During an interview in May, Dr. Francis Collins, former Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), admitted that the NIH “has a stake” in intellectual property used in the COVID vaccine. He went on to say of the pharmaceutical companies, “nobody sees this as a way to make billions of dollars.” He added they can expect a “tiny profit, maybe one-digit percent.” Well, obviously, that has not proved true.

Collins announced his resignation just weeks after documents revealed he made “untruthful” comments about U.S. federal funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Richard Ebright of Rutgers University bluntly said that Collins had not told the truth when asked about this research: “assertions by the NIH Director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID Director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement at WIV are untruthful.”

To those educated in public schools, that means Collins (and Fauci) lied and has been forced out of his position as head of the NIH, although Collins claimed it was time to step down. At least he didn’t talk about “spending more time with the family.”

Collins has publicly professed to be a “serious Christian” and sees no conflict between being a scientist and a “believer.”  But then, there is a conflict between being a Christian and a liar. Collins said he had been a Methodist, Presbyterian, Baptist, and Episcopalian.

Collins was the boss of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who, like Collins, has a reputation of lying even before Congress. Fauci is known for flip-flopping with a record that shows he changes sides more often than windshield wipers.

If a court proves they lied to Congress, they should both go to prison; but the chance of that happening is like Hunter Biden admitting his “art” work is amateurish and is being used to coerce money out of access seekers—lobbyists.

Over the years, there have been numerous scandals in the CDC, NIAC, NIH, but the media manages to look out for their reputation. The media will continue to use Collins’ expertise and never introduce him as “the formerly disgraced Director of NIH.”

Former Director of the CDC, Dr. Tom Freidman, was arrested and confessed to committing a sex crime but escaped jail time. However, the media still go to Tom for his opinion and never introduce him as the “former Director of the CDC and admitted sex offender.” He was hired to a cushy job at the Council of Foreign Relations.

They take care of their own.

Some would say that was in the past and is not germane to the issue at hand. But isn’t it strange that whenever David Duke is mentioned, without exception, he is always “a former member of the KKK?” Although that was more than 40 years ago. And when he ran for Louisiana Governor, he had the support of black civil rights leader James Meredith.

While the liberal/malicious media constantly refer to Duke’s KKK association, the media never reveal that former president Harry Truman was a member of the Klan or Senator Robert Byrd was a KKK official, or that Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black was a Klan member–all Democrats! Nor do they ever mention that Nelson Mandela was a lifetime Communist agitator imprisoned for espionage and sabotage, which he admitted at his trial. Maybe some media mogul will explain that to me, but I won’t hold my breath.

Not only are straying Liberals always forgiven but their infractions are buried by the media—if the culprit was far enough to the left.

You see, the problem is hypocrisy and honesty with an abundance of the former and the absence of the latter.

The World Health Organization (WHO) Director is former Ethiopian Minister of Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) and Foreign Affairs, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Ph.D. Tedros is often seen on television pontificating on world health issues. However, it is never mentioned (full disclosure?) that he is accused in his own country “for the role he played in systematic genocidal violence and gross human right violations including but not limited to arbitrary detentions and extrajudicial execution.”

Another major bit of information that is never revealed is Tedros was “the 3rd ranking member of the politburo (governing body) of the Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF) Terrorist Organization.” The TPLF is an organization founded as a communist revolutionary party that came to power in 1991.

Since no one else will, I should mention that Tedros is part of the Tigray ethnic group. But then, that is no reason to support Communists, although it is an excellent reason to oppose them. Of course, there is a method to his madness since he must have China’s support for re-election as Director of WHO.  Tedros is a puppet “made in China” who can always be counted on to spout praise for the Commies behind the Bamboo Curtain; after all, puppets always say what the person whose lap they sit on wants them to say.

One of the first things Tedros did after taking the job at WHO was to nominate dictator Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe as a goodwill ambassador to the WHO. Mugabe, 93 years old, was appointed, yet Zimbabwe’s healthcare system collapsed along with the economy under his watch! Remember the Zimbabwean 100 trillion-dollar bill in 2008 when inflation reached 231,150,888.87 percent? If you missed that, you might be about to see something similar in the U.S.

You are about to become a billionaire. Your $300,000 home will be a million-dollar home in a few months.

Mugabe ordered the killings of 20,000 people in Zimbabwe during the 1980s, yet the WHO Director appointed him goodwill ambassador “because of his contributions to public health.” I don’t suppose the WHO Director tried to get the opinion of the 20,000 victims Mugabe had killed.

However, Mugabe has gone where all Communists go when their toes turn upward, but thinking people ask, “What kind of a moron appoints Robert Mugabe as a goodwill ambassador for health?” You know WHO.

But the WHO debacle continues to accelerate.

Tedros announced on October 21, 2021, a “profound transformation” of WHO’s culture after the revelation that at least 21 WHO staff members sexually abused and exploited local citizens in the Democratic Republic of Congo from August 2018 to June 2020. Female victims told of being raped, becoming pregnant, and forced into an abortion.

Nothing new here. This has been the modus operandi for United Nations’ groups for decades. The U.S. has financially supported 15% ($400 million in 2019) of WHO’s budget until President Trump stopped it and pulled out of WHO. In one of his first acts as president, Biden rescinded former President Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S. from the WHO and sent them a $200 million check.

More wisely, on October 28, 2021, world news reported the European Commission (EC) suspended funding for WHO programs in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) “over concerns about mismanagement of W.H.O.’s massive sexual abuse scandal.”

Obviously, the almost sacrosanct feelings American and world citizens have towards the leading health officials seems to be misplaced, mistaken, and misappropriated. These highly trained officials may act like buffoons; may talk like buffoons but don’t get the wrong idea, they are buffoons.

You and I still fund their activities.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 20 books, the most recent, Reflections of a Lifetime Fundamentalist: No Reserves, No Retreats, No Regrets! The eBook is available at Amazon.com for $4.99. Other titles at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don  Boys, Ph.D., and visit his blog.  Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles and click here to support  his work with a donation.)

But most immigrants insist on clinging to their most offensive practices—no melting pot for them. They accept our opulent bounty but reject our obvious behavior, and they accept our cash but resist our culture. They have kept the cult in culture and removed the civil in civilization.

I smile when new immigrants, especially Muslims, speak glowingly of what they left behind. I may even fall to the floor, holding my sides with raucous laughter. I have seen what they left behind. I have seen the tragedies of multiple wives. I’ve seen their televised instructions on how to beat their wives. I’ve heard them try to justify molesting teenage girls. I have walked their dirty streets. I’ve sat around their Bedouin tents and tried to drink their thick black coffee as they spouted anti-Semitic nonsense and the false Palestinian myth.

Those new Islamic immigrants have a right to be offended at my critique, criticism, and condemnation, but I have a right not to care.

