Blacks and Hispanics gushed over the Super Bowl halftime that featured almost all minorities. I noticed one white no-talent rapper and another white male blowing a horn. While I detest and find offensive all rap “music,” the females were not only offensive but performed a slut show. In our very permissive society, a few people are willing to criticize minorities, even loose women with more beauty than brains who exploit their bodies for a buck. But then, I have a right to think they are unprincipled, pathetic sluts. I also have a right to declare what I think.

Black History Month, maybe worthily conceived, has been perverted and diverted to farce, falsehood, and foolishness. Some commendable Blacks are held up as good examples, but the waters were poisoned by including famous blacks who are famous for infamy. They chose a Black supremacist in choosing Malcomb X; a sex pervert felon/Communist in Bayard Rustin; an abuser of women and professional adulterer in Martin Luther King, Jr.; and a preacher-adulterer who fathered a baby out of wedlock in Jesse Jackson. Those “heroes” could have been and should have been rejected because of their personal and political failures. In contrast, many more Blacks who lived noble, honorable, and productive lives could have been used as good examples for all people.

Black History Month has been made deceptive as the media and educators add insult to fantasy by making heroes of such rascals.

Defenders of Black History heroes will tell us the accomplishments of black heroes overshadow their problems, peculiarities, and peccadilloes. However, that’s about as reasonable as saying, serial killer Ted Bundy (who admitted killing 36 people) had some problems, but he also saved lives while working at a suicide hotline.

It is time for truth, not just a time to make people feel good.  One does not have to minimize or twist the truth to build a case for others’ pride and self-esteem.

Polybius, in about 125 B.C., wrote, “It is natural for a good man to love his country and his friends, and to hate the enemies of both. But when he writes history, he must abandon such feelings and be prepared to praise enemies who deserve it and to censure the dearest and most intimate friends.”

Any historian who refuses to tell the whole truth deceives his readers, disgraces his profession, and dishonors the dead. Those who died in a battle and went to jail for truth, deserve the truth to be told. An honest writer must never exaggerate or even embellish the facts, nor should he be afraid to expose the whole truth of an incident.

However, maybe with good intentions to encourage fellow Blacks, black zealots don’t follow the advice above when February arrives. Desperate Blacks in the media and education inflate Black achievers to impress gullible Whites and prop up dispirited Blacks. Honest historians will refuse to tell an untruth and refuse to hide the truth for whatever noble cause. No honest person begrudges a person, group, or whatever being applauded for genuine accomplishments, but everyone should abhor a lie, even an exaggeration.

Some black zealots teach that all knowledge came from Africa, although African and Egyptian are often incorrectly used interchangeably. They do that so lazy and careless readers will think black when they read Egyptian. Modern black “scholars” tell us that Egypt was “an entirely black affair” and manage to drop such power words as pyramids, Pharaohs, etc., as if modern Blacks can rightly identify with the Blacks of Egypt. However, the Blacks in Libya and Sudan were purposefully kept out of Egypt except for slaves, low-level workers, etc.

Black nations shared Egypt’s border on the south and west while Egypt’s populated region was lands to the east and west of the Nile River, their lifeblood.

As to Egyptians being the same as modern-day Blacks, one only must look at the many photos of Egyptian mummies to know the truth. Many mummies are obviously white with red or blonde hair showing no relationship to Blacks from Libya (to the west) and Sudan (to the south). Ramesses II was a tall redhead, and the famous Tutankhamen was blond.       

Blacks only participated in the kingdom when it was in decline. About 730 B.C., Egypt’s population was like today: a mixed-race made up of white, Semitic, and black extraction.

For Blacks to take credit for the Egyptian civilization is like saying Detroit was founded by Blacks because more than 80 percent of the population are black. The city was really founded by white French colonists in 1701.

There were exceptions, such as Blacks from Libya and Sudan and Hebrews usually working as slaves or low-level jobs that no Egyptian wanted. There were many Hebrews as slaves, but some held high political positions such as Joseph, who was second only to Pharaoh. But that was in the “glory years” when all Egypt and Canaan came to Joseph for food.

