I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that Harvey Weinstein is a slime-ball but not a rapist and is therefore a victim of a radical feminist mentality run amuck. So, about now, the screaming female feminists can start their phone campaign against me although they usually dial my number late at night. No doubt, they still have my phone number from their last vicious, vile, and vindictive harassment campaign. Their response is more organized than a Baptist church’s telephone prayer chain effort.
Look, I am pleased that Harvey is in jail and has been toppled from his perch. About a hundred women have accused him of sexual misconduct. I am pleased that women are speaking out and revealing sexual predators out there. After all, I have a wife and many daughters, daughter-in-law, granddaughters, and great granddaughters so I want them all safe from rapists. As a legislator, I even tried to get rapists imprisoned for life without possibility of parole or pardon. I tried to require life in prison because the death penalty was not available at the time.
So, I don’t have to prove my bona fides as to my respect and concern for women.
Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance said, “Weinstein is a vicious, serial, sexual predator who used his power to threaten, rape, assault, trick, humiliate and silence his victims.” No doubt that is a correct characterization but that does not prove rape in specific cases. Weinstein was a quid looking for a quo and the “ladies” were a quo looking for a quid.
It’s the oldest profession in the world.
Vance really proved himself a loyal devotee to the screaming feminists by saying, “This is a new day. Rape is rape whether the survivor reports within an hour, within a year or perhaps never. It’s rape despite the complicated dynamics of power and consent after an assault. It’s rape even if there is no physical evidence.”
If that insane, illogical, and illegal concept takes hold nationwide, dating is dead and any man is a fool if he is ever alone with a woman.
What disturbs me is that sane people assume that a woman’s rape accusation demands belief without any proof. Wow, we’re not on a slippery slope; we’ve already landed in a garbage dump.
Isn’t it possible, maybe not probable, but possible that some women make false accusations? Isn’t it possible that some women climb into bed with an influential person to further their career or to get a “sugar daddy”? Isn’t it possible that some women can fornicate with a powerful man, then 20 years later accuse him of rape to fund their 401-ks?
To properly come to a correct conclusion of a rape charge, the word must be defined. Webster says rape is “Sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent (by force, deception, while she is asleep, etc.” Another says rape is “forcible violation of a woman.”
The ancient Jews required rape (that demanded the death penalty) victims to yell and resist; however, the female was always presumed to be innocent unless the circumstances proved otherwise. While her resistance might not be successful, it would call attention to any witnesses and make it very clear to the rapist that the act was unwanted, unwilling, and unlawful.
The Bible wanted to be sure that a malicious woman could not charge an innocent man with a crime that required the death penalty. She must protest; however, it appears that many women can have sex for whatever reason then make a rape charge for financial benefit. I suggest that many modern feminists are not concerned with a man’s innocence or guilt.
One accuser, actress Annabella Sciorra testified that Weinstein forced himself into her apartment and assaulted her. “I was trying to get him off me. I was punching him, kicking him.” But did she scream? After all, it was an apartment. Did she report it to police? It sure sounds like rape to me but biblically it is not rape unless she resisted, screamed, and reported it to authorities.
Miriam Haleyi testified that Harvey attacked her in his own apartment, “Every time I tried to get off the bed he would push me back and hold me down.” But did she scream for help? Surely, she would have received help from high class people in the high end apartment. The report does not reveal that she reported him to police. Why did she not do that? Moreover, she emailed him in 2008, signing off with “Lots of love.” That was to her rapist!
Jessica Mann was in a relationship with Weinstein (read: she was willingly fornicating with him) when he raped her in New York City in March of 2013. They had many sexual experiences including a threesome. He showed up at the lobby of her hotel (where he had a room) then, after taking her to his room, commanded her to undress which she did. She was intimidated and fearful. He allegedly raped her but she did not yell for help nor did she report it to authorities. Why not?
Maybe she kept quiet because as reported by the Daily Mail, she said “they had consensual sex after a ‘long negotiation’ and she did it so he couldn’t kill her acting career.” However, she was shocked when he did a Golder Shower on her. After all, she wasn’t totally without character. After the alleged rape she sent him her new phone numbers five times to stay in contact!
Mann testified that Weinstein raped her again later that year in a Los Angeles hotel room yet according to reporting by USA Today, “She continued to have a friendly email relationship with the fallen mogul for years after, which the defense attempted to use against Mann: showing the court dozens of messages from Mann to Weinstein saying ‘I love you’ and calling him ‘a blessing in my life.’” She told him their sex was best she ever had despite him “urinating on her.”
Wait a minute! A rape victim is in her rapist’s hotel room a few months later! And she tells him he, the rapist, has been a “blessing” in her life. And she loves him! Come, come, only a fool or an unhinged feminist would believe that was rape. Sex, but not rape.
Mann swore that she lied to numerous people when she declared that Weinstein “validated” her, “understands” her, was “nothing but good” to her, and made her “feel so fabulous and beautiful.” That praise of a “rapist” doesn’t sound like a rape victim. Additionally, she spent the next night with a friend so she could celebrate her “rapist’s” birthday the following day!
That sure doesn’t pass the smell test. In fact, the offensive odor would gag a maggot.
Moreover, none of these “ladies” got tested for an STD following their sexual encounter with Harvey the Pig. That is incredibly stupid.
This case is considered a big victory for the #MeToo movement but I think it is a threat to every man in America and to every woman if it is assumed that she never lies.
This case proves to me that all slime-balls don’t always have a beard; some come in skirts and high heels.
(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)
Fact, Fraud or Faith?
by Don Boys, Ph.D.
Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution or creation can be proved scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support our position. In every debate I’ve had with evolutionary scientists, the arrogant, asinine accusation is made, “Well, evolution is scientific while creationism is religion.” Evolution is about as scientific as a voodoo rooster plucking ceremony in Haiti. Almost.