In recent years, the U.S. brought thousands of rustics to our cities that have changed the culture of those cities. It can be observed in any major city, especially in Minneapolis, Detroit, Chicago, etc. Leftists tell us that Americans must devalue their culture so the new immigrants don’t feel unwelcome and out of place. Some major publications declare that downplaying our culture is necessary to bring cultural diversity to majority-white American towns with a very small percent minority population. Their pathetic pitch is we must never embarrass other cultures by suggesting our way is the best way or even a better way.

We are told that people from a better culture should modulate and subdue their higher standards to keep people from an inferior culture from knowing the differences causing them humiliation. However, unless we are idiots, everyone already knows the differences. All right, maybe a very sensitive person will not boast about his perceived higher standards but to purposefully distort reality to help someone save face is absurd, awkward, and asinine.

A quick look at Sweden, France, Germany, England, and others will easily prove that a massive influx of less developed people will change a higher culture almost immediately.

My culture is far more advanced than the culture of the Muslims as indicated when they tried to purchase my wife and daughters for ten goats or five camels, the normal price for that period. That happened in Syria and Jordan during some of my 14 tours of the Middle East. They wanted to purchase any blond woman in my group.

But it didn’t happen in Israel.

It is telling that such an incident never happened in Israel, where we spent most of our time. Is it because of a difference between the Muslim culture and the Israeli culture? Of course, there were some sophisticated Muslims whose homes I visited who would not make me such an offer because other advanced cultures had impacted them.

That same biased, backward, and bloody Muslim culture still mutilates little girls to keep them “sexually pure” for marriage to any lewd, crude dude willing to purchase them. Of course, the old dudes don’t pay as much for the small girls since they are not blondes. That culture teaches that any non-Muslim girl or woman is available to them, and they have expressed surprise when arrested for rape in civilized nations of Europe! They defend rape because they believe they have a right to those females! And some Muslims who don’t participate in the above refuse to condemn it, making them a part of the evil.

The Islamic practice of “honor killings” is enough proof for my premise of inferior cultures. It is considered acceptable, even expected, for a rape victim to be killed by family members. Not the rapist, but the raped is killed! Too often, a family kills a daughter who has been raped. I know of a case where a son raped his sister, and the girl was killed by her family, not the son/rapist!

The Koran commands Muslims in sura 9:4-5 to ambush the “Mushrikun,” who is identified in verse 6 as “the polytheists, idolaters, pagans, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah.” That covers everyone who is not a Muslim! He is to fight in advancing the cause of Islam, not simply in a time of war or defense; all Muslims are to fight to advance Islam. Moreover, each Muslim is obligated to fight for Islam with enthusiasm, or he will be penalized at the last judgment.

Now you know why traditional Muslims are so contentious, confrontational, and cruel. They are on a “holy” mission to force Islam down the throats of every person on earth. They are taught to kiss the hand of the enemy (every non-Muslim) when they are in the minority but to break his fist when in control. We are in a clash of civilizations, not only a clash of cultures.

Western culture is far superior to Muslim culture shown by their celebration of the death of Mohammed’s grandson 1300 years ago. Ashura Day is an annual day that Shia Muslims mutilate themselves and their children. It is a very bloody and traumatic scene as scores of Muslims whip themselves and cut their heads open. Some do that to their small children. If you dare, look at the bloody scene and tell me that all cultures are the same.

Many Muslims want us to think living in mud huts, bathing in a river, marrying our nine-year-old daughters to old men, ripping out a young daughter’s clitoris, and peeing in a hole in the ground is an advanced culture. Or maybe another culture. No, compared with America, it is a substandard culture, not similar, and for sure not superior to ours.

No, thank you. I’m satisfied with my Western Christianized Culture with its admitted failures.

Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! The eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send a request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

Look, I am pleased that Harvey is in jail and has been toppled from his perch. About a hundred women have accused him of sexual misconduct. I am pleased that women are speaking out and revealing sexual predators out there. After all, I have a wife and many daughters, daughter-in-law, granddaughters, and great granddaughters so I want them all safe from rapists. As a legislator, I even tried to get rapists imprisoned for life without possibility of parole or pardon. I tried to require life in prison because the death penalty was not available at the time.

So, I don’t have to prove my bona fides as to my respect and concern for women.

Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance said, “Weinstein is a vicious, serial, sexual predator who used his power to threaten, rape, assault, trick, humiliate and silence his victims.” No doubt that is a correct characterization but that does not prove rape in specific cases. Weinstein was a quid looking for a quo and the “ladies” were a quo looking for a quid.

It’s the oldest profession in the world.

Vance really proved himself a loyal devotee to the screaming feminists by saying, “This is a new day. Rape is rape whether the survivor reports within an hour, within a year or perhaps never. It’s rape despite the complicated dynamics of power and consent after an assault. It’s rape even if there is no physical evidence.”

If that insane, illogical, and illegal concept takes hold nationwide, dating is dead and any man is a fool if he is ever alone with a woman.

What disturbs me is that sane people assume that a woman’s rape accusation demands belief without any proof. Wow, we’re not on a slippery slope; we’ve already landed in a garbage dump.

Isn’t it possible, maybe not probable, but possible that some women make false accusations? Isn’t it possible that some women climb into bed with an influential person to further their career or to get a “sugar daddy”? Isn’t it possible that some women can fornicate with a powerful man, then 20 years later accuse him of rape to fund their 401-ks?

To properly come to a correct conclusion of a rape charge, the word must be defined. Webster says rape is “Sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent (by force, deception, while she is asleep, etc.” Another says rape is “forcible violation of a woman.”

The ancient Jews required rape (that demanded the death penalty) victims to yell and resist; however, the female was always presumed to be innocent unless the circumstances proved otherwise. While her resistance might not be successful, it would call attention to any witnesses and make it very clear to the rapist that the act was unwanted, unwilling, and unlawful.

The Bible wanted to be sure that a malicious woman could not charge an innocent man with a crime that required the death penalty. She must protest; however, it appears that many women can have sex for whatever reason then make a rape charge for financial benefit. I suggest that many modern feminists are not concerned with a man’s innocence or guilt.

One accuser, actress Annabella Sciorra testified that Weinstein forced himself into her apartment and assaulted her. “I was trying to get him off me. I was punching him, kicking him.” But did she scream? After all, it was an apartment. Did she report it to police? It sure sounds like rape to me but biblically it is not rape unless she resisted, screamed, and reported it to authorities.

Miriam Haleyi testified that Harvey attacked her in his own apartment, “Every time I tried to get off the bed he would push me back and hold me down.” But did she scream for help? Surely, she would have received help from high class people in the high end apartment. The report does not reveal that she reported him to police. Why did she not do that? Moreover, she emailed him in 2008, signing off with “Lots of love.” That was to her rapist!

Jessica Mann was in a relationship with Weinstein (read: she was willingly fornicating with him) when he raped her in New York City in March of 2013. They had many sexual experiences including a threesome. He showed up at the lobby of her hotel (where he had a room) then, after taking her to his room, commanded her to undress which she did. She was intimidated and fearful. He allegedly raped her but she did not yell for help nor did she report it to authorities. Why not?

