Some females are without shame and have no sense of Christian propriety, common decency, and biblical principles.

Sharon Hodde Miller, a doctoral student at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, said, “A woman’s breasts and buttocks and thighs all proclaim the glory of the Lord.” Yes, we are fearfully and wonderfully made but God did not expect this “glory of the Lord” to be observed by everyone everywhere, especially in church.

She said, “Modesty is an orientation of the heart, first and foremost. It begins with putting God first.”  In that, she is correct; however, if God is first in one’s life, he or she will seek to do all to the glory of God.  A woman is very unchristian if she uses her bouncing breasts, swaying buttocks, or exposed flesh to influence any man other than her husband. It is also a blasphemous use of the female body.

Nutty, shameless feminists in Fort Collins, Colorado, have contended that male and female breasts are identical!  Women brandished their bare bouncing breasts along with signs proclaiming, “My breasts are no more sexual than my mouth or my hands,” “Honk for gender equality,” and “Free the NIP.”

This is not your father’s world!

My deceased philosopher father, with a sixth-grade education, would say, “This world is nuttier than a fruitcake.”  And he would have found it incredible that professing Christians would defend immodest dress.

Some Evangelical and Fundamentalist youth wear shirts declaring “Modest is Hottest” or the reverse, although I can’t imagine Christians wearing something like that.  Whatever one’s definition of “hottest,” it obviously has a sexual connotation.  Why send the wrong message to others?  I wonder what parents are doing in the parenting department.

Are Christians to be “hot”?  That kind of sexual suggestion is not conducive to the body being the Temple of the Holy Spirit.  However, non-thinkers tell us never to correct our children since it might stunt their development, and they might even throw a hissy.  Can’t have that.  They also may think they are unloved.

Christians are not to draw attention to self but to Christ.  In Matthew 23:5, Christ rebuked the scribes and Pharisees saying, “But all their works they do for to be seen of men…and enlarge their borders.”  Enlarge borders refers to Jews who wore fringes on their robes as commanded in Numbers 15:38-39 to remind them to keep the Commandments.  However, some Jews went beyond God’s command and enlarged the borders to draw attention to themselves.  Likewise, people dress outrageously and do strange things to their bodies to attract attention to themselves.

I have often wondered why a beautiful young woman would put metal in her face. For sure, while it will attract people’s attention, it is not attractive. Principled people should know why they believe and practice certain things and not make decisions without reasonable thought.

Paul’s command in Philippians 2:5 to have the mind of Christ will eliminate seductive clothing, inappropriate clothing, piercings, tattoos, expensive jewelry, green hair, Mohawk haircuts, and pants drooping below the 38th parallel.  Christians are not to draw attention to self but to Christ. Believers were called Christians in Antioch because they reminded people of Christ.  Many modern Christians remind me of circus performers.  Shocking, shameful, and salacious dress (or activity) should be unacceptable to decent people.

A Texas public school district announced that any tattoos must be covered, and only ear piercings would be accepted!  Are any churches teaching such honorable standards to their members?  Of course, visitors should be welcomed whatever they wear as long as it meets a minimum standard of decency.

Church of God in Christ is a formal Pentecostal denomination where ushers wear white gloves, and their denominational handbook says, “dressing in a sensually provocative manner produces inclinations to evil desires.”

I agree with this Church of God in Christ statement, although I am not a Pentecostal.

Even Catholic churches are battling this problem of undress. I saw this scores of times on my tours to the Middle East, especially in Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and Nazareth. Tourists are asked to be modest when visiting famous historical and biblical church sites.

Often, Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are very careless, even indecent, in what they wear to church.  However, I contend that the concern should not only be on Sunday, but everyday indecent dress in public is always unacceptable, ungodly, and unnecessary.

Modesty should be a byproduct of genuine Christianity, although critics confuse modesty with prudery.  Prudery is as abnormal as exhibitionism is at the other extreme.  Modesty is Christian, common, and commendable.  Modest people have respect for their bodies (made in the image of God), respect for social norms, and respect for other people.

Both genders should consider proper dress as a sign of elegance, education, and erudition.  A silent statement is made by immodestly dressed people, male and female: “I don’t think much of myself, and I don’t expect you to value or respect me either.”

In many churches on Sunday morning, it is almost a Sunday Morning Slutwalk with bouncing boobs, cavernous cleavage, gyrating hips, skintight pants (male and female), and skirts slit front, back, and both sides.  It seems tempting, tantalizing, and taunting are parts of some modern women’s arsenal.

Feminists and others seek to remove all responsibility from women for the reactions they get from men because of seductive clothing, while most lusting men put the responsibility for their temptation totally upon the women!  However, smearing honey all over yourself and then strolling through bear country does invite attack by bears!

If the way women dress is not an invitation to men, then why do prostitutes dress the way they do? A good woman will dress to be modest and attractive, instead of modern and alluring. Street walking prostitutes feel a need to dress in salacious clothing to compete with other women.

Exposing the female body and doing the “come on” bit will also attract predator men. Immodest girls are like pigs rolling around in the mud and shouldn’t be surprised when men treat them like pigs.

Many women refuse to admit that their clothing sends a message to others. If they dress like a harlot, they will be perceived as a harlot even when it is not true. Proverbs 7:10 makes clear that dress is associated with prostitution: “And, behold, there met him a woman with the attire of an harlot, and subtil of heart.”

All women who dress provocatively are not trying to attract men; some are simply careless, thoughtless, or trying to be relevant. However, it is wrong, and their husbands should remind them of the danger of advertising without trying to do so. Proverbs 11:22 says, “As a jewel of gold in a swine’s snout, so is a fair woman which is without discretion.” Principled women will seek to be appropriate, wise, and thoughtful of how they are perceived.

It is normal for men to react to exposed breasts and other parts of the female body.  That is the way God made them.  It would be abnormal if they did not react to the exposed female body.  However, men are responsible for their own impure, illegal, and iniquitous thoughts and actions.  Moreover, mere attraction is not lust, but it often leads to lust.

Normal men like to see female skin, but how much skin is permitted?  Some Muslim women are forced to cover their entire bodies except the eyes and hands; others even hide their eyes!  That would be considered going far past modesty to prudery.

The absence of modesty among females is an egregious problem, but I must emphatically state that however wickedly women dress, it does not justify lecherous men’s abusive actions.  While lust is natural, it is naturally sinful.  It dehumanizes the female when a man takes her for himself (even mentally), often to prove superiority over her as well as to satisfy unpermitted personal cravings.

Decent people should ask themselves not only what is acceptable but also what is appropriate for each occasion.  It is a joy to meet a person with a happy smile, pure heart, and noble intentions who is modest, kind, humble, and genuine.  Not many out there!

I’ll be considered naïve and self-righteous for even suggesting they should be out there!

Young boys used to look at National Geographic for naked bodies, strange piercings, and tattoos. In this day, it is easy to see about anything everywhere, even observing leading members of some Evangelical and Fundamentalist churches.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 20 books, the most recent, Reflections of a Lifetime Fundamentalist: No Reserves, No Retreats, No Regrets! The eBook is available at Amazon.com for $4.99. Other titles at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don  Boys, Ph.D., and visit his blog. Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles and click here to support  his work with a donation.)

“You have not lived today until you have done something for someone who can never repay you.”  John Bunyan, Baptist Preacher

The Black Death (bubonic plague) is not simply a fearful fact in history but is still with us today. The CDC reported that in recent decades there are about seven cases annually in the western U.S. Colorado reported 22 cases of the bubonic plague between 2005 to 2020, and the Daily Mail reported a ten-year-old girl died in early July 2021of the plague. In 2015, four people died of the plague nationwide.

Bubonic plague is called Black Death because body parts such as fingers and toes turn black with gangrene. Death occurs within 2 to 7 days, often sooner. Its deadlier form, known as pneumonic plague, can prove deadly within 24 hours of onset and can be transmitted through the air.

CCN reported on July 6, 2020, “The infamous Bubonic Plague, also known as the ‘Black Death,’ has claimed two lives in Western Mongolia and infected a few in the Chinese region of inner Mongolia….China has become a Petri dish of deadly diseases lately….Judging by the craziness 2020 has brought us so far, one might think nothing could surprise us anymore. Well, think again. Bubonic plague, the one that killed half of Europe back in the 13th century, has just made a comeback in China and Mongolia.” One hundred and forty-six people were put in quarantine.

On February 20, 2021, The Independent reported bubonic plague  killed at least 31 people and sickened over 500 in the Biringi area of Ituri Province in the northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo between November 15 and December 13 of 2020. The health minister said, ‘We have more than 520 cases … of which more than 31 have been fatal.’”

New evidence supports the contention that bubonic plague started much earlier in China than thought. According to dental samples, the October 22, 2015, issue of Cell published a study revealing that Black Death was present in China almost 3,300 years ago. “They found the DNA of Yersinia pestis bacteria in seven individuals, the oldest of which walked the earth around 2794 B.C.”

What was thought to be the first recorded case of the bubonic plague was in China in 224 B.C., and it struck again in the first worldwide bubonic plague in A.D. 540 at Pelusium, Egypt. This was during the reign of Emperor Justinian, known as “the emperor that never sleeps.” The plague spread to all parts of the known world in sixty years. The dead lay unburied in the streets, and “at length, ten thousand persons died each day at Constantinople.” The people of Constantinople became desperate with all the bodies, so they placed them anywhere they could. It got worse as the black horse of famine galloped through the city streets because mills, where corn was ground, stopped operating.