Maybe Jews should make much of that historical fact. Joseph fed the world because of his food storage program. There was food in Egypt when “the money failed” (Genesis 47:15), and food was unavailable.

During this high Egyptian civilization, Egyptian leaders restricted Blacks, especially from their southern border with Sudan. Sesostris III (1878-1841 B.C.) was king at the peak of Egypt’s civilization. A stela inscription reads, “Southern boundary, made in the year 8 [of his rule], under the majesty of the king of Upper and Lower Egypt, Sesostris III . . . in order to prevent that any black should cross it, by water or by land, with a ship, or any herds of the blacks; except a black who shall come to do trading in Iken, or with a commission. Every good thing shall be done with them but without allowing a ship of the blacks to pass by Heh, going downstream, forever.”

That meant, “No Blacks Allowed.” Or, more precisely, only Blacks who can be helpful.

Of course, these black fanatics claim credit for the pyramids and the knowledge and wisdom from Egypt. However, black Nubians ruled as Pharaoh for a short period between 732 and 664 B. C., long after Egypt passed its peak and was in decline. The proponents are too ignorant or dishonest to admit that fact and are not willing to confess that black Africans made no significant improvement to Egyptian knowledge, wisdom, or progress.

We are told that the Blacks of Nubia (biblical Kush) ruled for sixty years under five “black pharaohs.” The University of Chicago website declares, “Kings of Nubia ultimately conquered and ruled Egypt for about a century. Monuments still stand—in modern Egypt and Sudan—at the sites where Nubian rulers built cities, temples, and royal pyramids.” All true but way too general. Like the Egyptians to their north, the Nubian black rulers built temples and royal pyramids, but any comparison as to size, beauty, and grandeur is a humiliating joke. Moreover, the Egyptian pyramids are known for their internal intricacy with hidden entrances, passageways, stairways, hidden chambers, etc.

The Nubian pyramids are smaller, usually less than 100 feet high, while the pyramid of Khufu is 440 feet tall. No one speaks or writes of the Great Pyramids of Nubia as they do of Egyptian pyramids. Furthermore, the Egyptian pyramids were filled with many precious stones, gold, etc. Several of the Giza pyramids are among the largest structures ever built. Egyptians are known for their quality while Nubian pyramids are known for their quantity.

The black rule did not add to the empire; instead, it began to collapse. This is documented by The Children of Ra: Artistic, Historical, and Genetic Evidence for Ancient White Egypt, which supports the contention that Egypt’s founders were of European racial stock.

Such deception, dishonesty, and deceit are numerous, especially in February when Black History Month is emphasized. However, honorable people, black and white, will tell the truth, not exaggerate to encourage and impress black youth.

Dr. Patricia Bath, a black physician, is credited (by desperate Blacks) with inventing laser cataract surgery, but an article about her declares, “Her Laserphaco Probe and procedure improved cataract surgery.” It is correct to say, “She was an early pioneer of laser cataract surgery.”  However, lasers to treat cataracts in the eye were developed in the mid-1970s when M.M. Krasnov of Russia first used such procedures.

Dr. Kai-yi Zhou did “the first foldable eye implant in 1978,” followed by Dr. Bath, who achieved “one of the most important discoveries in the field of ophthalmology” in 1986. She invented the Laserphaco Probe, which used light energy to ablate and remove cataracts. Dr. Bath was a talented lady and deserves much credit, but she did not invent laser cataract surgery.

I noticed this repeatedly where Black enthusiasts make an apparent effort to inflate the work of a black inventor but use deception to make a laudable improvement more than it was. Often, Blacks are given credit for inventing something, while honesty would require them to say they improved an item, such as the heating furnace, the fountain pen, the traffic light, etc.

Black zealots talk much and loud about great black civilizations but fail to support their assertions. Surely, they are not referring to Haiti located in the Caribbean, about 1900 miles from the U.S. Because of its location, it should be a paradise but is known for poverty, rebellion, famine, crime, corrupt politicians, and longtime dictators. The population is descended from African slaves and won independence from France in 1804. It has been on the slippery slope ever since.