Maybe she kept quiet because as reported by the Daily Mail, she said “they had consensual sex after a ‘long negotiation’ and she did it so he couldn’t kill her acting career.” However, she was shocked when he did a Golder Shower on her. After all, she wasn’t totally without character. After the alleged rape she sent him her new phone numbers five times to stay in contact!

Mann testified that Weinstein raped her again later that year in a Los Angeles hotel room yet according to reporting by USA Today, “She continued to have a friendly email relationship with the fallen mogul for years after, which the defense attempted to use against Mann: showing the court dozens of messages from Mann to Weinstein saying ‘I love you’ and calling him ‘a blessing in my life.’” She told him their sex was best she ever had despite him “urinating on her.”

Wait a minute! A rape victim is in her rapist’s hotel room a few months later! And she tells him he, the rapist, has been a “blessing” in her life. And she loves him! Come, come, only a fool or an unhinged feminist would believe that was rape. Sex, but not rape.

Mann swore that she lied to numerous people when she declared that Weinstein “validated” her, “understands” her, was “nothing but good” to her, and made her “feel so fabulous and beautiful.” That praise of a “rapist” doesn’t sound like a rape victim. Additionally, she spent the next night with a friend so she could celebrate her “rapist’s” birthday the following day!

That sure doesn’t pass the smell test. In fact, the offensive odor would gag a maggot.

Moreover, none of these “ladies” got tested for an STD following their sexual encounter with Harvey the Pig. That is incredibly stupid.

This case is considered a big victory for the #MeToo movement but I think it is a threat to every man in America and to every woman if it is assumed that she never lies.

This case proves to me that all slime-balls don’t always have a beard; some come in skirts and high heels.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)

New revelations reveal that King had sexual relations with as many as 45 prostitutes, mistresses, and girlfriends. He was especially violent with some of them knocking one across the motel bed the night before he was shot.

Such reluctance of the media to deal honestly with King reminds me of my MLK experience while writing columns for USA Today for 8 years until I resigned in disgust. At the beginning of each year, I wrote a column dealing with an MLK theme since his birthday was now celebrated as a national holiday. Each year, the editor refused my MLK column without comment. Of course, I knew why.

Some readers will remember in those days USA Today was really rocking the newspaper boat. Each day their editorial page dealt with a single controversial issue from four or five different perspectives. For some reason, the editor always rejected my columns dealing with King but accepted my other columns! I still have one USA Today issue that dealt with King from five perspectives and not one negative word was on that page!

Then, I took another group to Israel, Syria, Jordan, etc., and spent a couple days in London on my return trip. During that time, I read about King’s massive plagiarism of his university papers, his Ph.D. dissertation, his “I Have a Dream” speech, his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” and some of his books. It was big news in the United Kingdom.

Upon my return to the states, discovering that the King scandal had not reached America, I wrote a column dealing with King’s thievery, convinced that no dedicated editor would reject it; but he did. A few months later, another journal broke the story and USA Today lost a scoop!

Progressives must never tarnish the brilliant image of King however distorted, discredited, and degraded the reality.

Soon thereafter, the paper published a full page ad of a man totally naked with his hands over his genitals. The two incidents ended my stint with the nation’s largest newspaper. In March, I told them not to send the annual agreement for me to sign.

That cowardly editorial philosophy is still rampant today in the era of fake news, false stories, and fabricated history. The nation’s press and the broadcast outlets who record world history are without class, courage, or commitment. They obviously do not subscribe to Roman statesman and historian Cicero: “The first law for the historian [or journalist] is that he shall never dare write an untruth. The second is that he shall suppress nothing that is true.”

It seems David Garrow is such a person.

Referring to his 1981 King biography, Garrow declared, “I have been the King guy for 40 years and I wrote a book on exactly this 38 years ago [that won him the Pulitzer Prize]. I felt a complete obligation to confront this stuff. I did not feel I had a choice. I have always felt spiritually informed by King and yes, this changed it. I have not heard his voice much the past year.”

Wow, sounds like a conversion, at least in this matter. I salute his late-in-life epiphany.

Garrow reported on FBI surveillance tapes of King’s hotel rooms that, along with other evidence, reveal that King had 40 to 45 mistresses, girlfriends, and prostitutes. Of course, the number of one-night stands is simply a guess from the FBI files and other sources. Frankly, whether he had 45 or 4 illicit affairs is irrelevant except for the degree of his degeneracy.

It seems Baltimore Pastor Logan Kearse and some of his female parishioners stayed at the historic Willard Hotel near the White House where King was staying in January 1964. King and others were invited to Kearse’s room where they discussed as to which of the women would be more suitable for natural and unnatural sex acts. One woman said she did not approve and “the Baptist minister immediately and forcefully raped her as King watched.” The deplorable news is that King “looked on, laughed and offered advice” while Kearse raped this parishioner from his Baltimore Church!

Kearse did the world a favour when he pointed his toes skyward and turned cold in 1991.

Many are overlooking the multi-faceted aspect of this scandal. Of course, King was culpable in not defending the woman and for sure by laughing and encouraging the reverend rapist, but it gets worse because the FBI agents in the next room did nothing! So, there is plenty of blameworthiness to go around. What man, whatever his position, could permit a woman to be raped without trying to help her?

The day following the rape, “King and a dozen others allegedly participated in a ‘sex orgy’ engaging in ‘acts of degeneracy and depravity.’” When one woman “shied away” from the sex orgy, King told her that “it would be good for your soul.” Hypocrite!

In another incident, King was in a sexual threesome that included a famous gospel singer. The prostitute involved said that it was the “worst orgy” she had ever been in.

However, with this new revelation of King’s encouragement of a rape, what will the screaming ladies of the left do since they are supposed to be female supporters? It must be emphasized that the screaming feminists crucified Senator Al Franken for much less egregious sexual activity. Many women accused Al of unwanted kissing, attempted kissing, and touching of breasts. Well, that is no surprise since Franken came from the depraved entertainment industry. Yet, the Democrat legislators wanted his scalp and got it. Note, a U.S. Senator was forced to resign but King was a serial “john” who took advantage of innocent and many not-so-innocent women and encouraged a rapist.

What will the leftist ladies demand upon hearing of these revelations since the ladies are so sensitive to southern statues and slave holders such as Washington, Jefferson, and Lee? In the name of consistency (honesty), will they take a sledge hammer to King’s bust in Washington and statues around the nation? Will they rename all the streets named for King? What will they do about the puff pieces in the public school textbooks? Will they demand his national holiday be changed to National Civil Rights Day?

Race baiter Shaun King said he understands the “vital role” Jefferson played in the nation’s founding, but still contends he “should not be celebrated” in any way. “He should not have statues, or be on money, or even have a monument celebrating his positive contributions.” Now we will see what Shaun does about these new King revelations. While Jefferson is accused of sexual relations with his slave (and it may be true), there is no suggestion that violent rape was involved.