Historian William Rosen wrote in his book Justinian’s Flea: Plague, Empire, and the Birth of Europe, the plague “would mark the end of one world and the beginning of another. Along the way, it would consume at least 25 million human lives.” Some say half of Europe’s people (100 million) were killed before the plague left in the 700s.

The contemporary historian John of Ephesus described the scene of destruction at Constantinople in the following words — “noble and chaste women, dignified with honour, who sat in bed chambers, now with their mouths swollen, wide open and gaping, who were piled up in horrible heaps, all ages lying prostrate, all staturers bowed down and overthrown, all ranks pressed on upon another, in a single wine-press of God’s wrath, like beasts, not like human beings.”

Bubonic plague even attacked Emperor Justinian, but he survived; however, his Empire did not. The invisible bug brought an end to the Byzantine Empire and began the Middle Ages. The question is: how will bubonic plague and other deadly pestilences impact America?

The plague returned in 1339 and became known as the Black Death, Great Mortality, and Great Pestilence, killing millions. Others died during a seven-year famine called “the famine before the plague.” In August of 1347, the plague haughtily marched into England, killing millions more. One Italian wrote, “Its victims ate lunch with their friends and [ate] dinner with their ancestors in paradise.”  This epidemic claimed an astonishing 20 million lives in just four years.

The bubonic plague cut its way through the Far East to Italy and then to Europe. It is thought that Genoa merchants transported plague in their cargoes of spices, nutmeg, jewels, and silks. In Siena, Italy, 75% of the people were cut down like grain before the scythe. As described in the Cronica Senese by Agnolo di Tura in 1348, “The victims died almost immediately. They would swell beneath the armpits and in the groin and fall over while talking. Father abandoned child, wife husband, one brother another; for this illness seemed to strike through breath and sight. And so they died. None could be found to bury the dead for money or friendship.”

Pestilences have a horrific record in mankind’s history and have produced massive problems of civil disorder, disruption of labor, economic disaster, rebellion, and the demise of whole populations. Government officials, bishops, and the Roman Emperor accused Jews, lepers, beggars, and gypsies of spreading the plague by poisoning water wells resulting in the massacre of entire communities of men, women, and children for those alleged crimes.

In Germany, France, Switzerland, and Austria, Jews were massacred as the cause of the plague since rumors were rife that they had poisoned city water systems. In Strasbourg, 2,000 Jews were burned alive, and 3,000 Jews were slaughtered in Mainz. Rulers in Poland and Lithuania offered a haven to Jews starting a mass Jewish migration to those nations.

The King of Sweden believed fasting on a Friday and not wearing shoes on Sunday would appease God and stop the plague. However, lice on rats were the cause, not God, and the plague continued killing two of the king’s brothers and moved capriciously to Russia and Greenland.

The deadly plague lashed the face of Russia in 1351, and in 1353. It retreated but never disappeared, coming back sporadically but not killing millions again until another outbreak in the 1600s that also greatly reduced the population of Europe.

The face of London was smashed by the plague in 1348 and about every ten years thereafter until the plague of 1665. In 300 years, the city experienced 40 epidemics. During those times, about 20 percent of the living in London died of plague.

The Great Plague of 1665 was one of the worst of the numerous outbreaks, killing 100,000 Londoners in just seven months.

The most significant change that came with the pandemic was the end of serfdom in Western Europe as the lord of the manor no longer had a stranglehold on his serfs. The serfs were in great demand, so they could not be forced to stay with their lifetime lord. Homes were empty, businesses closed, and the land lay idle. A laborer became worth far more since workers were few. The survivors had better opportunities for work and increased wages.

The fifteenth century brought prosperity since numerous houses were empty after infected people fled their farms and businesses for hopeless healing and protection elsewhere. Moreover, the plague broke down the common divisions between the upper and lower classes, which led to the rise of a new middle class.

The Black Death outbreaks in the sixth, fourteenth, and seventeenth centuries claimed the lives of up to 200 million people, about 30 to 60 percent of Europe’s population! And all eruptions started in China!

Bubonic Plague lashed the face of Europe in the Middle Ages, killing half the population in some cities, more in others. The presence of plague, unknown to most people, is still with us today, even in America.

Now the World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that bubonic plague is spreading in parts of Madagascar (island nation just east of southern Africa), and a “weak health care system means it may spread farther.” The WHO reported that as of August 1, 2017, Madagascar was experiencing “a large outbreak of plague.” These cases were “unusually severe.” After November 2017, a total of 2119 confirmed, probable, and suspected cases of plague, including 187 deaths, were reported by the Ministry of Health of Madagascar to WHO.

Today, most plague deaths are in Africa, particularly the Congo. Other areas with regular outbreaks are Tanzania, Madagascar, Vietnam, Peru, China, Mongolia, and, occasionally, the U.S.

What does that portend for America?

It seems many people think (and knowledgeable Christians know) that earthquakes, famines, wars, and rumors of wars are an indication of the end of the world as we know it. No, I’m not a pessimist; that teaching comes from the Bible—and an old Time magazine cover screamed, “The End of the World.” Yes, we have seen disasters before but not with such frequency and intensity. Nations could be destroyed as they have in the past.

Muslim religious scholars taught that the plague was a “martyrdom and mercy” from God, assuring the believer’s place in paradise. For non-believers, it was a punishment from Allah. Some Muslim doctors cautioned against preventing or curing a disease sent by Allah.

Pope Francis even promised forgiveness of sins to all Chinese coronavirus victims and their caregivers. Francis is a usurper of authority spewing false hope to superstitious, susceptible, and suffering people.

Historically, the Black Death visited many major cities, but necessary border controls at some city gates, harbors, and mountain passes kept the disease at bay and some cities did not have many deaths. However, when the plague arrived in an area, it often killed 70% of the population!

National Geographic revealed the bacterium has even been researched as a biological weapon by some countries! Known nations experimenting with biological weapons are Iraq, Iran, Libya, China, Russia, and North Korea.

It is not demagoguery to suggest that the world could become a massive graveyard since the Black Death is still very much with us, as is the Chinese coronavirus.

I will sleep well tonight because I trust the sovereign God who is in control; however, while mankind cannot thwart the future, he can make preparation for the knowns and try to mitigate the unknowns.

I hope you also sleep well tonight, pilgrim.  

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 20 books, the most recent, Reflections of a Lifetime Fundamentalist: No Reserves, No Retreats, No Regrets! The eBook is available at Amazon.com for $4.99. Other titles at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D., and visit his blog. Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles and click here to support  his work with a donation.)

In fact, the comparison is eerie.

Rome was founded in 753 B.C. with Romulus as the first king ruling over erratic and violent citizens characterized by Livy as “a rabble of vagrants, mostly runaways and refugees, unrestrained by the power of the throne.” Rome’s early days are shrouded in mystery and myth and mistakes involving the “god” Mars, who fathered Romulus and his twin brother Remus and left them to die after their birth. The twin babies, washed up on a riverbank, were suckled by a she-wolf, and Romulus became king of Rome and killed his brother.

Wow, from miraculous birth to marvelous childhood to a mighty king in one generation!

Interestingly, city guides in Rome propagate that myth as fact to gullible tourists. When I kindly challenged them and finally ridiculed their promotion of a silly legend, they became indignant as if I also asserted the earth is flat, or even worse, that the city of Rome was overrated and overpriced.

After casting off the shackles of the Monarchy with the overthrow of the last of Rome’s seven kings who were absolute dictators, the Monarchy was followed by a Republic in 509 B.C.

The new Roman Republic was the period when the city-state of Rome was a republican government (from 509 B.C. to 27 B.C.). The Romans had replaced their last king with elected magistrates, which lasted until 27 B.C. It was one of the world’s first examples of representative democracy.

National Geographic asserts, “The Republic began to engage in wars with its neighboring rivals, slowly eliminating threats to its superiority in the Mediterranean. By the first century B.C., the Roman Republic stood alone as the dominant power in the Mediterranean region.”

During the middle of the first century B.C., Rome was marked by civil wars and the dictatorship of Julius Caesar. Caesar asked the statesman Cicero to work with his dictatorship; however, Cicero refused being a republican and desiring a return to traditional republican government.

Cicero knew an authoritarian ruler, like Caesar, could bring stability, safety, and success to a nation, but dictatorship always results in loss of personal freedom.

Caesar (who never lost a war) defeated Pompey in a civil war and led the nation out of a Republic into a dictatorship until his assassination in 44 B.C. Thus, he played a significant role in the events that led to the ruin of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. Following Caesar’s death, his adopted son Octavian won some major battles (defeating Mark Antony and Cleopatra), and the Senate proclaimed him Emperor Augustus Caesar in 27 B.C., followed by an unprecedented 200 years of peace.

Then, it was downhill to the emperors who were morally corrupt, mentally incompetent, and murder prone—often using assassination as a standard political tool.

Cicero was, for his day, a principled Roman, famous for his oratory. He vigorously criticized Caesar, Mark Antony, and other politicians who thought the Republic was passé and constantly grabbed personal political power. Antony was often criticized by Cicero, and Cicero was finally assassinated while leaving for a sea voyage. Cicero’s hands, which had penned the famous harangues against Antony, were cut off, and he was beheaded. His hands and his head were nailed to the podium in the Roman Forum. Antony’s wife pulled out the dead orator’s tongue and repeatedly thrust a pin through it, letting all know what she thought of his powerful speaking.