Maybe Blacks would like to point out any great black nations on the African continent. But wait, there aren’t any; after thousands of years, there is chaos, crime, poverty, tribal warfare, and disease. While the world turned and most people made progress, black Africa missed getting something as basic as the wheel!

According to Oxford University professor John Baker, the wheel didn’t arrive in sub-Sahara Africa until about the mid-1800s! And it was brought there by a fundamentalist missionary physician, Dr. David Livingstone. Livingstone tells in his diary of excited Blacks coming to his village from the jungle to see his wheeled vehicle.

In Africa, where are all the great cities with massive buildings, cathedrals, colleges, bridges, railroads, and airports? Blacks have been denigrated for a long time, and I don’t want to add to any bashing. Still, I am committed to the truth: Blacks, while making great contributions to civilization, have never produced a great and enduring civilization.

Don’t hear what I am not saying! it is unfair to lie with a desire to inspire, instruct, or inform anyone about anything. But especially when the lie is not needed.

It is better to be troubled by the truth than duped by deception.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 20 books, the most recent, Reflections of a Lifetime Fundamentalist: No Reserves, No Retreats, No Regrets! The eBook is available at Amazon.com for $4.99. Other titles at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don  Boys, Ph.D., and visit his blog.  Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles and click here to support  his work with a donation.)

Progressives declare that they cannot be racists; they get away with that because they use their own definitions. They can use offensive words in what they call music or in drama, but if I use the same words to tell people not to use those words, I am considered a racist! Frankly, a black progressive calling a conservative Christian a racist is like a skunk accusing a rabbit of having bad breath.

Leftists insist on using their unique definitions for many words as Humpty Dumpty said to Alice in Through the Looking Glass, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean.”

American universities are telling students “Understand that you are white, so it is inevitable that you have unconsciously learned racism. Your unearned advantage must be acknowledged and our racism unlearned.”

That is not only racist but also stupid.

Have you noticed that when a racial minority commits a crime against a white person, the media quickly tells us to not judge the whole race because of a few; however, when a white man does a crime against a colored person, we hear charges of systemic racism? It appears that those who yell the loudest and are the quickest to identify racism are the most racist of all.

Dictionaries should rewrite their definition of racist to be “someone winning an argument with a liberal.” The argument is easy to win if one simply reads leftist newspapers and journals. Of course, that would result in terminal brain rot.

The headline shouted, “Atlantic Writer Claims Solar Eclipse is Racist!” Mother Nature was racist because the path of the eclipse fell across areas of the country populated mostly by white people! No, it was not humor or satire. It was tagged, “science.” A dummy Brooklyn Law Professor said, “Still, an eclipse chaser is always tempted to believe that the skies are replaying a message.” Taking a second breath and wiping the foam from her quivering lips, she wrote, “The strange path of the eclipse suggests a need for reorganization” of our society. And generally, the path was over Americans who voted for Trump. I kid you not.

How dare Mother Nature spread the eclipse across white America leaving out the major black cities requiring them to experience the eclipse second or third hand.

The professor should be in a mental hospital where she can get the help she desperately needs, not in a law school where she can destroy young minds–young minds that are already soft and porous from drugs, rock music, and incessant bombardment from the left.

Folks, the big surprise here is not an idiotic statement made by a self-hating white racist but that any school would hire such a person. And to not fire her for such an outrageous statement proves the depth of moral cowardice in academia. I think she has a right to be a racist but she doesn’t have a right to be ignorant. Fire her for ignorance, not racism.

But it gets worse, if possible. “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition….” That statement came from an article titled “Abolish the White Race,” and published in Harvard Magazine, vol. 105, no. 1 (2002), p. 30. Yes, that Harvard.

The above was written by a Harvard Professor! Suppose a Christian had written the same thing about Blacks or Hispanics! Sane people believe that people, all people, should be treated like people—not Black, White, etc. Not Irish-Americans. Not African-Americans. Just Americans!

Now we are told that black racists complained to the Palm Springs, California Desert Sun that some trees planted in the 1960s are racist! I kid you not. Of course, note that this is California. Residents complain that the invasive trees block views of the Tahquitz Creek Golf Course and San Jacinto Mountains. In doing so, they have artificially depressed property values and prevented black families from accumulating wealth in their property over the past half century! Surely all Americans have a right to expect our trees not to be racist!