Will Shaun be fair, honest, and consistent by demanding MLK be treated as he demanded Jefferson be treated? Don’t count on it.

MLK was neither a saint nor a savior but for sure a sinner—like all of us. However, every person is born a sinner but not all of us climb into bed with Communists or prostitutes. And even principled sinners attempt to keep their marriage vows and not visit prostitutes—male or female.

What do I really expect to see? Nothing, since Liberals are generally the biggest hypocrites alive—Republicans and Democrats. Most people will continue to pretend that King was a good, great, if not godly man.

Trying to defend Martin Luther King is like pouring expensive French perfume over a healthy skunk. The results will only be temporary.

Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for eight years and authored 18 books. His eBook Martin Luther King, Jr.: Judged by His Character, Not His Color! can be viewed and purchased here. Follow Dr. Boys on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D. and TheGodHaters, Twitter, and visit his blog.

One FBI memo reported, “King maintains intimate relationships with at least three women, one in Atlanta, one in Mt Vernon, New York, and one in Washington, DC,” making him very susceptible to blackmail. He also had a long time mistress in Los Angeles, wife of a dentist, in addition to his many one night stands. It goes on and on. In 2010, Kentucky State Senator Georgia Davis Powers recounted her intimate relationship with King in her book, I Shared the Dream.

Garrow also reported about King’s “love child” with a girlfriend in Los Angeles and King “continued to support this child” and called the mother every Wednesday.

When Coretta King complained about her husband’s affairs, he told her she “should go out and have some sexual affairs of her own.” According to one of my contacts, Coretta got fed up and went after Martin with a butcher’s knife. He wrote me saying, “I am from Atlanta, and my grandmother’s neighbor was head of nursing at St. Joseph’s Hospital [now Emory St. Josephs]. One morning she told my grandmother that they had brought MLK into the emergency room the night before because “Coretta caught him with another woman and cut him up with a butcher’s knife.”

But evidently, Martin didn’t get her point and continued to fornicate.

Standpoint, where the original article appeared, reported, “he preferred to perform unnatural acts on women and that he had started the ‘International Association for the Advancement of P**** Eaters.’” Such an evil mind and mouth makes me ashamed of his being a Baptist.

The FBI doesn’t usually show any interest in the sexual proclivities of citizens but when a person of interest gets in bed with Communists, U.S. officials show an interest. This was especially true while we were in the middle of the Cold War with the Soviet Union. The FBI got interested in King’s activities because many of his associates were members of the Communist Party USA.

King admitted to being a Marxist to Communist bag man Stanley D. Levison, a white man, who served as his speech writer, ghost writer, and tax preparer. Levison, in addition to bankrolling the Communist Party in America, also gave King $10,000 in two years which is equivalent to $87,000 in today’s money. Levison gave the Communist Party $76,500 equivalent to $650,000 in today’s money. Remember that Levison worked for King while working for the Soviet KGB secret police!

In my eBook Martin Luther King, Jr.: Judged by His Character Not His Color!, I deal with King’s wild sex parties, his perversion, his drunkenness, his plagiarism, his many sexual exploits including his perversion and his admission of being a Marxist. All documented by his “best friend” Ralph Abernathy, FBI files, etc. My book highlights the person, the preacher, the politician, the party, the plagiarist, the prevaricator, and the philanderer.

Garrow, a liberal, Pulitzer Prize-winning author and official biographer of Martin Luther King, Jr., dropped the literary bomb on the world a few weeks ago, and it is still reverberating around the globe except in America! His article “The Troubling Legacy of Martin Luther King” was rejected by the Guardian, Washington Post, The Atlantic, and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The story from a highly recognized author was too hot to handle. It still is since none of the media moguls in the U.S. have reported the story!

What happened to the fearless reporters who try to be “fair and balanced”? What about “all the news that’s fit to print”?

Talk show host Rush Limbaugh was willing to take it on but made a serious mistake. Rush, speaking of Democrats said, “They have totally reconstructed what Dr. Martin Luther King believed in, starting with his devout Christianity, his devotion to Christ. They have totally remade the image of Dr. King. The Democrat Party has become exactly what he hoped to overcome. They have become wedded to and embedded in racial identity and sexual identity politics. The content of one’s character is of the least consequence.”

Rush was correct except the reference to King’s “devout Christianity, his devotion to Christ.” Rush was in the right ball park but not in the right seat.

I have spent many hours in King’s original papers at both Crozer Seminary and Boston University and the most generous person in the world could never identify King as a historic or biblical Christian. Of course, that is difficult for people to believe if they also believe church membership, baptism, etc., make one a Christian. King rejected, even ridiculed, all the doctrines that genuine Christians have always believed including Christ’s virgin birth, His virtuous life, His vicarious death, His victorious resurrection, and His ascension to Heaven. He also rejected the verbal inspiration of Scripture.

Obviously, Rush, the man who is usually right on target when dealing with political matters, was wrong but then everyone is from time to time.

Well, The New York Times took a swing at this explosive story, but it was from out in left field by black feminist history professor Dr. Barbara Ransby. She suggested the highly acclaimed author was “turning readers into historical peeping Toms by trafficking in what amounts to little more than rumor and innuendo from F.B.I. files.” Of course, the FBI has been known lately to be somewhat ideological but it is usually in favor of leftists.

Dr. Ransby made it clear that she believed the unsupported rantings of Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford but questions FBI motives in the King case.

Frankly, the issue is not the motives of the FBI but King’s morals—his philandering, perverted, pathetic lifestyle and how it might have made him a target of blackmail by Communists.

Considering how these revelations might impact society, Garrow said, “It poses so fundamental a challenge to his historical stature as to require the most complete and extensive historical review possible.” Of course, thinking people will ask if there should be a national holiday for him in light of King’s disgraceful life.

Decades before King’s holiday was thrust upon an uninformed nation, I voted against honoring him in 1977 in the Indiana House of Representatives. Every day we honored someone’s achievements or the success of an athletic team but one day a memorialization was introduced to honor King. It was a voice vote since it was no big deal and involved no expenditure or change in a law. It was a loud vote for the memorialization but when the Speaker asked for any no votes, I shouted the only, “no.” The House got as silent as a graveyard.

A shocked reporter for the Associated Press asked me, “Representative Boys, why did you vote no on the vote to honor Dr. King?” While my conservative friends surrounded me to make various excuses for not voting with me, I told her that King did not deserve to be honored.

Across the hall in the Senate, there was total silence on the no vote. And the next year, the same thing happened. My conservative friends in the House said that my vote was right but was not worth the negative repercussions from the Speaker who held any bills hostage if he was displeased with a bill’s author.

I am dubious about Liberals treating King as they have treated other women haters since Liberals are the most unprincipled people on earth with no concern for fairness, honesty, consistency, and truth.

I was right about King in 1977 and 1978, and I am right today. They should dump King’s holiday and replace it with National Civil Rights Day.