Before Cicero was killed in 43 B.C., he declared, “Rome’s swollen population of unemployed immigrates from the country-side was a bonfire waiting to be lit.” Rome was constantly on the march taking new territories of people whose language, religion, personal habits, and general culture differed from Roman citizens. As the conquered territories were farther and farther distant from Rome, it became more difficult to control them.

The Republic was followed by the Roman Empire ruled by numerous incompetent, immoral, even incestuous Emperors and only five good ones under whom there was impressive success and growth from 96 A.D. to 180. A.D. Rome’s control rapidly expanded during this period—from the city’s immediate surroundings to control of the entire Mediterranean world. The period witnessed a considerable expansion of the Empire into northern Britain and east to Mesopotamia.

The great Mediterranean Sea became a Roman lake.

By the end of the third century, Rome was still a powerful empire, but all was not well below the surface. The foundations were cracking and crumbling, and dangerous ideas were invading the Empire. The cities were decreasing, and industry was declining, and agriculture was being destroyed by excessive taxation. Peasants could no longer make a living by farming.

Travel was no longer safe. Under Caesar’s rule, he had produced peace, and “there are neither wars, nor battles, nor great robberies, nor piracies; but we may travel at all hours and sail from east to west,” according to Epictetus. That was no longer true, and the value of Roman citizenship was devalued since no one was safe and justice was only a word.

Outside Rome’s borders, vast numbers of barbarians had become more sophisticated in warfare and surged through the Empire, causing restless sleep in the Emperor’s palace. The Huns, in the 370s, invaded along the Danube River, driving the Germanic tribes into the Roman provinces. Rome was willing to accept that, but the desired controlled relocation of barbarians within the Empire’s borders ended as an invasion.

I’ve heard of that happening recently.

Small farmers of central Italy had been the foundation of Roman life but could not compete with imported grains from around the Black Sea. Therefore, they sold their land and moved to the city, and lived on welfare. They joined the mobs who demanded more bread and vicious contests and more exciting games. The government used public taxes and provided the mobs free grain at public events, including chariot races, gladiator contests, and mock naval battles.

Cicero wrote: “The evil was not in bread and circuses, per se, but in the willingness of the people to sell their rights as free men for full bellies and the excitement of games which would serve to distract them from the other human hungers which bread and circuses can never appease.” One Roman is recorded as saying: “Those who live at the expense of the public funds are more numerous than those who provide them.” That could not continue.

Rome was no longer Rome.

The civilization of a thousand years could see the handwriting on the wall: the brutal barbarians were at the gates of Rome, and collapse was imminent. In 410, Rome, the city of the Caesars, fell to the uncivilized, uneducated, uncouth Barbarians. With the collapse of Rome, a chill was felt through the civilized world.

If it could happen to mighty Rome, it could happen to any nation.

The Germanic clans 600 miles north of Rome did not want to destroy the Empire, but they were attracted to the “good life,” a consequence of civilization. Moreover, they liked the prestige and protection of Roman citizenship. Roman historian Tacitus in 98 B.C. was the first historian to mention Germanic tribes who were moving into southwestern Germany about the same time the Romans were conquering present-day Gaul—France, Switzerland, Belgium, and northern Italy.

Caesar defeated a barbarian clan in 70 B.C., making the Rhine River the boundary between Roman and German territory.

Some Germanic tribes lived outside Rome’s boundary and over the first few hundred years of the Christian era had been Romanized through trade and travel. As tribes prospered in their trade and made adjustments to their rugged lifestyle, they drew attention to the Huns who rode in from the Asian steppes. Roman citizenship looked very profitable to the German tribes since they would be protected by the greatest power on earth and the weather was much warmer, an advantage to farmers.

Rome was not opposed to taking the tribes into their Empire, and many Germans adapted well to the Roman Army. However, all immigrants had to assimilate. They were forbidden to live in cliques, perpetuating their old culture. They were dispersed throughout the Empire and had to become Romans, the price of citizenship.

Great, grand, and grandiose plan, but it didn’t work.

Bill Federer wrote, “Illegal immigrants poured across the Roman borders: Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Franks, Anglos, Saxons, Alemanni, Thuringians, Rugians, Jutes, Picts, Burgundians, Lombards, Alans, Vandals, as well as African Berbers and Arab raiders.”

After a slow deterioration process, the Romans lost control of the immigration procedure during the Fifth Century. Defeated Persia (Iran) felt frisky and lively again and made sounds like a powerful nation. Rome sent its troops to put the Persians back in their place as a failed empire. The Germanic tribes were permitted into the Empire, but they continued their political and cultural identities. They did not assimilate, even uniting with other tribes to form armies within the Roman Empire!

Will and Ariel Durant wrote, “If Rome had not engulfed so many men of alien blood in so brief a time, if she had passed all these newcomers through her schools instead of her slums, if she had treated them as men with a hundred potential excellences, if she had occasionally closed her gates to let assimilation catch up with infiltration, she might have gained new racial and literary vitality from the infusion, and might have remained a Roman Rome, the voice and citadel of the West.”

America has not learned from Rome’s many mistakes, and it is insane to expect a favorable result. Last week, the U.S. has absorbed over 15,000 Haitians of a different language, religion, personal habits, and race. This mass was added to the hundreds of thousands of others from Central American nations, plus an unknown number of Muslims whose religion demands they do not assimilate or cooperate with their new surroundings.

America’s politicians still do not understand that true Muslims can not and will not assimilate—they always dominate.

Many churches, like those today, had only a temporary influence on the dying Empire.

Richard A. Todd wrote in The Fall of the Roman Empire, “The church, while preaching against abuses, contributed to the decline by discouraging good Christians from holding public office.” And while we have some of that today, it seems the problem is not lack of Christians in office but lack of Christians in office with backbone.

The Fifth Century historian Salvian shockingly wrote, “For all the lurid Roman tales of their atrocities … the barbarians displayed … a good deal more fidelity to their wives.” He declared, “O Roman people be ashamed; be ashamed of your lives. Almost no cities are free of evil dens, are altogether free of impurities, except the cities in which the barbarians have begun to live. … Let nobody think otherwise, the vices of our bad lives have alone conquered us. … The Goths lie, but are chaste, the Franks lie, but are generous, the Saxons are savage in cruelty … but are admirable in chastity. … What hope can there be for the Romans when the barbarians are more pure than they?”

At that time, the “Christians” were quibbling over who was to be the supreme leader, what language would be used, the use of indulgences, Purgatory and Limbo, whether Jesus was human and divine; etc. While the various religious groups continued to win adherents, they made little impact on the direction of the Empire. It is agreed that the religious authority of the now developing Roman Catholic Church held the barbarians at bay for a while, which was only temporary.

I wish I had the talent of Gibbon to graphically write The Decline and Fall of the American Empire as a warning. I see no hope, and history gives no example of a nation, once on the slippery slope, ever recovering its greatness on its own.

Rome was an empire of legions and law devolving into luxury and license and became a hodgepodge of conquest and cruelty.

Personal virtue determines national values, and Rome permitted itself to become worse than Barbarians whose presence they welcomed.

America, are you listening?

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 20 books, the most recent, Reflections of a Lifetime Fundamentalist: No Reserves, No Retreats, No Regrets! The eBook is available at Amazon.com for $4.99. Other titles at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D., and visit his blog. Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles and click here to support his work with a donation.)

Bombs are falling, missiles are flying, and people are dying in the Middle East. As I write this, over 4,100 rockets have fallen on Israel from the “Palestinians” in Gaza and Lebanon. The long-range rockets that can hit Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and the Ben-Gurion Airport originated in Iran, which is the origin of the rocket technology.

Biden and what’s-her-name Harris have managed to destroy our economy, terrorize everyone with unproven vaccines (not safe and effective but dirty and dangerous), and destroyed the relative peace in the Middle East. The Hill opined, “Just over 100 days into office, President Joe Biden has drawn America’s enemies — Iran and its terror proxies — close to the U.S. administration, all while distancing from U.S. allies Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the peacemaking Gulf Arab states.”

The obvious is—well—obvious that Biden and Company are worthless, gutless, mindless, spineless, and toothless. Of course, I may be wrong since I don’t know if they are toothless.

The Biden administration promised in congressional testimony for a stronger and better deal with Iran, but his team is accelerating toward accommodation with the terrorist regime. However, American politicians voting for the Iranian deal is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.

Recently, the Wall Street Journal reported the Biden administration is considering “lifting terrorism-related sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran.” Even honest Liberals (a few still alive) admit that Biden’s weakness and ineptitude have brought this new acceleration of conflict to the Middle East.

When Israel began retaliating against the terrorist attacks, far-leftists in the U.N. and America’s congress demanded Israel stop defending herself!

Obviously, such people are leftist loonies. And apparently, not all the nuts are on trees, but tragically they appear to be multiplying in our government. Everyone has a right to be stupid but in this instance, American politicians have abused the privilege.

The world has been conned by Muslim leaders pleading the case for a separate nation in the Holy Land for the “Palestinian people.” Israel, desperate for peace, agreed to a two-nation arrangement whereby Israel and the “Palestinians” would coexist in the same land area, known as Israel. It is a trade of land for peace and a significant mistake, in my opinion.

The “Palestinians” will have land, but Israel will not get peace. Moreover, the “Palestinians” will be ruled by Muslim tyrants as they have been for generations. This truth is not admitted: Palestinians as a historic group do not exist. Displaced people exist, most of them Arabs, but the “Palestinians” have no history. In the beginning, Palestinians referred to anyone living in what is now Israel.