Students at Michigan State University are being taught that doing yoga is “cultural appropriation” by white people which makes them racists. I don’t like yoga because of its relationship to eastern religions but it is not racist.

Now, we are told that Little House on the Prairie (books and television series) was not the wholesome series we thought. It too is, you guessed it, racist!

The media glorifies racists and castigates Conservatives who call attention to black racism in Jesse Jackson, Barack Obama, Omarosa, or Al Sharpton. Al spoke at Kean College and provided a first class example of black racism. He said, “White folks was (sic) in caves while we was (sic) building empires. We taught philosophy and astrology (!) and mathematics before Socrates and them (sic) Greek homos ever got around to it.” It is difficult to imagine a legitimate college providing a platform (and a generous honorarium) to such an incompetent race baiter.

Overlooking his incredibly botched English and his positive reference to astrology, he implied that mankind lived in caves, which is a silly distortion of early civilization although it does fit the evolutionary mythology. Men have always lived in caves; even millions do so today in China and the Philippines but cave living is a cartoon depiction of reality. Moreover, he failed to mention one empire that Blacks have built. Now, remember he brought this up so I am only correcting his historical misinformation. Of course, I will be called a racist for doing so. That way, they don’t have to explain the missing black empires.

I’m not sure whether Sharpton knows the facts or not; he probably doesn’t know that he doesn’t know. He does know that race baiting pays off big time. He even has his own television show to display his $1000.00 suits and $400.00 shoes—and his proficiency in the English language!

Black leader Booker T. Washington wrote, “There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs—partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays.” It does pay and very well.

A few years ago, I didn’t know what racist was; now it seems I are one!

According to the racists with small minds and big mouths!

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

I am weary, even embarrassed at public figures who say something then apologize for it when criticism chases them down. Today, I suppose I will offend everyone and I will not apologize for it. After all, I will state what I believe and would prove to be a hypocrite if I apologized. I like being independent as a hog on ice.

I am tired of hearing about Don Sterling, the old dude in Los Angeles who seems to hate or at least dislike Blacks. Now, I don’t want him as a friend or neighbor but he has a right to be whatever he is as long as it doesn’t infringe on the rights of others. Blacks and wannabe Blacks should recognize his foolishness as well as the illegal taping of his private thoughts and move on. As to forcing him to apologize and sell his basketball team, that is undemocratic, unreasonable, and unAmerican. Those sensitive souls who were offended should refuse to support his team. There, that will take care of that.

As to Sterling’s opinion of Magic Johnson as a role model for children, of course he is right. Johnson may have been a great athlete but he is a failure as a human. He is a testimony to others that one can sleep around and still be rich, renowned, even respected. Of course, he is an unfit role model for children.

As to the league’s 2.5 million dollar fine and trying to force Sterling out of the league, I wouldn’t agree with either without a fight. Frankly, I don’t care what he does. He is obviously a corrupt individual who doesn’t know whether he is pitching or catching; but even fools, failures, and fanatics have First Amendment rights. At least they used to.

Then there are the Hispanic fanatics who want to shut down all-you-can-eat taco bars because they are offensive! No, all the nuts are not on trees or in California. It seems various sorority chapters host taco bar fundraisers on college campuses but a few Latino students are offended at such audacity! The offendees were at Stanford and Dartmouth. Very delicate souls, you know. Even though I don’t like Mexican food (now that will offend some) I would like to participate in one of those all-you-can eat fundraisers wearing (among other items) a big Texas belt buckle and a massive sombrero. As someone said, those militant Latino students on campuses “have a machete to grind.” And grind they do and fools cheer them on.

Paula Deen was harassed and intimated by the thought police because she used the word nigger many years earlier! Rather than satisfying the fascists with her fake apology she should have laughed at them and gone home and baked a cake. Her cooking show was cancelled, a publisher canceled a book contract, and she lost major endorsements. Of course, it is acceptable for blacks to use the word for themselves and others, but not Whites! Jesse Jackson called New York City “Hymie-town” and was not castigated for it. Wonder why? The reason is that liberals are the biggest hypocrites in America (and the biggest whiners).

