Why Do Even Conservatives Refuse to Discuss These Controversial Issues?
Roman statesman and historian Cicero declared, “The first law for the historian is that he shall never dare write an untruth. The second is that he shall suppress nothing that is true.” That is what I have striven for my entire career.
Muslims are very touchy people, as evidenced by the killing of ten journalists at the Paris-based satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015 after the magazine published cartoons of Mohammed. Two policemen were also killed, and a teacher in Paris was beheaded eight months later because he had shown some of the cartoons to his class.
Paris officials are almost sure it was a hate crime.
Earlier in 2005, Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten published irreverent, anti-Muslim material, and it caused riots around the world.
Muslims feel strongly what people say about Mohammed and Jews, especially what is said about the Holocaust. No traditional Muslim believes Hitler killed 6 million Jews during WW II. Most Muslims totally reject the Holocaust.
Everyone knows millions of people died during WW II, but it would be stunning for a panel of experts to discuss the circumstances: Who came up with 6 million dead Jews? Has that number been drastically reduced by experts? Has Auschwitz lowered the number of Jews killed from 4 million to 960,000? If so, why do intelligent people still use the 6 million number?
Has a written order been found to document such a vast program of Jewish extermination by the Nazis? Were the 6 million gassed and cremated? Can we discuss the physical problems of gassing and cremating 24,000 each day at Auschwitz alone?
Since Hitler was fighting a world war, Holocaust deniers say it would not be wise to kill millions of Jews when Nazis advertised for workers to produce rubber, supplies, bombs, planes, etc., in the prosecution of the war.
Were the stacks of emaciated bodies found at the liberated camps victims of typhus, dysentery, and pneumonia? Did anyone care enough about the truth to check it out?
Many people, other than Muslims, question various parts of the Holocaust story, but the issue must not be discussed, debated, and for sure, not denied. However, it is acceptable to deny that Jesus Christ is God of very God to whom everyone on Earth will give an account. It is also permitted to believe the silly story that the Earth and Universe created themselves. But we must not even discuss the Holocaust and any possible difficulties.
The Holocaust would make a stimulating discussion and permit experts to produce their evidence, thereby allowing non-experts to make intelligent decisions. Some may decide the Holocaust happened as per the common belief, while some could deny any Holocaust and decide that Hitler was a misunderstood, lapsed Roman Catholic altar boy. Still, others might decide Jews were murdered, but it was a haphazard program perpetrated by rogue camp superintendents. Some could decide that it is too complex and too much time has passed, so let’s move on with determination to never mistreat anyone, even our enemy.
Whatever the Holocaust facts, surely no true devotee to truth and freedom will defend the incredible sentence of Alison Chablozin in England of 18 weeks in prison for “disseminating grossly offensive material and messages on social media denying the Holocaust.” Prison for not believing the “correct truth”! Where are all the traditional Liberals demanding justice for Alison?
Hey, where are all the Conservative defenders of free speech?
Many will be angry with me for mentioning the banned subject, and some of the news sites that usually publish my columns will refuse this one. Why the fear of discussing this issue?
Or any issue? Can’t truth stand alone? Must it be propped up to protect it from falsehood? I thought truth always dispelled error as light dispels darkness. I demand to know why those who speak the loudest about truth and tolerance refuse to discuss forbidden issues.
It is un-American to have forbidden subjects.
Moreover, almost no one will discuss how German citizens were treated by the Allies following the war’s end. After the war, millions of Germans were put in huge fenced meadows without food, clothing, or protection. It is charged, “7 Million German Civilians were deliberately starved to death on extreme food rationing after the war – Any additional help with food from local sources or the Red Cross was denied.”
Very few Americans know there is anything to discuss about the above. What part did General Eisenhower play in that crime?
Maybe the chest-thumping declarations about devotion to truth are so much showboating by closet totalitarians who are very fearful of the truth.
Less volatile is the issue of forced vaccinations, especially for children. Most medical people adamantly insist on vaccinations when children attend school, although other physicians disagree. Everyone admits that anyone, at any time, can have an adverse reaction to a shot with a disability, disease, or even death resulting. Similar to Russian roulette! We are seeing that at this time with the China coronavirus vaccinations.
Most people believe that vaccinations have contributed to eliminating most childhood diseases in the past 50 years. But dare I ask about the widespread afflictions we have seen in the past 30 years? Is there a correlation between government-mandated shots and allergies, autism, mental retardation, and many other afflictions that were almost unheard of until recent years?
Let’s discuss it.
The charge is that vaccinations of very young children have been the catalyst of many health problems in the past 20 to 30 years with the mumps, measles, and rubella (MMR) and diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus (DPT) vaccinations especially dangerous. And when multiple shots are given at the same time, the evidence of harmful results is compelling. Of course, no one, child or adult, should ever permit a shot that contains mercury or aluminum or human remains.