As war was approaching in 1947, many Arabs living in what is now Israel fled to neighboring Arab nations expecting to return in a short time since the Jews were vastly outnumbered. When Jewish victories multiplied, the Arabs, not wanting to get caught in the crossfire, stayed with friends and relatives in other nations.

John Bagot Glubb, the commander of Jordan’s Arab Legion, was quoted in the London Daily Mail for August 12, 1948, saying, “Villages were frequently abandoned even before they were threatened by the progress of war.” So, contrary to “Palestinian” propaganda, the Arabs were not forced from their homes.

Jewish leader David Ben-Gurion (and soon-to-be Prime Minister) sent Golda Meir to Haifa to persuade the Arabs to stay, and was unsuccessful since the Arabs thought they would be considered traitors if they stayed. Jewish officials warned fellow Jews of severe penalties if any Arab property was molested and enacted a law to guarantee that protection. That fact is never mentioned by bogus “Palestinians.”

As the fighting continued, the trickle of fleeing Arabs became a torrent, with more than 200,000 leaving, expecting to return when the fighting ceased. Israel declared itself an independent nation on May 14, 1948, and after May 15, an additional 300,000 Arabs fled the new state leaving about 160,000 Arabs in Israel. About the same amount of Jews entered the new nation as Arabs who left. Arabs who stayed became Israeli citizens.

The Arab quarter in Haifa became a “ghost town” by May 3. Even in November 1948, after the fighting had ceased, a village of 3,000 Arabs between Tel Aviv and Beersheba decided to flee.

Syrian Prime Minister Haled al Azm admitted that Arab leaders told the Arabs to leave Israel saying, “Since 1948, we have been demanding the return of the refugees to their homes. But we ourselves are the ones who encouraged them to leave. Only a few months separated our call to them to leave and our appeal to the United Nations to resolve on their return.” Again, the Arabs were not robbed of their land but fled as ordered by their leaders, as Jordan’s King Abdullah admitted in his memoirs.

Advocates for “Palestinians” refuse to discuss the Jewish citizens who were forced from Arab nations at that time. That number of displaced Jews following Israel’s independence was about the number of Arabs leaving the new nation. Many displaced Jews were forced to leave with little more than the clothes they were wearing. Of the 820,000 Jewish refugees, about 586,000 of them were resettled in Israel at great expense. The Arab officials confiscated their possessions and provided no compensation.

The Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) is the official voice of “the Palestinians,” and they demand all Jews leave Israel permitting Arabs to occupy the land. The Palestinian National Authority is officially recognized as a state occupying land in the West Bank and Gaza. But they want all the land. Their maps show all the land from the Mediterranean to the Jordan as “Palestine.” Much of the world has tried to get the PLO to agree to an Arab nation adjacent to Israel on land given by Israel.

That would mean Israel would only be nine miles wide in one area. Evidently, Jewish leaders are desperate or deceived or dumb to agree to such an arrangement, and for the record, Jewish politicians can be as stupid as American politicians.

Most people think of Palestine as being the region located between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River. That region is mostly Israel made up of 75% Jews, 21% Arabs, and 4% others. Israeli Arabs live in Israel as citizens and even serve in Israel’s legislature.

However, Jews are not even permitted in some Muslim nations and, when permitted, are often persecuted, being forced to flee leaving everything. Jews living in Muslim nations have been forced to pay an added tax (as were Christians) and always experienced subordination, degradation, and humiliation.

Everyone, Jew or Arab, living in what was known as Palestine was known as a Palestinian; however, since Israel became a nation in 1948 and the Arab’s massive attack, those Arabs who fled the new nation have been known as Palestinians. They pretend to be a people like Jews, Italians, Americans, etc.; however, this is all a pretend game.

Pugnacious “Palestinians” are phonies, a political show, and it’s time to pull the curtain on the charade. Palestinians as a historic group have never existed, do not exist now, and will not exist in the future. Muslims may give themselves that label and, with the help of non-thinking leftists in the media, pretend to be what they are not; however, facts are stubborn and unbending. “Palestinians” are the only people in history that came into existence in a single day! Walid Shoebat, a former PLO terrorist, admitted: “Why is it that on June 4, 1967 I was a Jordanian, and overnight I became a Palestinian?” He added that he did not mind Jordanian rule.

Shoebat and his comrades were Jordanians “until the Jews returned to Jerusalem. Then all of the sudden we were Palestinians.” He was saying that when the Jews re-took their historic and biblical homeland, the myth of an Arab Palestinian nation was created out of thin air and promoted worldwide. The gullible media, too lazy to do the research, still spout the PLO line about the pathetic plight of “Palestinian people.”

It is political humbug. Those identified as “Palestinians” are simply refugees from Jordan, Egypt, Syria, and Saudi Arabia. However, millions of these people were born in refugee camps and have been convinced they are “Palestinians,” but they are not. There are no Palestinian people, or history, or culture, or coinage, or language, or uncovered artifacts. Their official flag only goes back to 1964. Palestinians don’t exist and never have. Muslims and media who promote the “Palestinians” are repeating a falsehood, resisting the facts, and are responsible for further bloodshed.

In 1948 through the early 1950s, displaced Arabs lived in wretched squalor in the refugee camps (supposed to be temporary) under the custodial care of the United Nations. Muslim leaders did not care about them until it became politically expedient to do so. Why didn’t Egypt, Jordan, or Syria joyfully absorb those refugees into their care and accept them as citizens? After all, they were the same people. Arab nations intentionally refused to help their own people. They simply did not care what happened to them, but now it is politically expedient to “use” this issue to express their hatred of Israel.

As a young man in the early 1950s, I remember seeing news reports of Muslims in filthy refugee camps and wondering why the United Nations permitted it to continue. Two generations have grown up in those camps, often seething with hatred and encouraged by political opportunists.

Israel was originally called the “land of Canaan” (Gen. 12:5), the “land of Israel” (1 Sam. 13:19), and the “land of Judah” (Isa. 19:17). First-century Jews had a thing about being under the thumb of the Romans (or anyone), so they seethed in constant hatred and rebellion against their oppressors. The Roman Emperor Hadrian (A.D. 117 to 138) was understandably (from his totalitarian view) displeased with the rebellious Jews. He wanted to erase the name of Israel and Judah from history and the face of the Earth.  He decided to ridicule them by renaming the land of Israel Syria Palaestina, identifying them with their hated enemy, the Philistines.

It is from the term Philistines that the name Palestinians has been taken. Emperor Hadrian knew that Philistines were ancient enemies of the Jews, and therefore the emperor showed his hatred and spite by giving Israel a new obnoxious name. The Philistines were not Arabs or Canaanites (and were, in fact, invaders from Crete), and there is no mention of Palestine until the first century with Hadrian.

Before the British set up the 30-year-long Palestine Mandate, Palestinian historian Muhammad Y. Muslih declared, “There was no political unit known as Palestine.” If there was no Palestine, there were no Palestinians.

On March 23, 2012, the Hamas Minister of the Interior and National Security Fathi Hammad linked the Palestinians’ origins to Egypt and the Arabian Peninsula: “Who are the Palestinians?… We are Egyptians; we are Arabs. We are Muslims. We are part of you. Egyptians! Personally, half my family is Egyptian – and the other half are Saudis.”

In A.D. 135, Hadrian put down a Jewish rebellion by killing 580,000 Jews, leveling 985 villages and 50 fortified towns. That is why Jewish writers always refer to him by saying, “may his bones be crushed.” Psalm 83:3-4 probably prophesied Hadrian’s oppressive actions: “They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.”

The “Palestinians” could have had their independent nation years ago, but they refused to recognize Israel’s right to exist. Their religion requires them to hate and kill any Jew “wherever you find them, and take them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush.” The PLO’s Charter still calls for the destruction of Israel. Muslim maps don’t even show Israel; moreover, their leaders have often promised to “drive Israel into the sea.”

Those Muslim leaders don’t have the ability, acumen, or aplomb to drive a go-cart.

Everyone has a right to be stupid but in this instance, politicians have abused the privilege as the rockets fall and innocent people die.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning!  The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don  Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog.  Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his  articles, and click here to support  his work with a donation.)

Muslims are very touchy people, as evidenced by the killing of ten journalists at the Paris-based satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015 after the magazine published cartoons of Mohammed. Two policemen were also killed, and a teacher in Paris was beheaded eight months later because he had shown some of the cartoons to his class.

Paris officials are almost sure it was a hate crime.

Earlier in 2005, Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten published irreverent, anti-Muslim material, and it caused riots around the world.

Muslims feel strongly what people say about Mohammed and Jews, especially what is said about the Holocaust. No traditional Muslim believes Hitler killed 6 million Jews during WW II. Most Muslims totally reject the Holocaust.

Everyone knows millions of people died during WW II, but it would be stunning for a panel of experts to discuss the circumstances: Who came up with 6 million dead Jews? Has that number been drastically reduced by experts? Has Auschwitz lowered the number of Jews killed from 4 million to 960,000? If so, why do intelligent people still use the 6 million number?

Has a written order been found to document such a vast program of Jewish extermination by the Nazis? Were the 6 million gassed and cremated? Can we discuss the physical problems of gassing and cremating 24,000 each day at Auschwitz alone?

Why not?

Since Hitler was fighting a world war, Holocaust deniers say it would not be wise to kill millions of Jews when Nazis advertised for workers to produce rubber, supplies, bombs, planes, etc., in the prosecution of the war.

Were the stacks of emaciated bodies found at the liberated camps victims of typhus, dysentery, and pneumonia? Did anyone care enough about the truth to check it out?

