non-profits get buckets of money from the government and other entities to plead the case of moving additional refugees to the U.S.

The U.S. government is shoveling buckets of cash into religious non-profit groups whose purpose is to deliver more immigrants into your neighborhood and provide amnesty to the gatecrashers already here. This is part of a one billion dollar annual refugee resettlement budget that is resulting in the ruin, rampage, and rape of our culture. Moreover, it will only accelerate because of more than 3 million Muslims having permanent residence and 250,000 being added each year! These facts suggest a major cultural shift has started in our nation.

Jim Wallis is the president of Sojourners (a leftwing religious/social outfit) and said that “Evangelicals finally realize that how we treat the stranger, these 11 million undocumented people, is how we treat Christ himself.” Jim must have been sleeping during his hermeneutics class in seminary because he did not get that from the Bible. Of course, Christians are to be kind, gracious, generous, and helpful; but that does not translate into being suckers, softies, and sentimentalists.

Wallis added that the leadership of the Evangelical Immigration Table (EIT), which includes the National Association of Evangelicals and the Ethics and Religious Liberty Convention of the Southern Baptist Convention, has “never been more united on an issue.” However, that is a little misleading. Of course, the feeble evangelical leaders are singing from the same page but the evangelical congregation is singing another song. The vast majority of evangelical church members want illegal immigrants to go home. A 2014 Pulse Opinion poll revealed that 78 percent of Evangelicals surveyed believed that the biblical command to “love the stranger” means “to treat the stranger humanely while applying the rule of law.”

If the social-minded Evangelicals want to help refugees then they should not expect American tax-payers to fund their altruism. They can dig into their church coffers and into individual retirement plans to accomplish that purpose. Furthermore, these religious groups are paid by the feds for each refugee they settle in your neighborhood! Follow the money.

Not only the feds but George Soros, the international money speculator, is sugar daddy to the EIT, a leftist group of Christian leaders that never saw a socialist scheme they didn’t like. Soros’ agenda, in addition to making money, is to promote every leftwing program especially transplanting Muslims into Europe and America. He is funding various religious non-profits to accomplish that task. National Review, reported that EIT receives a substantial portion of its funding from groups backed by George Soros. Keep following the money.

Evangelical leaders want to bring more and more Muslims to the U.S. and hand you the bill. Yet, experts tell us there may be 3 to 7 million Muslims in the U.S. and of those Muslims polled, nearly 20% agreed that use of violence to implement Sharia law is justified and 25% declared that it is acceptable to use violence to punish those who offend Islam in their portrayal of Mohammed!

Such people sound to me like terrorists not refugees.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

This nation will follow a new foreign policy that will help solve the problem of domestic terrorism. We will return to our roots and follow the wise advice of our Founding Fathers. We will no longer get entangled in foreign alliances. We will no longer meddle in the affairs of other nations nor consider ourselves the policeman of the world–nor the world’s banker. We will always consider our national interests first. We will not presume that we know what is best for other countries.

Since America was attacked by Muslim fanatics, we have aggressively gone after those responsible; however, we will no longer try to topple governments and set up democracies. Of course, we will always encourage liberty everywhere, but we will not carpet-bomb cities filled with innocent civilians. We do not believe “total war” where civilians are targeted or used as forced laborers is morally right or militarily justified. However, be assured that all culpable individuals will be punished as a deterrent to others.

Americans don’t hate Muslims or anyone else since it is wrong and unproductive to hate; however, we will no longer plead with Muslims, at home and abroad, to love us. We will no longer express guilt and self-loathing. Federal officials will no longer try to prove that Americans are not racists. It is up to Muslims to prove they are not terrorists!

I have ordered the Department of Homeland Security that no traveller will be mistreated; however, since all the attacks against us were done by young, Muslim men, we will do the reasonable thing and profile international travellers. The harassment of little old ladies, very young people, and handicapped persons will no longer be practiced. We will be alert for terrorists with special attention to those of Middle Eastern appearance with the understanding that most of them are totally innocent.

Moreover, any mosque that supports, defends, promotes, and finances terrorism, female sexual mutilation, or honor killings will be closed and their clergy imprisoned. Same for Methodists, Baptists, or whatever.

Additionally, I have authorized the use of troops on our southern border to secure that border and arrest, fingerprint, and photograph each illegal alien before he or she is deposited forthwith back to Mexico. All second offenders will be imprisoned and put to work on a Texas or Arizona work or chain gang. Furthermore, any American firm that knowingly hires an illegal alien will be heavily fined. Following a second offense, their business license will be revoked.