Socrates’ concept that “a man must not be honored above the truth” is applicable here.

Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for eight years and authored 18 books. His eBook Martin Luther King, Jr.: Judged by His Character, Not His Color! can be viewed and purchased here. Follow Dr. Boys on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D. and TheGodHaters, Twitter, and visit his blog.

Sensible Whites are fleeing the nation because of multiple problems with race relations, banking, crime, unemployment, health problems with 19% of the population infected with HIV, educational problems with inadequate buildings and dangerous latrines where kids have fallen in and drowned, and political corruption. It is a seething volcano about to explode.

Rape is common in the major cities with one man in three admitting to having raped at least one woman, and over 25% of women have been victims. A woman is more likely to be raped than to learn to read. The crimes are seldom investigated and litigated. If litigated, seldom are there any serious consequences.

Thievery abounds in all areas of society and every person looks out for himself. Everyone in any place of authority seems to have his or her hand out not for a shake but for a shekel. There seems to be a mania to get the bribe before someone else does as recent hearings have proved.

The government is finally looking into corruption charges against one of the major corporations. Corruption charges have even reached the sitting President and the top six leaders of the ruling African National Congress (ANC). ANC leaders admit that the Zondo Commission corruption hearings will have a major impact on the national election in May.

South Africa is about to become South Zimbabwe in my humble opinion. It seems what we learn from history is that we don’t learn from history and Zimbabwe, a northern neighbor of South Africa, is in death throes as I write. However, South African officials—which means the Communist-controlled ANC that has misruled since the fall of apartheid—have refused to look reality in the face. Their motto seems to be “continue to loot while there is anything available to loot.”

The world’s media seems to be oblivious to the death of a great nation; the media coverage in Britain, Canada, and the U.S. is insignificant. The New York Times finally published an article, “Hit Men and Power” highlighting that “corruption and divisions have flourished within the A.N.C. in recent years.”

But the corruption is not only in the ANC but also in every facet of the nation: the schools, local governments, the utilities, the mines, the police, the unions, South African Airlines, the rail service, and the banks. Plus, the political corruption in the ANC bleeds into all areas of national and local governments.

Jacob Zuma was forced to resign as President after eight years of corruption that shocked everyone in its extent and its audacity, charges that still have not been litigated. His trial has been postponed until after the election in May. Zuma was replaced by Cyril Ramaphosa (one of the leading candidates for president in May) who as noted by the New York Times, is “a veteran A.N.C. insider, and early signs have not been encouraging.” The article admitted that Ramaphosa has “amassed extraordinary wealth” since the presidency of Nelson Mandela.

Two basic necessities of life are a place to live and food to eat and black and white South Africans are having a major struggle to attain both. Mandela and the ANC promised jobs to everyone and to build one million new homes; however, the unemployment rate is over 27% and only 40,000 houses were built between 1994 to 1999 when Mandela left office. People have been waiting in line for many years for a home with few results. Blacks have priority over Whites in jobs, housing, welfare, etc. Blacks don’t envy starving Whites, but they cast lustful eyes toward successful white farmers. I have seen posters warning white land owners, “Everything you have is ours. We’re coming for it.”

Black thugs are encouraged by black politicians to take land from Whites thereby providing the ingredients for a bloody uprising.

The official “legal” decision of the government to take land from white farmers and give it to Blacks, who often know nothing about farming, has something to do with the slowdown at least in agricultural production and the alienation, anger, and antagonism between the races. Aidan Hartley, a London Times journalist wrote, “Once-productive maize fields now grow only weeds. Citrus orchards are dying, their valuable fruit rotting on the branches. Machinery lies about rusting. Irrigation pipes have been looted and farm sheds are derelict and stripped of roofing.”

But enough is enough and the government is being forced to try to control the corruption since it seems to be like a noxious fog that has permeated every part of the nation.

Bosasa was a company that provided services (and bribes) for the government primarily in the prison industry; however, recent testimony, if true, suggests that some of the company’s officials may end up in one of their facilities along with top ANC leaders. Angelo Agrizzi was the company’s chief operating officer (COO) who recently spent nine days giving testimony that implicated the top six officers in the ANC of corruption.

Agrizzi admitted that the corruption started long before Zuma’s administration but that Zuma received monthly payments of R300,000 from the former chairwoman of the South African Airways, Duduzile Cynthia Myeni, known as Dudu. She was a very good friend of Zuma and has been charged with corruption after almost bankrupting South African Airways according to Forensics for Justice.

Agrizzi admitted he stuffed bags of cash that amounted to between $300,000 to $440,000 a month in bribes to senior ANC officials to secure lucrative government contracts. Agrizzi also testified to the Zondo Commission of a R500,000 “donation” to Cyril Ramaphosa during his 2017 campaign for president of the ANC. Ramaphosa said the money went to his son as consultant but later admitted it was a contribution to his election 2917 campaign. Ramaphosa had pledged to clean up the nation’s corruption problem but appears to have benefited along the way.

Campaigning in Cape Town on February 28, 2019, Ramaphosa blamed the nation’s many problems on apartheid, the mantra of most black politicians—blame Whitey. Of course, there is plenty of blame for everyone involved. The President, aspiring to being reelected in a few weeks, declared, “Land in cities and towns must be identified for seizure without compensation upon which high-density housing can be developed so that ordinary South Africans can live close to their places of work.” So, the much touted plan to take farms from white farmers (without compensation that has resulted in thousands of white deaths by black thugs) has been expanded to the cities.

According to ANC officials, all of South Africa’s problems are because of apartheid even though the ANC has ruled for 25 years. It is believed that the Whites are the reason the economy is dying, rape and murder are commonplace, and the nation can no longer feed its people, consequently any corruption is acceptable as payment for past mistreatment.

News24 reported that it is estimated that over R40 million was “donated” by Bosasa over the years to the ANC representing a significant source of revenue for the party. The Communists in the ANC have proved that they are as dishonest as highway robbers. The Communist slogan, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” is a slogan to justify taking from the haves and giving it to the have-nots; but in South Africa, it is the powerful taking even more away from the poor—white and black.

The voters will decide on May 8 if President Ramaphosa and his cronies at the ANC will be standing in the employment line or continue to snort, scuffle, and struggle at the public trough for their share of the public loot.

Greek philosopher Diogenes with his lighted lantern in broad daylight, looking for an honest man in the streets of Athens, would have little success walking the streets of South African cities.

Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives, who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for eight years. Boys’ book, Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! is available here. Follow Dr. Boys on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D. and TheGodHaters, Twitter, and visit his blog.

In my column, I took the position that a false accusation can destroy a man’s family, friends, finances, and future. All sexual assaults should be seriously looked at and any rapist should be executed as they were in bygone years in America and most nations of the world.