Many people, other than Muslims, question various parts of the Holocaust story, but the issue must not be discussed, debated, and for sure, not denied. However, it is acceptable to deny that Jesus Christ is God of very God to whom everyone on Earth will give an account. It is also permitted to believe the silly story that the Earth and Universe created themselves. But we must not even discuss the Holocaust and any possible difficulties.

Why not?

The Holocaust would make a stimulating discussion and permit experts to produce their evidence, thereby allowing non-experts to make intelligent decisions. Some may decide the Holocaust happened as per the common belief, while some could deny any Holocaust and decide that Hitler was a misunderstood, lapsed Roman Catholic altar boy. Still, others might decide Jews were murdered, but it was a haphazard program perpetrated by rogue camp superintendents. Some could decide that it is too complex and too much time has passed, so let’s move on with determination to never mistreat anyone, even our enemy.

Whatever the Holocaust facts, surely no true devotee to truth and freedom will defend the incredible sentence of Alison Chablozin in England of 18 weeks in prison for “disseminating grossly offensive material and messages on social media denying the Holocaust.” Prison for not believing the “correct truth”! Where are all the traditional Liberals demanding justice for Alison?

Hey, where are all the Conservative defenders of free speech?

Many will be angry with me for mentioning the banned subject, and some of the news sites that usually publish my columns will refuse this one. Why the fear of discussing this issue?

Or any issue? Can’t truth stand alone? Must it be propped up to protect it from falsehood? I thought truth always dispelled error as light dispels darkness. I demand to know why those who speak the loudest about truth and tolerance refuse to discuss forbidden issues.

It is un-American to have forbidden subjects.

Moreover, almost no one will discuss how German citizens were treated by the Allies following the war’s end. After the war, millions of Germans were put in huge fenced meadows without food, clothing, or protection. It is charged, “7 Million German Civilians were deliberately starved to death on extreme food rationing after the war – Any additional help with food from local sources or the Red Cross was denied.”

Very few Americans know there is anything to discuss about the above. What part did General Eisenhower play in that crime?

Maybe the chest-thumping declarations about devotion to truth are so much showboating by closet totalitarians who are very fearful of the truth.

Less volatile is the issue of forced vaccinations, especially for children. Most medical people adamantly insist on vaccinations when children attend school, although other physicians disagree. Everyone admits that anyone, at any time, can have an adverse reaction to a shot with a disability, disease, or even death resulting. Similar to Russian roulette! We are seeing that at this time with the China coronavirus vaccinations.

Most people believe that vaccinations have contributed to eliminating most childhood diseases in the past 50 years. But dare I ask about the widespread afflictions we have seen in the past 30 years? Is there a correlation between government-mandated shots and allergies, autism, mental retardation, and many other afflictions that were almost unheard of until recent years?

Let’s discuss it.

The charge is that vaccinations of very young children have been the catalyst of many health problems in the past 20 to 30 years with the mumps, measles, and rubella (MMR) and diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus (DPT) vaccinations especially dangerous. And when multiple shots are given at the same time, the evidence of harmful results is compelling. Of course, no one, child or adult, should ever permit a shot that contains mercury or aluminum or human remains.

When parents refuse the required shots, often the physician, with his/her messiah-complex in full bloom, treats the parents as unloving, uneducated, and uninformed Neanderthals. Usually, the physician is the one who drags his or her knuckles on the floor. (And Neanderthals did not drag knuckles either, but many evolutionists do.)

But there can be no public discussion or debate, or disagreement because everyone knows vaccinations have saved millions of lives.

But, let’s discuss it anyway just to prove we can.

It is shocking the number of people who believe the 9/11 attacks were an “inside job” or that the American government knew in advance of the attacks. A Rasmussen poll revealed, “Overall, 22% of all voters believe the President knew about the attacks in advance. A slightly larger number, 29%, believe the CIA knew about the attacks in advance.” A majority of Americans believe that “the government is concealing information about the 9/11 attacks.”

I have seen the video of architects and engineers promoting the theory that the buildings were destroyed by well-placed bombs. The information cannot be dismissed out of hand. Too many professionals (who know far more about it than you and I) have raised too many questions, but we must not talk about it even though it may not change minds.

Why not discuss the facts that possibly make falsifiers look like fools?

Race has become a more volatile subject than any other issue, and there are nuts and non-thinkers on all sides of this issue. Of course, people with weak minds and big mouths use the race club to beat their way into a conversation. I’m a Bible-practicing Christian with a desire to love everyone since God loves everyone; however, that does not mean I must disregard facts and common sense when discussing an issue.

I am white and have been since birth and will probably stay white. Furthermore, I’m somewhat proud to be white, although I’ve been ashamed of what many Whites have done.

I’m also an American; therefore, I believe it is natural, biblical, and only logical to put America first. We should never do anything detrimental to our national interests. In foreign aid, trade, and international affairs, America’s interests should always be first. Frankly, I question the honesty, thinking ability, or patriotism of anyone who disagrees with that proposition.

However, I will fight for their right to be stupid.

Some would declare that such a position makes me a white nationalist. Gasp! Well, I am white by birth and a patriot by choice; therefore, I believe America’s interest must be preferred by Americans in all matters. Consequently, the expectation from the nutty left is that I should immediately fall on my knees and beg for mercy.

When pigs learn to fly in formation and do somersaults over the White House.

No, not even then.

There’s a lot of dishonesty and demagogy or simply dumbness floating around about this issue. One dictionary said a white nationalist is “one of a group of militant whites who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation.” To think they killed a live tree to print such tripe! That might be a good definition of a white supremacist but not of a white nationalist.

But the tripe goes on when you look at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) website (a radical left-wing group spewing hate while raising money from deceived, deluded, and dumb people). Honest people wonder why anyone supports such a leftist group since they have been discredited in recent months.

The fanatics at the SPLC are too lazy or too prejudiced to do their homework and delineate various controversial groups. They declare, “White nationalist groups espouse white supremacist or white separatist ideologies, often focusing on the alleged inferiority of nonwhites. Groups listed in a variety of other categories – Ku Klux Klan, neo-Confederate, neo-Nazi, racist skinhead, and Christian Identity – could also be fairly described as white nationalist.” That is a tub full of poppycock and more than a dash of hogwash.

With a generous portion of balderdash.

Kristen Clarke of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law said: “There is no defensible distinction that can be drawn between white supremacy, white nationalism or white separatism in society today.” Obviously, Kristen is dumb as a box of rocks, but then, she is a social justice attorney.

One does not have to be a hater to believe that white people have as much right to revere their own kind and seek to preserve their influence—as all groups should do.

But let’s talk about it.

It’s time to open the window and yell, “I’m not going to take it anymore.” Then use what pronouns you choose; tell an innocent joke even about racial minorities—or majorities, “gays,” women, men who pretend to be women or even Fundamentalists. And stop using “the n-word” and use nigger if it’s not used in contempt.

Then, run through the streets, yelling, “Free at last, free at last, thank God almighty, I’m free at last.”

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

The Nobel Peace Prize has lost its luster.

Palestinian terrorist leader Yasser Arafat was given the peace prize prompting a member of the committee Kåre Gudbrand Kristiansen to resign. In an article for the Times of Israel in 2012, American columnist Jay Nordlinger called Arafat “the worst man ever to win the Nobel Peace Prize.”

Most uninformed people think the Nobel Prize is the epitome of accomplishment but let me remind you that it has been given to the Larry, Curly, and Moes of this world. It is now a joke to informed people since, in recent years, it has become a farce, fraud, fake, and fatuity (unintelligence, silliness)! However, the problem is that most people don’t know much about the Nobel Prize other than it is supposed to be the highest honor a person can receive.

The Nobel Peace Prize stands for, well, nothing. The past prize holders are a gaggle of terrorists, two-faced politicians, empty suits, and malefactors. And a handful of worthies.

Alfred Nobel died in 1872, leaving most of his fortune to establish prizes as determined by various committees in Sweden and Norway. The Peace Prize is determined by members of the Norway Parliament. The professions to be honored for exceptional accomplishments were physics, medicine, chemistry, literature, for work in peace, and now economics. So far, so good.

Al made his fortune by inventing dynamite, an invention that changed the face of the world for good and evil. It is interesting that he almost called his invention “Nobel’s Safety Powder”! What a misnomer! He also developed “Gelignite,” a blasting gelatin that made drilling much more efficient and less expensive. Money started piling up in his bank account.

However, a French newspaper erroneously printed his obituary, confusing him with his deceased brother, and characterized Al as a “merchant of death” because of the deadly use of dynamite in warfare. The paper wrote, “The merchant of death is dead” and went on to say, “Dr. Alfred Nobel, who became rich by finding ways to kill more people faster than ever before, died yesterday.” He was horrified that he would be remembered in such a manner and instituted the Nobel Prizes to provide him a positive legacy. It worked.

Since 1900, many more or less deserving people have received the awards such as Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Rabin, William Faulkner, T. S. Eliot, Ernest Hemingway, Samuel Beckett, Pierre, and Marie Curie, Max Planck, and Albert Einstein.

Pierre and Marie Curie, along with their daughter and her husband, won five prizes, although Marie, when a widow, had an affair with a former pupil of her dead husband. Love letters were discovered and printed in a newspaper, and she was pressured to refuse the prize; however, she accepted it, saying her private life had nothing to do with her profession.

Le Duc Tho, a bloody communist of Vietnam, was awarded the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize, although he refused the prize because peace had not been established in Vietnam. President Obama accepted the prize even though he is an “empty suit” and may be the least qualified person to be nominated. Yet, he accepted the award. It seems some people can’t blush anymore.