Nigger is only offensive when it is used to deliberately insult someone; however, in our super sensitive day when the thought police roam the streets daily almost everyone has become super silly. Even when the word is used in a non-offensive way such as my discussion here, I am expected to say “the N word” not nigger. Even the courts and media have bought into such inane actions. Blacks tell us that they can use the word but Whites cannot; however, that dog won’t hunt.

Because of the mindless political correctness I can understand how media people would be fearful to use the term and other terms even in a non-offensive way. Recently, I was unthoughtful in using nigger in an inoffensive way on a national talk show of a friend. I did not think what affect it might have on him and his producer. While I don’t care about people who disagree with me, I should have played the “N-word” game since there were other people involved. I don’t have a business to destroy and can live with unpleasant repercussions; however, talk show people have many considerations I don’t have. Maybe someday we will have a return to sanity where people will not be so sensitive and manipulative. But don’t hold your breath unless blue is your favorite color.

But it gets worse. Two families from Atlanta area visiting Savannah’s river walk were jumped by a group of black thugs and beaten for being white. The two men were punched in the face and a six year old daughter was punched in the stomach and one of the wives was dragged by her hair by a black thug! When the police arrived the attackers had fled, after all they may have been hoodlums but they weren’t stupid.

The police report and the television news report did not mention that the thugs were black! The complete description by the television commentator was: “One male was wearing a yellow shirt, the other a red shirt and later took it off and was wearing a white tank top. A younger female was wearing a white skirt or shorts and a beige or yellow top. The elder male was wearing all white and a white hat.” Isn’t that interesting and revealing? No mention of the race, skin color, stature or hair. THAT is racism. It is also cowardly.

The refusal to reveal the race of a felon is now in vogue; after all, we must not make anyone feel uncomfortable.

I have discovered that many words I thought were acceptable in their proper use are now forbidden. Such words as Eskimo, black, colored (oops, someone tell the NAACP that), Indian, mulatto, native, negress, negro (meaning black in some languages), nigger, city-slicker, hillbilly, white trash, oriental, savage, peon, yank, Yankee, WASP (“a word for people who are white and have money, power, and opportunities that other people do not have”), gyp is from Gypsies who have a bad reputation, dyke (a word that “is a lot like” the “N” word) and is acceptable for a lesbian to say it, but no one else. Bossy, illegal immigrant, and man up are all forbidden.

Non-white is used for describing people who are not considered to be members of the race of people who have pale skin. This word is usually considered offensive because “it suggests that the white section of the population of the world is more important than any other.” Well, in God’s eyes, all people are equally important, loved, and need to trust Christ. However, obviously the people who control most of the wealth, power, academia, etc., in the world are the “most important” in that they influence for good or ill people of all races. That happens to be the white population. However, in stating an obvious fact, I will be accused of bigotry or at least being insensitive. Oh, me.

The leftist crowd is basically dishonest right up to where the buck is supposed to stop. How can they pretend to be consistent, honest people when they are intolerant of what they see as my (or anyone’s) intolerance? Moreover, they don’t understand an important concept: principled people can and must be tolerant of others without compromising their own principles.

I’m sure glad I don’t have a boss, contract, or sponsor who could control what I say; but at least I’m an equal opportunity offender. I like being as independent as a hog on ice. It also irritates my critics and I like that.

http://bit.ly/1iMLVfY Watch these 8 minute videos of my lecture at the University of North Dakota: “A Christian Challenges New Atheists to Put Up or Shut Up!”

Mandela (educated at a Wesleyan Mission School) was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993 although it was obvious to all except the deaf, blind, and dumb (especially the dumb) that he was a terrorist and waged war against his own people and nation. But then, the Nobel Peace Prize seems too often be given to those who lean to the left, are left handed, and live out in left field. Of course, their left knees jerk incessantly.

Mandela was cofounder and director of the militant Spear of the Nation and was involved in burnings, brutality, and bombings by the dozens. One of his terrorist acts was the bombing at Church Street in Pretoria that killed 19 people and injured 217.  He even advised black youths to burn down their schools. Those same children are now struggling in college because they missed so much school in their early grades where foundational facts are taught.