As a member of the Indiana House of Representatives, I introduced a bill that would put rapists in prison for life with no possibility of parole. I antagonized my friend the governor when I removed his authority to pardon future rapists. A reporter asked me why I introduced a bill that required life in prison for rape and I replied, “Because I know I can’t get the death penalty.” I did not win her vote as “favorite legislator of the year.”

With that background, I can hardly be accused of hating women or being soft on rape.

Most of the screamers took umbrage with my statement that rape “is having sex with a woman while she screams for help. No scream, no rape according to Deuteronomy 22:23-24. Did she bite his hand? Poke him in the eye? Women know instinctively how to protect their honor: screaming, shouting, slapping, spitting, slugging, and stabbing with a finger, pencil, or hat pin. Since she did not cry out or stab him, I will not believe her without a film of the event.”

A man called me and started screaming, “I’m a Ph.D. and have read the same books as you. The Bible passage you quoted requires death for both persons. What if she was too scared to scream? Have you ever been raped? Maybe she was unable to fight? Maybe she was a mute.” He went on and on but he refused to consider that no one should be found guilty without corroborating evidence. No one, not even a conservative.

“Cathy” called and sounded like an old friend. “Hi, Don. This is Cathy and I want to know what you meant by your Kavanaugh column.” I asked if we were friends or knew each other and she admitted we did not. I told her that her question was silly since I made it very clear what the column was all about: you can’t find a man guilty without corroborating evidence to prove guilt. And I was horrified that anyone would even consider such a thing. She used some very vulgar words to characterize me and hung up when I challenged her to tell me seriously if all women can always be believed. She called back in a few minutes and said, “Don, don’t try to make decisions based on a 3,000-year-old book.”

Well, everyone has to have a foundation for what he or she believes and I choose to believe the Bible as being the inspired, inerrant, infallible, and indispensable standard for my life. Now, because I believe in a perfect Book does not make me or all my decisions perfect since I am a flawed individual. But I do have a standard that helps me make minor and major decisions in my life.

So, the Bible and thousands of years of history support the fact that a rape victim must resist or there is no rape. My critics have presented all kinds of scenarios to prove the Bible wrong: what if she is incapacitated, she is deaf and dumb, she is too scared, etc. However, that’s covered in God’s command for the Jews to do justice for all under all conditions.

The Jews did not have police or prison system until the time of the Kings. Egypt did have prisons as per Joseph in prison after being falsely accused of rape. However, the Jews did have a justice system that included Cities of Refuge. Furthermore, Deut. 16:18 commanded Israel to appoint highly qualified judges to administer justice to the aggrieved and to enforce weights and measurements in each town. When they found anything wrong, they brought the offender before the magistrate at the city gate (where business was transacted and cases decided in the East), and the offender was punished by the officer on the spot.

The following verse warns judges, “Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift.” The judges were to do right to all and wrong to none. The judge’s personal opinion didn’t matter. The poverty or prosperity or position of of the accused and accuser were to be totally irrelevant.

Screaming feminists obviously do not believe in that high view of justice for all. Well, that’s not exactly true because if they were the accused, they would be quoting the Bible, the Koran, the Book of Mormon, and the Talmud. They would parrot even the U.S. Constitution in their own defense! Maybe even the babblings of ancient Druids to gain any support.

When rape occurred, the two principals were brought before the city fathers who compiled the facts, listened to the charges, heard the witnesses, and made a decision. If a maid were deaf, then of course, she could not cry out and she would not be complicit in any illegal sex activity. The rapist was then judged to be executed and was then stoned, the normal and the most ancient form of execution. The victim and any witnesses cast the first stones followed by other citizens. It was not vigilantism but an organized, methodical, and judicial procedure.

During the hearings, I believed Ford was honest but mistaken about her attacker. I felt sorry and pity for her; however, it is now my opinion that she is a liar and tool of evil, unprincipled Democrats. She lied about her fear of flying; she lied about being claustrophobic; she lied about the polygraph test; she lied about her ex-boyfriend’s credit card and charged $600 on it; and she lied about when her second front door was installed. My daddy the philosopher with a sixth grade education said, “Anyone who will lie will do anything.” Daddy was right.

Ford should be fired from her university position and get a job as a greeter at Target.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Deputy Minister of Higher Education Mduduzi Manana, a member of the ruling African National Congress (ANC), declared on the floor of Parliament during a discussion of the killing of white farmers, “Bury them alive.”

Black thugs are listening and following their orders.

An employee of the Gauteng Department of Sports, Arts, Culture and Recreation took his cue from black leaders and posted a tirade against all Whites. Velaphi Vel-hova Khumalo launched a hate-filled tirade against white South Africans on Facebook stating, “I want to cleans (sic) this country of all white people. We must act as Hitler did to the Jews…White people in south (sic) Africa deserve to be hacked and killed like Jews. U (sic) have the same venom moss. look (sic) at Palestine. noo u (?) must be bushed alive and skinned and your off springs used as garden fertilizer.”

I don’t think Khumalo wants to hold hands with white South Africans and sing Kumbaya around a campfire.

More than 3,000 white farmers have been murdered since the end of apartheid, according to Genocide Watch. Today there are about 30,000 white farmers while there were 60,000 twenty years ago. Is it any wonder that the nation is forced to import food to feed its people?

Last year, South Africa had an astonishingly high murder rate of 31.9 per 100,000 people according to police statistics; however, for white farmers, the murder rate is 99 per 100,000! The murder rate is more than 100 times worse than in London. Just released stats reveal that 57 people are killed each day in South Africa!

According to new figures released by the AgriSA Agricultural Union in Pretoria and reported in The European Union Times, “Black criminal gangs have killed one white South African farmer every five days so far this year.”

No white person in South Africa feels secure. One woman said, “I don’t feel safe in my own home.” Many have fled the nation leaving their farms that have been in their family for generations.

Many white farmers and complete families have been brutally tortured and murdered and females of all ages have been raped with victims burned with electric irons and blow torches or had boiling water poured down their throats. Others have been disemboweled or dragged to death behind vehicles, forced to drink bleach, mothers raped in front of their children, and babies boiled to death. An elderly white woman was tortured with an electric drill and died after her attackers drilled holes in her body. Often, an open Bible is placed on their bloody bodies.

“Necklacing,” has made a comeback especially in the black villages. This form of murder was made infamous by Minnie Mandela (yes, that Mandela) where killers placed a gasoline-soaked automobile tire around a person’s neck, cut him under his arms, and set fire to the tire. They jeer as they watch him burn. This is getting more frequent as frustrated black villagers catch accused criminals, try, and execute him on public streets. Vigilante justice is what happens when law and order do not prevail and political leaders encourage violence.

Such uncontrolled violence has chased one million South Africans to the United Kingdom and other nations between 1995 and 2005. While lack of employment for Whites is one reason for the emigration, the main reason given is the black on white crime. A straw poll conducted by the Afrikaans online news service News24 which serves the Afrikaans-speaking community in South Africa revealed, “over 85 percent of whites would leave the country immediately if the opportunity presented itself.”