Was Le Duc Tho more principled than Obama?

Others who received the Peace Prize include Martin Luther King, Jr., Mikhail Gorbachev, Nelson Mandela, Yasser Arafat, Jimmy Carter, and Al Gore. An observation: It seems that to qualify for the peace prize in modern times, one must be incompetent, a communist, a terrorist, or a socialist. All right, maybe one doesn’t have to fit into one of those categories, but it sure seems to help.

Martin Luther King, an admitted serial fornicator and major plagiarist accepted the prize in 1964. It is further enlightening of his character (or lack thereof) to note that when he went to Norway to accept the Nobel Prize, he was caught drunk, running naked down a hotel hallway trying to catch a woman and was stopped by the police as reported by Alan Stang in his January 21, 2008 column.

Nelson Mandela was a former president of South Africa, member of the Communist African National Congress, and hero to most people, but as a young man, he was arrested and spent 27 years in a South African prison not as a civil rights fighter but for sabotage (and other crimes). When arrested, he had on his person an article in his own handwriting, “Why I am a Good Communist.” The white South African government offered him his freedom many times if he would renounce terror and violence, but he refused and continued his prison sentence and enhanced his reputation as a weird kind of martyr.

Some Nobel winners have been a major embarrassment to the memory of Alfred Nobel, such as Daniel Carleton Gajdusek, who won in 1976 for his research in human slow-virus infections. Daniel spent 19 months in jail after pleading guilty in 1997 to charges of child molestation. Then there was Johannes Fibiger, who won in 1926 for discovering that parasitic worms cause cancer; however, that turned out to be totally false!

The Nobel Peace Prize is to recognize “the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Evidence is abundant that it has failed to live up to those standards.

A list of those who have not received a Nobel Prize is also noteworthy: Leo Tolstoy, James Joyce, Mark Twain, Gertrude Stein, Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla, Mahatma Gandhi, George Orwell, Arthur Miller, Ronald Reagan, and Raymond Damadian.

Dr. Damadian is the inventor of the MRI scanner (that has saved hundreds of thousands of lives), yet the Nobel committee gave the prize to two other scientists who helped him! The award can be bestowed to as many as three people for the same work, yet they purposefully refused to honor Damadian! Question: Could the Prize committee’s refusal to honor him be because Damadian belongs to an Independent Baptist Church and is a young-earth creationist? No, surely not. That would be, well, bigotry and unprofessional and prejudicial, and the black-tail, white-tie Nobel committee could never be guilty of such sins. Could such people be undisguised, unashamed, unfeeling, unaccountable hypocrites?

Famous agnostic anti-creationist Canadian philosophy professor Michael Ruse wrote of his deep concern suggesting the “likely hypothesis” that Damadian was rejected by the Nobel Committee for his open creationism, completely disregarding his amazing contribution to medicine. “Damadian is a Christian,” said Ruse, “whose beliefs include the Genesis account of creation, Adam and Eve the first humans, universal flood, and all the rest.”

Well, we can’t have that, can we? One of the world’s most important medical discoveries has been snubbed for years, but you can bet the farm that the snarling 17-year-old climate “expert” Greta Thunberg will win this year.

If they give a standing ovation for mediocrity, what will they do when they meet superior talent?

Yes, Virginia, the Nobel Prize Committees are made up of many sanctimonious hypocrites, and the prize has become a frivolous farce for famous fakers.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

It seems some of the critters in congress are disingenuous, dishonest, and dangerous.

The loudest proponents of Socialism and haters of America are Democrat “women of color” in the House of Representatives. These who are the loudest and most obnoxious ones bellowing about all the racism and misogynism in America, are sitting in the most prestigious seats of power. But they still whine. But then, radical liberals—of both parties and both genders—have always been people without working brains, character, talent, and spine. But they all whine.

These leftists have plenty of mouth as our ladies of color (a racist statement) display every day. They are having their “fifteen minutes of fame” and are enjoying every minute of it while the rest of America must suffer through their shrill caterwauling—as offensive as fingernails on a chalkboard.

But then, that’s called democracy. They earned their right to be wrong, pushy, loud, and obnoxious.

The Book of Revelation tells of four allegorical horsemen, known as the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse riding different colored horses (white, red, black, and pale) that represent pestilence, war, famine, and death. But Congresswomen Cortez, Omar, Tlaib, and Pressley are all riding red horses. The ladies’ speeches and public statements would make Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, and Joseph Stalin all stand up and cheer with gusto. Furthermore, if their political policies become law, we will experience pestilence, war, famine, and death or worse.

The four ladies are ladies of color but their true color is red. They are red with rage and red in philosophy and if they continue to gain power, America will become impotent, insignificant, and maybe irrelevant.

Congresswoman Cortez (former bartender) from New York defeated a ten-term white congressman using racism and ageism to replace him. She attacked him saying he deserved to be replaced by her on “ideological, generational, and racial grounds.” Since it worked for her, she is now using the racist slander every third statement she makes to get her way.

Cortez has charged that immigrant children in border detention are drinking water from toilets and contemporary America is “garbage.”

The more she talks, the bigger Trump’s win in 2020.

Cortez’s most recent bellowing claims that “Palestinians have no choice but to riot against Israel” and agreed that Israel is “criminal.”

She has suggested that the detention facilities at our southern border are “concentration camps.” I delight in hearing her speak because she reminds me of a mediaeval court jester playing the fool to the delight of the court.

Cortez has lived with her lover, Riley Roberts in an apartment since both graduated from the prestigious Boston University. So the woman of color is a fornicator. There, I’ve said it since no one else will.

Cortez’s comrade-in-arms is Representative Ilhan Omar, Democrat from Minnesota. Omar has said that Jews run the world and she keeps her foot (left one of course) constantly in her mouth. She is anti-Israel and anti-Semitic and has refused to apologize for declaring that some Israel-friendly Congress people owed “allegiance to a foreign country.” Even a few Democrats identified the statement as “vile.”

Cowardly house members refused to censure Omar for her unfair, unprovoked, and unpopular accusation. Instead, those paragons of hypocrisy decided not to condemn Omar but to condemn all forms of hatred. Not having to criticize Omar was an act of cowardice, not principle.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, “Omar last week refused to answer whether she would denounce al Qaeda terrorists.” Say what! A member of Congress refuses to renounce terrorist groups!

Omar also supported Cortez’s claim of concentration camps on our southern border and really lost her marbles when she said illegal aliens have a right to taxpayer-funded abortions!

Omar has refused to clear up her problems with her marriage. She is alleged to have married her brother as a ruse to get him into America from Somalia. She tried to clear her murky marriage mess but made it worse when she admitted that she and Ahmed Hirsi applied for a marriage license but “we never finalized the application and thus were never legally married.” They ended their relationship in 2008 and she “entered into a relationship with a British citizen” (Ahmed Nur Said Elmi) and married him legally in 2009.

Numerous charges have been made that Elmi is actually Omar’s brother whom she married to facilitate his entrance to the U.S. but Omar refuses to clarify the matter.

They were divorced in 2011 “in our faith tradition.” That means they did not get a legal divorce as she admits, saying, “I have yet to legally divorce Ahmed” but am “in the process of doing so.” She added, “Since 2011, I am happy to say that I have been reconciled with Ahmed Hirsi, we have been married in our faith tradition and are raising our family together.” Note, she did not state that she has been legally married to her present “husband.”

A few days ago the Daily Mail revealed that Omar and “the father of her three children – have split.” The article revealed that Omar has “moved into a penthouse apartment in one of Minneapolis’s trendiest neighborhoods.” When Hirsi was asked about the split, he replied, “Wow, I can’t comment on that. I’m sorry, I just can’t say anything.”

I guess not, after being married to her and siring three children; although usually a Muslim husband is dominate (boss, overlord, master, superior) but maybe Omar has special status and is an anomaly in Islam—a dominant wife.

Omar also filed joint income tax returns with her husband Ahmed Hirsi while still married to Ahmed Elmi. Obviously, Omar is in deep doo-doo.

As to her “marriage” to her brother, that is still murky and she refuses to provide any clarity. Whatever that relationship, Omar is a fellow fornicator as is Cortez.

Rashida Tlaib is a congresswoman from Michigan. Tlaib is a racist who calls other people racists as when she called Lynne Patton (a black person) a “prop” because she appeared in the gallery while the debate was going on as to whether or not Trump is a racist. Tlaib was also photographed with a Palestinian activist who praised Hezbollah and declared Israel has no right to exist.

Furthermore, Tlaib tried to rewrite history by suggesting Muslim leaders had offered Jews a “safe” haven from the Holocaust. Evidently, she has never seen photos of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem visiting with Hitler. I presume Tlaib is familiar with WWII.

Representative Rashida Tlaib said she doesn’t regret using obscene language about Trump when she vowed to “impeach the motherf***er.” It seems our ladies of color are vile, vulgar, and vicious Representatives.

Representative Ayanna Pressley is a Democrat from the Peoples’ Republic of Massachusetts whose claim to fame is her statement, “We don’t need any more black faces that don’t want to be a black voice.” She was saying that Blacks who didn’t reflect her positions are not legitimate. Now THAT’S racism and insulting to all Conservative Blacks. She said that minorities need to have a “seat at the table” and said it was time to “shake that table.”

Well, from my balanced, informed, and unprejudiced point of view, I think the minorities own and control the table and too many white people of power are fearful of challenging them since minorities are considered to be “entitled” people.