It is unusual if the media do not refer to him as a political prisoner; however, it is interesting that Amnesty International did not consider him such because that group “rejects the proposal to recognize as prisoners of conscience people who use or advocate the use of force.” Nelson did not qualify and the media’s “make over” will not change that fact.

Mandela is known for his many illicit affairs, but we are expected to overlook all that because he was so devoted to freeing his people and throwing off the oppressive white yoke! One day, his first wife returned home to find that Mandela had installed his mistress in his bedroom!

Nelson was married three times and abandoned his first wife (a Jehovah’s Witness who was never political following the precepts of that sect) to raise their three children alone. He married Winnie who lost all credibility with everyone except those whose salaries and benefits she pays. Nelson shot her into space (divorce) when she embarrassed him and became a drag on his political life. She was vocal about advocating terror and violence to support her cause.

Winnie, convicted of fraud and theft in 2002 and still a member of the ANC’s National Executive Committee, rides in a limousine and wears very expensive clothes and jewelry, and has scores of bodyguards wherever she goes. She was convicted of kidnapping a young man who was subsequently murdered. She also said, “With our boxes of matches and our necklaces we shall liberate this country,” referring to the grisly township practice of putting a gasoline-soaked tire around the neck of suspected apartheid agents (anyone working for the white regime), cutting under their arms, and setting the tire on fire. Then the black crowd of “freedom fighters” taunted the dying “agent of apartheid.”  Minnie is a sweetie.

Such savagery did not stop after Blacks took over. Three men were killed by necklacing last year for burglary. Early in 2013 four students were necklaced in Nigeria, so this gruesome death penalty is spreading across Africa, Haiti, and Brazil.

All the victims of necklacing in South Africa have been black! Almost 200! Nelson even defended Winnie’s infamous speech on necklacing! Yep, a man of peace, principle, and purpose.

In Mandela’s long walk to free the Blacks of white domination, he and his former wife, Winnie, and his Red buddies at the ANC became filthy rich. One ANC leader said, “I didn’t enter this struggle to be poor.” They aren’t poor anymore. Meanwhile, the “natives on the reservation” are angry since the trainload of goodies did not stop for them. The gravy train stopped just long enough for Mandela and his Red cronies to climb on board before it chugged on down the tracks leaving millions of poor, disillusioned blacks wiping the soot from their faces. Winnie even said, “[Nelson] Mandela let us down. He agreed to a bad deal for the blacks.”

Mandela carefully maintained a statesman-like, friendly, likeable, reformer persona, trying to help his people (Blacks) but he has not shown any concern for his only living sibling, his elderly and sick sister. While Mandela built himself a 30-room mansion, surrounded by a high wall next to the main highway, his sister lives with seven relatives in one, round-shaped room sleeping in just four beds! However, it is crass, if not crude to speak of such things since he was a “man of conscience” and the “George Washington and Abraham Lincoln” of South Africa!

And he did spend 27 years in prison but even if he had been innocent, it would not qualify him being nominated as a member of the Trinity by the unbalanced, untruthful, unskilled, and unnecessary media!

Copyright 2013, Don Boys, Ph.D.

http://bit.ly/1iMLVfY  Videos of my lecture at the University of North Dakota titled “A Christian Challenges New Atheists to Put Up or Shut Up!”

Universities are almost held in reverence, a reverence that is not justified. The basic message emanating from most secular universities: “People of color are automatic victims; whites are villains and should feel guilty for undeserved white privileges. Homosexuality is commendable and abhorring that behavior is contemptible. Minorities have privileges that no one else has and to question their special treatment is prima facie evidence of bigotry. America is a selfish, evil nation taking advantage of poor people everywhere.” Every parent can expect their children to be taught such balderdash at all state colleges, Ivy League universities, and many Christian universities. Plus the education received will be third rate and would not have been acceptable in the average high school 50 years ago!