Furthermore, as of today, we have shut the welfare window. No more foreign aid to any nation. We may decide in the future that it is in our best interest to help some nation, but it will be temporary and as unusual as snow in July.

Furthermore, all UN members will be required to pay a reasonable and proportionate share of UN expenses. In the following months, my team and I will determine whether it is in the best interest for America to host the UN that is often hostile to our interests and the nation of Israel.

We will also start bringing our troops home from all over the world. They will be sent to foreign nations only in event of declared war or in the interests of the U.S. This is not isolationism but it is an “America First” policy. Any other policy is insane. Japan, Germany, and the 120 nations where our troops are now stationed must protect themselves. We have been there long enough.

As to the Middle East, we don’t know what is best! Israel has been a long-time friend of the U.S. and we will support their right to exist within secure borders, and support their right to defend themselves against those who want to “drive them into the sea.” We will not support a Palestinian state carved out of Israel but would support a separate state if it is carved out of surrounding Muslim nations. They must settle their own affairs, with or without the assistance of surrounding nations. I pray to the God of the Bible that they will solve their differences, but they will do so without U.S. meddling.

The U.S. will recognize what all informed people have always known–that Jerusalem is the eternal and indivisible capital of Israel and we will move our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem immediately. It is a fact that Jerusalem is the seat of the President of the State, the Prime Minister, their legislature, their government, and their Supreme Court.The UN wants Jerusalem to become the capital of both Israel and Palestine; however, no entity has the authority to determine, dictate, and decide on the internal affairs of another. East Jerusalem was taken from Jordan in the 1967 Six-Day War and the last time I checked, defeated nations have to accept the results of warfare. Israel defended herself and won–the Arabs lost. Israelis own the city as much as America owns the southwestern states of California, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico as a consequence of the Mexican American War ending in 1848.

As to our reliance on Middle East oil, we have already started drilling in Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, and the coast of California and will begin to drill off the Atlantic Coast. We will try to be sensitive to the environment; however, I believe that people are more precious than plants or bugs or snakes or fish or spotted owls. Our drilling equipment may cause a caribou here and there to abort her young or a bear may singe its rear end on our pipeline, but we will live with those tragedies. American oil will flow. Moreover, we will immediately expand the mining of our vast coal supplies while being concerned with the environmental impact.

We will still buy oil from South America and even Middle Eastern nations; however, we will not buy oil from countries that support terrorists. They can pour their excess oil over their pancakes each morning for all we care. Or drink it! This government will no longer pretend that terrorist leaders, kings, dictators, etc., are gracious gentlemen, nor will American officials shake their bloody hands while smiling like idiots.

We will encourage American entrepreneurs by tax incentives and other measures to pursue the development of alternative fuels.

Individual households and businesses can be assured that taxes will be cut not raised while we pay off our national debt by eliminating the Department of Energy, Department of Commerce, Department of Education, and hundreds of unnecessary and overlapping commissions that harass and limit private enterprise. Government assistance will be ended or limited to only the neediest cases.

We have some difficult days ahead that will require an adjustment by all of us. Nevertheless, we see a bright future after a few years of sacrifice. This administration will keep you informed since you are the Boss. You fund our world travels and generous salaries as you do for all Federal employees. Regarding this issue, I have determined that I will pay for my own vacations unlike Obama who cost the U.S. about $80 million dollars for his vacations!

This administration takes our jobs seriously; therefore, we promise that any further bills that come to the Oval Office from the Congress must meet five criteria to qualify for passage: It must be constitutional. It must be necessary. We must be able to afford the proposed law. It must not expand government and limit individual liberty. The last criterion is that it must not undermine the family, decency, and general morality. If a bill does not pass those five criteria, it will not get the required signature.

No doubt there are knees jerking all across America (left ones, of course) and those people can cast their vote for new leadership and their policies in the next election. Until then, learn to live with it. I am your President and will do as I have promised.

As we begin a new year and new administration, may I wish the best for you and your family. Meanwhile, I must get back to work building my beautiful wall! Thank you, and may the God of the Bible bless the United States of America!

Obama served under a physical handicap since he is without a spine. Trump does not have that problem but he is deficient in convictions, courage, or character. So, he will not make such a bold statement as the above.

However, he will be an incredible improvement over Obama; but then Bozo the Clown would also be an improvement.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.