The four ladies of color are irresponsible, irrepressible, and ignorant people who should be, well tending bar or serving tables, not making laws in a still-free Republic.

But they got the votes, so they can saddle up and giddy-up but true patriots will see that they have a very rough ride and hopefully get bucked off their red, high horses.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to my articles, and click here to support my work with a donation.)

The Boys’ family thought that Hell had frozen over, but in those days, no one was interested in theology except me and I knew better. But it was a big deal for Dad to vote Republican.

Many years later, I left the GOP because the Grand Old Party morphed into the Grand Old Progressives, so I even wonder how principled Republicans can stay in that party. But in spades for Democrats.

Surely decent Democrats are embarrassed almost daily by their leaders making outrageous charges simply to score points with their dumb, deceived, and the delusional members. Their actions during the Supreme Court Hearings, their political ads, and their nonsensical accusations during the political season make a buzzard sitting on a dead carcass look like the essence of elegance.

While people in both parties can disagree about tariffs, foreign policy, and the deficit, surely no one really tries to defend killing innocent unborn babies; same-sex “marriage”; permitting males in women’s rest rooms or locker rooms because they think they are female when their genitalia screams their manhood; or the invasion of America by foreigners who may be unhealthy, uneducated, and unrepentant terrorists, or even arrogant caravanners and others who are trying to defy and upend our laws.

Can far left “progressive” positions like the above really be defended? Do Democrats even try to defend such positions or do they simply call people who are critical of the above racists, homophobe, and bigot? But then, that is much easier than defending one’s position.

Some principled Democrats began thinking about their association with a corrupt party when the shenanigans of Ted Kennedy and Gerry Studds were revealed. As it accelerated into the Clinton administration, it became an avalanche of evil and corruption. With Obama, we were slapped in the face almost daily if we did not worship facing Saudi Araba. It seemed people were given high positions in his administration if they were black and/or Muslim, preferably both. Think of the rogue’s gallery: Holder, Rice, Jarrett, Jones, Lynch, Emanuel, et al. It also seemed to help one’s résumé if one were a female.

Lynch, Rice, and Jarrett are women; however, there was an abundance of females as revealed in Essence magazine issue October, 2015 that headlined, “29 Powerful Black Women Who Called The Shots In The Obama Administration”! I looked in vain for a photo of white women who “called the shots” for Obama without success. Likewise, I looked for any Fundamentalist or Evangelical Christian who “called the shots” for Obama but without success. I would have been satisfied whether he or she was black or white.

All of us now know that Obama was photographed with Louis Farrakhan in 2005 while Obama was still a U.S. Senator from Illinois. The Muslim photographer promised to keep the photo secret since it would have destroyed Obama’s budding political career. The photo was released in 2017 when no one cared about Obama or Farrakhan.

Frankly, I would leave any group that had anything to do with Farrakhan. However, he sups and dines with the political elite when he should be making license plates in prison or using a sledge hammer making little rocks out of big rocks. The fact that he has not been investigated by state and Federal officials reflects on the Democrat Party and the Justice Department that deliberately refuses to investigate his hate crimes, advocacy of terrorists, and his audacious anti-Semitism.

President Obama deliberately excluded Christians from senior White House positions according to White House emails sent to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign manager John Podesta. Obama had a list of Muslim candidates for high level jobs; sounds like religious discrimination to me.

Obama had many Muslim Brotherhood (a terrorist group masquerading as religious rights group) operatives—all Islamist activists—in his administration having major influence over U.S. policy. Mohammed Elibiary was Homeland Security Advisor and appeared at a conference honoring Ayatollah Khomeini! Salam al-Marayati was an Obama Advisor who founded the Muslim Public Affairs Council and is an Israel hater. Eboo Patel was on the Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships and Rashad Hussain was Special Envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference. He is famous for memorization of the Koran, proving his devotion to Islam. Dalia Mogahed, an Egyptian-born hijab-clad Muslim American, was the first Muslim woman appointed to a position in the Obama administration.

Other Muslims with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood were Huma Abedim who was Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during Obama’s presidency. Mehdi K. Alhassani was Special Assistant to the Office of the Chief of Staff, National Security Council Staff, and Executive Office of the President. Rashad Hussain was Obama’s special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. All stamped: “Approved by the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Obama nominated Abid Riaz Qureshi, a Washington lawyer to a prestigious federal judgeship, making the first Muslim American tapped for the federal judiciary. Abid was born in Pakistan.

It has been reported in the national media that former Director of the CIA John Brennan converted to Islam while serving as CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia during the 1990s. He became Obama’s Homeland Security Advisor from 2009 to 2013 and CIA Director from 2013 to 2017.

The far left Mother Jones magazine reported that eleven of Obama’s confirmed judges were “openly gay.” No, not your father’s party, for sure.

How could any Democrat sleep at night knowing he was a member of party that promoted such people to places of public trust?

Jesse Helms was a lifelong Democrat and switched to the GOP and became a leading conservative senator. Ronald Reagan also switched and became one of the most effective presidents in U.S. History. While President Donald Trump is not much of a Republican, he did leave the Democrat Party and there is scuttlebutt about some Democrat senators jumping ship after the midterm elections.

However, my biggest concern is not the professional politicians but average working Democrats who need to do the principled thing and leave the party that left them many years ago. No thinking, honest person can defend the platform of the Democrat Party. Far left issues that Democrat spokesmen are forcing down the throats of Americans would gag a maggot: same sex “marriage”; transgenderism; the use of any rest room by anyone, depending on what he/she feels like; open borders; sanctuary cities; blatant Socialism that has proved itself a failure wherever it has been tried; higher taxes; statehood for Washington, DC; environmental extremism that will close coal mines and oil wells; universal preschool for every child; universal health care; grab all guns; debt free college education for all, ad infinitum. Most of these proposals reek of Socialism and I am surprised, shocked, and stunned that any American, not living in a padded cell, would seriously and unashamedly promote a socialist America.

If many of those hot-button issues become law, they would totally change America and frankly, America has been changed too much already in my opinion. We must understand, if we have not already, that our world has been changed forever for evil, not good. It is past time to start facing reality about radical Democrats coming out of left field. Ayn Rand reminded us that “You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.”

If the U.S. and our “forces of freedom” are to win, then we must be dauntless, decisive, and determined. It is incredulous that anyone would argue with the plan to Keep America American or the policy of always asking, “What is in the best interest of America?” Would any sane person suggest that we do what is best for some other nation instead?

But a word of caution. We must be vigilant that we don’t become haters of good and decent people who are different from most of us. Such a result would mean that dark forces have been successful in destroying America, and it would no longer be America. We must also hold public officials’ feet to the fire and chain them to the Constitution (notice how smoothly I go from one metaphor to another?).

We must be careful not to become un-American in our desire to remain American!

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Modern Muslims are having a difficult, even impossible task, of explaining the outrageous teachings of Mohammed, a desert Bedouin who could neither read nor write. However, to continue their power grab, Muslims must continue to defend a castle in ruins.

As more non-Muslims read the Hadith, it becomes more and more difficult for Muslims to defend their teachings since they contain so much nonsense as documented below.

Mohammed, always the virulent anti-Semite, taught that a group of Jews had been literally transformed into rats! Narrated Abu Huraira: “The prophet said, “a group of Israelites was lost. Nobody knows what they did. But I do not see them except that they were cursed and transformed into rats….” (Vol. 4, Book 54, No. 524.) The footnote to this hadith reveals, “Later on, the prophet was informed through inspiration about the fate of those Israelites: They were transformed into pigs and monkeys.” So declare Muslim scholars!

Faithful Muslims are promised that they will be protected from poison or major powers if they eat seven dates every morning. (See Vol. 7, Book 65, No. 356.) However, that didn’t help Mohammed because he was poisoned by one of his wives and died a slow, painful death as he cursed Christians and Jews.

It is permissible for Muslims to eat non-Muslim human flesh according to top Islamic scholars and the major Muslim educational institution Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt. The university has produced a high school curriculum that teaches cannibalism to teen students! According to the Hadith, “One may eat the flesh of a human body. It is not allowed to kill a Muslim nor a free non-Muslim under Muslim rule (because he is useful for the society), nor a prisoner because he belongs to other Muslims. But you may kill an enemy fighter or an adulterer and eat his body.” (Vol. 1, p. 716, Al-Kortoby.)

Additional instructions are not provided as to whether the use of knife and fork are required when eating human flesh or whether table manners are required except for the general instruction that after a meal, you must lick your hand before you wipe it with a cloth. Narrated Ibn Abbas: “The prophet said, ‘When you eat, do not wipe your hand till you have licked it, or had it licked by somebody else.’” (Vol. 7, Book No. 366.)

Surely high class Bedouins would do their own licking, but who knows!

Mohammed taught that angels curse any woman who refuses to sleep with her husband: Narrated Abu Huraira: “Allah’s messenger said, ‘If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. have sexual relation) and she refuses and curses him in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.’” (Vol. 4, Book 54, No. 460.) Evidently, the angels always stop cursing for breakfast.

For a while, Mohammad allowed what is called Mut’a, temporary marriages for Muslims to satisfy their sexual desires. Narrated Abdullah: “We used to participate in the holy wars carried on by the prophet and we had no women (wives) with us. So we said (to the prophet) ‘Shall we castrate ourselves?’ But the prophet forbade us to do that and thenceforth he allowed us to marry a woman (temporarily) by giving her even a garment….” (Vol. 6, Book 60, No. 139.) The “temporary” marriage has been an embarrassment for some Muslims from the beginning.