Dr. Walter Williams wrote about an English professor’s comment: “One of the items that I assigned was a two-page essay that described a favorite vacation or holiday. One college student turned in two pictures drawn with crayon depicting the beach. When I gave her a failing grade, she was indignant and said that she put a great deal of work into the pictures. When I told her that she did not do the assignment and that she was supposed to write an essay, she said, ‘But I don’t know what an essay is!’” That was a college student not an elementary student!

At America’s major 55 liberal arts universities it was found that 98 percent could identify rap “artist” Snoop Doggy Dogg and Beavis and Butt-Head, but only 34 percent knew George Washington was the general at the battle of Yorktown. It’s time to arouse from sleep and get your students out of those schools before they become lazy, lobotomized losers for a lifetime.

Parents and students need to know what a college has to offer before writing that tuition check. The core subjects will usually be offered (but don’t count on it) but remember that the school is in the business of selling worthless degrees. So the courses offered will run the gamut–soup to nuts, with an emphasis on the nuts.

American universities have trashed or minimized core subjects and emphasize “Black Studies,” “Disability Studies,” “Queer Body Politics,” “Men’s Studies,” (at about 100 universities), and “Whiteness Studies.” David Horowitz says: “Black studies celebrates Blackness, Chicano studies celebrates Chicanos, Women’s studies celebrates women, and white studies attacks white people as evil.” Are you funding that?

Oh, I forgot to mention a big deal, “Fat Studies,” and one school offers classes in “Buffyology” which is the study of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” Educators a hundred years ago would blush in shame and think me an unreliable gasbag to suggest that any college would be so trivial, tasteless, and trashy. Oh, but it gets worse, much worse. You can take classes on Harry Potter and Elvish–the language of “Lord of the Rings.” Maybe students can learn to say “No” in Elvish to outrageous courses.

Carnegie Mellon University students will study “Sex and Death.” They will decide “whether we need to liberate death now that (maybe) we have figured sex out.” I’m not sure how we can “liberate death” but I’m pleased to know that someone has “figured sex out.” After these academic “how to” courses dealing with sex, someone should have done so by now.

Obviously, sex is a major concern at these schools but another major concern is race and Marxism. A good example is Occidental College (where our President attended) that offers “The Unbearable Whiteness of Barbie: Race and Popular Culture in the United States.” They also explore ways in “which scientific racism has been put to use in the making of Barbie [and] to an interpretation of the film The Matrix as a Marxist critique of capitalism.” Everyone has been wondering about that. I wonder if I could audit that course!

Amherst College in Massachusetts offers the class “Taking Marx Seriously: Should Marx be given another chance?” Students in this course are asked if Marxism still has any “credibility” left. Did Marx ever have any credibility? If so, with whom? Now there’s a course I could get excited about! If people had taken Marx seriously during the nineteenth century, millions of people would not have been butchered and enslaved all over the world. However, I doubt seriously that the professor will deal with that aspect of Marx. Wonder why?

Other mindless courses are taught such as University of California’s “The Psychology of the Lesbian Experience,” Harvard University’s “Marxist Concepts of Racism,” Alfred University’s “Nip, Tuck, Perm, Pierce, and Tattoo: Adventures with Embodied Culture,” John Hopkins University’s “Sex, Drugs, and Rock ‘n’ Roll in Ancient Egypt.” I should stop but it continues so I will: University of North Carolina (Chapel Hill); “Canine Cultural Studies”; while Harvard has “I Like Ike, But I Love Lucy”; and the reputable George Mason University offers “Hip-Hop: Beats, Rhyme and Culture”; and Georgetown’s “Bible and Horror” seems to be a sure winner. Of course the current day horror is in the “miseducation” in these major universities.

Could this be why Today’s College Students and Yesteryear’s High School Grads reported that “Contemporary college seniors scored on average little or no higher than the high-school graduates of a half-century ago on a battery of 15 questions assessing general cultural knowledge.” Weep America, weep and stop supporting “miseducation.”

Thoughtful, concerned, dedicated students should run from these universities like their hair is on fire. They should run, not walk, as fast as possible from such “schools of higher learning.” In fact, if my child even looked at one of their catalogs, I would nail him in a barrel and feed him through a hole once a day–with thanks to Mark Twain!

Copyright 2013, Don Boys, Ph.D.