Transparency International found that 74 percent of people think all public officials and civil servants are corrupt or extremely corrupt, while 70 percent believe the whole political system is corrupt. During the hated white government that ended in 1994, they were racist in some policies but there was stability, safety, and a soaring economy.

No one feels safe in their own homes anymore.

The British newspaper The Telegraph asserts that up to 40% of women experience rape in their lifetimes. This includes “corrective rape” performed by allegedly concerned men to “cure” lesbian women of their homosexuality. “Blow the Whistle,” a non-government group, reports that almost one in three girls will be raped before she turns 18.

Other savages rape babies as young as three thinking it will cure their AIDS as they were told by their local witchdoctors (holders of Wi.D., I suppose). The World Health Organization reported on HIV infection in South Africa in 2017, “1 in every 25 adults (4.1%) [is] living with HIV and accounting for nearly two-thirds of the people living with HIV worldwide.”

About 37 million people in South Africa have HIV and 30% don’t know it! About 18% of the adult population is infected with HIV, the cause of about half of all deaths in South Africa. Almost 35 million South Africans have died of AIDS.

AVERT reported in 2016, “Men who have sex with men, transgender women, sex workers and people who inject drugs experience even higher HIV prevalence rates.”

Interpol says South Africa is “the rape capital of the world.” The Telegraph for Sept. 3, 2018 reported “For every 25 men brought to trial for rape, 24 will walk free.” Moreover, in a related survey, “a quarter of Soweto schoolboys described ‘jackrolling’—a local term for gang rape—as ‘fun.’” The attackers said that they were making the women feel like “real women.”

A 2010 Medical Research Foundation survey found that more than 37 percent of South African men admitted to raping at least one woman.

The BBC alleges that more South African women are likely to be raped than will learn to read.

Much of the rape and the killings involve vicious torture by roving black thugs. A 3-year-old-girl was raped by four men who wrapped her in newspapers, doused her in gasoline, then set her on fire. A 4-year-old-girl was gang raped and crucified on the kitchen table while her parents died on the kitchen floor.

The oppressed Blacks have become the oppressors of Whites and no one in the West seems to care.

Why has the United States not offered asylum to these desperate South Africans? Russia and Australia have already done so.

America is silent. Well, there was one tweet but nothing about accepting harassed and endangered white people, many who profess to be Christians.

Could the reason no one seems to care be because they are white and Christian?

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

Everyone will agree that male and female aggressions are ever with us disconnecting families, disrupting the workplace, disturbing society–and dumping rapists, killers, and thieves into the prisons.

All Conservative theologians teach that sin was inflicted upon us by the first family’s disobedience to God’s clear command. The result of that disobedience is the cause of all pugnacious activities. However, most people don’t believe this in our day and some liberals declare that all violent behavior is an abnormal activity in flawed persons (of course, everyone is flawed) or it is a response to provocation or stimulation. Then, if those provocations can be identified or eliminated, all violence could be expelled from the earth.

They are wrong.

When God created the world and man, He placed Adam in the Garden of Eden to dress and keep it. All the other creatures had sexual counterparts but not Adam so He created Eve to be Adam’s “help meet.” When Satan initiated the Fall, he used a serpent to convince Eve to disobey God. Satan approached Eve, not Adam and when they sinned by disobeying God, Adam, not Eve was reproached by God. The man had to accept most of the responsibility.

Satan saw Eve as vulnerable and God saw Adam as responsible as head of the nascent human race. As a consequence of their sin, Eve would deliver children in sorrow and pain and Adam would have to work hard fighting the birds, bugs and beetles, thistles and thorns, drought and downpours to produce enough food to sustain them. All Bible-oriented denominations used to believe that.

I still do.

It is interesting that the couple, newly sinners, showed the very human quality of placing blame rather than accepting responsibility. When confronted by God for their sin, Adam blamed Eve. She then blamed the serpent, who of course, didn’t have a leg to stand on.

Note the deterioration: It is generally agreed by conservative theologians that Creation took place about 4000 B.C.; A few hundred years later Cain killed Abel; Over the next five hundred years violence and wickedness accelerated to the point of provoking God to destroy the world with a global flood about 2400 B.C.

Adam’s son, Cain was an Alpha Male or as Chad Howse wrote, “the real man, a man’s man, a warrior, a stand-up guy. It doesn’t matter what you call him, he’s a leader, the guy others look to for motivation, inspiration, and often with a hint of jealousy.” Such a dude was Cain who with his drive, desire, and determination to escape his family and belligerent background, left family and friends to build Enoch, the world’s first city. Cain tried to escape his reputation without success. As Matthew Henry commented, “those who depart from God cannot find rest anywhere else.”

Note the progression and rapid growth in violence and especially the development of female aggression following the Flood. Even with a new start, there was failure.

In the very earliest days of civilization Nimrod was an aggressive male being “a mighty hunter” who built the Tower of Babel in present day Iraq. Flavius Josephus wrote that it was likely under his direction that the building of Babel and its tower began.

The first indication of warfare is seen about 2084 B.C. in Genesis 14 when a coalition of kings kidnapped Lot along with others and fled the countryside. Abraham, being responsible for his nephew, armed his 318 trained servants and pursued the bad guys almost to Damascus. He fought the enemy and brought back Lot, his family, and servants and all the bounty. All modern warfare started at that time.

Of course, there was fighting in various parts of the occupied world from the beginning but in 1457 B.C., the first detailed account of an actual battle comes to us from the ancient Egyptians. It seems a series of fiefdoms in present day Syria and Israel rose up against their Egyptian masters in the Battle of Megiddo. In modern day Israel, the site will be the place of the Battle of Armageddon in the last days.

Aggressive women are seen in 2067 B.C. when Sodom was destroyed and Lot’s daughters had sex with their drunk father “that we may preserve seed of our father.” This was the first time the written record shows females being sexually aggressive. Then, in 1898 B.C., Tamar deceived Judah, her father-in-law into thinking she was a prostitute and slept with him. Nine years later, Joseph, master of Potiphar’s house, refused to be seduced by Potiphar’s wife as he fled with his coat left in her hands. Obviously, females can be aggressive and make false accusations against a totally innocent man! That’s been true from almost the beginning of time.

That fact must be constantly reiterated, even shouted from the house tops.

God created male and female each with a personality, potential, and propensities to perpetuate the human race. He made man to be strong to protect the family and to provide daily sustenance. He would have to work hard to meet the needs of the family. Men are to protect, provide, and preserve the family unit.

The woman was given persistence, patience, and placable qualities to round out the family’s needs. Men are made different from women–but you knew that. Women don’t need upper body strength as men do. Some argue that the differences in the genders is a result of millions of years of evolutionary progress while others tell us it is simply the original creation plan. Each gender is made to accomplish the reason for their creation–the continuation of the human race.