When parents refuse the required shots, often the physician, with his/her messiah-complex in full bloom, treats the parents as unloving, uneducated, and uninformed Neanderthals. Usually, the physician is the one who drags his or her knuckles on the floor. (And Neanderthals did not drag knuckles either, but many evolutionists do.)
But there can be no public discussion or debate, or disagreement because everyone knows vaccinations have saved millions of lives.
But, let’s discuss it anyway just to prove we can.
It is shocking the number of people who believe the 9/11 attacks were an “inside job” or that the American government knew in advance of the attacks. A Rasmussen poll revealed, “Overall, 22% of all voters believe the President knew about the attacks in advance. A slightly larger number, 29%, believe the CIA knew about the attacks in advance.” A majority of Americans believe that “the government is concealing information about the 9/11 attacks.”
I have seen the video of architects and engineers promoting the theory that the buildings were destroyed by well-placed bombs. The information cannot be dismissed out of hand. Too many professionals (who know far more about it than you and I) have raised too many questions, but we must not talk about it even though it may not change minds.
Why not discuss the facts that possibly make falsifiers look like fools?
Race has become a more volatile subject than any other issue, and there are nuts and non-thinkers on all sides of this issue. Of course, people with weak minds and big mouths use the race club to beat their way into a conversation. I’m a Bible-practicing Christian with a desire to love everyone since God loves everyone; however, that does not mean I must disregard facts and common sense when discussing an issue.
I am white and have been since birth and will probably stay white. Furthermore, I’m somewhat proud to be white, although I’ve been ashamed of what many Whites have done.
I’m also an American; therefore, I believe it is natural, biblical, and only logical to put America first. We should never do anything detrimental to our national interests. In foreign aid, trade, and international affairs, America’s interests should always be first. Frankly, I question the honesty, thinking ability, or patriotism of anyone who disagrees with that proposition.
However, I will fight for their right to be stupid.
Some would declare that such a position makes me a white nationalist. Gasp! Well, I am white by birth and a patriot by choice; therefore, I believe America’s interest must be preferred by Americans in all matters. Consequently, the expectation from the nutty left is that I should immediately fall on my knees and beg for mercy.
When pigs learn to fly in formation and do somersaults over the White House.
No, not even then.
There’s a lot of dishonesty and demagogy or simply dumbness floating around about this issue. One dictionary said a white nationalist is “one of a group of militant whites who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation.” To think they killed a live tree to print such tripe! That might be a good definition of a white supremacist but not of a white nationalist.
But the tripe goes on when you look at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) website (a radical left-wing group spewing hate while raising money from deceived, deluded, and dumb people). Honest people wonder why anyone supports such a leftist group since they have been discredited in recent months.
The fanatics at the SPLC are too lazy or too prejudiced to do their homework and delineate various controversial groups. They declare, “White nationalist groups espouse white supremacist or white separatist ideologies, often focusing on the alleged inferiority of nonwhites. Groups listed in a variety of other categories – Ku Klux Klan, neo-Confederate, neo-Nazi, racist skinhead, and Christian Identity – could also be fairly described as white nationalist.” That is a tub full of poppycock and more than a dash of hogwash.
With a generous portion of balderdash.
Kristen Clarke of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law said: “There is no defensible distinction that can be drawn between white supremacy, white nationalism or white separatism in society today.” Obviously, Kristen is dumb as a box of rocks, but then, she is a social justice attorney.
One does not have to be a hater to believe that white people have as much right to revere their own kind and seek to preserve their influence—as all groups should do.
But let’s talk about it.
It’s time to open the window and yell, “I’m not going to take it anymore.” Then use what pronouns you choose; tell an innocent joke even about racial minorities—or majorities, “gays,” women, men who pretend to be women or even Fundamentalists. And stop using “the n-word” and use nigger if it’s not used in contempt.
Then, run through the streets, yelling, “Free at last, free at last, thank God almighty, I’m free at last.”
(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most recent Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! eBook is available here with the printed edition (and other titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D.; and visit his blog. Send request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to his articles, and click here to support his work with a donation.)
The Fuse is Burning!
by Don Boys, Ph.D.
Muslin Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! is an interesting, informative, and for the politically correct and infuriating read. Islam, Muslims, immigration, Jihad, Sharia, and the war against our civilization, culture, and creed is a present reality. Gutless public officials are selling us short either by complicity with the enemy or due to a doctrinaire commitment to idiotic tolerance ideology. Whatever the case, citizens must stand up against the invasion now before it is to late. The author suggests that the fuse is burning and the results will end in a complete upheaval of America and every free nation, unless we act now. Forget the lame stream media. Forget Obama. Common sense mandates, our very survival demands that we act NOW to keep America from going off the cliff; This book promises to be a life changing read.
Posted in: censorshipLeave a Comment (