Martin Luther King’s statement that a person should be judged by his character not the color of his skin is a majestic thought. I will do that as I look at King, and I wonder if radical leftists, King worshipers, white liberals, black non-thinkers, media moguls and others will do the same?
Some “conservatives” need to do likewise!

Some will object to my research, questioning my motives but do my motives really matter? Isn’t it the truth that is important? Don’t people of character care about truth anymore?

Richard John Neuhaus said of King: “Dr. King was, for all that was great about him, an adulterer, sexual libertine, lecher, and wanton womanizer.” Neuhaus is a well-known liberal theologian and writer. My research also indicates that King was a drunk, plagiarist, bisexual, and Marxist. Try to remember that we are not concerned with his race or complexion, but his character.

If I were looking at David Duke and did not deal with his past involvement with the Nazi movement, I would be accused of bias or poor research. In the interest of truth am I not required to do the same with King? If not, then why is he exempt from a careful, honest look at his past to make a decision about him in the present? If I am wrong, please correct me.

No person deserves to be called a journalist if he refuses to look at both sides of an issue or if he/she refuses to give proper weight to all arguments because of prejudice. If a writer is fearful of where the truth will lead him, he should be selling insurance.

During the eight years I wrote columns for USA Today, I asked the editor if I could do a column on King’s plagiarism, however, I never got permission. I had read the story of King’s literary thievery in the London papers during a stopover from one of my trips from the Middle East. The editor of USA Today either did not believe me or more probably did not want to take the heat for breaking the story. The Wall Street Journal broke the story a couple of months later although they did so gingerly.

It is noteworthy that the American media was then forced to deal with King’s plagiarism, but even then they defended him! One main defense was that it was a “black thing,” which was an insult to honest, decent Blacks. When you quote King you don’t know whom you are quoting!

Why is there little debate in the King controversy? During the eight years I wrote columns for USA Today, the editor would not permit me to do a column on King although every year in early January, they always did a page dealing with him. I have one issue that has five columns dealing with King without one critical word on the whole page about him! That is a disgrace to all honest journalists everywhere.

Evidence proves that King had numerous affairs with various women plus numerous one night stands with prostitutes; two black columnists reveal that FBI tapes support the charge that King was bisexual having been heard during a sex orgy with his “best friend” Ralph Abernathy. King was also caught running naked after a woman down a Norway hotel hallway during his trip to accept the Nobel Peace Prize! The night before he was killed he spent the night with two women and fought with a third, according to his “best friend” Ralph Abernathy. If a man will not keep his marriage vows, he is not worthy to walk my dog.

According to the Bible, King was not even a believer in Christ! He rejected Christ’s deity, His virgin birth and his physical resurrection so according to II John he should not be honored; in fact, no one should “bid him God speed.” Furthermore, I challenge anyone to produce one example of King, a Baptist preacher, ever seeking to get lost men to accept Jesus Christ as Savior. Never happened because he did not believe that was essential.

King, like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, Rudy Giuliani and assorted Republicans was a man without character, and informed, honest, decent Americans should not be honoring him with a special day each year.

While I was a member of the Indiana House of Representatives, a member introduced a bill to memorialize King before we had his national holiday forced upon us. The memorialization meant nothing since we did them almost every day as routine.

When the King vote came up (it was a voice vote since it was no big deal) mine was the only negative vote out of a hundred. No one in the senate voted no. I wondered where all the conservatives were. Soon they surrounded me saying that they should have voted with me but didn’t think it was worth the flack. I was told that had I demanded a recorded roll call vote and spoken against the memorialization, there would have been repercussions with my legislation!

The following year the same thing happened in exactly the same way! I started to speak to the issue and demand a recorded vote but did not do so. Why? I don’t know. Some might say it was peer pressure. My conservative friends told me, “Don, it won’t do any good and could hinder your chances of getting your bills even assigned to committee.” It was the only time I did not follow my principles while in office.

King does not deserve a national holiday but instead he should be exposed as a fraud, a fake, and a fool, and I would feel the same about a white conservative!

As for celebrating King’s birthday, I will not do so but I will take the day off since it is my birthday!