Mohammed actually believed that inanimate objects could actually speak and feel, and do other things that humans do. Narrated Abdullah bin Umar: “Allah’s messenger said, ‘You (i.e. Muslims) will fight against the Jews till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray them) saying, ‘O Abdallah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.’” Sure!

According to Mohammed, when angels pray they say, “O Allah! Forgive him, as long as he keeps on sitting at his praying place and does not pass wind.” (Vol. 1, Book 8, No. 466.) Wow, Mohammed sure knew what was important, didn’t he.

Do educated Muslims really believe such outrageous things? The two major Islamic groups, the Sunni and Shia accept the Hadith since much of what they believe and practice is revealed only in the Hadith. The Qur’anists are a small Islamic sect that only accept the Koran and totally reject the Hadith.

We find Mohammed making racist comments in regard to people with black skin. Narrated Anas bin Malik: “Allah’s messenger said, ‘You should listen to and obey your Imam (Muslim ruler), even if he was an Ethiopian (black) slave whose head looks like a raisin.’” (Vol. 9, Book 89, No. 256 and Vol. 1, Book 11, No. 662.)

Mohammed also owned black slaves. For instance, Umar b. Al-Khattab came to Mohammed’s house and found that, “A black slave of Allah’s Apostle was sitting on the first step.” (Vol. 6, Book 60, No. 435.) No one has explained how Black Muslims can justify becoming Muslims when its founder was a slaveholder!

I also expect major media moguls to demand a repudiation of Mohammed as they are doing to major American military leaders and founders. Sure I do!

It is shocking to learn that Adam and Eve were 60 cubits (90 feet) tall! Narrated Abu Huraira: “The prophet said, ‘Allah created Adam, and his height was 60 cubits.’” (Vol. 4, Book 55, No. 543.) Furthermore, “All of them will look alike and will resemble their father Adam (in stature), sixty cubits tall.” (Vol. 4, Book 55, No. 544.)

Maybe Adam was the original Jolly Green Giant.

And Gabriel, the angel has more wings than body. Narrated Ibn Masûd: “He (Ibn Masûd) said that the prophet had seen Jibrael (Gabriel) having 600 wings.” (Vol. 4, Book 54, No. 455.)

Mohammed practiced medicine when he revealed the healing powers of the ordinary housefly. Narrated (Abu Huraira): “The prophet said, ‘If a housefly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease.’” (Vol. 4, Book 54, No. 537.) I suppose that might qualify as alternative medicine.

Here is exciting new information about a child’s birth. “As for the resemblance of the child to its parents; if a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets a discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets her discharge first, the child will resemble her.” (Vol. 4, Book 55, No. 546.) Ladies, better talk with your obstetrician about that before you get pregnant.

One “revelation” of Mohammed has even caused his most dedicated followers to blush. Mohammed taught that the sun rises in the West! “…but it will be ordered to return whence it has come and so it will rise in the West.” (Vol. 4, Book 54, No. 421.) Desperate Muslim scholars try to explain that silly assertion by saying in a footnote: “The procedure of the sun mentioned in this Hadith and similar other things mentioned in the Quran like the prostration of the trees, herbs, and stars, etc. (v. 55:6) are beyond our limited knowledge of this universe. It is interpreted that these are mentioned so because of our limited understanding of the people at that time about the matters of the universe.”

Can’t you just feel their frustration as they try to wiggle out of this? Muslim scholars blame Mohammed’s stupid statements on their limited knowledge rather than admit that Mohammed was a raving maniac. He was nuttier than a Snicker’s Bar.

Mohammed gets in deeper when he says that the sun sets in murky water. “It sets in a spring of murky water, (then) it goes and prostrates before its Lord, the Exalted in Might and the Ever-Majestic, under the Throne.” Sure it does, only Galileo and Kepler didn’t know that.

Mohammed even ridiculed the penis of John the Baptist! Of course, I would like to know how Mohammed knew that personal informational about John since he lived about 600 years before Mohammed! This silly, vulgar tradition is recorded in Mahmoud Ayoub’s The Quran and its Interpreters, vol. II: The House of Imran: “…‘Everyone of the sons of Adam shall come on the day of resurrection with a sin [of sexual impropriety], except Yahya (John the Baptist) b. Zechariah.’ Then, picking up a tiny straw, he continued, ‘This is because his generative organ was no bigger than this straw.’”

Do intelligent Muslims really believe such poppycock? Do they even know the poppycock that is taught in the Koran and the Hadith?

It’s time for sane people to rush out of Islam into the arms of Christ who said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life.”

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

And his tribe is increasing at a rapid rate all over Europe—Netherlands, Italy, Austria, Hungary, with others arising in France, Germany, England, etc. And such patriotic leaders give heartburn to open border fanatics and all globalists.

Let me see if I understand this correctly: the nations that refuse to take in Muslims are having no problem with terror and the nations that have almost open borders and are being flooded by Muslims have had numerous terrorist attacks. Maybe America and Canada should take note.

All politicians had better face reality and not snuggle up to the political, social, academic, and media elite: Muslims have an agenda that seeks every nations’ capitulation to their influence.

A Muslim demonstrator in Dearborn, Michigan proudly held a sign stating, “We will use the freedoms of the Constitution to destroy the Constitution!” But political fools refuse to believe such “peaceful” religious people could really be telling the truth as to their intentions!

No democracy or republic or monarchy, or dictatorship is safe and many nations are even financing their own fall as in the United Kingdom. Sharia-practicing Muslim organizer Anjem Choudary of Islam4UK stated, as reported in the London Daily Express, “We have had enough of democracy and man-made law.…We will call for a complete upheaval of the British ruling system…and demand full implementation of Shariah in Britain.”

Hardline Iranian Judge Ayatollah Sadegh Khalkhali openly declared, “Those who are against killing have no place in Islam. Our Prophet killed with his own blessed hands…If the survival of the faith requires the shedding of blood, we are there to perform our duty.” He may be a bigot, barbarian, and butcher but he was honest about what Islam is.

Friends, it’s time to wake up!

Dr. Imran Waheed, the London spokesman for the international “peaceful” jihadist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, claimed in May 2005 that 99 percent of the Muslims worldwide want a caliphate to rule the world!

Shukri Abu Baker gave marching instructions of destruction to his followers in a secret meeting with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and it was taped by the FBI. “I swear by Allah that war is deception…We are fighting our enemy with a kind heart…Deceive, camouflage, pretend that you’re leaving while you’re walking that way. Deceive your enemy….” Note that he was speaking at a CAIR meeting–you know, the Muslim group that is only a public relations firm or civil rights group, or so they say. Their actions prove otherwise. Notice the use of war, deception, fighting, enemy, deceive, and pretend, all indicative of confusion, confrontation, and conflict leading to control.

Omar Ahmad is co-founder of CAIR and former Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) officer. FBI surveillance tapes at secret Hamas meeting in 1993 reveal that IAP could not admit support for the terrorist group Hamas since it would not be politically wise. Of course not. They may be terrorists but they aren’t stupid! The Holy Land Foundation paid for Omar’s travel and lodging for the meeting.

Omar declared, “Those who stay in America should be open to society without melting, keeping mosques open so anyone can come and learn about Islam. If you choose to live here, you have a responsibility to deliver the message of Islam…Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” Well, that’s clear.

Omar praised suicide bombers of innocent people, “Fighting for freedom, fighting for Islam, that is not suicide…they kill themselves for Islam.” Remember, that comes from the mouth of the co-founder of CAIR, America’s number one Muslim organization! Wake up!

However, CAIR is a front for Islamic terror groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah, and terrorists are as easily found in their company as a bowling ball in a bathtub. The Hamas Charter states their purpose is terror. “Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.” The Bible in Psalm 83:4 predicted this hatred of Israel: “They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.”

Israel is the most hated nation on earth and is not even on the maps of many Islamic nations! Many Muslim leaders have boldly declared that Israel should be driven into the sea.

Nihad Awad is Co-Founder and CAIR Executive Director and former Public Relations Director for the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP). He was born in Jordan and is now a U.S. citizen. He boldly declared, “I am in support of the Hamas movement.” He also said, “We do not and will not condemn any liberation movement inside Palestine or Lebanon.”

Randall “Ismail” Royer was CAIR’s National Civil Rights Coordinator and Communications Specialist who was convicted of terrorist crimes while working for CAIR. He was sentenced to twenty years in a Federal Prison. CAIR is a nest of rattlesnakes!

Ghassan Elashi was founder of CAIR-Texas and Chairman of Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. He was convicted for committing terrorist crimes while working for CAIR and sentenced to 65 years in a Federal Prison.

Mo Hassan is a Pakistani-American and former CEO of Bridges TV who was convicted of beheading his wife in 2011! In 2007, he received a CAIR Award but his fellow prisoners aren’t that impressed with the honor. Mo will spend 25 years in prison. I wonder why he didn’t get life. After all, how can a beheading not be premediated?

I reported in my book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! that 60% of Muslim-Americans under 30 told Pew Research they’re more loyal to Islam than America! That is Muslims in America, not Egypt, Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia.

Islam has eyes on every nation in the world! Each one is to be part of their world system called the caliphate. It is already too late for some national leaders to wake up to the truth: Islam, true Islam, is our number one enemy with plans to destroy every legitimate government.

It is dumb, dangerous, and deadly for a nation to disregard Islam; after all, like rattlesnakes, they have warned us of their intentions!

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.