In recent months, men realized the rules between men and women have changed after some male pigs took advantage of their position, power, and prestige to grope, fondle, kiss, and rape women. Only God knows how many accusations were false and prompted by revenge, hatred, or publicity. Only a fool or a screaming feminist refuses to admit some of the charges were untrue. False accusations have damaged and destroyed some innocent men and nothing on earth can help them.

Many in authority have taken the position that a false rape charge never happens but those people will believe anything. They think Pepsi will sell for a nickel again, mainline China will retake Taiwan, the Democrats will come to their senses and cooperate for the good of the nation, and Elvis Presley, Jimmy Hoffa, Judge Crater, and Amelia Earhart will be found eating an escoviche dinner with adult beverages at a beachside bistro in Jamaica.

If men get to where they have no interest in women then the future of the race is in jeopardy. Men, by their nature, are aggressive in all areas of life; however, that aggression must be harnessed and directed by caution, kindness, gallantry, honesty, and grace. A man must never force his attention upon any woman and if he does, the full force of the law should hit him like a pile of bricks. However, courtship and romance must never be taboo or out of date. For France to make it illegal for a man to ask a woman for her phone number ($435.00 fine) is insane.

But then, that happens in France.

The left fears, hates, and tries to castrate strong, white men and while that could solve an immediate problem it sure does not bode well for the future.

Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published recently by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.

We have permitted the prissy preachers of permissiveness to take control of the nation’s morality and it needs to return to biblical standards. When there is an absence of or very limited pornography, sexually explicit books, magazines, and television shows there is more kindness, peace, and cooperation among our people. With ubiquitous sex being used and abused, our nation is a sleazy, sex-absorbed nation in need of a genuine revival of godliness.

In this battle against male sexual aggression of women, we must differentiate between rape and molestation. Foolish feminists are careless in this regard; but of course, no man should presume to take advantage of women. As I mentioned in a recent column, the answer for unwanted touching, kissing, caressing of a woman is a simple, strong, swift, stinging slap to the face. That would end most of the problems in my opinion. A sexually abused woman loses credibility every day she waits to report an incident, and I wouldn’t believe a 40-year-old charge without video evidence.

I felt of a girl’s back in the third grade and she stabbed me in the knee with a sharp pencil. I got the message that she wasn’t too pleased. In the fifth grade, I lifted Mildred’s pretty, purple, pleated skirt and saw stars as Mrs. Horn paddled me on the back of my lower legs. The message got louder. As an eighth grader, I was shoved through a glass door by Phyllis while dancing (my last dance) with her. Don’t remember what I did, but I deserved the shove. Women must react immediately when men take advantage of them. Men are a little slow when they think they are irresistible to women.

Most problems between men and women will be solved with a shout, a stab, a slap, or a shove. Women who fail to do that should not be believed when they make accusations. After all, women do lie from time to time. And not all men are lechers.

Then if you eliminate the drugs and alcohol most of the conflict between men and women will be solved.

No man should be convicted of rape if the woman did not yell and fight him. Deut. 22:23 commands, “If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour’s wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you.” That was God’s practical, proficient plan to handle sex abuse in ancient Israel.

We are not under an obligation to execute fornicators today but we are obligated to understand the necessary requirements in finding a person guilty. The innocent one must resist. There is no rape without resistance. A woman’s charge of rape or molestation should not be accepted if she did not scream, scratch, or shove her assailant. That provides some protection for men against untrue sexual assault charges. Honest, fair people want protection for women and men.

One of the first steps is to protect women is to punish rape more severely. Most people don’t know that at one time in America we executed rapists! Seemed to work. We didn’t have many rapes. And for sure, there were no second offenses!

As a member of the Indiana House of Representatives, I introduced a bill to require life in prison for rape with the stipulation that the Governor had no authority to pardon a rapist. Well, almost no one liked the bill–especially rapists and liberals. Of course, the liberals began whining about it and the Republicans didn’t like it mainly for encroaching on the authority of Governor Bowen. At an impromptu news conference in the rotunda of the State House, a reporter asked me, “Representative Boys why do you want to imprison rapists for life?” I replied, “Because I can’t get the death penalty for their crime.” I got neither.

In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court in Coker v. Georgia, held that the death penalty for the rape of an adult was “grossly disproportionate” and an “excessive punishment,” and hence was unconstitutional. The court dealt a blow to women’s rights and common sense and lost an opportunity to give some protection to innocent women. But then, it had done that before. Does any sane person believe men would be so sexually aggressive if they knew they would get the death penalty if they raped a woman? Or life in prison?

Furthermore, surely anyone can support the death penalty for any man who would rape a child! In fact, they should get the death penalty twice if that were possible.

In recent years, there has been a virus I call the “hugging” virus that has especially infected younger people. It seems everyone hugs everyone for any reason. Many young women even hug the mailman. I believe there should be no touching between the genders. Extremist? Well, maybe but I prefer that to the present condition of relations between the men and women.

I have followed the no hugging dictum all my adult life thinking it is presumption of me to touch a woman or hug her. I have been accused of being aloof but I can live with that. That’s better than being accused of adultery!

Orthodox Jews refuse to shake a woman’s hand or even touch it! I think that is wise. A female medical doctor and friend wrote me of her experience with a Jewish rabbi: “I forgot this [rabbis not touching a female] and reached out to shake the hand of a Hasidic rabbi – he kept his hands to his side, bowed graciously and said, ‘The last time I touched a woman’s hand I ended up with eight children.’ It was charming, we laughed, and I didn’t mind.”

Modern sophisticates say, “How quaint.” I say to the “sophisticates” that they are partly responsible for the “anything goes” atmosphere in America. God and the Bible were expelled from our schools and we are surprised that schools have become ignorance factories where students sleep with students and students sleep with teachers. Greedy media people produce movies and television shows that are pornographic, uninteresting, and stupid; and careless parents permit their children to watch the visual garbage. Such parents are heedless of the admonition in Psalm 101:3–“I will set no wicked thing before mine eyes.”

America is rolling in filth because of the failure of pastors, parents, teachers, legislators, media, and others. Many are so blind they don’t even know filth when they see it.

The media have been quick to rebuff any criticism of Hollywood and television as if society will suffer if a nude scene is removed from a film. In defending soft porn, they try to give a tone of sophisticated substance to empty drivel. It surprises me that people don’t fall to the floor gasping and choking with laughter at their sick sophistication. Intelligent people see an obvious link between watching immorality and practicing immorality.

G. K. Chesterton wrote in 1926 the “the madness of tomorrow is not in Moscow, much more in Manhattan.” He added, “It has been left to the very latest Modernists to proclaim an erotic religion which at once exalts lust and forbids fertility. The next great heresy is going to be simply an attack on morality, and especially on sexual morality.” We are there!

Toleration of sexual immorality is the first stage of decadence. Acquiescing to the pathetic cries of the preachers of permissiveness is a rejection of thousands of years of civilization, biblical teaching, and an acceptance of pigpen morality.

Boys’ book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! is available here. An eBook edition is also available.